International Symposium Program I. Welcome from Project PIs Andrea Lunsford, Stanford University Brigitte Mral, Örebro University II.Fall 2006 & Intercultural.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A GUIDE TO CREATING QUALITY ONLINE LEARNING DOING DISTANCE EDUCATION WELL.
Advertisements

Building an Online Learning Community for "Blended" Librarians Steven J. Bell, Philadelphia University Steve Gilbert, TLT Group Hope Kandel, Learning Times.
Communication, Technology, and Effective Integration for Teaching and Learning Academic Technologies for Learning University of Alberta.
International Education Network of Central Ohio Educational Service Center of Central Ohio April 25, 2012.
Changing School Culture – Using IT to Cope with Individual Learning Differences in Schools 28 th March 2003 Lee Kar Tin Department of Information & Applied.
Online Collaboration Bob Schoenberg Overview What is Collaboration? Collaboration Tools Specific Examples (Students’ Work) Questions and Answers.
Jennifer Robertson, SAGE Director Suzette Dohany, Professor of Communication.
Benefits of Blended e-Learning in Education
McWeadon Education, USA
Telecollaboration in University Foreign Language Education The INTENT conference Facultad de Filosofía y Letras University of León, Spain February.
Project NEStLeD Move Forward VIA University College Project NEStLeD NESTLED (Nurse Educator Simulation Based Learning) Project Leonardo Transfer of Innovation.
Globalization and Education Collin College EDUC 1301 Chapter 8.
School’s Cool in Childcare Settings
Jude Carroll, author of Tools for Teaching in an Educationally Mobile World (Routledge 2015) Supporting teaching across cultures: the role of good practice.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Welcome to Project High Five: Culture Collaboration Commitment Communication Community.
Distance Delivered Courses and the University Professor Mark Hawkes, Dakota State University July 15, 2003 Nova Southeastern University... “Trends and.
STRATEGIES FOR ONLINE LEARNING IN A GLOBAL NETWORK UNIVERSITY INTED 2013 Annette Smith, Kristopher Moore, Erica Osher Reifer New York University.
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
How could Teacher Education contribute to the development of European Citizenship Literacy ?
1 DR. BADRUL HUDA KHAN MCWEADON EDUCATION, USA DR. BADRUL HUDA KHAN
Building Capacity in Chinese and Arabic Pam Delfosse World Languages Education Consultant Claire Kotenbeutel Critical Language Fellows Project Consultant.
Communication Degree Program Outcomes
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Kristoffer Greaves Reflection on Masters of Professional Education & Training, Semester 1, 2009.
Teaching and Learning with Technology  Allyn and Bacon 2002 Distance Education: Using Technology to Redefine the Classroom Chapter 11 Teaching and Learning.
Building Collaborative Initiatives that Enhance Student Learning Nancy Mitchell and Linda Major.
Intercultural Language Teaching VU Teaching LOTE 2010 Andrew Ferguson
Learning Objective III: Diverse Learners Teacher candidates and candidates for other professional school personnel roles exhibit knowledge, competence,
Rigor in the Classroom DECEMBER 11, Standards: 3. INSTRUCTIONAL STRATEGIES: The teacher promotes student learning by using research-based instructional.
Models of Online Learning – Identifying Components Week 3 Introduction to Web-Based Mentoring and Distance Education.
Developing an Effective Web-Based Learning Resource that Support Lifelong Learning of Thai Learners Within K-12 ASEAN Environment Presented by Dr. Watsatree.
ELA: Focus on Collaborative Conversations & Writing FCUSD Instructional Focus Meeting Sara Parenzin September 20, 2012 Welcome! Please sign in and start.
01.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION 1 16 SEPTEMBER 2015 EMBARKING ON A LEADERSHIP JOURNEY.
Jonghwi PARK ICT in Education, APEID UNESCO Bangkok How to Design Project Based Learning : Lesson Plan.
IRISS = International Relations Inspiring Students and Staff General objectives: -to foster cultural diversity and intercultural dialogue - to enhance.
Christine L. Alfano & Alyssa J. O’Brien, Stanford University ELI Focus Session || September 23, 2009.
Welcome to the Second Annual International Symposium, June 9, 2008 an online global learning conference An event made possible by the Wallenberg Global.
Negotiating Sex and Gender Mediums Across Continents: Brockport NY to Novgorod Russia COIL Faculty: Novgorod State University, Novgorod Russia Dr. Elena.
ICCC Kansas|| May 23, 2008 Anders Eriksson, Örebro University Alyssa O’Brien, Stanford University.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.8 | 1 Globalization and Education Chapter Eight.
1 “e-Learning” Dr. Mohammad Daud Khattak In-charge/Assistant Professor Project Director “Strenththening AIOU” Associate Director (Multimedia Content) Centre.
MJM22 Digital Practice and Pedagogy Week 9 Collaboration Tools.
What is Asynchronous Learning? Asynchronous learning is a student-centered teaching method that uses online resources to facilitate information sharing.
USING TECHNOLOGY TO PROMOTE CULTURAL UNDERSTANDING IN HIGHER EDUCATION CLASSROOMS.
Teaching and Learning with Technology lick to edit Master title style  Allyn and Bacon 2002 Teaching and Learning with Technology lick to edit Master.
Örebro-Stanford Cross-Cultural Rhetoric Workshop Rhetoric A meets Rhetorics of Art and Commerce Led by Anders Eriksson & John Peterson April 12, 2007 WGLN.
Gain an interdisciplinary perspective on how faculty from other units approach teaching and learning Expand knowledge of teaching strategies Acquire the.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
1 NH PACE Tier 2 Leadership PLC Session 1 September 28, 2015.
Tuning Indiana: Education. Originally focused on: Elementary education Math education Special education.
Digital Communications Assignment
Virtual Learning Communities (VLC) Engaging Students in Blended & Online Environments.
Design Strategies for Effective Delivery INTERACTIVE LEARNING.
Integration of Distance Education to Support Learning.
Welcome to the Cross-Cultural Rhetoric Workshop Uppsala University, Sweden  Stanford University, USA Professor Patrik Mehrens and Dr. Alyssa O’Brien.
 managing self managing self  relating to others relating to others  participating and contributing participating and contributing  thinking thinking.
The efficacy of technology in the classroom: Web authoring as a pedagogical tool.
Jennifer Gilligan, Open Learning Research Associate, IT Sligo, Ireland Using Moodle as a MOOC platform in the classroom Moot Ireland UK.
1 Disclaimer This resource is provided for informational and support purposes only. There is no requirement that it be used as- is or as a template by.
NCEES Standard 3: 21 st Century Learning in the Classroom.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Leading E Competent Schools – Implementing Digital Learning Materials
International Education and Resource Network
Strengths-based teaching in Indigenous health – what it looks like in practice Leanne Coombe, Lisa Fitzgerald & Alison Nelson.
Professor Patrik Mehrens and Dr. Alyssa O’Brien
Cross-Cultural Rhetoric
Speeches of Global Leadership A Video Conference Exchange:
Trends and Terminology in Online Learning
Welcome to Cross-Cultural Rhetoric!
Presentation transcript:

International Symposium Program I. Welcome from Project PIs Andrea Lunsford, Stanford University Brigitte Mral, Örebro University II.Fall 2006 & Intercultural Theory Alyssa O’Brien, Stanford University III. Winter 2007 & Technology Christine Alfano, Stanford University IV. Spring 2007 & Rhetoric Anders Eriksson, Örebro University V.Looking Ahead & Pedagogy Eva Magnusson, Örebro University ** 10 minute break ** VI. Globally-Distributed Team Discussions VII. Return for Large Group Reflections

Project Overview and Goals A project made possible by a grant from the Wallenberg Global Learning Network (WGLN) Wallenberg Hall, Stanford University Campus

To design, implement, and evaluate a curriculum devoted to developing intercultural competencies through effective use of collaborative information and communication technologies (ICTs) To build meta-knowledge about the role that intercultural competence and ICTs can play in global communication and international relations Project Overview and Goals Theoretical Base (Goswami & Lovitt, Hawisher & Selfe) Measure 1: Develop “Sensitivity and Consideration for Others” Measure 2: Understand Globally “Situated Knowledge”

Fall 2006 Course-to-Course collaboration 10 week collaborative course: Cross-Cultural Rhetoric (CCR) Örebro Rhetoric elective Stanford PWR 2 theme Student population: 6 Örebro - 15 Stanford 5 intercultural activities

Fall 2006: Activities to Foster Intercultural Competencies 1.Group Presentations on Cultural Identity 2. Oral Presentations of Research and Feedback on Delivery 3. WebCT/ Exchange of Rhetorical Analysis Papers 4. Marratech Rhetorical Analysis of Political Speeches & Personas 5. Closing analysis of writing practices across institutions and countries

Fall 2006: Activities, Continued 1.Group Presentations on Cultural Identity 2. Oral Presentations of Research and Feedback on Delivery 3. WebCT/ Exchange of Rhetorical Analysis Papers 4. Marratech Rhetorical Analysis of Political Speeches & Personas 5. Closing analysis of writing practices across institutions and countries

Class Blog Electronic Writing. Cross-Cultural Communication Distributed Teams For Presentations & Political Texts WebCT Marratech videoconferencing Synchronous communications (real time) Asynchronous communications (variable time interval) Small Groups Stand in Class For Cultural Identity Presentations Fall 2006: Technology for Intercultural Activities WebCT and CourseWork

Fall 2006: Evaluation - Intercultural Competencies

Fall 2006: Evaluation - Best Technology Practices

Winter 2007 Course-to-Course collaboration 10 weeks, 2 different courses: Örebro Rhetoric B Stanford PWR 2 / CCR Student population: 19 Örebro - 15 Stanford Intercultural activities: Consistent global teams 5 Marratech Connections Asynchonous Writing

Winter 2007: Örebro Rhetoric Room Design of Space for active learning New technologies made possible by the WGLN grant

Winter 2007: Örebro Rhetoric Room Flexible Learning Environment

Winter 2007: Stanford Wallenberg Hall Designated Space for Globally-Distributed Teams

Winter 2007: Globally Distributed Teams “Green Hat” Group demonstrates Collaborative Embodied Rhetoric

Central frame for shared documents that can be uploaded ahead of time or created together chatroom interface for text-based communication windows show the participants in the video conference session Winter 2007: Technology & Virtual Community

Winter 2007: Unexpected Team Uses of Technology

Wiki Collaborative Blogs. Cross-Cultural Communication Instant Messaging Flickr Marratech videoconferencing Synchronous communications (real time) Asynchronous communications (variable time interval) Skype video chats Winter 2007: Technology WebCT and CourseWork

Winter 2007: Wiki – Cultural Identity Profile

Winter 2007: Activities – Cultural Identity Group Identities: Green Hat Group Velcro Group Fuglesang Group Muzikaholiks Group

Winter 2007: Activities - Ads

Winter 2007: Activities - Websites

Winter 2007: Activities – Political Texts

Winter 2007: Activities – Collaborative Blogging

Winter 2007: Evaluation - Intercultural Competencies

Winter 2007: Evaluation – Best Technology Practices

: Evaluation – Project Goals & Measures

Spring 2007: Workshop Model Class-to-class workshop One-time meeting: Örebro Rhetoric A course Stanford PWR 2 theme course “Rhetorics of Art and Commerce” by Guest Instructor John Peterson Student population: 7 Örebro – 15 Stanford 1 intercultural activity

Spring 2007: Workshop Template Lesson Plan Template on Wiki for Ease of Guest Instructor

Spring 2007: Workshop Protocol Preparing the Students 1. Opening remarks by Instructor to both classes via Marratech

Spring 2007: Workshop 2. Students analyze texts in 4 globally-distributed teams

Spring 2007: Workshop Protocol 3. Teams collaboratively present new knowledge and intercultural analysis insights to class 4. Turn cameras off and debrief on both sides

Spring 2007: Workshop - Rhetorical Theory Anti-logos, the different perspective Doxa, questioning your assumptions Decorum, the appropriate in the context Ethos, cultural credibility Logos, rational discourse Pathos, emotions at Stanford and Örebro

course Several meetings between two courses during the academic term workshop class One or two meetings between between classes from two or more institutions class Looking Ahead – Future Collaborations

Looking Ahead – Pedagogy

Pedagogy: Listening

Pedagogy: Reflecting

Pedagogy: Active Learning

Thank you for Listening

Rhetoric Group: Stay in this Marratech Room Pedagogy, Technology, & Intercultural Theory Groups: type into Marratech address bar Then select your virtual room Small Group Discussions: Instructions

After the Break Globally-Distributed Team Discussions Pedagogy. Focus on globally distributed teams, how you need to prepare students, developing effective lesson plans and class activities to engage students in cross-cultural dialogues, how to accommodate the language barrier, what kind of debrief is necessary, how to create bonding, etc. Technology. Using different ICTs (blogging, video conferencing, wikis, etc.) for cross-cultural exchanges, room design and limitations of technology, how to balance between real-time and timelag communications. Best practices for mobile collaboration and digital writing in a global context. Rhetoric. How to teach rigorous rhetorical theory when looking at popular and cross-cultural texts, what are the different traditions of rhetoric (eastern/western), balancing traditional rhetorical instruction with hands-on learning. Intercultural Theory and Evaluation. How to develop intercultural competencies, the debate between cultural immersion and communication strategies, limitations for global community based on geography or language. Discussion of assessment and research measures, how to bring in diverse groups (Asia, Europe, Africa).

Symposium Large Group Reflection Questions for Discussion What do you see are the challenges and benefits of this approach to developing intercultural competencies in students and teachers? What are the challenges and benefits of this approach to teaching rhetoric and this methodology as a pedagogical model for global pedagogy? What are the benefits and challenges of this sort of technologically-mediated learning in a global context or in globally-distributed teams? What do you see as the feasibility and benefit of your institution's potential participation in this project?

Thank you for your participation Check the website for footage of today’s Symposium: