1 Proposed Adoption of Biological and Toxicological Water Quality Data Elements and WQDE Guide LeAnne Astin Interstate Commission on the Potomac River.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EMAP Efforts in SF Bay Overview of EMAP Western Pilot Overview of Coastal component Activities in SF Bay (FY 2000) Relationship to other SF Bay efforts.
Advertisements

Implement Wy-Kan-Ush-Mi Wa-Kish- Wit Watershed Assessment and Restoration Plan Now A Regional Support Program Sponsored by the Columbia River Inter-Tribal.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal watershed and salmon monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring.
ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
Federal Audit Executive Council (FAEC) June 2012 Bi-Monthly Meeting Heather I. Keister Doris G. Yanger June 14, 2012 Green Book Update.
The New TNI Laboratory Accreditation Standards Requirements for an Accreditation Body.
Methods Board Report National Water Quality Monitoring Council July 28, 2005.
Projects to Help Implement The Monitoring Council’s Framework March 26, 2003.
The National Water Quality Monitoring Council Summer Meeting Fort Collins, Colorado July 22, 2008.
5/10/2015 Stream Physical Habitat Data Elements: Request for ACWI Approval Methods and Data Comparability Board Herndon, VA, Feb. 10, 2009.
Lec 12: Rapid Bioassessment Protocols (RBP’s)
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Jennifer Gimbel, ACWI Chair Acting Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior.
Summary of Biological Assessment Programs and Biocriteria Development for States, Tribes, Territories, and Interstate Commissions: Streams and Wadeable.
National Water Quality Monitoring Council Methods and Data Comparability Board Report to Advisory Committee on Water Information September 10, 2003.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Advisory Committee on Water Information 2005 Interim Status September 14, 2005 USGS National Center Auditorium.
Water Quality Data Elements (WQE) Workgroup Workgroup Co- Chairs Chuck Job, USEPA LeAnne Astin, ICPRB Glenn Patterson, USGS.
Community-based Education K-12 students serving as a resource for meeting community needs.
National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design Alfred L. Korndoerfer, Jr. Karl Muessig.
National Aquatic Resource Surveys National Coastal Condition Assessment – 2010 Sarah Lehmann.
Metadata: Integral Part of Statistics Canada Quality Framework International Conference on Agriculture Statistics October 22-24, 2007 Marcelle Dion Director.
Sharing Environmental Sampling, Analysis, and Results Information Mike Carter, ESAR Co-chair Public Health Data Standards Consortium March 18, 2004.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
STORET and the Water Quality Exchange Status Update Dwane Young OWOW/AWPD/MB April 26, 2007.
NSDI Future Directions Initiative Towards a National Geospatial Strategy and Implementation Plan Ivan B. DeLoatch FGDC Staff Director.
Standards for Internal Control in the Government Going Green Standards for Internal Control in the Federal Government 1.
1 Institutional Controls LTS “Framework” EPA Post-ROD Authority State and Tribal Government Working Group March 14, 2002.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
SB 1070 Overview California Water Quality Monitoring Council –MOU CalEPA and Resources (Dec 2007) –Monitoring Inventory (April 2008) –Monitoring Recommendations.
Initial thoughts on a Global Strategy for the Implementation of the SEEA Central Framework Ivo Havinga United Nations Statistics Division.
The Benefits of National Accreditation Steve Arms The NELAC Institute TNI.
Activities of the National Water Quality Monitoring Council Gail Mallard, USGS NWQMC Meeting Phoenix, AZ, December 10, 2002.
Methods Board Meeting – March 2005 Highlights Most 2-yr workplans for each Workgroup prepared Discussed Board involvement in NMN – reported earlier in.
A forum for coordinating state, federal, and tribal aquatic monitoring programs in the Pacific Northwest Pacific Northwest Aquatic Monitoring Partnership.
7 June 2012 Guidelines for the Compilation of Water Accounts and Statistics Guidelines for the Compilation of Water Accounts and Statistics UN Statistics.
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
1 Survey of the Nation’s Lakes Presentation at NALMS’ 25 th Annual International Symposium Nov. 10, 2005.
Forging Partnerships on Emerging Contaminants November 2, 2005 John Vandenberg Associate Director for Health National Center for Environmental Assessment.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
ACWI 2004 ACTION ITEMS. Opening Remarks Lynn Scarlett, Interior’s Asst. for Policy, Management and Budget ! ACWI is part of a larger spectrum of conversation.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
National Water Quality Monitoring Council Methods and Data Comparability Board Advisory Committee on Water Information Herb Brass September 15, 2004.
Advisory Committee Kickoff Meeting SWRCB Program to Develop Sediment Quality Objectives for Enclosed Bays and Estuaries of California July 29, 2003 CAL/EPA.
Benefits of the Redesigned RMP to Regional Board Decision Making Karen Taberski Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region.
1 Methods and Data Comparability Board Accreditation of Federal Laboratories for Water Quality Monitoring Advisory Committee on Water Information April.
JRC - IRMM – 17/18 June 2008 – EAQC-WISE project workshop – Held1 The EAQC-WISE blueprint: Recommendations for a quality control system for chemical monitoring.
A Framework for Monitoring March 26, Mission: Provide a national forum to coordinate consistent and scientifically defensible methods and strategies.
NWQMC July 26, 2005 Developing A National Water Quality Monitoring Network Design.
Increasing Momentum in the Formation of State and Regional Monitoring Councils Linda Green, co-chair, Collaboration and Outreach Workgroup, National Water.
Water Quality Exchange (WQX) Pilot and its Potential Role in NWIS/STORET Coordination October 18, 2005.
1 The United Nations Demographic Yearbook and the Work Programme for Social Statistics Expert Group Meeting to Review the United Nations Demographic Yearbook.
Evaluation of State and Regional Water Quality Monitoring Councils September 9 th, 2003 Advisory Committee on Water Information U.S. Environmental Protection.
Report to Advisory Committee on Water Information (ACWI) January 19, 2006 Herndon, VA.
California’s Surface Water Ambient Monitoring Program “SWAMP” Comparable Program Guidance Valerie Connor, Director Office of Information Management and.
Update Methods and Data Comparability Board San Diego, CA, Dec. 6,2007.
USGS Water Quality Programs and the Water Quality Monitoring Framework CONTACTS: Herb Buxton (609) Tim Miller
The National Water Quality Monitoring Network for U.S. Coastal Waters and their Tributary Rivers
Preserving the Comparability of Sensor Data A Possible Use Case Charles S. Spooner, US EPA ESIP 2010 Winter Meeting Washington, DC.
Advisory Committee on Water Information Subcommittee on Ground Water Presented to the NWQMC July 24 th, 2007 David R. Wunsch SOGW Member.
HOMELAND SECURITY: WATER SECURITY MONITORING METHODS/NEMI Herb Brass NATIONAL WATER QUALITY MONITORING COUNCIL MEETING PHOENIX, ARIZONA DECEMBER ,
WQX Biological and Habitat Data Effort STORET/WQX Users Conference Austin, TX November 28, 2007.
Reporting and compliance checking on RBMP in 2010 WFD Reporting Working Group D on Reporting Brussels, 17/18 October 2006.
EPA’s Vision for WQX Suzanne Schwartz, Deputy Office Director, US EPA Office of Wetlands, Oceans and Watersheds STORET/WQX Users Conference, Austin TX.
1Your reference The Menu of Indicators and the Core Set from the South African Point of View Moses Mnyaka 13/08/2009.
EPA’s Water Quality Exchange (WQX) Annual Exchange Network Users’ Meeting April 18-19, 2006.
Stela Barova, senior expert, “Marine environmental protection and Monitoring” Department, “Plans and Permits” Directorate State of play of MSFD implementation.
Contacts Advisory Committee on Water Information Anne Castle, ACWI Chair Asst. Secretary Water and Science U.S. Department of the Interior William H.
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment Mid-Atlantic States
Presentation transcript:

1 Proposed Adoption of Biological and Toxicological Water Quality Data Elements and WQDE Guide LeAnne Astin Interstate Commission on the Potomac River Basin Herb Brass USEPA Office of Water September 14, 2005 Presented to: ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON WATER INFORMATION

2 OUTLINE OF THIS PRESENTATION What are water quality data elements and why are they important? Why do we need to add biological and toxicological data elements? Recommend that ACWI approve and publish: –Data Elements for Reporting Water Quality Results of Biological (population and community) and Toxicological Analytes –Guide: Data Elements for Reporting Water Quality Monitoring Results for Chemical, Biological, Toxicological, and Microbiological Analytes Data elements and Guide approved by the National Water Quality Monitoring Council and Methods and Data Comparability Board

3 WHAT ARE WATER QUALITY DATA ELEMENTS? Information about data that answer basic questions to facilitate data sharing: Who? (Which organizations are responsible?) What? (What was monitored & found?) Where? (Where was the monitoring done?) When? (When was the monitoring done?) Why? (Why was the monitoring conducted?) How? (How was the sampling/ testing done?)

4 WHY DO WE NEED WATER QUALITY DATA ELEMENTS Data cannot be interpreted by anyone but its owner unless it is explained by metadata Because no single group can collect all the data needed to understand and deal with the complexities of natural systems, we must learn to share data effectively FGDC (2000) : "Data producers and users cannot afford to be without documented data” “

5 WHY DO WE NEED WATER QUALITY DATA ELEMENTS GAO (2004): “[recommend] development of clear guidance on metadata standards so that data users can integrate data from various sources” Many different biological sampling and analysis methods being used in the U.S. – Current documentation/reporting inconsistent Needed to guide database designs “

6 BENEFITS OF COMMON SET OF DATA ELEMENTS Provide the basis for common documentation Can share with confidence Compare results more readily Facilitate more effective and economical use of monitoring resources at all levels

7 OBJECTIVE To develop and recommend a “core” set of data elements for reporting water quality monitoring results, to be voluntarily implemented, that would allow data to be compared regardless of, but recognizing, the purpose of the monitoring activity

8 DATA ELEMENTS ARE ORGANIZED BY MODULES 1.0 Contact 2.0 Results 3.0 Reason for Sampling 4.0 Date/Time 5.0 Location 6.0 Sample Collection 7.0 Sample Analysis

9 CHEMICAL AND MICROBIOLOGICAL DATA ELEMENTS Original Workgroup Included-Local, State, Federal, Private Sector, Research Organizations Austin TX NWQMC Workshop in over 60 participants from all types of organizations Incorporated public comments from 36 organizations Federal Register notice and three public meetings ACWI approved chemical and microbiological data elements May 15, 2001

10 ACWI-APPROVED DATA ELEMENTS ARE BEING USED Adapted by: –Pacific NW Data Exchange –Delaware River Basin Commission –California State Water Resources Control Board Basis for new EPA Environmental Sampling, Analysis and Results (ESAR) data standard –In the Federal Register seeking public comments –Expected to be the basis for the successor to STORET, the WQX

11 WHY DO WE NEED BIOLOGY? Many environmental objectives are directly related to questions of biological condition Biological and toxicological data integrate water quality factors, providing unique information regarding condition Many different biological sampling and analysis methods being used in the U.S. –current documentation/reporting inconsistent Key water monitoring programs in the U.S. include a strong biological component –NAWQA, EMAP, states/tribes, National Fish Tissue Study, National Coastal Assessment, Status and Trends Program, Wadeable Stream Assessment –National Monitoring Network will have a strong biological focus

12 Biological Data Elements “Biological” = ecological and toxicological Biological assessment (bioassessment) evaluates conditions of waterbody using biosurveys & other direct measurements of resident biota Toxicology (ecotoxicology) studies the harmful effects of chemicals on biota in the context of the natural environment: –biomonitoring: evaluation of effects using ecological indicators, populations, etc. –bioassays: evaluates toxicity of water sample or waterbody

13 BIOLOGICAL AND TOXICOLOGICAL DATA ELEMENTS BUILD UPON THE CURRENTLY APPROVED LIST Incorporates many data elements from the current approved list Includes some unique elements that were recommended over a 3-year consensus process Developed in conjunction with numerous local, state, federal, and private sector water- quality sampling entities

14 Who Where When Why What Drives the “How” and the “What” Chem/MicroBioassessmentToxicity Chemical WQDE useful for reporting toxicological data Sample collection WQDE useful for reporting organism contaminant data Sample processing WQDE useful for reporting ambient toxicity data These Modules have data elements common to all types of monitoring data WQDE Organized using a Modular Framework

15 How Example: Toxicological Data Elements Sample Collection temperature of sample [others same as for population /community] Sample Processing temperature at lab [others same as for population/community] Analysis test method used test duration statistical methods used laboratory certifications organism weight, length elements from population /community elements QA/QC - negative control results - control replicate precision - minimum significant difference value reference toxicant test results; QC flags; method issues

16 WATER QUALITY DATA ELEMENTS GUIDE Initiated in 2003 to provide: –Definitions of the chemical and microbiological data elements –Documentation of the process used to develop the data elements –Suggestions on how data elements should be used by water quality monitoring programs Explains the logic and importance of the ACWI data elements

17 WATER QUALITY DATA ELEMENTS GUIDE Encourages data collectors and data users to use data elements as a means to help identify key metadata needed to improve data sharing Contains a consolidated list of data elements for chemical, microbiological, population/community, and toxicological analytes monitoring Further refined in 2004 and 2005 incorporating comments from the NWQMC and the MDCB: –Updated case study examples where ACWI-approved data elements are being incorporated –Information regarding implementation of WQDE in programs –Incorporates discussion of modular concept and additional biological and toxicological data elements

18 Proposed Resolution for ACWI Be it Resolved that the Advisory Committee on Water Information adopts: The Data Elements for Reporting Water Quality Results of Toxicity Tests and Assessments of Biological Populations and Communities and recommends these new data element modules to all Federal agencies and other entities engaged in water quality data collection. And approves for publication: The Guide: Data Elements for Reporting Water Quality Monitoring Results for Chemical, Biological, Toxicological, and Microbiological Analytes