Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR SOCIAL BEHAVIOR Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD & Nadia Katul Sampson, MA University of Oregon.
Using the PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory (TFI) E-12
Establishing an Effective Network of PB4L: School wide Coaches
Extending RTI to School-wide Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon
Building Evaluation Capacity for States and Districts
School-wide PBIS Universal Systems Year 3 Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland State University
Guiding and Evaluating Positive Behavioral Support Implementation Shawn Fleming.
MARY BETH GEORGE, USD 305 PBIS DISTRICT COORDINATOR USD #305 PBIS Evaluation.
Coaching: Tier 2 and 3 Rainbow Crane Dr. Eleanore Castillo-Sumi.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
VTPBiS Universal School Coordinator Orientation. Agenda Introductions Review Morning and Answer Questions Define Coordinator responsibilities and competencies.
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
EBS Survey Vermont PBS “Bringing out the BEST in all of us.”
District Level Implementation of Secondary & Tertiary PBS Interventions: So Our Universal System is Working! What’s Next? Chris Borgmeier, PhD Portland.
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership George Sugai & Susan Barrettt OSEP Center on PBIS University of Connecticut February 14,
Leadership within SW-PBS: Following the Blueprints for Success Tim Lewis, Ph.D. University of Missouri OSEP Center on Positive Behavioral Intervention.
PBIS Applications NWPBIS Washington Conference November 5, 2012.
Progress Monitoring and Action Planning Using the Team Implementation Checklist The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges.
Virginia PBIS Conference | June 30, 2011 Building Capacity for Progress Monitoring within School-wide Systems of PBIS Lucille Eber IL PBIS Network
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
Maine’s Response to Intervention Implementation: Moving Forward Presented by: Barbara Moody Title II Coordinator Maine Department of Education.
V 2.1 Tier II Critical Features Building the Infrastructure to Support Tier 2.
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
Intensive Positive Behavior Support -- Secondary and Tertiary Behavioral Interventions Bruce Stiller, Ph.D.; Celeste Rossetto Dickey, M.Ed.
Cynthia M. Anderson, University of Oregon Lisa Bateman, Bethel School District Bruce Stiller, School District 4j Chris Borgmeier, Portland State University.
Building A Tier Two System In An Elementary School: Lessons Learned Tina Windett & Julie Arment Columbia Public Schools, Missouri Tim Lewis & Linda Bradley.
Coaches Training Introduction Data Systems and Fidelity.
Tier 2 PBIS: Check-In / Check-out
V 2.1 Evaluation Tools, On-Line Systems and Action Planning.
Coordinator Orientation for PBIS at the Universal Level April 9, 2015.
Rob Horner University of Oregonwww.pbis.org. Celebrate: PBS now being used in many parts of society. Focus: On school-wide positive behavior support.
Andrew L. Reitz, Ph.D. Christine Peck, Psy.D. Cooperative Educational Services SWPBS Consultants October 25, 2011.
Measuring Implementation: School-Wide Instructional Staff Perspective Amy Gaumer Erickson, Ph.D. University of Kansas Evaluator: Kansas & Missouri SPDGs.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
New Coaches Training. Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Rainbow Crane Behavior RtI Coordinator
PBIS Meeting for BCPS Team Leaders and Coaches March 14, 2008 Oregon Ridge.
Monitoring Advanced Tiers Tool (MATT) University of Oregon October, 2012.
Student and Family Engagement within SWPBIS Rob Horner and Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Slides available at as well as at.
SW-PBIS Cohort 8 Spring Training March Congratulations – your work has made a difference Cohort 8.
IN NORTH THURSTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS KATY LEHMAN PBIS SPECIALIST MAY 22, 2013 PBIS Implementation.
V 2.1 TFI Wordle. V 2.1 Objectives of Session: 1.Not bore you to sleep 2.Types of PBIS Data 3.pbisapps.org 4.PBIS Evaluation Tools 5.Action Planning.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM BOB ALGOZZINE AND STEVE GOODMAN National PBIS Leadership Forum Hyatt Regency O’Hare Rosemont, Illinois October 14, 2010.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
DEVELOPING AN EVALUATION SYSTEM FOR SWPBS Rob Horner and Bob Algozzine.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Preparing for Advanced Tiers using CICO Calvert County Returning Team Summer Institute Cathy Shwaery, PBIS Maryland Overview.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Annie McLaughlin, M.T. Carol Davis, Ed.D. University of Washington
Notes for Trainers (Day Training)
 This is a presentation of the IL PBIS Network. All rights reserved. Tier Two Systems in High Schools Ami Flammini, IL PBIS Network.
Systems, Data, & Practices to Move PBIS Forward in Ravenswood City School District Sheldon Loman, Ph.D.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1/31/20161 If you modify this powerpoint, update the version information below. This.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Evaluation Day 2.
School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports: New Team Training Data Entry and Analysis Plan Established Day 2.
ORGANIZATION & DELIVERY OF TERTIARY SYSTEMS AT THE DISTRICT LEVEL Cynthia M. Anderson & Kimberli Breen University of Oregon & Illinois PBIS.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
Secondary Interventions: Check-in/ Check-out as an Example Rob Horner, Anne Todd, Amy Kauffman-Campbell, Jessica Swain-Bradway University of Oregon
PBIS District Leadership Team Overview Administrative Team Meeting August 13, 2008.
Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance Network PAPBS Network Coaches Day January 28, Fidelity Measures Lisa Brunschwyler- School Age- School.
Module 2 : Using Data to Problem-Solve Implementation Issues Session 3 Phase I Team Training Presented by the MBI Consultants.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory
TFI Wordle This presentation is intended to introduce the PBISApps site and the types of data teams will be working with. The teams will take their first.
Using Individual Student data for initial support planning
Presentation transcript:

Targeted and Intensive Interventions: Assessing Process (Fidelity) Cynthia M. Anderson, PhD University of Oregon

Intensive Interventions Specialized Individualized Systems for Students with High-Risk Behavior Targeted Interventions Specialized Group Systems for Students with At-Risk Behavior Universal Interventions School-/Classroom- Wide Systems for All Students, Staff, & Settings ~80% of Students ~15% ~5% School-Wide Positive Behavior Support

Important Outcomes Effects of the system Student behavior Staff behavior Overall system Process (fidelity) Fidelity of specific interventions Fidelity of the system

Tools for Assessing Fidelity Self Assessment Monitoring progress over time Developing an action plan External Evaluation Monitoring progress over time Useful when outside opinion is warranted

Existing Tools for Assessing Process Universal Component of SWPBS External School-wide Evaluation Tool (SET) Self Assessment Team implementation Checklist (TIC) Benchmarks of Quality (BoQ) Phases of Implementation Targeted & Intensive Components of SWPBS External Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool (ISSET) Self Assessment Checklist for Individual Student Systems (CISS)

ISSET and CISS Key Features 1. Foundations: What needs to be in place? 2. Targeted interventions 3. Intensive interventions SYSTEMS Practices Data For each feature: 1. What practices are implemented? 2. What systems are used? 3. What outcomes are assessed?

Foundations Practices Is there a team that meets regularly and uses data?? Are there multiple systems for identifying students?? Do students and teachers receive assistance quickly? Systems Commitment Universal level of SWPBS in place?? Does team have access to expertise in function-based supports?? Does administrator attend team meetings? Are new faculty and staff trained? Does the behavior support team consist of key roles? Data Are outcomes monitored for and across students? Are data used for identifying interventions? Do teachers see data? Are family members involved and do they see outcomes?

Targeted Interventions Practices Is there at least one targeted intervention? Are interventions efficient? Systems Are interventions documented? Are all faculty and staff familiar with intervention? Is there a coordinator? Data Are there data-based decision rules for all group interventions? Is fidelity monitored?

Intensive Interventions Practices Are FBAs technically adequate? Are interventions linked to the FBA? Do interventions contain key components? Systems Are relevant people involved in developing intervention? Data Are outcomes assessed? Is fidelity monitored?

Implementation Logistics ISSET Who is involved? External evaluator Within the school: Administrator, team leader, 5 random staff What do they do? Interview administrator and team leader Quick interviews with staff Review permanent products How long does it take? 2-4 hours CISS Who is involved? School behavior support team What do they do? Complete CISS, build action plan How long does it take? 1-2 hours

Results: What is Learned? ISSET Percent implemented score for each section CISS Percent implemented score Each section Overall Goals prioritized Action plan built

Using the CISS Planning (the system) Determine who will complete the measure Whole team or specific members? Individually or as a group? Become familiar with the CISS Identify time to complete CISS All at once In stages Scoring (the data) Will the CISS be Scored? Building an action plan

Scoring the CISS Numerical score allows for assessing progress over time Considerations Administer CISS at approximately same time each year Administer in similar way each year Graph outcomes cumulatively

Monitor Progress Over Time

ISSET and CISS: Next Steps Disseminate CISS Use ISSET in research studies Conduct further evaluations of measures

University of Oregon Educational & Community Supports School Psychology Program Cynthia M. Anderson

Targeted Interventions Matches needs of school Can be implemented within 5-days of identified need Similar across students and efficient Staff trained in intervention Materials on hand Coordinator exists Function-based Data collected to monitor outcomes Formal system for informing parents of progress

Identify & train 2 more people in efficient FBA CICO coordinator to attend team meetings Shift team meetings to twice/month Ask SWPBS team to identify students w/+2 ODRs Add routines to RFA Curriculum for annual orientation Build and implement annual screen Jill May, 08 Burt Nov,07 Burt Nov,07 Destiny Nov,07 Fall, 08 Fall, 09