By Alexander M. Barker. Born as a slave in the late 1700s Owned by the Blow family Parents are unknown Lived in Southampton County, VA Moved to Alabama;

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Kansas-Nebraska Act Dred Scott Case Pages Workbook 88.
Advertisements

Dred Scott v Sanford. Who was Dred Scott? A slave born around the 1800’s Married fellow slave: Harriet Robinson 2 children: Eliza and Lizzie Died: Sept.
Dred Scott And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor And The case for freedom By: Nate Widitor.
The Dred Scott Decision
II. Basis of Citizenship
Chapter 9 Section 3 Troubles Build. 1) The debate over slavery was turning ________________________. Senator __________________________ of Massachusetts.
Road to Civil War Challenges to Slavery p
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857). Background: The Missouri Compromise 1803: U.S. purchases Louisiana Territory from France 1820: Compromise allows slavery.
Extending Rights to All present What documents and institutions protect the rights of Americans?
Dred Scott Decision, March 1857 Dred Scott was a slave who moved from a Missouri a slave state to free states Illinois and Wisconsin In 1846 Scott sues.
Causes of the American Civil War. The Missouri Compromise of 1820 The U.S. needs a balance of Free and Slave States. Why? Henry Clay (The Great Compromiser)
 Dred Scott v. J. A. Sanford (1857).   Who was Dred Scott?  Events Affecting Dred Scott’s fate  Timeline of Events  The Two Sides of the Issue 
A Nation Divided Political Divisions Chapter 15, Section 3 Pages
Causes of the Civil War and The Election of 1860 We will look at events that polarized the country, including the 1860 election. We’ll compare that election.
Dred Scott Decision :The Worst Decision the Supreme Court Ever Made Dred Scott was a slave from Missouri. (MO) Dred Scott.
The Court ruled that Scott's "sojourn" of two years to Illinois and the Northwest Territory did not make him free once he returned to Missouri.
Historical Discussions Congress Passes the Kansas-Nebraska Act The Republican Party is Founded The Supreme Court Hands Down The Dred Scott Decision The.
II. Basis of Citizenship. A. National Citizenship Founders let states decide who was a citizen Naturalization – Legal process by which a person is granted.
Griffin Honeycutt Block 2 October 29,  Official Name- Dred Scott v. John F. A. Sandford  The defendant’s name was actually Sanford, but was misspelled.
V. Sanford Dred Scott A presentation presented by Paola Garcia.
Chapter 15, Section 3 Challenges to Slavery.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
The Path to the Civil War Pre-constitution law Prohibited slavery in the new territories Founding Fathers’ plans for the eventual end of slavery? #1: The.
 By: Kylisha Smith and Hasan Evans.  Dred is an slave who lived in the free state of Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving back.
Dred Scott. Background Scott was the slave of an Army surgeon who took him from Missouri to posts in Illinois and modern day Minnesota. Scott was the.
Fill in your “Describing Historical Event” handout using the following PowerPoint presentation. If you need extra space use the back of your handout. Aim:
APUSH – Spiconardi.   In the 1830s, Dred Scott, a slave, accompanied his owner from Missouri to Illinois and later the territory of Wisconsin  Scott.
The Crisis Deepens & Start of the War Chapter 14.
Lesson 18: The Union in Peril part 7
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Deaton US History.   What Rights do you have as a citizen? Citizen Rights.
APUSH Review: Dred Scott v. Sanford Everything You Need to Know About Dred Scott v. Sanford To Succeed In APUSH
Dred Scott v. Sandford By Chloe Sturges. Overview Dred Scott, a slave in the 1800s, was taken out of Missouri, a slave state, by his owner John Emerson.
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
Ch. 15, Section 3: Challenges to Slavery pg. 445  Main Idea: Social, economic, and political differences divided the North and South.  Key Terms:  Arsenal.
Compromises and Events that Led to the Civil War.
By Greg Munetz. He was born a slave in 1795 in Southampton County, Virginia He was industrious and intelligent, he served as a farmhand, a stevedore,
Tyler Kennedy Nick Logan.  Born a slave to the Blow family  Sold to Army Surgeon named Dr. John Anderson  Owner died then got a new owner  Lived in.
Dred Scott V. Sanford 1858 Julien Mercier and Kendal Kulp.
By: Mireina Barrios. Dred Scott and Roger B. Taney Dred Scott, a slave who had his freedom at Illinois and the free territory of Wisconsin before moving.
Back to the 1850’s… Law in the 1850’s. Rights of African Americans Still the Fugitive Slave Act Whether free or slave you could NOT be citizen Still segregation.
How did the Civil War test and transform the American Constitutional system? Lesson 17.
Dred Scott v. Sandford A Supreme Court Decision in 1857.
Standard 9 Sectionalism in the Antebellum Era sectionalism These regional differences increased sectionalism–placing the interests of a region above.
Kansas-Nebraska Act (1854) 1854 Law that allowed for popular sovereignty in the Kansas and Nebraska Territories Devised by the “Little Giant” Stephen Douglas.
The 10 events that led to the American Civil War.
Dred Scott.  I can explain how the Dred Scott Court decision impacted African Americans during the time before the Civil War.
The Road to the Civil War. Republicans Challenge Slavery People were looking for a new political party that would share concerns about the spread of slavery.
Ch:14 The Nation Divided :3 The Crisis Deepens.
WhoA Missouri slave What When Where Why Concept Development: Dredd Scott was a slave who argued for his freedom to the Supreme Court. Dredd Scott vs. Sanford.
21.6 & 21.7: The Dred Scott Case & Decision Page
On your own and on the worksheet provided: 1) Write a definition for the word property. 2) List some examples of property.
America’s Civil War Page 11.
Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Dred Scott
Pre-Civil War Events Ms.Bean.
Dred Scott.
Dred Scott v. Sandford (1857)
Dred Scott Presentation created by Robert Martinez
Opener – Copy into Notebook pp. 84
The Dred Scott Case and the Election of 1860
Background: Who was Dred Scott?
Challenges to Slavery 15-3
Famous Abolitionists.
FOA 2/29/16 1. What did the Kansas-Nebraska Act actually do?
To do this, Congress repealed (ended) the Missouri Compromise line at 36˚30’ in the western territories.
Dred Scott Decision Scott was not a citizen, could not sue
And The case for freedom
Dred Scott Decision (1857).
The Freed Man Shall Not Be Free
Presentation transcript:

By Alexander M. Barker

Born as a slave in the late 1700s Owned by the Blow family Parents are unknown Lived in Southampton County, VA Moved to Alabama; then Missouri, along with Blow family page/3/

Robert Blow, Dred’s owner, died in the 1830s Dred was bought by Dr. John Emerson Emerson was an army doctor He took Dred to Illinois, Wisconsin, Louisiana, and Missouri He also took Dred to Fort Armstrong and Fort Snelling

While at Fort Snelling, Dred met and fell in love with Harriet Robinson She was a slave owned by another army doctor They were soon wed Ownership of Harriet was transferred over to Dr. Emerson They later had two daughters, Eliza and Lizzie scotth/index.html

Dr. Emerson died in 1843 In 1846, Dred attempted to buy the freedom of he and his family from the doctor’s widow She refused his offers He took his case to the Circuit Court

During he and his family’s time with Dr. Emerson, he had taken them to Illinois and the Wisconsin territory These places both prohibited slavery Dred lived in Missouri at the time that he sued Missouri had a “once free, always free” policy This policy said that any slave that spent time in a free state at any point could sue for their freedom and win security-systems/illinois/

At first, Dred was not able to prove that Dr. Emerson had purchased him He lost the first trial on a technicality because of this

Dred made another attempt at winning his freedom through the Circuit Court Two sons of Dred’s original owner, Peter Blow, testified that Dred had been bought by Dr. Emerson Case was technically over in 1850 In 1852, case was moved to Missouri Supreme Court Dred and his family were technically free until case in pinsker/2012/02/13/dred-and-harriet-scott/

Case began in 1852 Reversed the Circuit Court’s decision, making Dred and his family slaves yet again Dred brought the case before the U.S. Supreme Court He hoped they would reverse the Missouri Supreme Court’s decision

Seven of nine justices had been appointed by pro- slavery presidents of Southern origin Five were from slave-holding families At first, it seemed likely that the Supreme Court would simply throw the case out A previous case had given states the right to treat their citizens as they see fit Dred argued that he and Sandford were from different states Case was accepted

Mrs. Emerson’s attorneys argued that slaves could only be set free with consent of their master Mrs. Emerson’s attorneys also questioned constitutionality of Missouri Compromise Dred continued to use the “only free, always free” policy and use the sons of his original owner as witnesses

Chief Justice Roger B. Taney wrote the court’s majority opinion The ruling specified that: Dred was not a U.S. citizen Dred had no right to sue in a federal court No black could ever be a U.S. citizen No black could “have rights that the white man were bound to respect” The Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and had to done away with merican/scott/scott.asp

Chief Justice Taney claimed that the Missouri Compromise broke the Fifth Amendment by taking away property without due process of law Said that all blacks were property, so they could not be U.S. citizens or have rights

Mrs. Emerson’s new abolitionist husband, Dr. Calvin Chaffee, transferred Dred and his family ownership to Taylor Blow Taylor Blow set Dred and his family free Dred worked as a porter at Barnum’s Hotel, and died a year later, in 1858 Lizzie, Dred’s daughter, got married Harriet lived with Lizzie and her husband until her death in

Contentment in South, because slavery was virtually secure Outrage in North and West Abolitionists were enraged and insulted the Supreme Court Westerners feared the spread of slavery would disrupt their economic system Tension between pro-slavery advocates and abolitionists dramatically increased To this day, the ruling is known as one of the most controversial rulings in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court

Due to the Supreme Court’s ruling, Congress could no longer prevent slavery from spreading or remove it from places it had already been established This put an end to peaceful means of ending slavery The only option was violence South Carolina succeeded in 1860, and the battle at Fort Sumter officially started the war that would end slavery Decision of Dred Scott v. Sandford essentially made the Civil War inevitable Connecticut-Focus--February-26th--March-4th---March- 18th.html?soid= &aid=ATb71FdYCLY

32a. The Dred Scott Decision. n.d. (accessed November 21, 2014). Dred Scott. n.d. (accessed November 21, 2014). Dred Scott's Fight for Freedom n.d. (accessed November 21, 2014). Kermit L. Hall, James W. Ely Jr. "Scott v. Sandford." In The Oxford Guide to United States Supreme Court Decisions, by James W. Ely Jr. Kermit L. Hall. Oxford University Press, Missouri's Dred Scott Case, n.d. (accessed November 21, 2014).