Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Metering Guidance & Best Practice Integrated EnergyMetering Strategies Saralyn Bunch Federal Energy Management.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A PERMANENT energy cost control program. Energy cost control is a PROCESS, not a Project! What is an Energy Action Plan?
Advertisements

Civilian Property Realignment Act The need to reform defined.
DOE O 430.2B Metering Requirements and Status
HB1438 Update & Statewide Capital Planning Initiative Office of State Finance Department of Central Services November 8, 2011.
ADEQ Headquarters, North Little Rock, Arkansas Building Assessment for New Construction and Major Renovations for compliance with Federal Requirements.
California HVAC Program Strategy IOU Program Overview CPUC HVAC Workshop June 24, 2009.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov June 16, 2011 Soudeh Motamedi IBM Contractor, DOE Sustainability Performance Office Year-End Sustainability.
Leading By Example towards a Clean Energy Economy and Sustainable Natural Environment Signed by Governor Markell on February 17, 2010.
ENERGY STAR ®. Earning the ENERGY STAR ® means a product meets strict energy efficiency guidelines set by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 4: Create an Action Plan Toolkit 4: Create an Energy Management.
Combined Heat and Power in the Ethanol Industry Tom Kerr Energy Supply and Industry Branch U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Governors’ Ethanol Coalition.
Promoting Energy Efficiency In Buildings in Developing countries.
Creating Energy-Efficient Data Centers
Getting Green Building Automation. Why is Building Automation a Green Technology? There are programs starting all over the nation that focus on alternative.
SECRET Green Procurement Office of Greening Government Operations May 4, 2006.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Federal Energy Management Program Safe, Secure, and Sustainable Facilities May 13, 2010 Richard Kidd Program.
Article 5 of the Energy Services Directive Edward Green.
Metering - FEMP’s Perspective Presentation to the Interagency Energy Management Task Force by Ab Ream, FEMP O&M Program Lead October 16,
June 4, 2002 Cindy Jacobs EPA E NERGY S TAR Buildings E NERGY S TAR Greening the Government.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 2: Assess Performance & Opportunities Toolkit 2C: School.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Getting Results From Your Energy Projects Session 3Greening the Federal Government Jim Bochat Commissioning.
Unit 8:COOP Plan and Procedures  Explain purpose of a COOP plan  Propose an outline for a COOP plan  Identify procedures that can effectively support.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 3: Set Performance Goals Toolkit 3A: Set Energy Performance.
*Green City “Briefing” presentation to the City Council Summer 2008 GCGC GCGC * Project Location is confidential.
Federal High Performance and Sustainable Buildings, the MOU and DOE Briefing May 1, 2006 Anne Crawley DOE Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy Federal.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona A Review of the Current DOE IDIQ Track 5: Project Financing Session 3: ESPC Large and Small: The Basics of ESPC.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona DOE eGuide for Strategic Energy Management Building PerformanceStrategic Energy Management Ridah Sabouni Energetics.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Using Private Financing to Maximize Energy and Cost Savings Track 5: Project Financing Session 7: Economics.
LBNL and Government Data Center Programs SC07 November, 2007 William Tschudi
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Solution Showcase GSA’s NDER Program: Doubling the Energy Savings from Financed Projects Kevin Vaughn Schneider.
1 DOE Data Center Energy Efficiency Program and Tool Strategy Paul Scheihing U.S. Department of Energy Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Overview of the ESTCP Energy & Water Program Technology Track Overview of Federal Technology Demonstration Programs.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona ANDREA L. KINCAID DLA Energy Integrated Energy TrackIntegration of the Energy Industry.
Karen Herter (HMG) Mike Langley (DGS) April 15, 2008 Portfolio Manager for California State Buildings Meeting the Requirements of Executive Order S
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona FEMP Training Supports FBPTA and FMI.gov Institutional Change Federal Buildings Personnel Training Act: Resources.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Federal Water Efficiency Sustainability TrackWater Efficient Operations Kate McMordie Stoughton Pacific Northwest.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Lessons Learned from ARRA Projects Solution ShowcaseLessions Learned from ARRA Projects Walter Tersch, LEED.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Engaging and Empowering Building Occupants to Meet Energy Goals Track 9: Institutional Change August 12, 2015.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona GSA’s Actions under the PPCC GSA’s Pipeline Session 1, Track 5Meeting the PPCC Sharon Conger Public Building.
Challenges of Localized Cooling Systems
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Army’s Net Zero Initiative Sustainability Getting to Net Zero: Energy, Water and Waste Alicen Kandt National.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Data Center Energy Management Strategies Track 7, Session 7 Overview Building Performance Data Center Energy.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona An Introduction to EO Track 4Sustainability Brad Gustafson, P.E., LEED-AP Federal Energy Management Program.
Confidential and Proprietary | © 2012 Cenergistic This material may not be copied, modified, distributed or disclosed except upon written approval from.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona District or Distributed Integrated EnergyDistrict Heating and Cooling Robert McMillin Siemens Industry, Inc.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Retained Energy Savings: A Success Story Track 1 Retained Energy Savings: Putting It into Practice Don JUHASZ,
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona ESPC Overview Project FinancingESPC Large and Small: The Basics of ESPC Tom Hattery, DOE-FEMP Federal Project.
October 29, 2008 SESSION LAW / SB 1946 October 29, 2008 Larry Shirley State Energy Office NC Department of Administration Performance Standards.
Energy Efficiency Action Plan Kathleen Hogan Director, Climate Protection Partnerships Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NARUC Winter Meetings.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
Livable Delaware Energy Task Force - the Key to Energy and Environmental Co-Benefits.
2015 Pipeline Safety Trust Conference November 20 th, 2015 | New Orleans, LA API RP 1175 Pipeline Leak Detection Program Management – New RP Highlights.
1 Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration Sustainability Overview GSA’s Sustainability Opportunity Houston Taylor Deputy Assistant.
CEQA and Climate Change Evaluating & Addressing GHG Emissions from Projects Barbara Lee, CAPCOA.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
Lighting Phase-Ineere.energy.gov 1 U.S. Department of Energy: Building Energy Codes Program Stakeholder Meeting David Cohan, Jeremiah Williams, Mohammed.
2009 Federal Environmental Symposium East June 16-18, 2009 Bucky Green, EPA Sustainable Facilities Practices Branch Matt Sawatzki, Booz Allen Hamilton.
Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Case Studies of Institutional Change at the Campus Level Track 9: Institutional Change August 13, 2015.
Buying Energy Efficient Products: Policy Requirements, Purchasing Tools, and Agency Experiences Christopher Payne Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
1 New Energy Efficient Products Requirements: What Federal Purchasers Need to Know Joan Glickman Federal Environmental Symposium May 3, 2006.
Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products: Policy Requirements & Purchasing Tools Christopher Payne Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory June 17,
Transforming Renewable Energy at the U.S. Department of Energy OFEE Symposium East – June 2008 Anne Sprunt Crawley U.S. Department of Energy.
Heat Network Demonstration SBRI: policy context & objectives for the competition Natalie Miles Heat Strategy and Policy (Heat Networks)
1 Guidance on Renewable Energy in Federal Facilities under EO and EPACT 05 June 5, 2007 Anne Sprunt Crawley Federal Energy Management Program Energy.
Powering a Reliable and Sustainable Energy Future for Ontario Bruce Campbell, President and CEO, IESO March 3, 2016.
Rick Khan, Director Federal Energy Management Program Department of Energy FEMP: Leading and Partnering with Agencies to Design and Build High Performing,
Fort Stanwix National Monument Energy Audit Contract
DOE Data Center Energy Efficiency Program and Tool Strategy
Presentation transcript:

Phoenix Convention Center Phoenix, Arizona Metering Guidance & Best Practice Integrated EnergyMetering Strategies Saralyn Bunch Federal Energy Management Program August 13, 2015

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Background Statute and Executive Order instruct DOE to establish guidelines to meter Federal buildings for Energy (electricity, natural gas, and steam) and Water DOE issued guidance in November 2014 which serves as an update February 2006 Guidance November 2014 Guidance broadens the 2006 guidance established for metering of electricity to include both Statutory and E.O. requirements and to reflect current metering practices within the Federal Government The Metering Best Practices Guide (MBPG) was updated in March 2015 to support the Guidance and to reflect current practices. 2

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade The metering guidance provides a two-step process for installation of meters in Federal buildings: – Step 1 sets criteria for determining Federal buildings for which the installation of meters is “appropriate.” – Step 2 recommends a methodology for establishing a prioritization process for the installation of meters at all “appropriate” Federal buildings – The metering guidance requires an agency metering implementation plan be submitted to DOE FEMP within a year of the guidance being published. The agency plan shall consider resources required and prioritize metering implementation efforts for “appropriate” Federal buildings over the next five years Guidance Overview

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Appropriate – The installation of energy and water meters is “appropriate” for all Federal buildings that are not excluded under Step 1 of the guidance. Cost-effective – Studies show reduced operation and maintenance costs when metered data is used to manage building energy consumption. These life-cycle cost savings exceed the life-cycle costs for installation and maintenance of the meters. Therefore, installation of meters is “cost effective” at all appropriate Federal buildings (including multi building installations). Guidance Review – Key Definitions

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Exclusion criteria for Metering of Federal Buildings: – Planned to be sold or razed within the next five years – Leased or owned, but the agency does not pay the utility bill or does not pay the lessor for utilities based on actual consumption – Building does not have an energy-consuming heating or cooling system or significant process loads – Generates electricity that is sold commercially to other parties in the course of regular business where installing meters would require an impractical shut-down of service – Does not meet, or is expected not to meet, the de minimis thresholds set forth in the following tables Step 1: Determine “Appropriateness” Water Energy

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Install energy and water meters at all Federal buildings determined to be “appropriate” under Step 1 As required by statute use, to the maximum extent practicable, advanced meters or advanced metering devices for energy DOE recognizes that agencies may not have resources for the immediate implementation of the guidance at all “appropriate” Federal buildings Agencies are expected to prioritize the order in which advanced meters and advanced metering devices are to be applied Step 2 – Prioritization

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade For the purpose of maximizing cost effectiveness a recommended installation prioritization of advanced energy (electricity, natural gas, and steam) meters is provided: 1.New Constructions and Major Renovations 2.Covered Facilities –Give highest priority to metering covered facilities that are known to be the largest energy consumers. For covered facilities that are multi-building (campus) installations, agencies should prioritize meters, in addition to feeder lines (order follows) a)All self-generated electricity and steam supplied to installation (campus), b)All agency data centers not planned for consolidation or closure, identified as part of the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative and PortfolioStat, c)All other known energy-intensive building types (e.g., laboratories, hospitals, control towers, and food services), d)All individual buildings 10,000 square feet or above, e)All large energy-consuming mission support processes (training systems, industrial systems, communication transmitters, ship cold iron services, etc.), f)All High Performance and Sustainable Buildings, if not already captured above, and g)Remainder of “appropriate” buildings, largest first. Prioritization for Energy Meters

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade 3.Non-Covered Facilities –Give highest priority to metering Federal buildings that are known to be the largest energy consumers. For facilities that are multi- building (campus) installations prioritize meters, in addition to feeder lines (order follows) a)Self-generated electricity, including renewable energy sources b)Data centers not planned for consolidation or closure identified as part of the Federal Data Center Consolidation Initiative and PortfolioStat c)Individual energy-intensive building types (e.g., laboratories, hospitals, control towers, and food services) d)Buildings 10,000 square feet or above e) All High Performance and Sustainable Buildings – if not already captured above f) Remainder of “appropriate” buildings Prioritization for Energy Meters (Cont.)

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade For the purpose of maximizing cost-effectiveness it is recommended the installation of advanced water meters be prioritized as follows: 1)New Constructions and Major Renovations - install advanced meters at the supply for the building and for new landscape water use 2)Covered Facilities –Give highest priority to metering covered facilities that are the largest water consumers. For covered facilities that are multi-building (campus) installations prioritize the installation of meters in addition to supply lines (order follows) a)Well water and internal supply lines b)Meters or other leak detection devices on distribution lines to identify system losses (largest distribution lines first) c)Water-intensive facilities, and large landscape systems d)Individual building 10,000 square feet or above, e)High Performance and Sustainable Buildings if not already captured above f)Remainder of “appropriate” buildings Prioritization for Water Meters

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade 3.Non-Covered Facilities – Install advanced meters for each water supply line leading to the facility. Give highest priority to metering Federal buildings that are the largest water consumers. For facilities that are multi-building (campus) installations prioritize the installation of meters as follows: a)Well water and other internal supply lines b)Meters or other leak detection devices on distribution lines to effectively identify system losses (largest distribution lines first) c)Water-intensive facilities and large landscape systems d)Individual buildings10,000 square feet or above e)High Performance and Sustainable Buildings if not already captured above f)Remainder of “appropriate” buildings Prioritization for Water Meters (Cont.)

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Incorporate metered data into existing agency energy tracking systems and make data available to facility managers. Ensure that covered facility metered building energy and water data is entered into EPA’s ENERGY STAR Portfolio IAW Building Energy Use Benchmarking Guidance. Using Metered Data

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Not later than 12 months from November 2014 Agency Plans shall include metering implementation for each sub-agency (bureau, component, service, etc.) within its jurisdiction – Resource consideration and prioritization of “appropriate” Federal buildings over the next five years. – Path forward for those remaining buildings to be metered following the initial five years. Submit plan to: Saralyn Bunch Federal Energy Management Program Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy U. S. Department of Energy Five-Year Metering Plans

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Highlight the benefits of using metered data to identify opportunities and drive cost-effective, energy management and investment practices. Understand and be able to outline the key elements of a metering plan, including prioritization. Illustrate how to use metered data to identify energy and cost saving opportunities. Achieve a high-level understanding of metering technologies, equipment, and applications. Describe the methods and approaches for building- level, distribution-level, and end-use metering. Explain the different data communication options for metered data. 13 Objectives of Metering Best Practices Guide

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade E.O. section 3(a)(ii) improving data center energy efficiency at agency facilities by: – (A) ensuring the agency chief information officer promotes data center energy optimization, efficiency, and performance; – (B) installing and monitoring advanced energy meters in all data centers by fiscal year 2018; and – (C) establishing a power usage effectiveness target of 1.2 to 1.4 for new data centers and less than 1.5 for existing data centers 14 E.O Implementing Guidance Planning Impact

Energy Exchange : Federal Sustainability for the Next Decade Metering Best Practices: A Guide to Achieving Utility Resource Efficiency, Release 3.0 – utility-resource-efficiency utility-resource-efficiency Federal Building Metering Guidance (per 42 U.S.C. § 8253(e), Metering of Energy Use) November 2014 Update – De Minimis Thresholds for Federal Building Metering Appropriateness March 2015 PNNL – pdf pdf Federal Metering Data Analysis Needs and Existing Tools March 2015 PNNL – Federal Building Metering Implementation Plan Template – implementation-plan-template implementation-plan-template 15 Resources