VIRTUAL monitoring What is Virtual Monitoring EXAMPLES:  STAR SYSTEM – Vehicles Cell Phones – I phones or Smart Phones used as a security system detector.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title One Parent Involvement
Advertisements

(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
FRANKLIN PUBLIC SCHOOLS SCHOOL COMMITTEE MAY 27, 2014 Massachusetts Kindergarten Entry Assessment (MKEA)
Goals of Title II, Part D of No Child Left Behind The primary goal of this part of NCLB is to improve student academic achievement through the use of technology.
Technology Planning & ePeGS David W. Dillard David W. Dillard.
Parent Engagement: The Law, Assessment, Strategies and Evaluation District (LEA) and School/Building Expectations and Requirements.
1 Workshop Part I: Federal Monitoring Basics Victoria Rankin, Greta Colombi, and Alexandra Woods NDTAC.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Do Now: Matching Game  Match the numbers from Column A to the clues in Column B to learn fun facts about Title IIA Massachusetts Department of Elementary.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title I, Part D—Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children.
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
CESA 10 February,  Overview of the the legal requirements  Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) formerly known as No Child Left Behind.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
9/2/20151 Ohio Family and Children First An overview of OFCF structure, membership, and responsibilities.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Subrecipient Monitoring FY15 of Education Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Federal Programs Federal Programs Office of Titles I, II, III,
Ensuring Exemplary Instruction for the Students Behind the Data Linking Informal Observation to Performance Measures.
Title I, Part A Fiscal Requirements for Comparability FY Oklahoma State Department of Education Office of Title I, IIA, VI, & X December 2012.
Special Education Briefing April 10, 2015 HAWAII STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HawaiiPublicSchools.org.
ACADEMIC SERVICES DIVISION. ACADEMIC SERVICES In other words, Chapters 4, 5, and 6 of your charter.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Fall 2012 LEP Coordinator Meeting Helga Fasciano Section Chief, K-12 Programs Federal Update.
Successful Program Implementation: Meeting Compliance Statutes Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title.
Single Plan for Student Achievement Session #2.
Enhancing Education Through Technology (Ed Tech) Title IID Competitive Grants Michigan Department of Education Information Briefing July 17 and.
Title I, Part B (Subpart 3) Even Start Family Literacy Equitable Services to Private Schools: Program Specifics.
Technology Literacy by Grade 8 Grant To assist every student in crossing the digital divide by ensuring that every student is technologically literate.
NCLB Federal Funding Planning Meeting Private Non Profit Schools LEA Date.
Title I, Part A Improving Basic Programs Program Requirements and Guidelines.
Statewide System of Support The Ohio Story: Federal Response.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
1 Division of Public Schools (PreK -12) Florida Department of Education Florida Education: The Next Generation DRAFT March 13, 2008 Version 1.0 Office.
Title III Desk Monitoring Oregon Department of Education September 24,
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Historical and Legal Perspectives of Assistive Technology BJ Gallagher, Ph.D., CCC-SLP.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
WELCOME Title I School-wide Open House EWING PUBLIC SCHOOLS
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
PrevNext | Slide 1 MANS 2006 Michigan Educational Technology Standards and Expectations METS - Students October 19, 2006 Ron Faulds Michigan Department.
Title I, Part A Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Lynn Sodat Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
TOM TORLAKSON State Superintendent of Public Instruction CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Title.
South Hunterdon Regional School District Consolidated Monitoring Report (CMR) Presentation to the SHRSD Board of Education on October 26, 2015 Audit from.
Taft Elementary Title Meeting. AGENDA What is Title 1? Action Plan: What does it look like at Taft Elementary? Assessment Title Policy Parent Conferences:
Federal Programs Academy January ……just an fyi  NO WORD on 21 st Century Community Learning Centers Awards!  Keystones to Opportunities pre-application.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
8 th Grade Technology Competency Test Michelle Obert Instructional Technology Specialist
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
Parental Involvement Staff Training
Butte Falls Charter School Open House & Annual Title I Meeting
Presented by Sarah Martinez and Patricia Meyertholen June 2, 2016
Family Engagement Coordinator Meeting July 25, 2018
Equitable Services Under ESSA
Sarah Martinez Patricia Meyertholen June 23, 2016
Parent Involvement and No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
ESSA Updates for Title V, Part B, Subpart 2
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 2
Cross Elementary School Annual Title I Meeting
Preparing for Federal Program Monitoring Title I, Part D, Subpart 1
Title I Document Training, Revision, Input Meeting
2019 Title I Annual Parent Meeting
Presentation transcript:

VIRTUAL monitoring

What is Virtual Monitoring EXAMPLES:  STAR SYSTEM – Vehicles Cell Phones – I phones or Smart Phones used as a security system detector for vehicles  Viper Car Alarm System – Remote views vehicle Interactive White Boards – Records presentations or trainings  Laptops, Desktops, I-Pads, etc. - Home Security, Video Conferencing, Webinars, On-Line Chats 2

What Purpose does Virtual Monitoring Serve Government Performance Results Act of 1993 For strategic planning and performance measurement To cut waste and inefficiency To improve program efficiency and effectiveness The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 requires the state education agency to ensure that programs and activities are implemented as stipulated in the law. The Guam Department of Education is responsible for adopting and using proper methods of administering each program included in the No Child Left Behind Act. Section of EDGAR (Education Department General Administrative Rules) requires grantees to monitor their sub-grantees to ensure compliance with applicable federal requirements and that performance goals are being achieved. Virtual On-Site Monitoring is a way of identifying and correcting problems in program policies and operations. 3

Federal Grant Monitoring Plan Monitoring Plan and Design Goal: To facilitate the comprehensive and integrated use of educational technology into instruction and curricula to improve teaching and student achievement. 4

 Timeline  Topics of Discussion  Video Technology  Request for Materials  Visit Planner  Agenda  Specific Dates  The Visit  Programs to be Monitored  Site Visit Report  Participants  Outlying Area’s Response  Letter to the Commissioner  Final Site Visit Report 5

Audio Conference 6 Example Date: Thursday, June 7, 2012 at 8 a.m. (ChST) Topic: Successful strategies in establishing effective communication and implementing meaningful private school consultation Conversation with school division and private school personnel To access: CALL IN NUMBER; enter conference code xxxxxx when prompted.

Virtual Monitoring What to Expect US-Ed Lead Team contacts SEA counter-part to begin scheduling process, but formal invitation sent to the Commissioner and he/she designates a coordinator for SEA (Federal Programs Division). 1 and ½ Day meeting with Fiscal, Federal Program Office, Program Office Staff and others as appropriate and the Title V-A LEA representative (dependant on what program will have a site visit). Follow-up Report. 7

Virtual Monitoring Site Visit Topics Covered Overall Federal Grant Fiscal Management Overall Management of Grants Processes Requirements and Experiences with Each Grant Program. 8

School Division:State Program Officer: Date of Review:LEA Program Coordinator: PNP Staff: 9 I.Program GoalsRequirement Being Met? DocumentationSchool Division Response (Actions taken or to be taken, if areas of concern, including a timeline for completion) A.To assist every student in crossing the digital divide by ensuring that every student is technologically literate by the time the student finishes the eighth grade, regardless of the student's race, ethnicity, gender, family income, geographic location, or disability. Guiding Questions: 1. Has the school division developed a method of assessing student technology literacy? 2. Does the school division have information on the technology literacy level of its students? A.To improve student academic achievement through the use of technology in elementary schools and secondary schools. Yes or No

USDOE Focus Partnership – working with the State to ensure: – Compliance – Grants Management – Accountability – Fiscal Control 10

GET READY for your Virtual On-Site Monitoring with USDOE COMING SOON TO A SCHOOL DISTRICT NEAR YOU 11