Critical Phenomena in Random and Complex Systems Capri September 9-12, 2014 Spin Glass Dynamics at the Mesoscale Samaresh Guchhait* and Raymond L. Orbach**

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Paper Structure.
Advertisements

Kondo Physics from a Quantum Information Perspective
Theory of the pairbreaking superconductor-metal transition in nanowires Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu Talk online: sachdev.physics.harvard.edu.
Metabolic theory and ecological scaling Geoffrey WestJames Brown Brian Enquist.
1 Lecture 11 Emulsions and Microemulsions. The dielectric properties of heterogeneous substances. Polarization of double layer, Polarization of Maxwell.
1 Time dependent aspects of fluid adsorption in mesopores Harald Morgner Wilhelm Ostwald Institute for Physical and Theoretical Chemistry Leipzig University,
Information Networks Small World Networks Lecture 5.
Influence of Acceptor Structure on Barriers to Charge Separation in Organic Photovoltaic Materials Ryan D. Pensack†, Changhe Guo‡, Kiarash Vakhshouri‡,
Aging in short-ranged attractive colloids G. Foffi INFM, Universita’ “La Sapienza”, Roma.
1 Relaxation and Transport in Glass-Forming Liquids Motivation (longish) Democratic motion Conclusions G. Appignanesi, J.A. Rodríguez Fries, R.A. Montani.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © Distribution of Passenger Mutations in Exponentially Growing Wave 0 Cancer Population Yifei Chen 1 ;
Longitudinal Experiments Larry V. Hedges Northwestern University Prepared for the IES Summer Research Training Institute July 28, 2010.
Alloy Formation at the Co-Al Interface for Thin Co Films Deposited on Al(001) and Al(110) Surfaces at Room Temperature* N.R. Shivaparan, M.A. Teter, and.
Dynamics of a Colloidal Glass During Stress-Mediated Structural Arrest (“Relaxation in Reverse”) Dynamics of a Colloidal Glass During Stress-Mediated Structural.
Glassy dynamics of electrons near the metal-insulator transition in two dimensions Acknowledgments: NSF DMR , DMR , NHMFL; IBM-samples; V.
Critical Scaling at the Jamming Transition Peter Olsson, Umeå University Stephen Teitel, University of Rochester Supported by: US Department of Energy.
Critical Scaling at the Jamming Transition Peter Olsson, Umeå University Stephen Teitel, University of Rochester Supported by: US Department of Energy.
Jamming Peter Olsson, Umeå University Stephen Teitel, University of Rochester Supported by: US Department of Energy Swedish High Performance Computing.
Summary Of the Structure of the Milky Way The following graphical data is meant to help you understand WHY astronomers believe they know the structure.
Pierre Le Doussal (LPTENS) Kay J. Wiese (LPTENS) Florian Kühnel (Universität Bielefeld ) Long-range correlated random field and random anisotropy O(N)
Boyce/DiPrima 10th ed, Ch 10.5: Separation of Variables; Heat Conduction in a Rod Elementary Differential Equations and Boundary Value Problems, 10th.
Chapter 6 Random Error The Nature of Random Errors
Magnetic properties of SmFeAsO 1-x F x superconductors for 0.15 ≤ x ≤ 0.2 G. Prando 1,2, P. Carretta 1, A. Lascialfari 1, A. Rigamonti 1, S. Sanna 1, L.
KINETICS MATERIALS SCIENCE &ENGINEERING Anandh Subramaniam & Kantesh Balani Materials Science and Engineering (MSE) Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur-
Relating computational and physical complexity Computational complexity: How the number of computational steps needed to solve a problem scales with problem.
FLUCTATION SCALING: TAYLOR’S LAW AND BEYOND János Kertész Budapest University of Technology and Economics.
Spin Dynamics and Magnetic Properties of Molecular Magnets
Ying Chen Los Alamos National Laboratory Collaborators: Wei Bao Los Alamos National Laboratory Emilio Lorenzo CNRS, Grenoble, France Yiming Qiu National.
Shai Carmi Bar-Ilan, BU Together with: Shlomo Havlin, Chaoming Song, Kun Wang, and Hernan Makse.
Critical behaviour and dynamics of Ising spin glasses Ian Campbell LCVN Universite Montpellier II Collaborations with - Helmut Katzgraber, ETH Zurich and.
Passive Investors and Managed Money in Commodity Futures Part 2: Liquidity Prepared for: The CME Group Prepared by: October, 2008.
Lecture 12: Domains, nucleation and coarsening Outline: domain walls nucleation coarsening.
Some experimental approaches to study the aging phenomena in spin glasses Tetsuya Sato Keio University Yokohama, Japan.
Experimental Approach to Macroscopic Quantum Tunneling of Magnetization in Single Domain Nanoparticles H. Mamiya, I. Nakatani, T. Furubayashi Nanomaterials.
Thermodynamics and dynamics of systems with long range interactions David Mukamel S. Ruffo, J. Barre, A. Campa, A. Giansanti, N. Schreiber, P. de Buyl,
How and why things crackle We expect that there ought to be a simple, underlying reason that earthquakes occur on all different sizes. The very small earthquake.
Ch 9.5: Predator-Prey Systems In Section 9.4 we discussed a model of two species that interact by competing for a common food supply or other natural resource.
Overview of coatings research and recent results at the University of Glasgow M. Abernathy, I. Martin, R. Bassiri, E. Chalkley, R. Nawrodt, M.M. Fejer,
Glass Phenomenology from the connection to spin glasses: review and ideas Z.Nussinov Washington University.
Interface Roughening Dynamics of Spreading Droplets
Rates of Reactions Why study rates?
1 Reaction Mechanism The series of steps by which a chemical reaction occurs. A chemical equation does not tell us how reactants become products - it is.
Influence of carrier mobility and interface trap states on the transfer characteristics of organic thin film transistors. INFM A. Bolognesi, A. Di Carlo.
Physics of Flow in Random Media Publications/Collaborators: 1) “Postbreakthrough behavior in flow through porous media” E. López, S. V. Buldyrev, N. V.
Meta-stable Sites in Amorphous Carbon Generated by Rapid Quenching of Liquid Diamond Seung-Hyeob Lee, Seung-Cheol Lee, Kwang-Ryeol Lee, Kyu-Hwan Lee, and.
Engineering the Dynamics Engineering Entanglement and Correlation Dynamics in Spin Chains Correlation Dynamics in Spin Chains [1] T. S. Cubitt 1,2 and.
Mortality over Time Population Density Declines through Mortality.
Molecular Modelling - Lecture 2 Techniques for Conformational Sampling Uses CHARMM force field Written in C++
DISTRIBUTED LATENT HEAT OF THE PHASE TRANSITIONS IN LOW-DIMENSIONAL CONDUCTORS V.Ya. Pokrovskii, Institute of Radioengineering and Electronics, Russian.
The Boltzmann Distribution allows Calculation of Molecular Speeds Mathematically the Boltzmann Distribution says that the probability of being in a particular.
Glassy dynamics near the two-dimensional metal-insulator transition Acknowledgments: NSF grants DMR , DMR ; IBM, NHMFL; V. Dobrosavljević,
M. Ueda, T. Yamasaki, and S. Maegawa Kyoto University Magnetic resonance of Fe8 at low temperatures in the transverse field.
Korea Institute of Science and Technology Seung-Hyeob Lee, Churl-Seung Lee, Seung-Cheol Lee, Kyu-Hwan Lee, and Kwang-Ryeol Lee Future Technology Research.
Slow Dynamics of Magnetic Nanoparticle Systems: Memory effects P. E. Jönsson, M. Sasaki and H. Takayama ISSP, Tokyo University Co-workers: H. Mamiya and.
Lattice 2006 Tucson, AZT.Umeda (BNL)1 QCD thermodynamics with N f =2+1 near the continuum limit at realistic quark masses Takashi Umeda (BNL) for the RBC.
Thermodynamics and dynamics of systems with long range interactions David Mukamel.
Marco G. Mazza Departmental Seminar Boston – February Acknowledgements: Kevin Stokely, BU Elena G. Strekalova, BU Giancarlo Franzese, Universitat.
Results using atomic targets Suppression of Nonsequential ionization from an atomic ion target (comparison of double ionization of Ar and Ar + ). Determination.
Percolation Percolation is a purely geometric problem which exhibits a phase transition consider a 2 dimensional lattice where the sites are occupied with.
Eutectic Phase Diagram NOTE: at a given overall composition (say: X), both the relative amounts.
Computational Physics (Lecture 10) PHY4370. Simulation Details To simulate Ising models First step is to choose a lattice. For example, we can us SC,
Miral Shah Course: Thermodynamics and kinetics of confined fluids
The London-London equation
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
Volume 87, Issue 7, Pages (December 1996)
David C. Immke, Edwin W. McCleskey  Neuron 
Sean A. McKinney, Chirlmin Joo, Taekjip Ha  Biophysical Journal 
Sang-Pil Kim and Kwang-Ryeol Lee Computational Science Center
Effects of Receptor Interaction in Bacterial Chemotaxis
Magnetic Properties of Spin Glass
Presentation transcript:

Critical Phenomena in Random and Complex Systems Capri September 9-12, 2014 Spin Glass Dynamics at the Mesoscale Samaresh Guchhait* and Raymond L. Orbach** *Microelectronics Research Center **Texas Materials Institute The University of Texas at Austin Austin, Texas Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, (2014) Phys. Rev. B, submitted for publication (2014)

Spin Glass Behavior at the Mesoscale  Growth of spin glass correlation length after nucleation:  At time t = t co, spin glass correlation length ξ(t co, T ) = L  Then for t > t co, spin glass dynamics will cross over from d = 3 to d = 2 state  But if the spin glass lower critical dimension d l > 2, then spin glass temperature T g → 0  However, there are states with length scales less than the sample thickness L 2 (c 1, c 2 are constants)

Relaxation dynamics at the Mesoscale  When ξ(t,T ) = L, there is a largest Hamming distance, and hence a highest barrier height Δ max (t co, T):  Moreover, because of ultrametric geometry, there is an exponentially large number of states associated with highest barrier  Hence, after cross over, spin glass dynamics will change from conventional to exponential 3

Amorphous Ge:Mn Sample Preparation 4 Guchhait et al., Phys. Rev. B 84, (2011) nm 15.5 nm TEMSTEM  Amorphous Ge:Mn prepared by ion implantation  Average Mn concentration ≈ 11 at. %, T g ≈ 24 K.  Mn concentration is uniform within few percent

Determination of Spin Glass Dynamics Time Constant, Highest Barrier Height: Δ max (t co, T) 5

Determination of Ge:Mn Spin Glass Cross-Over Time: t co 6

Determination of constants c 1 and c 2  We have two equations: J. Kisker et al., Phys. Rev. B 53, 6418 (1996): 0.12 < c 2 <

Spin glasses are at criticality at all temperatures T < T g, associated with diverging barrier heights at all temperatures T < T g Initial conditions set subsequent dynamical properties When a thin film is quenched to a “quench temperature”, Δ max (T) is set by the minimum length scale of the system (here the thickness of the film) independent of T (Eq. 1):

Temperature Dependence of Δ max (T) J. Hammann et al., Physica 185A, 278 (1992) have shown that a particular barrier Δ has a temperature dependence that can be followed experimentally. In the case of thin films, the largest barrier is set by the thickness of the film when t > t co at the quench temperature. Once Δ max has been set, its temperature dependence, Δ max (T), can be followed as a function of temperature T because of ultrametricity.

Unusual Behavior of ξ(t, T) for Very Thin Films At 15.5 nm, ξ(t co, T) equals the sample thickness at very long times for T significantly below T g [e.g. t co = 5 x 10 5 sec for T/T g = 0.83], and becomes of the order of the age of the universe for T/T g ~ 0.5. But at 3 nm, the opposite is true. As an example, consider a Cu:Mn 13.5 at.% sample for which T g = 66.8 K, a 0 = 4.45 Å, and scaling from previous fittings [Joh et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 438 (1999)], c 1 = and c 2 = 0.169, and 1/τ 0 = 9.2 x sec -1. At ξ(t co, T) = 3 nm = 30 Å and T = 37.5 K (T/T g = 0.56), inserting into generates t co = 5 msec. This means that the crossover from d = 3 to d = 2 can take place over a very large range of temperatures for very thin films. Consider the work of Sandlung et al. [30 Å films] and Granberg et al. [20 Å films] of Cu:Mn 13.5 at.%:

Dynamic Susceptibility χ(τ) as a function of temperature T for Cu:Mn (13.5 at.%): (1/τ = ω) [Sandlung, et al. Phys. Rev.[Granberg et al., J. Appl. B 40, 869 (1989)] Phys. 67, 5252 (1990)]

Fitting to the temperature at which χ(τ) peaks, From Sandlung et al. and Granberg et al.

Extraction of Δ max (T) Ultrametricity leads to an exponential increase in the occupation of states with increasing Hamming distance, proportional to increasing Δ. The dynamics are then controlled by the occupied states at the largest Hamming distance, or, concomitantly, with the largest Δ, Δ max (T). The dynamics are given by a simple activation relationship at any temperature T above or below the quench temperature: 1/τ = (1/τ 0 ) exp[-Δ max (T)/k B T] Reading off τ and the peak temperature T (where the response is a maximum) yields Δ max (T).

Extracted values of Δ max (T)

Self Similarity of Dynamical States It is seen in other experiments [J. Hammann et al., Physica 185A, 278 (1992)] that the fit to is independent of T. That is, the same distribution of meta-stable states is true for all initial conditions (quench temperatures). This is evidence of self similarity for the meta-stable states. Unfortunately, there appears to have been only a single quench temperature in the experiments of Sandlung et al. and Granberg et al., so the self-similarity of states cannot be probed. Nevertheless, the evidence from previous measurements suggests that T* is general: “you give me a value of Δ max (T), and I’ll tell you at what T* it will diverge.”

From then on, the value of Δ max (t co, T) at a temperature T is in reference to the initial value of Δ max at the quench temperature

“Divergence” of Δ max (T) for the 30 Å film where (Eq. 4): Integration leads to (Eq. 5): where T* is an integration constant, and the temperature at which Δ max (T) diverges:

Comparison of 20 Å and 30 Å films Fluctuations in δΔ max (T)/δT for 20 Å film are too severe to fit With an average distance between spins of ≈ 4.45 Å, there are only of the order of spins within a correlation length volume. The 30 Å film contains ≈ five times as many spins, and appears to be a precursor to bulk behavior. It would be of interest to examine film thickness in between to see where bulk behavior sets in.

Cooling rate dependence of χ FC Sandlund et al. observe “a pronounced cooling rate dependence of the FC susceptibility, with the knee shifting towards lower temperatures with decreasing cooling rate.” Associating the decrease in cooling rate with an increase in τ is consistent with the growth of Δ max (T) as the temperature is lowered. Divergence of Δ max (T) represents an infinite time scale for τ. This leads to a projected “knee” in the FC susceptibility M FC /H at T = T* ≈ 28.2 K in the τ → ∞ limit.

Dynamic Susceptibility χ(τ) as a function of temperature T for Cu:Mn (13.5 at.%): (1/τ = ω) [Sandlung, et al. Phys. Rev.[Granberg et al., J. Appl. B 40, 869 (1989)] Phys. 67, 5252 (1990)]

“Critical” behavior (?) Inserting activated dynamics for τ into Eq. 5 leads to the conventional form for critical dynamics. The fit to the 30 Å film yields β = 0.19 and T* = 28.2 K. With a quench temperature of T ≈ 37.5 K, the critical exponent zν = 1/[β(T/T g )] ≈ 9, in remarkable agreement with bulk spin glasses. T* = 28.2 K is close to the critical slowing down analysis of Granberg et al. of T g = 26 K.

Differences in Interpretation The interpretations presented here are in marked contrast to Sandlung et al. and Granberg et al. whose data we have analyzed. They associate their time scales with a generalized Arrhenius law using droplet scaling theory for two- dimensional spin glass systems. They extract a “freezing temperature” associated with the maximum in the time-dependent susceptibility: with ψν = 1.6 ± 0.2 and T f = 26 K. We keep T g fixed at 66.8 K, and associate the apparent freezing temperature with the temperature for the divergence of Δ max (T).

Summary The mesoscale takes advantage of dimensionality to explore spin glass dynamics at dimensions d < 3 Growth of the correlation function ξ(t, T) allows transition from dimensionality d = 3 to d = 2 at a time t = t co Because the lower critical dimension d ℓ > 2, only states with ξ(t co, T) ≤ sample dimensions remain Relaxation dynamics are controlled by largest remaining length scale [ξ(t co, T) = sample dimensions], and hence the largest remaining barrier Δ(t co, T) ≡ Δ max (T), leading to activated dynamics Activated dynamics, and t co, are observed for a-Ge:Mn thin films

Summary (Continued) For very thin films, ξ(t, T) can grow rapidly to sample dimensions, even for temperatures far below T g. States remaining, for ξ(t, T) less than sample dimensions, continue to exhibit bulk properties as long as there are sufficient number of spins The temperature dependence of Δ max (T) can be extracted from measurements of the dynamic susceptibility χ(τ) for 30 Å Cu:Mn thin films The divergence of Δ max (T) at T = T* leads to a natural explanation of thin film Cu:Mn critical dynamics, with an exponent zν equal to bulk values The mesoscale offers opportunities to study critical dynamics over a broad temperature range.