DE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct 17 1998)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Present Assembly Status Three important milestones completed: – We tried the entire assembly procedure on real modules and it worked – The construction.
Advertisements

Investigations of Semileptonic Kaon Decays at the NA48 Еxperiment Milena Dyulendarova (University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”) for NA48 Collaboration.
Status of DHCAL Slice Test Data Analysis Lei Xia ANL-HEP All results preliminary.
1 STAR TOF Calibration. 2 Detectors TPC(TPX) - tracking MRPC TOF (TOFr) – stop time measurement pVPD/upVPD - start time measurement Particle momentum;
14 Sept 2004 D.Dedovich Tau041 Measurement of Tau hadronic branching ratios in DELPHI experiment at LEP Dima Dedovich (Dubna) DELPHI Collaboration E.Phys.J.
Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Signal Processing in PHAT (P. Decowski, A. Olszewski, H. Pernegger, P. Sarin) Outline –Requirement for the signal calculation –Layout of the measurement.
Design and test of a high-speed beam monitor for hardon therapy H. Pernegger on behalf of Erich Griesmayer Fachhochschule Wr. Neustadt/Fotec Austria (H.
The Time-of-Flight system of the PAMELA experiment: in-flight performances. Rita Carbone INFN and University of Napoli RICAP ’07, Rome,
1 M. Bonesini - CM 25 RAL 5/11/09 PID status report M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LBNE R&D Briefing May 12, 2014 LArIAT and LBNE Jim Stewart LArIAT EPAG Chair BNL LBNE LARIAT-EPAG J. Stewart BNL T. Junk.
PPR meeting - January 23, 2003 Andrea Dainese 1 TPC tracking parameterization: a useful tool for simulation studies with large statistics Motivation Implementation.
06/03/06Calice TB preparation1 HCAL test beam monitoring - online plots & fast analysis - - what do we want to monitor - how do we want to store & communicate.
GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.
Feb 10, 2005 S. Kahn -- Pid Detectors in G4MicePage 1 Pid Detector Implementation in G4Mice Steve Kahn Brookhaven National Lab 10 Feb 2005.
VC Feb 2010Slide 1 EMR Construction Status o General Design o Electronics o Cosmics test Jean-Sebastien Graulich, Geneva.
Possibility for Double DVCS measurement in Hall A Alexandre Camsonne SBS Meeting June 4 th 2013.
Preliminary results with the Alibava Telescope G. Casse, S. Martì, J. Rodriguez, I. Tsurin and the Alibava collaboration 1 G. Casse,20th RD50 Workshop,
TOF, Status of the Code F. Pierella, Bologna University and INFN TOF Offline Group ALICE Offline Week, June 2002.
M. Chefdeville LAPP, Annecy, France. Introduction  Motivations for a Digital hadronic calorimeter Count hits instead of measuring energy deposits Reduce.
1 Behaviour of the Silicon Strip Detector modules for the Alice experiment: simulation and test with minimum ionizing particles Federica Benedosso Utrecht,
CALICE Digital Hadron Calorimeter: Calibration and Response to Pions and Positrons International Workshop on Future Linear Colliders LCWS 2013 November.
Silicon Front End Electronics and Data Acquisition System for PHOBOS experiment at RHIC Pradeep Sarin for PHOBOS Collaboration October Fall 2000.
January 31, MICE DAQ MICE and ISIS Introduction MICE Detector Front End Electronics Software and MICE DAQ Architecture MICE Triggers Status and Schedule.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting Rutherford Appleton Lab Tuesday 25 th April 2006 M. Ellis.
Observation of light nuclei with PAMELA Roberta Sparvoli Laura Marcelli, Valeria Malvezzi, Cristian De Santis and the PAMELA Collaboration.
FIT (Fast Interaction Trigger) detector development for ALICE experiment at LHC (CREN) Institute for Nuclear Research (INR RAS) National Research Nuclear.
Instrumentation and Simulations for Target Test MICE Collaboration Meeting 22 October Bill Murray 1, Paul Soler 1,2, Kenny Walaron 1,2 1 Rutherford.
KEK Test Beam Phase I (May 2005) Makoto Yoshida Osaka Univ. MICE-FT Daresbury Aug 30th, 2005.
The experimental setup of Test Beam HE EE ES BEAM  A slice of the CMS calorimter was tested during summer of 2007 at the H2 test beam area at CERN with.
Particle Identification with TRD Prashant Shukla Institute of Physics University of Heidelberg Presentation at International Workshop on TRD 27 th September.
Particle Identification. Particle identification: an important task for nuclear and particle physics Usually it requires the combination of informations.
5-9 June 2006Erika Garutti - CALOR CALICE scintillator HCAL commissioning experience and test beam program Erika Garutti On behalf of the CALICE.
STAR Collaboration Meeting, BNL – march 2003 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC Update Update on EMC –Hardware installed and current.
STAR Analysis Meeting, BNL – oct 2002 Alexandre A. P. Suaide Wayne State University Slide 1 EMC update Status of EMC analysis –Calibration –Transverse.
CP violation in B decays: prospects for LHCb Werner Ruckstuhl, NIKHEF, 3 July 1998.
Feasibility study of Heavy Flavor tagging with charged kaons in Au-Au Collisions at √s=200 GeV triggered by High Transverse Momentum Electrons. E.Kistenev,
11 October 2002Paul Dauncey - CDR Introduction1 CDR Introduction and Overview Paul Dauncey Imperial College London.
Luminosity Monitor Design MICE Collaboration Meeting 31 May 2009 Paul Soler.
Low Momentum dE/dx Testbeam H.P. 7/24/98. Goals for Spectrometer are based on tracking and PID –Multiparticle correlation –production of particle species.
1 Performance of a Magnetised Scintillating Detector for a Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting U.C. Irvine Monday 21 st August 2006 M. Ellis & A. Bross.
M. Bonesini - CM 22 RAL October 081 TOF0 status M. Bonesini Sezione INFN Milano Bicocca.
ch/~bdl/lepc/lepc.ppt 1 MICE Status and Plans Rikard Sandström Université de Geneve International Scoping Study CERN,
PHOBOS at RHIC 2000 XIV Symposium of Nuclear Physics Taxco, Mexico January 2001 Edmundo Garcia, University of Maryland.
BESIII offline software group Status of BESIII Event Reconstruction System.
QM2002 (July / / Nantes / France)Susumu SATO (JSPS) for the PHENIX collaboration page 1 Susumu SATO Japan Society for the Promotion of Science,
Layout and test of silicon pad detectors for the PHOBOS experiment at RHIC Heinz Pernegger for the Phobos collaboration Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Nikhef Scientific Meeting 2000Onne Peters D0 Muon Spectrometer December 14-15, Amsterdam Onne Peters Nikhef Jamboree 2000.
Particle Identification of the ALICE TPC via dE/dx
Mark Rayner – Analysis SessionCM25, 4 November The TOF detectors: Beyond particle identification Mark Rayner The University of Oxford MICE CM25.
SHIP calorimeters at test beam I. KorolkoFebruary 2016.
14/06/2010 Stefano Spataro Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Status of LHE Tracking and Particle Identification Stefano Spataro III Panda.
0 Characterization studies of the detector modules for the CBM Silicon Tracking System J.Heuser 1, V.Kyva 2, H.Malygina 2,3, I.Panasenko 2 V.Pugatch 2,
Electromagnetic Physics Working Group discussion
The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment
Status Report Fenfen An
Marcin Chrząszcz Cracow University of Technology Itamar Levy
Luminosity Monitor Status
CMS Preshower: Startup procedures: Reconstruction & calibration
Measurements of Cosmic-Ray Lithium and Beryllium Isotopes
Sergey Abrahamyan Yerevan Physics Institute APEX collaboration
Test Beam Measurements october – november, 2016
Study of dE/dx Performance in TPC at CEPC
Commissioning of the ALICE-PHOS trigger
Particle ID Diagnostics in the MICE Beamline
The LHCb Level 1 trigger LHC Symposium, October 27, 2001
The CMS Tracking Readout and Front End Driver Testing
J. Rutherfoord & P. Schacht 17 May 2004
August 19th 2013 Alexandre Camsonne
Presentation transcript:

dE/dx measurement with Phobos Si-pad detectors - very first impressions (H.P Oct )

What characterizes dE/dx in Si? In the MIP range: –measure momentum and and amplitude for which particles are minimum ionizing in thin silicon detectors In the high p range: –measure the relativistic rise of dEdx and compare it to predictions (Bethe Bloch, Geant) In the low p range: –measure the 1/beta-part of dE/dx for poins and kaons –characterize the energy different momenta and particles for PID –try to measure the signal range for stopping particles

What do we need for this measurement The Silicon detector: –use final 4 planes of the spectrometer type 1 modules –small pads -> good and full tracking –high S/N -> good energy loss measurement –8 sensors & 96 chips -> minimize systematic error, give redundancy and allow cross checks The TOF: –provides pi/K seperation and particle identification in the low p range Cerenkow counters: –suppress e- back ground of secondary beams We need to do a real precision measurement! -> Use final PHOBOS calibration –allows to get very high precision dE/dx to better than 1%

Our setup: The high momentum beam line: –pi- beam from 0.5 to 8GeV/c The low momentum beam line (The E913 beam in C6) –pi-/K- beam line from 300MeV/c to 750 MeV/c Trigger scCerenkowPhobos4 planes of Spectrometer Paddletype 1 modules TOF start(Degarder)Phobos 4 planes of TOF stopCerenkow Paddle (Trg) type 1 modules

The Readout system Based on VME analog readout system developed by HEPHY/Vienna –repeater cards inplace of FEC and sends analog signals via 20m cables to dedicated VME ADCs (0.6 to 40MHz 12-bit) –uses 40MHz ADC to digitize TOF data –readout is based on 1 Pentium II and a simple PCI-VXI interface card and LabWindows The calibration is based on the final PHOBOS calibration card build by FH, Wr. Neustadt, Austria –uses 12 DAC voltage –switched with 20ns rise time on the calibration capacitor –linearity better than 0.5%

The system performance = Excellent! Si- system: –a channel system –Signal/Noise was about 17:1 to 18:1 –about 60/12300 channel noisy –total efficiency about 98 % The TOF: –largely based on the PHOBOS paddle counter –resolution about 200ps (average over 2/3 of the paddle acceptance) (TDC intrinsic resolution about 120ps) The DAQ: –transfered RAW data in NON-SUPPRESSED mode with up to 100Hz ! –Limited only by CPU time and disk access

The PHAT analysis software is ready ALL analysis is based on standard PHAT routines Parts implemented: –all detector data unpacking routines are prepared –the full geometry is described –ready for track fitting –a first version for signal calculation is implemented Some parts still to go –implement calibration –tune signal calculation

Let’s get to the “first impressions” on the data quality The high p range: –aim to determine what a “MIP” is in thin silicon detector –measure dE/dx up from 0.5 to The beam and trigger –pi- beam –veto e- with Cerenkow –muon contents <2% –no protons –delta p/p = 0.5% –chross checked absolut energy with calorimeter - better an 4% Recorded tracks at each energy point:= 200k hits energies: 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8 GeV/c

Measurement precision WITHOUT good calibration already 1-2%!

The low p range and energy straggling: –aim to determine pi and K seperation –get energy straggling data at low momenta –test dE/dx PID The beam and trigger –pi-/K- beam (60:40) –veto e- with Cerenkow –muon contents <2% –delta p/p = 4% –use energy calibration files of E913 Recorded tracks at each energy point:= 200k hits energies: 285, 500, 620, 750 MeV/c and 4 degrader with lower energies for pi

Kaons Pions Not yet looked at!

YES - we did get stopping particles ! (pi-) –use paddle counter a veto –trigger now only on small area finger counter (1cm2) –use a 4.5 inch steel degrader –energy after degrader about 80MeV/c for cross check used detector part which is not in beam recorded data –with veto counter to enhance stopping events (low p tail selection) –without veto counter to cross check rates –with veto as trigger (high p tail selection) we have very limited data but can get more on monday

30MIP signal 100MIP signal

Conclusion We have beautiful data! We measured: –the MIP point: measured –the relativistic rise: measured from 0.5 to 8GeV/c –dE/dx below one MIP: measured from 280 to 750 MeV/c for pi (500 to 750 MeV/c for K) –measured stopping particles and their signal range (try to get more statistics on Monday We can analyse: –energy loss over two orders magnitude in momentum! –Can fully characterise straggling over the full p range –Can explore our particle identification with REAL data –Can get ideas what to do with stopping particles …