Consumer Feedback Gathered Through a Telephone Survey N=1,013 April 2013 An Evaluation of Consumer Awareness & Attitudes Regarding Marcellus Shale Drilling.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Survey conducted for Team New England by the Center for Survey Research and Analysis at the University of Connecticut Business Perceptions of New England.
Advertisements

ATTITUDES TOWARD AFTERZONE Presented by Dr. Julie Pokela February, 2010.
U.S. Public Opinion September 2013 Ann Bisconti, PhD President, Bisconti Research, Inc. BRi.
Impact Analysis of the Maryland Marcellus Shale Safe Drilling Initiative Daraius Irani, PhD, Executive Director Jessica Daniels Varsa, AICP, LEED AP, Senior.
Survey Conducted May 6-8, Project Objectives & Results  A recently commissioned project of The Lew Edwards Group--with survey research.
National Conference on Public Employee Retirement Systems: National Research Findings from a Survey of 500 Small Business Owners Nationwide.
Potten End Parent & Child Survey 2013 High Level Results October 2013.
© 2006 SHRM SHRM Weekly Online Survey: March 21, 2006 Ethics - Held Accountable to Ethics Standards Sample comprised of 458 randomly selected HR professionals.
City of Victoria Presentation of Results - January 11, Business Survey.
Summary of Surveys: Families, Dentists and School Nurse Administrators Children’s Oral Health Coalition August 2011.
Festival of Firsts Visitor Feedback Summary Report Intercept Interviews and Online Survey June 2013 N=275 An Analysis of Visitors’ Demographics and Feedback.
Community Decisions and Public Perceptions about Using Wood for Energy Martha C. Monroe, Annie Oxarart, and Jessica Tomasello Woody Biomass Outreach Training.
Beef Producer Attitude Study – June 2010 Prepared for Cattlemen’s Beef Board By Aspen Media and Market Research.
Tim Wigley President Western Energy Alliance. Bringing discipline to our advocacy and offering political cover to our friends and allies.
1 Public ne Arundel County: Greater Severna Park Council – Presentation of CSLI Survey Findings for Spring 2009 April 14, 2009 Dan Nataf, PhD Director,
EMC Research, Inc th Street, Suite 820 Oakland, CA (510) EMC # Telephone Survey of Cambrian Elementary School District Voters.
Alabama 2003 Survey of Rural Land Issues College of Agriculture Auburn University.
Contra Costa County Survey of Likely November 2014 Voters Presentation to Board of Supervisors June 24, 2014.
2013 Administration & Resource Management (AR) Division Climate Survey Results 21 January 2014.
Summary of Survey Results Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland, CA – Madison,
6th Biennial National Survey of U.S. Nuclear Power Plant Neighbors Summer 2015 Ann S. Bisconti, PhD Bisconti Research, Inc.
COLORADO LOTTERY 2010 IMAGE SURVEY Prepared By The Howell Research Group.
Market Research Results for East Devon AONB 8 th March 2013.
Report of findings prepared for: FGI Research, Inc. May 2007 The Impact of CSR on the General Public A Nationwide Poll on Corporate Social Responsibility.
Nobody’s Unpredictable March 2009 Legal Aid in BC Prepared by Ipsos Reid for the Legal Services Society of British Columbia.
1 Colorado Transportation Issues July 10, These unique polling results are based on 1,001 live telephone surveys among likely 2014 voters statewide.
Executive Summary July SURVEY OVERVIEW Methodology Penn Schoen Berland conducted 1,650 telephone interviews between March 27, 2015 and May 4, 2015.
Southern Maryland Association of REALTORS® Charles County Issues Survey American Strategies Incorporated and Myers Research | Strategic Services, LLC designed.
AGA 2009 Tracking Survey Perceptions of Governmental Financial Management Prepared for the Association of Government Accountants December 29, 2009 © Harris.
1 Tapping into the ‘silent majority’s’ voice: The use of sample surveys in community engagement programs Presented by: Libby Paholski.
Prepared for: Quantitative Research November 2009.
Survey of 49 Swing Congressional Districts Regarding Environmental Issues August 26 - September 2, 2007 Ayres, McHenry & Associates, Inc. 112 North Alfred.
North East Green Barometer Public Attitudes Survey April 2010 Energy Saving Trust and Climate NE.
Orange County Voter Perceptions: Water and Desalination Survey Analysis October 14, 2008.
ASU Energy Center. Public Attitudes Toward Wind Energy in Western North Carolina A Presentation to the 2002 NC Wind Summit December 9, 2002 Appalachian.
SHRM Poll: The Ongoing Impact of the Recession—Health Industry August 28, 2012.
Citizens’ Survey Presentation of Results for Total Sample February 25, 2003 Prepared By: 831 E. Morehead Street, Suite 150 Charlotte, North Carolina
Guilford County Schools Parent and Community Surveys Presentation January 24, 2015 Prepared By Nancy Burnap, Ph.D Research Strategies, Inc. Presented By.
Conservation Tillage Study Prepared for: The Cotton Foundation December, 2002 Doane Marketing Research St. Louis, Missouri.
2012 Community Survey Results Water Issues Conducted by.
Consumer attitudes to the energy market and smart meters Smart Meter Central Delivery Body May 2014: Wave 1.
Nobody’s Unpredictable Smoke-Free Spaces Survey August 2011.
Interpreting Statistics LG: I can evaluate the reliability of data based on its source and margin of error.
Public Attitudes Towards Decriminalisation Of Abortion.
Social Networking Websites and Identifying Potential Job Candidates ©SHRM 2011 June 20, 2011 SHRM Poll: Social Networking Websites for Identifying and.
332 registered voters were sampled Selected from a population of 12, 500 registered voters in Churchill County Respondents were selected using a computer.
CBC News Poll on Discrimination November Methodology This report presents the findings of an online survey conducted among 1,500 Canadian adults.
Spokane River Water Quality Survey. Statement of Methodology Robinson Research was commissioned by The Spokane River Forum to conduct a telephone survey.
Understanding the Values and Priorities of Central Floridians Presentation to the River to Sea TPO CAC & TCC August 19, 2014.
May 17, 2010 SHRM Poll: The Hiring of 2010 Graduates.
Ann S. Bisconti, PhD Bisconti Research, Inc. Why Public Opinion about Nuclear Energy is Changing.
Baseline Survey of Voter Attitudes about Education in Pennsylvania with focus on CCSS and CSA Survey of 600 randomly selected registered PA voters by The.
Survey Conducted: May 6-14, 2009 Fairbank, Maslin, Maullin & Associates Opinion Research & Public Policy Analysis Santa Monica, CA – Oakland,
Survey Research Results Sharon Gotter November 19, 2002.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
Moving Ahead The American Public Speaks on Roadways and Transportation in Communities Federal Highway Administration Industry Briefing March 20, 2001.
SHRM Poll October 30, 2008 January 6, 2009 SHRM Poll, Executive compensation in light of current financial challenges to the U.S. economy.
THE NUCLEAR ENERGY SURVEY : Nuray ÖZDEMİR Prepared by : Nuray ÖZDEMİR EDIRNE SULEYMAN DEMIREL SCIENCE HIGH SCHOOL APRIL 2009 EDIRNE / TURKEY The use of.
Department of Education: Valuing Education Tracking February 2016 Research Presentation 14 th April 2016.
Transportation Authority of Marin SB83/VRF Feasibility Survey June 2010.
TRANSPORTATION PROGRAMS Statewide Transportation Survey Arizona Transportation Summit May 29, 2008.
MARICOPA COUNTY REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION SURVEY TOPLINE FINDINGS.
NEIGHBORWORKS AMERICA AMERICA AT HOME 2015 Findings from a Telephone Survey of 1,000 Americans on Homeownership, The Home-Buying Process and the Impact.
Orland Park, IL Key Findings 2016 The NCS is presented by NRC in collaboration with ICMA.
Community Decisions and Public Perceptions about Using Wood for Energy
Future Of Transportation National Survey
Waters of the United States
Islington Residents’ Survey 2018 March 2018
U.S. Public Opinion September 2013
Presentation transcript:

Consumer Feedback Gathered Through a Telephone Survey N=1,013 April 2013 An Evaluation of Consumer Awareness & Attitudes Regarding Marcellus Shale Drilling April 2013 Consumer Tracking Survey Summary Report

Executive Summary ● A total of 1,013 telephone interviews were completed between March 11 and April 1, 2013 for a margin of error of +/- 3%. ● The overall conclusion from this research is a majority of consumers continue to support natural gas development. ● Additional insights include: ● Improvements since August 2012: ● Think natural gas drilling is: ● Beneficial to US economy (+2 points). ● Beneficial to PA economy (+3 point). ● Familiarity with natural gas development in Marcellus Shale (+2 points). ● Awareness of Marcellus Shale Coalition (+6 points). ● Opposition messages are stagnant and “strain on community services” has lost ground (percentage disagreeing with message has increased from 38% to 45%). ● Support messages are unchanged and many are rated more favorably than are opposition messages. ● While two-thirds saw no issues with constructing pipelines and transporting natural gas, one-third listed environmental, safety and other issues. ● Consumers are split on whether the industry has become more open and honest over the past year (agreeing, 30%; disagreeing, 33%; neither agreeing nor disagreeing, 35%). Slide 2 Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013 ● Unchanged or down slightly since August 2012: ● Support for the use of fossil fuels (-7 points). ● Support for natural gas drilling (-4 points). ● Think natural gas drilling is safe for the environment (-4 points).

Slide 3 A random sample was generated based on interview quotas for each county with wells in the Marcellus Shale area (n=763) and an additional sample in the Philadelphia area (n=250). Survey fielded from March 11, 2013 to April 1, Where appropriate, this report includes comparisons to previous surveys: 2008 (N=346), July 2010 (N=503), January 2011 (N=514), October 2011 (N=1,006) and August 2012 (N=1,020). *Statewide consumer survey. Methods Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 4 Respondent Profile Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 5 Respondent Profile Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 6 Attitudes Toward Drilling Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 7 Support/Oppose Use of Fossil Fuels Q1: Generally speaking, do you support or oppose the use of fossil fuels? Oppose Support TrendApril 2013 Key Demographics The number of consumers who support fossil fuels is down slightly since August 2012, but has resulted in more uncertainty than opposition. 25% 30% 19% 21% 18% 20% 14% 11% 16% 21% 15% 21% 16% Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April %

Slide 8 Why Support/Oppose Use of Fossil Fuels (unaided) Q1: Why do you support/oppose the use of fossil fuels? The need, availability and jobs are top reasons for support, while environmental concerns and better alternatives are reasons for opposition. Support Oppose Base: 645Base: 101 Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 9 Support/Oppose Natural Gas Drilling Q2: Generally speaking, do you support or oppose drilling for natural gas? Oppose Support TrendApril 2013 Key Demographics Support for natural gas drilling has slightly since August 2012, but is still up 11 points since January % 19% 26% 14% 16% 9% 0% 12% 17% 11% 16% 12% 15% 14% Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 10 Why Support/Oppose Natural Gas Drilling (unaided) Q2: Why do you support/oppose natural gas drilling? The need for fuel and job creation is the top reason for supporting natural gas development, while environmental concerns is the top reason for opposition. Support Oppose Base: 645Base: 127 Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 11 Natural Gas Drilling: Beneficial to US Economy Q3: Do you believe drilling for natural gas is beneficial for the US Economy? No Yes TrendApril 2013 Key Demographics A strong majority continue to believe natural gas is beneficial to the US economy. Nine-in-ten of those who support Marcellus Shale drilling agree. 8% 15% 6% 5% 6% 10% 8% 11% 12% 13% 10% 11% Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 12 Natural Gas Drilling: Beneficial to PA Economy Q4: Do you believe drilling for natural gas is beneficial for the local PA economy? TrendApril 2013 Key Demographics A majority continue to believe that natural gas drilling is beneficial to the local Pennsylvania economy. No Yes 12% 22% 6% 9% 15% 11% 14% 13% 12% 13% 11% 13% Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 13 Natural Gas Drilling: Safe for the Environment Q5: Do you believe drilling for natural gas is safe for the environment? TrendApril 2013 Key Demographics Two-in-five think natural gas drilling is safe for the environment— down slightly since August No Yes 37% 41% 32% 34% 33% 42% 32% 41% 34% 53% 48% 38% 36% Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 14 Q5: Why do you believe drilling for natural gas is safe/unsafe for the environment? Drilling techniques and practices influence reasons for supporting drilling, while environmental concerns are the main reasons for opposition. Why Natural Gas Drilling: Safe/Unsafe for Environment (unaided) Why Safe Why Unsafe Base: 418Base: 210 Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 15 Familiarity with Natural Gas Development Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 16 Familiar with Natural Gas Development in M.S. Q 6: Are you familiar with the topic of natural gas development in shale formations such as the “Marcellus Shale?” TrendApril 2013 Key Demographics Familiarity with Marcellus Shale development has steadily increased since July Philadelphia residents are much less aware of the topic. No Yes 6% 4% 3% 5% 0% 5% 4% 6% 11% 6% 5% 3% Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 17 Q 7: What issues do you see in the construction of natural gas pipelines and systems of transporting natural gas? One-third (37%) see issues regarding the construction of pipelines and transporting natural gas. Issues Regarding Natural Gas Development in M.S. (unaided) Issues Selected Comments Base: 1,013 ● As long as they can do it in an eco-friendly way with no problems. ● Big business taking over and it not benefiting the masses. ● Going through people’s private land. ● I don't have a problem as long as they don't start tearing up the forest. ● It depends on the impact on the environment. ● Our roads aren't built to carry these trucks. ● Ruining the land, and private property rights. ● Safety concerns about pipe lines exploding. Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 18 Message Potency Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 19 Opposition Message Resonance Q 8: To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements? No single opposition message stands out from the others. The assertion “strain on community services” is losing ground. Strongly DisagreeStrongly Agree 46%31% 23% 44%28% 26% 35%43% 20% 38%37% 24% 32%46% 20% 28%33% 37% 23%31% 45% Disagree Neutral Agree April 2013 (N=1,013) Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April %33% 22% 42%34% 24% 33%48% 19% 35%42% 23% 32%47% 21% 24%35% 40% 33%29% 38% August 2012 (N=1,020)

Slide 20 Support Message Resonance Q 9: To what extent would you agree or disagree with the following statements? Most support messages are gaining ground. Not relying on foreign oil and the fact that natural gas is cleaner burning are messages that continue to resonate the most with consumers. Strongly Disagree Strongly Agree 73%18%9%9% 70%24%5%5% 59%30%9%9% 58%30%12% 44%35%21% 34%50%15% 36%42%22% Disagree Neutral Agree 34%44%22% 30% 43% 26% Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April %18%7% 68%26%6% 60%29%10% 45%37%18% 37%49%14% 38%43%19% 35%45%20% 29%58%12% 30% 42% 27% April 2013 (N=1,013) August 2012 (N=1,020)

Slide 21 Awareness of Marcellus Shale & Other Organizations Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 22 Q13: Have you seen, read, or heard about the Marcellus Shale Coalition? The awareness of the Marcellus Shale Coalition is up 6 points since August 2012, and has more than doubled since January Awareness of Marcellus Shale Coalition TrendApril 2013 Key Demographics No Yes Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013

Slide 23 Q10: Do you believe in the past year, the natural gas industry has become more open and honest? Respondents’ are divided about whether the industry has become more open and honest in the past year. Awareness of Marcellus Shale Coalition Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013 TrendApril 2013 Key Demographics No Yes Believe Strongly Believe Somewhat Do Not Believe Strongly Do Not Believe Somewhat 33% 44% 27% 34% 30% 35% 32% 36% 32% 35% Neither

Slide 24 Marcellus Shale Coalition Consumer Tracking Survey April 2013