Delta Company METL Assessment 1
Overall Assessment Last YearThis Year AcademicBA MilitaryBC Moral-EthicalAB Physical FitnessBB 2
Academic Assessment A Strengths – High focus on academics – Guard not conflicting with class – Inter company tutor system Weaknesses – To much freedom to upper class during ESP – Not promoting already existing resources 3
Academic Assessment Cum GPA last year Cum GPA this year – Fall 14 only Class Absences last year E/U=T Class Absences this year E/U=T Number Academically Deficient last year Number Academically Deficient this year 1C /119=32674/46= C /197=411319/44= C /262=605174/61= C /56=128154/22=17610 Total /634= /173=
Academic Pillar Strategy Productive ESP environment Squad leaders monitoring progress Company tutors by major 5
Military Assessment C Strengths – SMIs – Not bring back contraband – Professional attitude Weaknesses – Accountability (All-ins) – Corps squad rumors vs. white/blue book – Parade 6
Military Assessment Avg parade results last year Avg parade results this year Class I Offenses last year Class I Offenses this year Suitability Boards last year Suitability Boards this year 1C0000 2C0201 3C0900 4C0000 Total
Military Pillar Strategy New accountability formations Standards across all 4 classes Focus on Parades 8
Moral-Ethical Assessment B Strengths – No alcohol/drugs violations – Going to honor training – Approachable honor reps Weaknesses – All-ins, eyes on policy – Rising honor reps were BT 9
Moral-Ethical Assessment Number of honor accusations this year Number of honor accusations last year Number of “in violation” honor findings last year Number of “in violation” honor findings this year Number of sexual harassment/ assault incident reports last year Number of sexual harassment/ assault incident reports this year 1C C C C Total
Moral-Ethical Pillar Strategy Continue training Enforcing standards All-In procedures done correctly 11
Physical Effectiveness Assessment B Strengths – Large percentage of Corps Squad – Focus on intermural sports – Large percentage of Hess majors Weaknesses – Former Corps Squad athletes with H/W – Poor diet – No incentives to max CPFT 12
Physical Effectiveness Assessment CPFT avg last year CPFT avg this year Number of CPFT failures last year Number of CPFT failures this year Number of H & W failures last year Number of H & W failures this year 1C C C C Total
Physical Effectiveness Pillar Strategy Squad Leaders identify PT test issues in their squad All 4 classes participate in intramurals Incentives for maxing PT Test 14
Company Commander/TAC Comments Strong company after facing a number of problems. Strong class of Juniors (2016). A lot of promises in class of