CALIBRATION OF CURRENT INTEGRATORS USED WITH IONIZATION CHAMBERS V. Spasić Jokić, I. Župunski, B. Vujičić, Z. Mitrović, V. Vujičić, Lj.Župunski Faculty.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estimation of TLD dose measurement uncertainties and thresholds at the Radiation Protection Service Du Toit Volschenk SABS.
Advertisements

BIOPOTENTIAL AMPLIFIERS
Measurement of Voltages and Currents
Potentiostat Basics I’m Max Yaffe
VOLTMETER LOADING EFFECTS
1 Chapter 5 Sensors and Detectors A detector is typically the first stage of a communication system. Noise in this stage may have significant effects on.
II–3 DC Circuits II Applications Main Topics Example of Loop Currents Method Real Power Sources. Building DC Voltmeters and.
Uncertainties of measurement in EXCEL
1 Seventh Lecture Error Analysis Instrumentation and Product Testing.
REPUBLIC OF SLOVENIA MINISTRY FOR THE ENVIRONMENT AND SPATIAL PLANNING SLOVENIAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY Vojkova 1b, 1000 Ljubljana p.p. 2608, tel.: +386(0)1.
Lecture 6: Measurements of Inductance, Capacitance, Phase, and Frequency 1.
Classification of Instruments :
Lecture 3: Bridge Circuits
Calibration is a comparison between measurements of known magnitude with one device and another measurement made in as similar a way as possible with.
Chapter 1 INTRODUCTION. Instrumentation is a technology of measurement which serves sciences, engineering, medicine and etc. Measurement is the process.
Improving Test Ratios Using Reference Multimeters.
Development of An ERROR ESTIMATE P M V Subbarao Professor Mechanical Engineering Department A Tolerance to Error Generates New Information….
Training Learning to Work Efficiently and Accurately.
Training Making accurate Electrical Measurements.
Analog and Digital Instruments
INTRODUCTION TO MEASUREMENT
Measurement Uncertainty Information in
Quality Control Lecture 5
Your measurement technology partner for global competitiveness CSIR National Metrology Laboratory The National Metrology Laboratory of South Africa Feedback.
BENE 1183 ELECTRONICS INSTRUMENTATION NAME: AZDIANA MD. YUSOP ROOM NO
Uncertainties Using & Calculating Uncertainties for Electrical Measurement.
IPC-X 2005 October 6 th Uncertainty in Radiation Measurements and Calibrations1 Uncertainty in Radiation Measurements  Uncertainty budgets for each type.
1 Review from previous class  Error VS Uncertainty  Definitions of Measurement Errors  Measurement Statement as An Interval Estimate  How to find bias.
Doc.: IEEE /0333r0 Submission March 2006 Dr. Michael D. Foegelle, ETS-LindgrenSlide 1 Introduction to Measurement Uncertainty Notice: This document.
Uncertainty of measurement & Technical Specifications SAAMF Roadshow Durban CSIR NML Eddie Tarnow Metrologist: Torque & Automotive 14 June 2006.
Capacitive transducer. We know that : C=kЄ° (A/d) Where : K=dielectric constant Є° =8.854 *10^-12 D=distance between the plates A=the area over lapping.
Probability (Ch. 6) Probability: “…the chance of occurrence of an event in an experiment.” [Wheeler & Ganji] Chance: “…3. The probability of anything happening;
Copyright 2011 by Coleman & Steele. Absolutely no reproduction of any portion without explicit written permission. 1 UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS: A BASIC OVERVIEW.
Lecture 3: Bridge Circuits
USE OF UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT IN TESTING ROHAN PERERA MSc ( UK ), ISO/IEC Technical Assessor, Metrology Consultant.
Electronic Instruments
International Atomic Energy Agency Quality Management System ASSESSMENT OF OCCUPATIONAL EXPOSURE DUE TO EXTERNAL RADIATION SOURCES AND INTAKES OF RADIONUCLIDES.
BME 353 – BIOMEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENT PRINCIPLES.
Measurements Measurements and errors : - Here, the goal is to have some understanding of the operation and behavior of electrical test instruments. Also,
EMT 462 ELECTRICAL SYSTEM TECHNOLOGY Part 2: Instrumentation By: En. Muhammad Mahyiddin Ramli.
UNCERTAINTY OF MEASUREMENT Andrew Pascall Technical Director Integral Laboratories (Pty) Ltd
Building Valid, Credible & Appropriately Detailed Simulation Models
RPCs with Ar-CO2 mix G. Aielli; R.Cardarelli; A. Zerbini For the ATLAS ROMA2 group.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Lecture 8 – Quality management system Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of.
PCAR Precision In Practice 1 Precision In Practice Achieving the best results with precision Digital Multimeter measurements Paul Roberts Fluke Precision.
Home Reading Skoog et al. Fundamental of Analytical Chemistry. Chapters 5 and 6.
Workshop on Providing the traceability of measurements
Basics of Bypass Capacitor, Its Functions and Applications.
Establishing by the laboratory of the functional requirements for uncertainty of measurements of each examination procedure Ioannis Sitaras.
K.-D. Sommer 09/02 san_diego.ppt Modelling of Measurements for the Evaluation of the Measurement Uncertainty Klaus - Dieter Sommer Manfred Kochsiek San.
Residential Cabling Technologies Copyright © 2005 Heathkit Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved Electrical Measurements.
Mrs V.S.KharoteChavan,E&Tc,PC poly
MECH 373 Instrumentation and Measurements
Product Presentation T12 Thermometer.
Unit 11: Calibrating Instruments
Accuracy Significance in Measurement.
(4) Filters.
PROCAL UNCERTAINTIES CALCUATION OVERVIEW. PROCAL UNCERTAINTIES CALCUATION OVERVIEW.
Measurement Uncertainty and Traceability
Calibration of Weighing Instruments
Electrical Engineering Technology EE306
This teaching material has been made freely available by the KEMRI-Wellcome Trust (Kilifi, Kenya). You can freely download,
Introduction to Electrical Measurement
Uncertainty of Measurement
Digital instrumentation – Unit 1
Analog and Digital Instruments
Measurements Measurements and errors :
Measurement errors and uncertainties
Measurements & Error Analysis
Presented By: T.M Ramashidzha Metrology Scientist
Presentation transcript:

CALIBRATION OF CURRENT INTEGRATORS USED WITH IONIZATION CHAMBERS V. Spasić Jokić, I. Župunski, B. Vujičić, Z. Mitrović, V. Vujičić, Lj.Župunski Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad

S PECIFIC AIMS Purpose : trace the harmonization of uncertainty evaluation within accreditation framework Uncertainty estimation in accordance with the GUM but it is necessary to establish the method more suitable for the measurements in calibration laboratories Good metrology practice : evaluation of Type B uncertainty is particularly important and requires proper use of the available information is based on experience and skill.

D OSIEMETERS BASED ON I ONIZATION CHAMBERS Reading device The typical order of magnitude of ion currents: (10 -6 to ) A

R EADOUT CONSIDERATION Voltmeter function: The input resistance of an integrator is greater than 100 TΩ, the input offset current is less than 3fA. Ammeter function: can detect currents as low as 1fA Coulombmeter Function: Current integration and measurement as low as 10fC, has low voltage burden, (less than100μV).Currents as low as 1fA may be detected using this function Low current source + HV IC IC self capacitance = 100 pF

C URRENT INTEGRATOR For charge measurement For current measurement Capacitor in the feedback: ( ) F (calibrated within 0.1%) Conventional carbon resistors are available in values up to 10 8 

C ALIBRATION : WHICH SOLUTION IS THE ‘ BEST ’ Ionization chambers are used together with current integrators and they should be calibrated together Chamber is standard instrument Integrator is standard instrument Calibrated together as the same rank instruments Good reason for separate calibrations is that, one integrator is used with a number of chambers, so it would be inconvenient to calibrate it with every chamber.

Assumes user has a calibration factor for exposure N D for the ion chamber/ integrator combination in use But allows IAEA 398 SOLUTION D w,Q = M Q N D,w,Q o k Q,Q o beam quality factor calibration coefficient at Q o corrected instrument reading at Q P elec a factor allowing for separate calibration of the integrtor - here 1

Calibration method for a current-measuring feedback-controlled integrator The output impedance of the current source must be large compared to R.

Verification of dosimeters used in health care and radiation protection is a legal requirement in Serbia Verification is a subject of accreditation according to SRPS/ISO 17025

ISO 17025: G ENERAL REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMPETENCE OF TESTING AND CALIBRATION LABORATORIES EUROMET Project n. 830, “Comparison of small current sources” Laboratory for metrology at the Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad is accredited in terms of SRPS/ISO for verification of current integrators

C ALIBRATION OF CURRENT INTEGRATORS Suitable direct current source that simulate the output from ionizing radiation detectors. Range: 100 fA mA (uncertainty better than 0.05 %), depending of chamber type IEC Calibration: using method of direct measurement

S IMPLIFIED CALIBRATION SETUP - standard high impedance DC source Keithley 6220, - various standard resistors and capacitors and - digital multi-meter HP 3450 B

A CCREDITED METROLOGICAL LABORATORY FTN UNS

C ONCEPT OF UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION Model function for uncertainty estimation in the calibration procedure for current integrator can be expressed as I x - current read by integrator under the test; δI x – error of reading obtained by integrator under the test due to final resolution; I e – preset current (on current source) derived from the declaration of the manufacturer or calibration certificate

C ONCEPT OF UNCERTAINTY ESTIMATION Sensitivity coefficient is derived from expressions Calibration uncertainty for current integrator can be expressed as

RESULTS The main part of each calibration procedure is uncertainty estimation and design of uncertainty budget Uncertainty budget obtined during calibration procedure of current integrator type NP 2000 manufactured in OMH, Hungary Preset value: 2 nA Rectangular probability distribution was assumed

T HE UNCERTAINTY OF THE CURRENT SOURCE ITSELF Comes from several contributions: Capacitance calibration (5 ppm) Temperature coefficient (4 ppm/K) ac-dc difference Voltage reading (35 ppm) Triggering timing (1 ppm) Leak current compensation ( I + 10 aA)

Preliminary uncertainty assessment for the current generated by the source Only type B evaluation has been considered IU B (I)( k=2) 100 fA13 aA 1 pA48 aA 10 pA420 aA 100 pA4.2 fA

E STIMATION OF TYPE B UNCERTAINTY ASSUMPTIONS I = 2 nA Lower and Upper limit values: ( I - =I – Δ, I + =I+Δ ) Rectangular distribution: there is 100 % probability that the true value is found in the interval 2 nA I-I- I+I+

Step 1. Probability density p(x) for the distribution of current values as p(x)=C for I- Δ  x  I +Δ p(x)= 0 in all other cases E STIMATION OF TYPE B UNCERTAINTY

Step 2: Calculation of the best estimated value and variance

U NCERTAINTY BUDGET QuantityValue Uncertainty (Type) cici Integrator under the test 2,004 nA 0,00802 nA (A) Uncertainty due to final resolution of reading 100 fA 28,9 fA (B) 1 Preset current on DC source 2 nA 0,001 nA (B) Uncertainty of integrator 0,0081 nA

U NCERTAINTY BUDGET OF THE CURRENT TO VOLTAGE CALIBRATION FOR THE 100 P A, 10 P A AND 1 P A Uncertainty component 1 pA [ppm] 10 pA [ppm] 100 pA [ppm] Voltage measurement5010 Resistor value /f noise Current source10 Combined standard uncertainty Expanded uncertainty (k=2)

M EASUREMENT CAPABILITIES WITH UNCERTAINTY BUDGET IdV/dt Reference capacitor u 95 source u 95 integrator calibration 100 fA10 mV/s1 pF400 μA/A2 % 100 pA100 mV/s1 pF100 μA/A1 mA/A 1 pA100 mV/s10 pF20 μA/A500 μA/A 10 pA100 mV/s100 pF18 μA/A90 μA/A 100 pA100 mV/s1 nF10 μA/A70 μA/A The expanded uncertainty U with the coverage factor k = 2, corresponding to the 95% confidence level, is often used to represent the overall uncertainty, which relates to the accuracy of the measurement of the quantity Q.

CONCLUSION The current uncertainty permits the calibration of even the most accurate commercial meters present on the market. The source is simple, portable and based on low- cost electronics and equipment typically present in most electrical metrology calibration laboratory, where it could be efficiently employed.