Scholastic Code X Middle School Meeting May 24, 2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The 21st Century Context for
Advertisements

Understanding by Design Stage 3
Common Core at CPS Scope and Sequence Implementation Plan
A Guide to Implementation
PORTFOLIO.
The Principal’s Role in Leading College and Career Readiness September, 2013.
Parents as Partners in Education
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
The “Highly Effective” Early Childhood Classroom Environment
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Baldwin-Whitehall School District
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Presented by Karen Cardinali CFN 609
Principles of Assessment
Moving to the Common Core Janet Rummel Assessment Specialist Indiana Department of Education.
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
 State Standards Initiative.  The standards are not intended to be a new name for old ways of doing business. They are a call to take the next step.
The Framework for Teaching and the Student-Led Classroom
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Overview of the Common Core ELA Learning Standards Dennis Atkinson Christine Cutler IES E2BOCES
UNWRAPPING THE MATH BUNDLES DIANE FOLEY, NETWORK LEADER CFN 204 Paul Perskin
Rigorous Curriculum Design
Expeditionary Learning Elementary School Meeting June 10,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Introduction to the LAUSD Teaching and Learning Framework
Citywide Instructional Expectations, Teacher Teams and the QR—Implications for Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 May 17, 2013.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
CFN 609 Principals’ Summer Institute Citywide Instructional Expectations Teacher Development Schools will select competencies relevant.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Connected Mathematics Project 3
CFN 609 Principal’s Meeting New Evaluation System
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
Summer 2012 Day 2, Session 6 10/13/2015R/ELA.EEA.2012.©MSDE1 Educator Effectiveness Academy English Language Arts And the journey continues… “Transitioning.
ReadyGen Brooklyn Elementary School Meeting May 21,2013
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Assistant Principal Meeting September 18, :00am to 1:00pm Presenters: Anna Arrigo & Marygrace DiForte.
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
“Developing an Implementation Map: Mapping / Mapping ” Dr. Ann Johnson
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
District One Administrator Institute Elementary Literacy Session August 17, 2005.
Citywide Expectations for
The School Effectiveness Framework
CFN 609 Principals’ Meeting December 6, 2012 Providing Effective Feedback Domain 1: Planning and Preparation Component 1e: Designing Coherent Instruction.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Standards Development Process College and career readiness standards developed in summer 2009 Based on the college and career readiness standards, K-12.
December 20 th 2011 Melissa H. Silberman Deputy Executive Director Office of Post Secondary Readiness.
Quality Review Updates for Presented by Mary Barton, SATIF CFN 204 Assistant Principals’ Conference September 2, 2011.
Math Study Group Meeting #1 November 3, 2014 Facilitator: Simi Minhas Math Achievement Coach, Network 204.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Smarter Balanced & Higher Education Cheryl Blanco Smarter Balanced Colorado Remedial Education Policy Review Task Force August 24, 2012.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
School Self-Evaluation 
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) &
Shelton School District
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Presentation transcript:

Scholastic Code X Middle School Meeting May 24, 2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1

Citywide Expectations Prepare: Set up to meet higher standards Ensure curricula in Pre-K-9 are aligned to the Common Core Standards in all content areas. (QI 1.1, 2.2) Schools should work toward closing curricular gaps during spring and summer 2013, whether through purchasing and integrating publisher-made materials or by adjusting current materials. Schools must provide dedicated time, resources, and support for reviewing and revising curricula, using Universal Design for Learning to ensure access for all learners. 2

Quality Review Indicator 1.1 Ensure appropriate, engaging, rigorous, and coherent curricula in all subjects accessible for a variety of learners and aligned to Common Core and/or Content Learning Standards. A)School leaders and faculty ensure curricula that are appropriate in all subjects aligned to CCLS and/or Content Standards, integrate the instructional shifts and align curricula across grades and subject areas to close the achievement gap and promote college and career readiness in all grades. B) Rigorous habits and higher order skills are emphasized in curricula and academic tasks are embedded in a coherent way across grades and subjects so that all learners, including ELLs and SWDs, must demonstrate their thinking. C) Curricula and academic tasks are planned and refined using student work and data so that individual and groups of students, including the lowest and highest achieving students, ELLs and SWDs, have full access to the curricula and tasks and are cognitively engaged. 3

Quality Indicator 2.2 Align assessments to curricula, use on-going assessment and grading practices, and analyze information on student learning outcomes to adjust instructional decisions at the team and classroom levels. A) Across the vast majority of classrooms, teachers use or create assessments, rubrics and grading policies that offer a clear portrait of student mastery of the school’s chosen key standards and curricula, thus providing actionable and meaningful feedback to students and teachers regarding student achievement. B) The school uses common assessments to create a clear picture of student progress toward goals and benchmarks across grades and subjects, track progress, and adjust curricular and instructional decisions so that all students, including ELLs and SWDs, demonstrate increased mastery. C) Across the vast majority of classrooms, teachers’ assessment practices consistently reflect the varied use of ongoing checks for understanding and student self-assessment so that teachers make effective adjustments to meet all students’ learning needs and students are aware of their next learning steps. 4

Quality Review Indicator 4.2 Engage in structured professional collaborations on teams using an inquiry approach that promotes shared leadership and focuses on improved student learning A) The vast majority of teachers are engaged in inquiry-based structured professional collaborations that has strengthened teachers’ instructional capacity (including CCLS integration), resulting in school- wide instructional coherence and increased student achievement for all learners. B) Teacher teams systematically analyze key elements of teacher work, including classroom practice, as well as assessment data and student work for students they share or on whom they are focused, resulting in shared improvements in teacher practice and mastery of goals for groups of students. C) Distributed leadership structures are embedded so that there is effective teacher leadership and teachers play an integral role in key decisions that affect student learning across the school. 5

Danielson’s Framework for Teaching: Component 1e, 3b and 3d 1e: Learning activities and Instruction designed to engage students and advance them through the content Materials and resources that are appropriate to the learning needs of the students Intentionally organized instructional groups to support student learning And a clear and sequenced unit structure to advance students’ learning. 3B High quality questions/prompts that cause students to think and reflect, to deepen their understanding and to test their ideas against those of their classmates. Discussion techniques that promote learning through discussion Teacher uses a range of techniques to ensure all students contribute to the discussion 3D There is clear assessment criteria that students are aware of and at the highest level had a hand in articulating Monitoring of student learning that is woven into the lesson Timely, constructive and substantive feedback that guides students to improve their performance. Student self-assessment and monitoring of progress 6

Periodic Assessment The DOE’s Periodic Assessment portfolio will continue to help schools transition to the Common Core and meet citywide instructional expectations by providing new assessments and technology for the school year. These new supports will include : Benchmark assessments aligned to Core Curriculum options in grades 3-8 Transition from Acuity to SchoolNet, an easy-to-use technology platform for assessment and instructional materials management, with data analysis tools 7

Code X Code X was created in partnership with the NYC DOE Curriculum teach to ensure that it meets the needs of New York City Schools. Grade –Specific Student Edition – Bound book -printed in color 7 units of Study 2 Novel study trade books Grade- Specific Teachers Edition Grade-Specific Assessment Guides 8

Code X Professional Leaning Plan – Free to NYC teachers, coaches and leaders with the purchase of Code X In person training – (Summer dates will be forthcoming) Online training Follow up webinars Online Live Coaching and Resources Capacity Building Seminar Series Follow up Training Video Models Writing from Sources 9

Code X Code X promotes the Instructions shifts of the Common Core Balance of texts includes a balance of informational and literary texts Building Disciplinary Knowledge Staircase of Complexity Academic Vocabulary Target words Words to Know Words and Phrases in Context Text-Based Evidence 10

Code X Teacher’s Edition – Free when you order a set of 30 students materials! Pacing Guide for each Unit Standards map outlines the introduction and progression of each standard during the year and across one grade to the next Unit overview lists all standards and content- area connections/ disciplines Scholastic will be sending the first unit for each grade electrically for each grade in the near future. 11

Code X Literature circle books are available for purchase. Shortly Scholastic will be generating a list of these literature circle book recommendations which are connected to the units “Theme”. These books will represent a variety of reading levels. Current Classroom Libraries. 12

Code X - Grade-Specific Novel Study Trade Books: Grade 6 Tuck Everlasting, Natalie Babbit Make Lemonade, Virginia Euwer Wolff Grade 7 Inkheart,Cornelia Funke I thought My Soul Would Rise and Fly, Joyce Hansen Grade 8 Monster, Walter Dean Myers Endangered, Eliot Schrefer 13

Code X :Suggested Pacing 25 day plan Sequential order Number of days to spend on each part of the Unit… 1 Day : Introduce the Unit. 1 Day : Teach Academic Vocabulary. 5-7 Days: Close Reading, Daily Writing, and Discussion of Text 1. 1 Day: Teach Academic Vocabulary. 5-7 Days: Close Reading, Daily Writing, and Discussion of Text 2. 3 Days: Collaborate and Present Assignment. 3-5 Days: Writing Performance Task. 2-3 Days: Extended Reading s. 14

Code X Webinar focused on Unit 4 “Coming to America” Grade 6 15

Let’s take a look… Sample Instructional Model :  Routine 4  Routine 7  Routine 8  Routine 10 16

September Assess your Unit of Study for September using the assessment tool. Note the strengths and challenges against the CCLS Dimensions. Next steps for Teacher Teams. 17

Agenda for Middle School Cohort Day 2: Next Steps… 18