Rationale for the Evaluation Frameworks Project 2012-14 Previous Paradigm in Our State A Compliance Exercise, Often Based Solely on Positional Authority.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
USING THE FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING TO SUPPORT EFFECTIVE TEACHER EVALUATION Mary Weck, Ed. D Danielson Group Member.
Advertisements

Five -Year Strategic Title I School Plan. Session Objectives Review the five year components utilizing the rubric Organize actions steps to meet the requirements.
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
Althea Taylor James Ellerbe District and School Transformation Division, North Carolina Department of Public Instruction.
Using Data Effectively or Why Weigh the Hog If You Aren’t Going To Feed It? Presented by Ronni Ephraim, Chief Instructional Officer Los Angeles Unified.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.
Purpose and Intent Mrs. Monica Holmes Dr. Michael Brooks OFFICE OF TALENT DEVELOPMENT- FFT SUMMER INSTITUTE.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research & Literature From Session 1 Homework Video Exercise Mid-Year Conferences.
Weber State University’s Teacher Preparation Program Conceptual Framework.
Targets PGP and SV Describe the components of the PGG and PGP. Identify key parts of a PGP and PGG from a sample. Be able to locate SV material on KDE.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Coaching Framework Improving Teaching and Learning Literacy District More than Literacy.
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
PDC Procedures – Individual Growth Action Plan The Individual Growth Action Plan (IGAP) is a plan each individual completes describing professional.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Revised Goals-Based Evaluation (GBE-R)
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
Data supported by professional development Baron Rodriguez Chief Information Officer Oregon Department of Education Mickey Garrison School Improvement.
Rising Star An Overview Prepared for the District 97 Board of Education By Felicia Starks Turner and Cynthia Baranowski November 27,
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Effective Instructional Feedback Mike Miles July 2009.
OVERVIEW 1. WHAT IS FIP YOUR SCHOOL? 2 What is a FIP School? Our goal is to make every school in Ohio a FIP School – a school committed to embracing.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
My Partner For Learning Solutions Central Office Administrators in the era of TPEP Day 3 January 9,
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Leading at All Levels to Support MDC Implementation
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System. Ohio Superintendent Evaluation System (Background) Senate Bill 1: Standards for teachers, principals and professional.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
IT’S ALL ABOUT THE BIG PEOPLE Presented by: Sylvia Mijuskovic.
Using the Learning Targets for Coaches Supporting Coaches to Do Their Best Work.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
WCPSS Coaching Framework Strengthening Consistency, Cohesion, and Clarity for Coaches in WCPSS.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana
Self Reflection and Professional Growth Synergy of Two Measures of Effectiveness.
Principal Learning Teams S.I.M. May 1 st, 2013 Principal Learning Teams.
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez Explore Explore Explore Math Teacher Leaders October 18, 2011.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Welcome TDEC Professional Learning December 22,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
National Summit for Principal Supervisors Building an Effective Evaluation System May 11-13, 2016 Jackie O. Wilson, Interim Director, Professional Development.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Gary Kipp, Executive Director Association of Washington School Principals Dr. Michael Starosky, Asst. Superintendent, Chief of Schools Seattle School District.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Jackie Wilson Gary Bloom Jill Baker Kelly An Damaries Blondonville
Instructional Leadership Team: Implementation Woodland Middle School
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Teacher Effectiveness and Support for Growth
State Board of Education Progress Update
Presentation transcript:

Rationale for the Evaluation Frameworks Project Previous Paradigm in Our State A Compliance Exercise, Often Based Solely on Positional Authority The Need to Objectively Justify and Quantify the Evaluation of Leadership Instructional Frameworks and TPEP Were in the Works Central Office Positions were Called Upon to Facilitate the Growth of Instructional Leaders Operations & Management were Called Upon to Accountably Support Student Success “We are all in it Together” Every Certificated and Administrative Role (Teacher – Superintendent) is Accountable

District Philosophy of Growth and Improvement Role of the Leader It’s a Different Job to Help Our People Grow Measurably, Rather than Evaluate Subjectively To Model the Purpose of Our Model, Ownership, Growth and Reflective Practice The Intended Outcome A Culture of Accountability and Ownership, Rather than Adherence and Compliance Professional Development to Support the Work Clearly Aligning the Time and Resources for this Project to Become Culture

Initial Influence by WASA Central Office Framework Customized to align with work in Puyallup Intentional alignment between content and number of criteria

Example: Teachers: Use student data to modify instruction Principals:Planning with data O&M:Planning with data Instructional:Planning with data & system-wide improvement Superintendent:Goal Setting & achievement progress using data

Implementation… Year 1 PSD Committee for O & M Instructional CMT partial implementation Year 2 O &M partial implementation Instructional CMT full implementation Current Year O &M and Instructional CMT full implementation

Initial Results

“Moved my chair from the other side of the table to a shared space at the desk with the teachers I evaluated. My role as an evaluator has been transformed into the coach.”

“The process of improvement through evidence sharing and deep conversations with my supervisors. It’s not just about collecting evidence, rather it’s about connecting my actions with the evidence and reflecting on whether or not the work I did made a difference to impact learning & achievement.”

“Opened the door for extensive conversation around instruction like none before. In talking with teachers it has helped define the conversation and focus base on various learning targets, criteria, components and practices.”

QUESTIONS