Fort Monroe Historic Design Standards for New Construction Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoJune 1, 2009 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION June 1,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 13 Site Orientation.
Advertisements

Master Plan Update July 25, The Guiding Principles for Fort Monroe’s Future Preserve the place Tell the stories Achieve economic independence.
2 Existing building 1 story metal 1972 Water Street CFA TechWorks! - Site Plan - Photo Index Number indicates photographer location Caption describes.
City of Scottsdale Senior Center at Granite Reef
Vineland Commercial Site Address: 7626 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7634 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N ) 7630 N. Vineland Ave. (A.P.N )
Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + Company | Studio D Architects Analysis Concepts Refinement Integration Campus Master Plan NMSU
Old Mankato Railroad Station By: Ryan Carlson Adam Otto.
Graphic Language of Buildings Architectural Plans.
GUD AFTNOON. SUBJECT CODE : GE1151 BASIC CIVIL AND MECHANICAL ENGINEERING.
1.Define zoning. 2.Define building codes. 3.List the key players in implementing CPTED. 4.List the two thresholds of review for new construction or redevelopment.
City Council 2642 Second Street Appeal of Landmarks Commission Approval of Certificate of Appropriateness 07CA-009 February 12, 2008.
 PA requires FMFADA submit a plan for interpretive and educational programs  Original 2006 Plan called for museums inside moat  Interest in retaining.
Shireen Abdelrahman Lecture 7. Analysis Synthesis Evaluation Implementation Four basic phases of urban design:
Hadrian’s Wall By Emily Curry. Introduction Hadrian’s Wall is an ancient Roman fortification in Northern England. It was the most fortified border in.
Building Plans.
Planning and Design in Rockford: West State Street Corridor Overview 315 North Main Street · Rockford IL
Central Petaluma Specific Plan TOD Marketplace September 29, 2006.
22 Elevations Chapter Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only.© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Introduction to Elevations Elevation –An.
GSA Early Concept Design Project – Energy Analysis
Competency: Draw exterior elevations
Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards and Standards for New Construction Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoJune 25, 2009 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR.
Fort Monroe Historic Preservation Design Standards Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoNovember 20, 2008.
1 Public Planning Meeting Date: June 24, 2015 Application: Draft Plan of Subdivision, Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment Applicant: Highland Gate.
Places of Assembly December 5, 2006 Open Discussion.
1 Upper West Side/Central Park West Historic District Protective Mechanisms R8-B Contextual Zoning Districts W. 70 th Street midblock – north side Upper.
Chapter 13 Site Orientation.
Prepared by: Alex Fisch Planning Services Division.
Design Review Purpose, process and elements Dh 2005.
NORTH 40 SPECIFIC PLAN Advisory Committee Meeting #6 November 3, 2011.
site analysis A2D2 Zoning Changes “Core Downtown” D1 District Assumed 180’ Height Limit 400% FAR 700% FAR with premiums - Green construction - Parking.
San Francisco. San Francisco, officially the City and County of San Francisco, is the leading financial and cultural center of Northern California and.
Key Geography Concepts Chapter 1. Geography and Human Geography Three main geographic interests – Variation of Human and physical phenomena and humans.
City of Ormond Beach Planning Board Workshop June 18, 2012 PMUD : Ormond Crossings Planned Mixed Use Development Rezoning.
Planning & Community Development Department Olivewood Village Project (530, 535 E. Union St., 95, 99, 119 N. Madison Ave. and 585 E. Colorado Blvd.) Predevelopment.
© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only 1 PowerPoint Presentation Publisher The Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc.
Waterfront and Marinship Steering Committee Form Based Zoning A Petaluma Experience 05 March 2009.
Lowe’s Home Improvement Center TLZM TLSE TLSE January 14, 2014 Town Council Public Hearing.
Site Planning Planning 1 M.S.Chua.
OHLONE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, HERCULES CONSTRUCTION PROGRESS REPORT WCCUSD FACILITY SUB-COMMITTEE MEETING AUG. 14, 2012 POWELL & PARTNERS, ARCHITECTS.
Bubble Chart Plan Brainstorming. Bubble Diagram A simple drawing in which bubbles are used to designate areas for specific purposes: – dining area, seating.
1 Villa Laguna MXD3 Site Plan Review. 2 Request: The applicant is requesting site plan review of a proposed mixed-use project pursuant to the recently.
Student Services Projects
PROPOSED DISCOUNT TIRE 10 GARDEN STREET PALM COAST, FL
Physical Features North Africa GOVERNMENT RELIGION RESOURCES
Agenda 15th and Race Project Summary Current Requests
Drawing & Building Names
DrawING exterior elevations
Chapter 1: Maps as Models of the Earth
Competency: Draw exterior elevations
INDOOR BASEBALL / SOFTBALL FACILITY
Proposed “a” Overlay Impacts Almost All Inner Residential Neighborhoods East of the Willamette River. Now Includes Properties East of I-205 R5 = 5,000.
Map Skills.
Social Studies Online Introduction
Mapping It Out Grade 2 Concept 3.
Chapter 13 Site Orientation.
University Center 517 University Center North: Inaccessible Element
Sport Center Description and examples
310 Linda Vista Avenue J.D. Gunder House

254 East Union Street Pre Development Plan Review
Planning Commission January 20, 2016
North Augusta High School – Phase 2A and 2B
Student Center A South: Inaccessible Element
Overlay Districts Presented by: Zina Lagonegro Manager of Zoning
Site and Context. Section from East Section E2 Section E1 Sannidhanam Malikapuram Sannidhanam Malikapuram.
Question 1. Question 1 What is 10 x 40? A 40 B 400 C 4000 D 4.0.
115-Unit Mixed-Use Project (711 E
Nomination 802 N Monroe St Jenkins Building
Item #: 3.1 Public Hearing – Vacating Lot 1 of Kings Industrial Subdivision, Plat A, and approving the final plat of Kings Industrial Subdivision, Plat.
Social Studies Online Introduction
Presentation transcript:

Fort Monroe Historic Design Standards for New Construction Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoJune 1, 2009 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION June 1, 2009

How-to Introduction Purpose Implementation Organization Management Zones Concepts Planning Building Form Building Elements Site Features Landscape Streets

ZONE D

INTRODUCTION SITE BUILDING FORM/ BUILDING ELEMENTS ADDITONS/ MATERIALS

Planning Form Elements Site Features Landscape Concepts Organization patterns Massing Height Configuration Fenestration Porches/Entrances Roofs Materials Views Vistas Patterns Defines space Relates to buildings

ZONE A INTRODUCTION SITE BUILDING FORM/ BUILDING ELEMENTS MATERIALS

ZONE B INTRODUCTION SITE MATERIALS BUILDING FORM/ BUILDING ELEMENTS

Zone B – East PeninsulaZone D – McNair, Ingalls, Fenwick

Zone A – West Peninsula

Zone B – East Peninsula

Zone C – North Gate

Zone D – McNair, Ingalls, Fenwick

Zone E – Stone Fort and Moat

BUILDING DESIGN FORMMASSSCALEORGANIZATION Zone AA-1NO PERMANENT CONSTRUCTION IN THIS ZONE A-2SIMPLEFLAT ROOFS / SLOPED ROOFS1-STORYANY A-3SIMPLEFLAT ROOFS / SLOPED ROOFS1-STORYANY Zone BB-1NO NEW CONSTRUCTION IN THIS AREA B-2 SIMPLESLOPED ROOFS2-STORYSYMMETRY B-3SIMPLE / ARTICULATEDFLAT ROOFS / SLOPED ROOFS1 1/2 STORYSYMMETRY / ASSYMETRY Zone C SIMPLE / ARTICULATEDFLAT ROOFS / SLOPED ROOFS2 1/2 STORYSYMMETRY / ASSYMETRY Zone DD-1NO NEW CONSTRUCTION IN THIS AREA D-2ARTICUALTEDSLOPED ROOFS2 1/2 STORYSYMMETRY / ASSYMETRY D-3ARTICUALTEDFLAT ROOFS2 1/2 STORYSYMMETRY D-4SIMPLE / ARTICULATEDFLAT ROOFS / SLOPED ROOFS1 1/2 STORYSYMMETRY / ASSYMETRY Zone E ADDTIONS ONLY

Planning Form Elements Site Features Landscape Concepts Organization patterns Massing Height Configuration Fenestration Porches/Entrances Roofs Materials Views Vistas Patterns Defines space Relates to buildings

Fort Monroe Historic Design Standards for New Construction Hanbury Evans Wright Vlattas + CoJune 1, 2009 DESIGN STANDARDS FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION June 1, 2009

Zone D – McNair, Ingalls, Fenwick

Zone A – West Peninsula

Zone E – Stone Fort and Moat

Endicott Batteries