O BS Colorado 800 Grant Street, Suite 100 Denver, Colorado 80203 Telephone 303.832.2200 Fax 303.832.0400 1 Q ualifications.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Bargain Heart Surgeon: Are You Getting the Best Value From Your Professional Service Providers.
Advertisements

MASBO February Information to purchase Services Information to purchase Construction.
ENGINEERING The Future of Our World FIDIC Resources.
Session 8 Implementing PPPs
Selecting Contractors and Architects Hiring Architects and Engineers in Missouri Dwight Dickinson, AIA Missouri Association of Rural Education PART 1.
Gene Shawcroft, P.E. Central Utah Water Conservancy District April 29-30, 2013.
1 Opportunities Related to EPC Initiatives Support Services Management - NWC.
1 Last update: February 12, 2009 Is Your Selection Process Attracting the Right Consultants? Best Practices, Benefits and Insights to Using a Qualifications.
Procurement and Tendering Presentation to [NAME OF CLIENT] [YOUR NAME] [DATE]
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
QBS Colorado QBS Colorado QBS Colorado is an organization comprised of the Colorado chapters of AIA, ACEC, NSPE, and others; to be.
Legal Perspective on NDOT Alternative Procurements Geoffrey S. Petrov, Nossaman LLP.
Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build. Extensive master planning preceded this phase 2003 – Dagit Saylor Master Plan Hanbury Evans Update.
Determination of Construction Contract Duration for Public Projects in Saudi Arabia By: Ahmed Saleh Al-Sultan, June 1989 Presented by Sameh Elish January.
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
DESIGN PART 1 SELECTING THE DESIGNER AGREEMENT FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES.
Conclusion Finally… A Best Practice for Selecting Engineers From Vision to Reality Engineering Canada’s Future.
I ntroduction Finally… A Best Practice for Selecting Engineers From Vision to Reality Engineering Canada’s Future.
INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC PROCUREMENT
07/09/20051 Fédération Internationale des Ingénieurs-Conseils FIDIC Annual Conference Quality Procurement Workshop Beijing, China September 7, 2005 BEST.
Model Procurement Documents for Architectural Services [NAME] [PLACE] [DATE]
Large Public Works Projects and the General Contractor/ Construction Manager (GC/CM) Procedure: A New Way to Save Money, Time and Aggravation.
Using QBS A Qualifications-Based Selection Process Presenters: Ron Brenke, PE - QBS Manager.
Qualification Based Selection. Qualifications Based Selection – Basing selection of design professionals on their qualifications first and foremost through.
The Art of QBS Qualifications-Based Selection (QBS): Procuring Intellectual Services the Smart Way Claude Paul Boivin, ACEC Canada Title #1.
The Brooks A&E Act National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration Acquisition & Grants Office January 24, 2006.
The Importance of the Qualifications Based Selection (QBS) Process
QBS Colorado APA Colorado 2012 Conference “Planning Out of Bounds” Introduction to QBS Qualifications Based Selection October 5, 2012.
This Presentation is a Copyrighted Property of Waller S. Poage, AIA, CSI, MAI, CVS – All Rights are Reserved Session CDT 01 – Fundamentals Lesson CDT 1.3.
PREVENTION OF CORRUPTION IN PUBLIC PROCUREMENT Đinita Fočo.
The Best Practice: Selecting a Professional Consultant Canadian Public Procurement Forum October 6, 2010 FIDIC Resources.
Kimball Bullington, Ph.D. - MGMT Materials Management Systems Purchasing Chapter 7.
Growing the Value of Your Firm through Supplemental Architectural Services May 2011.
Best Value for Clients Presented to the Canadian Public Procurement Forum by Glenn Martin, Executive Director Consulting Engineers of BC November 4, 2009.
Module 10 Session 10.4 Visual 1 Module 10 Organizing Procurement Session 10.4 Procurement of Services: Use of Consultants and Developing Terms of Reference.
Solving Challenges Others Cannot Virginia’s Public Private Partnership Law Toyo University Tokyo, Japan Christopher D. Lloyd September 29, 2008.
1 Outsourcing: Managing the relationship Example: Reclining chair project FIGURE 12.1.
COFPAES Presentation on GSA Federal Supply Schedule/ Multiple Award Schedule Re: Architect-Engineer Services Brian Pallasch, CAE American Society of Civil.
Risk Assignment in The Delivery of a Project  RISK! –Construction projects have lot of it –Contractors manage it –Owners pay for it.
Governmental Procurement ISQA 440 Goals of Procurement Steps in the Procurement Cycle Specifications and Work Scopes 1.
Consultants' Competitive Negotiation Act Acquisition of professional architectural, engineering, landscape architectural, or surveying and mapping.
CHAPTER#08 MANAGEMENT OF TECHNICAL PROPOSALS AND SPECIFICATIONS Lecture No. 08 Course: Engineering Management 19 april 2013 MED DEPARTMENT, U.E.T TAXILA.
1 Procurement. 2 Overview Every municipality should keep procurement records that allow an auditor or other interested party to track the specific nature.
Two Heads are Better Than One Patrick Callahan, Snyder & Associates Handouts and presentation are available online at
Quality Based Selection The Best Practice for Selecting Professional Consultants [DATE]
Selecting Contractors and Architects Hiring Architects and Engineers in Missouri Dwight Dickinson, AIA Missouri Association of Rural Educators PART 1.
NREL is a national laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, operated by the Alliance for Sustainable.
Introduction Procurement of Consultant Services (based on PPA 2004 and Best Practices) Presented by: NM Lema Macrh, 2013.
An Introduction To Food Service Consulting FCSI & AIA Working Together.
Contractor Alternate Design Serving the Public’s Best Interest.
The Best Practice: Selecting a Professional Consultant Presented by John Gamble, P.Eng. President & CEO, ACEC-Canada.
Department of Education Race to the Top Assessment Program January 14, 2009 Public Meeting Procurement Issues Mark D. Colley 555 Twelfth Street, NW. Washington,
Elevating the Quality of Life in the District Contracting and Procurement Division Information Session 2 Request for Proposal November 5, 2015.
QBS Colorado FALL FORUM 2011 Daniel W. Akin, P.E. – P.L.S. Chairman QBS Colorado October 4, 2011.
College of Engineering CIVE 4750 Using QBS A Qualifications-Based Selection Process Adapted from a presentation by QBS, Inc. 215 N. Walnut St. Lansing,
CHAPTER 10 Implementing Achievable Plans. ANTICIPATING UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES  Human service organizations inadvertently experience unintended consequences.
CSO Observer Member of the Evaluation Committee. Civil Society Organization May have representation in the Evaluation Committee As a member of the Evaluation.
Solubilis Corporate Service. Company Registration of Directors  The directors stand in fiduciary relationship with the company registration services.
Introduction to Procurement for Public Housing Authorities Procurement Planning: Choosing a Contracting Method Unit 2.
BIMILACI 2007 Best Practice Procurement of Engineering Services Washington, D.C. May , 2007 Gregs Thomopulos, P.E., FACEC Executive Committee Member,
QUALIFICATIONS-BASED SELECTION
PRESENTER Jose A. Galan ▸ Division Director, Internal Services Department, Real Estate Development Division ▸ Current Chair of the Florida Council For.
ACEC INDIANA Environmental Business & Funding Source Conference
Reconstruction site Investigation, Planning, Scheduling, Estimating and Design Eng. Fahmi Tarazi.
PRE-BID MEETING ITB UNDP Design and Construction of a new medical warehouse in Bissau, Guinea Bissau 15th August 2017 Presented by Antoine Fadoul UNDP-
The Best Decision by Design: Professional Services Selection
Architectural Services RFQ
PROJECT DELIVERY METHODS
Procurement.
Delivering Successful Outcomes
Presentation transcript:

O BS Colorado 800 Grant Street, Suite 100 Denver, Colorado Telephone Fax Q ualifications B ased S election of Architectural and Engineering Services Updated: October 2009

AWARD WINNING CONSTRUCTION 2 Let’s begin with a few examples of…

More… AWARD WINNING CONSTRUCTION 3

4

5

6

And the winner is… the lowest bidder!! 7

8 Avoid mistakes and save money, Qualification-based selection (QBS) A process for the selection of design professionals by Owners. It is a negotiated procurement process for selection based ONLY on qualifications and competence in relation to the work to be performed.

9 QBS is endorsed by: American Institute of Architects (AIA) American Council of Engineering Companies (ACEC) National Society of Professional Engineers (NSPE) American Public Works Association (APWA) American Bar Association (ABA) Association of General Contractors (AGC) American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE)

QBS… IT’S THE LAW for Federally and State-Funded Projects Federal: Brooks Act of 1972 Colorado: SS to , CRS 1988 and 1991 It’s a good idea for everyone else! 10

11 Comprised of members from:  American Institute of Architects ( AIA )  American Council of Engineering Companies ( ACEC )  Professional Engineers of Colorado ( PEC, NSPE )  Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers (CAGE) O BS Colorado

 Disseminate information about QBS  Investigate selection procedures and practices  Provide guidance to public and private entities  Provide professional advice and assistance to Architects and Engineers  Encourage industry wide practice of QBS 12 OUR PURPOSE

How to use QBS Classical QBS Process 1. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) 2. Shortlist the best qualified offerors 3. Rank and select the most qualified 4. Create specific Scope of Work (SOW) 5. Negotiate SOW and fees 6. Contract or try again 13

QBS Might Seem Complicated 14 There are many different ways to select a Design Professional Why not take the lowest bid? …what are you really after? Creativity, Innovation, Value

Professional A/E Services Require critical thinking skills, intellectual effort Involve investigation, analysis, and research Problem-solving 15

Remember what we’re after…a GOOD design Services are Creative by nature Not a tangible commodity Design is only about 1% of total life cycle cost Significant impact on lifetime cost 16 Professional A/E Services

The other 99% of a project’s life cycle cost is dependent on the quality of the 1% spent on design. It’s smart business. 17 So Why use QBS?

Why Use QBS? Results in productive, team relationships Creates partners with common goals and expectations through communication Promotes a thorough understanding Allows fair and reasonable fees Flexible 18 It’s not just about money…

Without QBS…Low Bid You Get What You Pay For Lowest bidder has to “win” Execution by economics (shortcutting?) Opposition of interests Easiest design vs. best design Oversizing vs. optimal selection Minimization of critical detail/review Inflexible 19

SEVEN REASONS TO HIRE CONSULTANTS BASED UPON QUALIFICATIONS 1.QBS is a competitive process based upon qualification criteria. 2.QBS leads to better quality projects – lowest life-cycle cost. 3.QBS allows the owner is to review a variety of alternates including the least costly, allowing the owner to select the most cost- effective solution. 4.QBS allows for the development of a detailed and clear scope that benefits the owner. Bids for engineering services are rarely compared on an equal basis. 5.QBS assures best effort. In fee-based selection, the competing firms will likely submit a price for the least effort envisioned 6.QBS results in lower administrative cost by allowing competing firms to develop the details of the project scope. 7.It’s the law for federally and state funded projects. 20

But again, IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT THE MONEY!!! Date: April 23, 1987 Where: Brand new mega Sav-On Foods Store, Station Square Burnaby, British Columbia Event:Approximately 6,400 square feet of the roof-top parking lot collapsed into the food store, injuring 20 people. A Commissioner's Inquiry by the Canadian Government determined that one of the major factors that led to the ultimate collapse of the structure was the selection of the Structural Engineer on the basis of competitive bidding. Although competitive bidding bids were required, the structural engineering work had been awarded to the third lowest bidder for the $5.4 million Sav-On Foods building. Unfortunately, this bidder's fee was subsequently negotiated down by the building's development manager. In the Commissioner's Report, it was stated that: "with tendering [bidding], relatively intense competition has driven fee levels down, and this has raised questions about the quality of professional services in this environment." The Commissioner's Report went on to state that "bidding for Professional Services…caused a great deal of concern." The report stated that one approach to correcting the situation was to "pressure the owner of the building to provide sufficient compensation to permit the Engineer to do the work properly." 21

But again, IT’S NOT JUST ABOUT THE MONEY!!! Date:July 17, 1981 Where:Hyatt Regency Hotel, Kansas City, Missouri Event:Two elevated walkways over the lobby of the collapsed during a party, killing 114 people and injuring over 200 others. The engineering services on this structure had been awarded on the basis of low bid, and the design professional services were limited by contract. In order to keep his fees low, and because of the "practices of the industry at the time and past dealings with the fabricator, the Engineer had specified that the detailing of the rod connections of the two walkways to the building be done by the fabricator". A 1984 U.S. House of Representatives Subcommittee report on Structural Failures in Public Facilities (House Report ), stated that one of the six factors of critical importance in causing the structural failures in this particular project was the selection of architects and engineers based on bid. When such selection is generally made on a "low bid" basis, the report stated as one of its findings: "…there is a tendency to unrealistically reduce the price when price is known to be the primary basis for the contract award…use of "low bid" procedure has frequently resulted in insufficient funds allocated to a project to adequately verify the accuracy of design and to thoroughly check plans before construction…selection of an Architect or Engineer solely on price-competition basis provides the potential for reductions in quality due to initial underestimation of the costs and resources required to adequately perform the work." 22

CONCLUSIONS BENEFITS OF QBS Increased competition Allows for consideration of non-conventional, long-term, and sustainable and efficient designs Results in significant, life cycle cost savings More comprehensive plans and specifications for construction Reduce construction change orders Reduce time delays Reduce potential for disputes and unfortunate legal expenses Creates a cooperative relationship between Client and Consultant Improves the defined Scope of Work QBS raises the bar it’s good for the client and good for the profession 23

Good consultants truly desire to find the best, most economic, and creative solutions to achieve the long-term goals of a project It’s who we are…and QBS is the best chance for clients to allow this resource to be tapped The main advantage of a QBS system is that the design professional and the client are working in a collaborative, sustainable spirit to maximize the quality, value, cost effectiveness and usefulness of the final product. 24 CONCLUSIONS

O BS Colorado 800 Grant Street, Suite 100 Denver, Colorado Telephone Fax (303)