Nina Dunham R&D Manager

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence into Practice: how to read a paper Rob Sneyd (with help from...Andrew F. Smith, Lancaster, UK)
Advertisements

Sundararaj Manou 1 Benjamin Rayner 2 Alison Lovatt 3 Introduction: Community acquired pneumonia is the fourth leading cause of death in the United Kingdom.
Critical Reading Strategies: Overview of Research Process
What is a review? An article which looks at a question or subject and seeks to summarise and bring together evidence on a health topic.
Study Objectives and Questions for Observational Comparative Effectiveness Research Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
Characteristics of research. Designed to derive generalisable new knowledge.
What are the differences between research, clinical audit and service evaluation?
Michael Clark PhD.  Both involve answering specific questions which relate to the quality of care.  They can both be carried out either prospectively.
A feasibility study to explore patient, clinician and GP decision making of acute recurrent tonsillitis for NATTINA: The NAtional Trial of Tonsillectomy.
ICGP Professional Competence System How to complete the cycle.
What is going on with psychotherapy today? Carolyn R. Fallahi, Ph. D.
The situation The requirements The benefits What’s needed to make it work How to move forward.
DECO3008 Design Computing Preparatory Honours Research KCDCC Mike Rosenman Rm 279
Chapter 11: Sequential Clinical Trials Descriptive Exploratory Experimental Describe Find Cause Populations Relationships and Effect Sequential Clinical.
Statistical presentation in international scientific publications 5. A statistical review (group work) Malcolm Campbell Lecturer in Statistics, School.
A HIERARCHY OF EVIDENCE WITHIN THE SCHOLARLY LITERATURE Shelly Warwick, Ph.D – Permission is granted to reproduce and edit this work for non-commercial.
Research problem, Purpose, question
By Dr. Ahmed Mostafa Assist. Prof. of anesthesia & I.C.U. Evidence-based medicine.
Introduction to evidence based medicine
Clinical Audit How to make it work Clinical Audit Department Last revised July 2009.
Are the results valid? Was the validity of the included studies appraised?
PROGRAMME Audits for the PGA in Professional Skills Thursday 26 August, CSB UHCW 2.30 – 3.15pmPGA and Audit Dr Paul O’Hare 3.15 – 3.30 pmBreak 3.30 – 4.30pmWorkshops.
Section 2: Science as a Process
Critical Reading. Critical Appraisal Definition: assessment of methodological quality If you are deciding whether a paper is worth reading – do so on.
Reading Scientific Papers Shimae Soheilipour
Presenter-Dr. L.Karthiyayini Moderator- Dr. Abhishek Raut
Clinical Audit as Evidence for Revalidation Dr David Scott, GMC Associate, Consultant Paediatrician and Clinical Lead for Children’s Services, East Sussex.
Medical Audit.
The Audit Process Tahera Chaudry March Clinical audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes through systematic.
CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE
What’s in the news right now related to science???? Flesh eating bacteria.
Systematic Reviews.
Plymouth Health Community NICE Guidance Implementation Group Workshop Two: Debriding agents and specialist wound care clinics. Pressure ulcer risk assessment.
LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT CLINIC Julia Taylor Nurse Consultant Salford Royal Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
Critical Appraisal of the Scientific Literature
Title of Scholar Project Month day, year Presenter: Supervisor(s): Critical Care Western.
Study Designs for Clinical and Epidemiological Research Carla J. Alvarado, MS, CIC University of Wisconsin-Madison (608)
Unit 1 Lesson 3 Scientific Investigations Copyright © Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.
EXPERIMENTAL EPIDEMIOLOGY
Introduction to Earth Science Section 2 Section 2: Science as a Process Preview Key Ideas Behavior of Natural Systems Scientific Methods Scientific Measurements.
Critical Reading. Critical Appraisal Definition: assessment of methodological quality If you are deciding whether a paper is worth reading – do so on.
(MEDICAL) CLINICAL AUDIT
Research Report. Introduction Introduce the research problem Introduce the research problem Why is the study important and to whom Why is the study important.
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Middle Step An evolving best practice model addressing the emotional needs of people with sight loss Carl Freeman Health and Social Care Policy Manager.
Unit 11: Evaluating Epidemiologic Literature. Unit 11 Learning Objectives: 1. Recognize uniform guidelines used in preparing manuscripts for publication.
Audit, Service Evaluation and Research Midhun Mohan STARSurg Steering Committee Protocol Launch Meeting and Research Skills Course September 16 th 2015,
Research Methods in Psychology Introduction to Psychology.
Dr Gen Wong Associate Clinical Director NHS Salford.
Training for organisations participating in Peer Review of Paediatric Diabetes.
Auditing Key Practice Indicators Workshop Henry Averns.
Intro to Qualitative Research Scientific Practice.
Linking research questions & design
Analytical Observational Studies
Research Into Practice
Understanding Quantitative Research
Implementation of Clinical Guidelines Author: dr. Martin Rusnák
Research Process №5.
Critical Reading of Clinical Study Results
Research Clinical Audit Service Evaluation
Characteristics of research
Reading Research Papers-A Basic Guide to Critical Analysis
EFFECTIVENESS OF CLINICAL AUDITS: USAGE OF A PDSA CYCLE
11/20/2018 Study Types.
CLINICAL RESEARCH: An Introduction
Sign critical appraisal course: exercise 2
Clinical Audit Summary Guide
Research & scholarship
Randomized Controlled Trial’s in a self-improving health system
Presentation transcript:

Nina Dunham R&D Manager Research or Audit? Nina Dunham R&D Manager

Introduction What is Research? What is Audit? Why Research & Audit get confused? How the Trust processes research & audit

Research A systematic investigation undertaken to discover facts or relationships and reach conclusions using scientifically sound methods. (Hockey, 1996)

Research Purpose – To provide new knowledge in order to set or change standards Methods – Randomised Trials etc… Data Analysis – Extensive statistical analysis Ethical & Trust Approval – Always required Sample size – statistically powered calculation

Research Significance – Statistical difference (hypothesis driven) Outcome – Improve knowledge Results, publications – Generalisable, publishable in peer reviewed journals Findings influence clinical practice as a whole

Example of Research Purpose – comparing recovery rates in surgical procedure A compared to surgical procedure B in patients with diabetes over the age of 65 Method – Randomised Clinical Trial (RCT) Data Analysis – Statistical analysis Sample size – n = statistically powered calculation Significance – statistical p value

Example of Research Outcome – Emperical Data which can be compared to existing knowledge and utilised in the decision making to use surgical procedure A as opposed to B Results – Generalisable, results can influence clinical practice as a whole, accepted and published in peer reviewed medical journals

Audit A quality improvement process that seeks to improve patient care and outcomes -through systematic review of care - against explicit criteria and the implementation of change (NICE 2003)

Audit Audits are cyclical – ie completion of audit cycle includes identifying areas of non-conformity with evidence based standards implementing practice changes to address these and then re-auditing standards of care

Audit Purpose – Tests conformity with evidence based standards Methods – Never involves allocation to different treatment groups Data analysis – Simple statistical analysis eg descriptive and unadjusted comparisons such as t-tests Ethic approval – not necessarily required

Audit Sample size – sufficiently large case number to influence practice based on audit findings Significance – Clinically meaningful performance indicators set against standards Outcome – Improved clinical practice Results – Audit methods and findings are usually locally implemented

Example of Audit Purpose – Surgical procedure A is recognised as a gold standard for patients over the age of 65 with diabetes Method – Case note review Data Analysis – Percentage of cases reviewed which meet the criteria Sample size – not statistically powered

Example of Audit Significant – acceptable adherence threshold may be set 100%, 90% or 80% dependent on practice being audited Outcome – improved clinical practice Results – Relevant to designated setting. Audit methods and findings may be of wider interested to be published.

Similarities between Research & Audit Research & audit involve answering a specific question relating to quality of care Both can be carried out either prospectively or retrospectively Both involve careful sampling, questionnaire design and analysis of findings Both activities should be professionally led

How the Trust processes Research & Audit The NHS clinical effectiveness initiative explicitly links research and clinical audit, “without research we won’t know what clinically effective practice is” “without audit we won’t know whether it is being practised”

How the Trust process Research & Audit In order to conform with the Research Governance Framework all research projects must have Ethical & Trust approval All Audit projects have to be processed through the Audit department using the CG1 form

How the Trust process Research & Audit What happens when there is a difference of opinion? Discussion between Ethics, Research & Audit dept Research Executive Group Medical Director

Further Information Research Dept – R&D Admin Porta Cabin, CHH Research Staff Intranet Pages Audit Dept – Hull Royal Infirmary Audit Staff University Web Site

Conclusion What is Research? What is Audit? Why Research & Audit get confused? How the Trust processes research & audit Where to find further information