Building on sand? Using statistical measures to assess the impact of electronic services Dr Angela Conyers evidence base research & evaluation UCE Library.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
COUNTER: making statistics useful Peter Shepherd Director COUNTER January 2007.
Advertisements

COUNTER: achievements and future challenges Peter Shepherd Director COUNTER April 2007.
Usage statistics in context - panel discussion on understanding usage, measuring success Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER AAP/PSP 9 February 2005.
COUNTER Update Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER STM Innovations Seminar, 2 December 2005.
The annual SCONUL Statistics Philip Payne JIBS workshop on management data in higher education libraries 1 st. June 2009.
Making numbers count Angela Conyers, Evidence Base, Birmingham City University Jisc Digital Festival, March 2014.
Demonstrating value: Using JUSP to analyse, compare and inform Angela Conyers, Evidence Base 21 May 2014.
COUNTER: an overview Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER Usage Statistics Training Seminar, Oxford, 9 December 2005.
KB+ Overview Anne Simmons. What we’re going to cover  Introduction to KB+ & it’s Uses  Subscription Information  Licences  Journal Statistics in KB+
The COUNTER Code of Practice for Books and Reference Works Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER UKSG E-Books Seminar, 9 November 2005.


Joint Information Systems Committee JISC New Business Models Briefing Session : ICOLC 2005 Lorraine Estelle JISC Collection Team Manager.
1 JURO4C: Online Usage Reports for Consortia José Fernandes 12th October 2006.
JUSP: building on success Angela Conyers and Jo Lambert 22 nd July 2013, Northumbria International Conference.
Performance measurement in a changing environment The SCONUL e-measures project 2010.
KB+, Licences and Usage Statistics Jonathan McAslan Anne Simmons.
Ejournal use statistics Diane Carroll, OHSU April 2006.
Using JUSP with your own data 10 July 2013 Angela Conyers Evidence Base, Birmingham City University JUSP webinar.
Hazards of price-per-use comparison in e-journal management Jason S. Price, Ph.D. Claremont Colleges’ Libraries Los Angeles, California Are they any use?
E-journals: opportunities and challenges Bharati Banerjee.
Usage statistics for collection management The work of JUSP Angela Conyers Evidence Base, Birmingham City University
Collections Support at UMKC Libraries Faculty Library Advisory Committee October 15, 2013.
JUSP - The JISC Journal Usage Statistics Portal Ross MacIntyre, Mimas The University of Manchester
Measurement of use and impact of electronic information services Dr Angela Conyers Evidence Base Birmingham City University
Journal Usage Statistics Portal (JUSP) Adding value and assessing impact through a collaborative approach to service development and delivery Angela Conyers.
JUSP Utilising usage data to assist in decision-making Angela Conyers Evidence Base, Research & Evaluation Birmingham City University.
COUNTER usage statistics: Measuring the benefits of the big deals Angela Conyers Evidence Base, Research & Evaluation Birmingham City University.

JUSP - The JISC Journal Usage Statistics Portal Ross MacIntyre, Mimas The University of Manchester
COUNTER: a practical approach to measuring online usage Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER ALA, Chicago, 27 June 2005.
COUNTER and the development of meaningful measures Peter Shepherd Project Director COUNTER IFLA, Oslo, 18 August 2005.
Evaluation of the impact of library discovery technologies on usage of academic content Valérie Spezi, LISU (Loughborough University, UK) UKSG Webinar.
JISC Journal Usage Statistics Portal A simpler way to measure use and impact.

JUSP: Getting to grips with your usage statistics Paul Meehan & Anne Reed - Jisc / Mimas.
Where's the evidence? The role of usage statistics in collection management Angela Conyers Evidence Base, Research & Evaluation Birmingham City University.
How JUSP can help Angela Conyers Evidence Base. What to do with the JR1 Select any time period you like Sort alphabetically by title Sort by total number.
COUNTER: background, Codes of Practice, current activities, future developments Peter Shepherd Director COUNTER January 2008.

Experiences on the Ground: usage stats as a practical tool in the Library Jill Taylor-Roe Newcastle University Library UKSG Usage Statistics Training Seminar.
1 Jo Lambert and Paul Meehan. JUSP aims Supports libraries by providing a single point of access to e-journal usage data Assists management of e- journals.
Using JUSP to help with the SCONUL return Angela Conyers Evidence Base
Usage versus Cost Analytics for Selection Management and Informed Purchase Decisions MTA Budapest, October 2012.
Using JUSP to help with the SCONUL return Angela Conyers Evidence Base, Birmingham City University.
Tom Francis E-Resources and Serials Co-ordinator Aberystwyth University Usage Statistics at Aberystwyth.
Marie Reddan, Librarian NUI Galway. 15 Nov ‘07HEAnet Networking Conference 2007 Presentation Outline IReL background Funding Management Product selection.
The Journal Usage Statistics Portal (JUSP)
Fixing a Hole: Incorporating Usage Statistics into the Electronic Resource Life Cycle Margaret Hogarth & Barbara Schader, ER&L 2008.
INMAS. Out of the Box Ideas for Marketing of Electronic Information Resources: Experiences at INMAS Library Dr Rajeev Vij & Navin K Soni Institute of.
UKSG United Kingdom Serials Group April 2005 slide 1 Are they open yet? The impact of Open Access publishing on research libraries Dr Paul Ayris.
Finding Books and Electronic Resources César Pimenta and Juliet Ralph October 2006.
JUSP: The University of Portsmouth Experience Sarah Weston Data Manager University Library.

February 14, 2016NAME OF EVENT1 What’s the Big Deal? Collection Evaluation at the National Level Clare Appavoo, Executive Director, Canadian Research Knowledge.
Walking a Tightrope in the Transition to Electronic Resources Debra G. Skinner Georgia Southern University GOLD/GALILEO Users Group Conference July 31,
Date of Presentation Name of Presenter Insert image _________ Toolkit.
The JISC Usage Statistics Portal Ross MacIntyre, Mimas The University of Manchester.
The Journal Usage Statistics Portal (JUSP)
Are your ebooks being used?
JUSP - The JISC Journal Usage Statistics Portal
London – 11th June 2015 (afternoon – part 2)
The JISC Journal Usage Statistics Portal (JUSP)
JISC Journal Usage Statistics Portal
COUNTER Update February 2006.
Journal Usage Statistics Portal (JUSP): a simpler way to measure use and impact
The Journal Usage Statistics Portal (JUSP)
Journal Usage Statistics Portal (JUSP): a simpler way to measure use and impact
JUSP: Getting to grips with your usage statistics
Guide to Usage Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Building on sand? Using statistical measures to assess the impact of electronic services Dr Angela Conyers evidence base research & evaluation UCE Library Services UCE Birmingham

Why collect usage statistics? What statistics to collect? How to collect them? How to analyse them? How can libraries be assisted in this task? Key questions

E-measures project funded by HEFCE working with 25 UK higher education libraries NESLi2 study of usage statistics funded by JISC working with 17 UK higher education libraries

Because they’re there Because SCONUL has asked for them To help with promotion and user support For budgeting and decision-making To aid bench-marking Why collect usage statistics?

1. Identify type of resource: Serials Databases E-books Digital documents Virtual visits Electronic enquiries What usage statistics to collect?

2. Identify reliable statistics: COUNTER compliance: Serials: JR1 report – number of full-text article requests – 40 publishers/suppliers Databases: DB1 report – total searches and sessions by month and database – 13 publishers/suppliers - DB2 report – total searches and sessions by month and service – 15 publishers/supplier E-books: new draft COUNTER code of practice What usage statistics to collect?

Identify sources of statistics Collect passwords Download Establish where gateway statistics to be added Encourage all suppliers to be COUNTER compliant How to collect?

1.Identify supplementary information required: –Cost of deal (subscribed titles and e-access costs) –Lists of subscribed titles –Number of FTE users –Total library serials budget How to analyse?

2. Identify groupings: –Usage range –Price band –Subject category –Subscribed/unsubscribed titles How to analyse?

Nil and low use (under 10 requests) nil use 1-4 requests 5-9 requests Medium use (10-99 requests) requests requests High use (100 or more requests) ,000 plus Usage range

Unpriced: those for which no price could be found Low price – under £200 Medium price - £ High price - £ Very high price - £1,000 and over Price band

Subject category: STM (science, technology & medicine) HSS (humanities and social sciences) Subscribed and unsubscribed titles Other groupings

Average cost per request – all requests Average cost per request – subscribed titles Average cost per request – unsubscribed titles Cost per FTE user Cost per title Yield per £ for access to unsubscribed titles Assessing value for money

NESLi2 study main recommendations to the JISC: –Clearer, more transparent deals –Review of pricing and cancellations policies –Portal site for publisher usage statistics –More support to libraries in monitoring usage- toolkit, workshops etc How can libraries be assisted with the task?

NESLi2 study main recommendations to the higher education library community: –Libraries to ensure they have sufficient internal resources to manage and analyse usage data –Libraries to be encouraged to take a more joined-up approach to the management of print and e-journal resources How can libraries be assisted with the task?

Workshops Tool-kits Benchmarking groups Outsourcing Angela Conyers The future?

Some results –full-text article requests

Some results – costs

Some Conclusions Number of full text article requests considerably higher in large old universities in this study Overall increase in usage Balance of usage and costs generally led to similar range of costs across large and small universities Low average cost per request Small % of titles generated high usage Low use titles were mostly low price High use titles were generally high cost STM titles most heavily used. Data limitations