HOT Lanes on I-77 What we don’t know… Sept 9, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Transportation Legislation Overview Presented By: Dwight L. Farmer, P.E. Executive Director/Secretary Hampton Roads Metropolitan Planning Organization.
Advertisements

American Trucking Associations National Association of Steel Pipe Distributors March 2007 Ray Kuntz Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Watkins and.
HOT Lanes on I-77 An imminent calamity Jan 14, 2013.
HOT Lanes on I-77 How did we get here and what do we do? October 30, 2014.
Presents. Tough Times For Transportation Funding Declining gas tax revenues Declining state revenues Uncertain federal revenue + Increasing construction.
Transportation’s Relation to Growth Management `.
1. Virginia’s Public-Private Transportation Act (PPTA) Northern Border Finance Workshop December 11, 2006 Thomas W. Pelnik III, P.E. Director, Innovative.
Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations Federal Highway Administration Department of Transportation Enabling Congestion Pricing in the.
Dulles Metro Extension Phase I: Tyson’s Corner Martene Bryan Luis Serna Matt Zarit.
21 st Century Committee Report Recommendations NC 73 Council of Planning Annual Meeting January 22, 2009.
North Carolina: Integrating Other Modal Elements into Performance-Based Analyses Pam Keidel-Adams.
North Corridor Commuter Rail The Case For Tax Increment Financing Mecklenburg County May 2007.
RIMMS RESOURCE INNOVATION MEDICAL MOBILITY SYSTEMS A Comprehensive Set of Development and Support Resources.
Presentation to the Subcommittee on Highways and Transit and the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure Peggy Catlin, Deputy Executive Director.
2014 Budget Department Presentations Infrastructure Funding Options.
Transportation Funding Act HB Up date Radney Simpson, Assistant State Transportation Planning Administrator Presented to Georgia Association of Metropolitan.
Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.
A New Regional Vision ASPA Conference April 2010 Steve Heminger, MTC Executive Director.
Michigan’s Roads Crisis: Study Findings, Conclusions and Where Do We Go From Here? Best Practices Conference Rick Olson, State Representative, 55 th District.
Commuter Transportation Benefits Plan An Employee Communication Presentation.
I-680 Value Pricing: A “Smart Carpool “ Lane Demonstration Project June 2004.
General Purpose Lanes on I-77 The Plan… February, 2015.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
1 North Carolina Department of Transportation Financial Overview Mark L. Foster April 20, 2010.
KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.
Transportation Program Status Orange County Transportation OCBC Infrastructure Committee Meeting April 14, 2009 Kia Mortazavi, OCTA, Executive Director,
ADOT Multimodal Planning Division Planning Assistance for Rural Areas (PARA) Program Overview December 4, 2013.
Authorization of a New Federal Transportation Program AASHTO Executive Director John Horsley Subcommittee on Design Albuquerque, New Mexico July 15, 2008.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
OPEN HOUSE #4 JUNE AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment.
Interstate 95 Corridor Improvement Program June 20, 2012.
WELCOME! July 31, 2012 ODOT District July 31, 2012 PURPOSE OF TONIGHT’S MEETING Introduce the project –Reconstruct I-75.
HOT Lanes on I-77 Widen I-77 Goes To Raleigh Apr 3, 2013.
1 CTC Discussion P3 Ingenuity Made Congestion Managing Pricing a Success James Martling, April 9, 2008.
Tom Norton, Executive Director Colorado Department of Transportation American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials September 9, 2003.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
May 21, SAFETEA Safe, Accountable, Flexible, and Efficient Transportation Equity Act of 2003.
HOT Lanes on I-77 What do we do now? July 24, 2014.
SAFETEA-LU System Management and Operations Key Provisions Jeff Lindley Office of Operations Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.
I-680 Value Pricing: A HOT Lane Demonstration Project of “Smart Carpool Lanes” Sponsor: Alameda County Congestion Management Agency 2003 Sponsor: Alameda.
HOT Lane Discussion Sept 4, CA 91 (LA Area) I-15 (San Diego) Some HOT Lane Examples.
North Carolina Transportation Issues David T. Hartgen, Ph.D., P.E. Emeritus Professor of Transportation Studies UNC Charlotte Remarks at the Shaftesbury.
HOT Lanes on I-77 Widen I-77 March 3, The Purpose of P3 Legislation Source: I-77 Mobility Partners Brief in Favor of Motion to Strike and In Opposition.
IH-10 Managed Lanes Project: A “Public-Public” Partnership ENGINEERS PLANNERS ECONOMISTS Wilbur Smith Associates Presented at the Value Pricing Conference.
HOT Lanes on I-77 More Questions Than Answers Feb 22, 2013.
P3 Failures and I-77: Mar 10, “Will It Happen Here?” Cornelius, NC Widen I-77.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
Successful Commute Programs Critical components include: 1.An active and informed Employee Transportation Coordinator (you!) 2.Guaranteed ride home 3.Parking.
Virginia House Bill 2 – Funding the Right Projects Intelligent Transportation System Activities May 19, 2016.
Beyond Oil Transforming Transportation: A National Demonstration Project Breakout Session: A New Paradigm - Future of Transportation, Funding, and Climate.
Response to Mercator Report
Englewood Mews HOA May 23, 2017 Michelle Holland, Megaprojects Communication Manager Virginia Department of Transportation John Morse, I-66 Project.
Using Public-Private Partnerships to Move More People The Story of HOT Lanes in Northern Virginia January 30, 2017 Morteza Farajian, Ph.D.
Calculating the benefits of Transit in North Carolina
Integrating Transit and Highway Solutions In High Volume Corridors
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
STI Prioritization and Programming Process
Charlotte Region Fast Lanes Study
I-77 High-Occupancy Toll Lanes
21st Century Transportation Committee Finance Subcommittee
Mobility Choice Blueprint
Mobility Fund High Impact/Low Cost Projects: Cape Fear RPO
HOT Lanes on I-77 Today vs 2010 May 6, 2013.
Presentation to DATA on VTrans 2040 / HB2
Undoing the “done deal”
An Easier Commute Coming Soon
Prioritization Explained
NCRR is helping build a strong economy that benefits the people of North Carolina. We do this most visibly with steel and wood. Even more important, we.
Presentation transcript:

HOT Lanes on I-77 What we don’t know… Sept 9, 2014

Overview  Project Scope  Toll Rates  Congestion  Ingress/Egress  Confidential Information

The Problem Congested stretch of four lane road from mm21 to exit 36… with “no money” to widen it

A Solution Add a general purpose lane in both directions 13 miles $ M (est) Source: “I-77 Feasibility Study,” December 7, 2009

The Current Plan Privately Operated Toll Lanes 27.5 Miles $655 M 50 year contract Cintra, a Spanish company Source: NCDOT Press Release, April 11, 2014 Why the difference?

Example: Toll Lane Flyover Source: NCDOT

The Cost Of Toll Lanes Source: I-77 JLTCO Report, , WI77 analysis

Taxpayer Obligation  Taxpayer Contribution$88M For private tolling lanes  Taxpayer Subsidy$75M To cover potential revenue shortfalls  Taxpayer Liability$215M Government-backed bonds Substantial Taxpayer Involvement for Having “No Money” Source: I-77 JLTCO Report, , WI77 analysis

How Toll Lanes Work  Built and operated under an exclusive 50 year contract  Vehicles with 3+ occupants use lane for free  Electronic Tolling- no toll booths  Guaranteed minimum speed  “Congestion pricing” More congestion in “free” lanes = higher price to use toll lanes  No limit on tolls Business Model Ensures Congestion

Toll Rates 2015 Source: I-77 HOT Lanes Technical Memorandum #6, Stantec, Sept 4, 2012 $20 Round Trip When Toll Lanes Open

Toll Rates 2035 Source: I-77 HOT Lanes Technical Memorandum #6, Stantec, Sept 4, 2012 $40 Round Trip In Twenty Years ???

Cintra’s Answer Source: “How much will I-77 tolls cost?”, WCNC, August 21, 2014

Congestion On General Lanes Difference AM Commute (Minutes) PM Commute (Minutes) Total (Minutes) Source: I-77 HOT Lanes Technical Memorandum #6, Stantec, Sept 4, 2012 Commute Time Lengthens By An Hour per Day Average Commute Time- Charlotte to Mooresville

Typical Access Point Source: Executed Comprehensive Agreement

Ingress & Egress Source: RFI for Senator Tarte, ; NCDOT “Managed Lanes” FAQ Exit 27 (Westmoreland) Exit ~20 (Hambright) Charlotte Exit 18 (WT Harris) Exit 13 (I-85) Existing LKN Exits Bypassed (23, 25, 28, 30) Mooresville Exit 36 (NC 150) Exit 31 (Langtree) ? ? ?

Patron Confidential Information  Foreign company could collect: Name, Address, Tel #, , credit card info Drivers license number Vehicle registration information Social Security Number Law enforcement records Financial profiles Medical data  Information shared with: NCDOT (upon request) Authorized employers or contractors Authorized collection agencies North Carolina Public Safety agency (for toll enforcement) Any other public law enforcement agency (for toll enforcement) Any governmental entity (under applicable law) Source: Executed Comprehensive Agreement, Sect 8.7, June 26, 2014

Private toll lanes…  Are Expensive $20 daily tolls  Ensure Congestion for 50 years Commute times nearly double  Bypass local businesses  Could collect significant personal data Can be shared widely  Siphon millions out of our local economy and send it to Spain Private Toll Lanes Are Not the Answer

Status  “Commercial Close” Signed June 26, 2014  “Financial Close” Q Time Is Short

Now What?

A New Funding Paradigm: STI  Passed last summer HB 817  Replaces Equity Formula Favored rural over urban areas  More data-driven Supposed to remove pork politicking

NCDOT STI Scores for I-77 Project How Does This Rank Against Other Statewide Projects?

 I77 General Purpose Lane Project I77 scores higher than 33 funded projects Projects to be funded Projects unfunded I-77 GP project through Lake Norman 73 “Statewide” funded projects 377 Unfunded Projects Highest scoring funded project Lowest scoring funded project A General Purpose Lane Project Would Likely Be Funded…

The Bad News: STI Corridor Cap  A maximum of 10% of projected funding in the “statewide” category  A “corridor” is defined as “any contiguous projects or group of projects”  Since I-77 South (i.e. Charlotte) scores higher it would use all corridor cap money  NCDOT says corridor cap applies... we disagree, but…

The Good News…  Corridor cap only applies to STATEWIDE Category  I-77 LKN could still be funded under Regional and Division categories 60% of total fundng ~$9B dollars  I-77 general use project eligible to be ranked as early as July 2014! Six Month Wait vs 50 Years of Tolls

What do we do now?  Apply pressure to rank the general use project under STI Local elected officials State representatives CRTPO  Seek to null the contract

About Widen I-77  A 501(c) organization  Donations are tax deductible  Subject to IRS reporting and auditing Our only shot at avoiding 50 years of tolls…

Thank You WidenI77 PO Box 792 Cornelius, NC wideni77.org

Appendix

Reprioritizing Transportation Funding Statewide (40%) ~$2.4B Regional (40%) ~$2.4B Division (20%) ~$1.2B Per capita by region Equally to Divisions Project Merit (Data) A B C D E F G Interstates/ NHS/STRAHNET /Tolls/Etc (S) + Hwys, Airport, Rail, Transit (S) + (R) + Local Three-Plus Chances for Funding GP Lanes HB817, Strategic Transportation Investments,

Strategic Mobility Fund- Criteria Benefit/Cost Congestion Economic competitiveness Freight Multi-modal Pavement condition Lane width Shoulder width 100% Statewide (40%) ~$2.4B Regional (40%) ~$2.4B Division (20%) ~$1.2B Benefit/Cost Congestion Economic competitiveness Freight Multi-modal Pavement condition Lane width Shoulder width 70% Local considerations 30% Benefit/Cost Congestion Economic competitiveness Freight Multi-modal Pavement condition Lane width Shoulder width 50% Local considerations 50% Much Greater Emphasis on Project Merit

NDOT Divisions