Working Portfolios For Non Classroom Teachers. Agenda Determine Working Portfolio rubric Understand the performance levels and scoring Brainstorm possible.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NC Educator Evaluation System Process Orientation
Advertisements

Observer Schedules Pre-Observation Conference To schedule a pre-observation conference, select Schedule.
Student Learning Targets (SLT) You Can Do This! Getting Ready for the School Year.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Purpose of Evaluation  Make decisions concerning continuing employment, assignment and advancement  Improve services for students  Appraise the educator’s.
Evidence: First… 1. Assemble your district team to include teachers, administrators, association representatives 2. Research and select an instructional.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
Differentiated Supervision
Please check, just in case…. Announcements 1.Bring a draft of your current work on your final essays to class next week. We will have time to work on.
HCPSS End-of-Year Teacher Evaluation Process April Leadership I.
Adapted from Growing Success (Ontario Schools) by K. Gibson
Portfolios.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 1: Content and Structure Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Administering the DRA2 and EDL2 Denver Public Schools Spring 2008 Grades 4–8.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) “101”
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
OASYS Teacher Evaluation
Introduction to Working Portfolios Educator Effectiveness System Training.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Classroom Assessment A Practical Guide for Educators by Craig A. Mertler Chapter 7 Portfolio Assessments.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Idaho Principal Evaluation Process & Principal Observation Lisa Colón, Idaho State Department of Education Matt Clifford, Ph.D., American Institutes for.
Getting Engaged in Evaluation: How to Develop an Evidence-based Offense for Your Evaluation Presented by Ellen Holmes, NBCT
The Ugly Truth… Most school principals think they are “effective instructional leaders” but few really are.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
NC Teacher Evaluation Process
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 6: Reflecting and Planning for Next Year December 2013.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
Jeffrey Freund. Jeff Freund: Education and Work History Class of 2000 Class of 2004 Elementary Education Middle Level Mathematics.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
The Use of Artifacts as Evidence in Educator Evaluation Fall 2015.
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System Jessica Garner
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Nuts & Bolts Tri 3 AHEP - Getting to the End of the Year!
Focused Evaluation. Who?  Teachers who completed the Comprehensive cycle  Proficient or distinguished.
Ohio Principal Evaluation System Pike County Joint Vocational School March 7,
The North Carolina Teacher Evaluation Process November 1, 2012
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
1 NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION PROCESS REVIEW Welcome Introductions Agenda.
Lenoir County Public Schools New North Carolina Principal Evaluation Process 2008.
My Learning Plan Observation and Appraisal SYStem
Instructional Leadership for a Professional Learning Culture:
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation System
Evaluation Orientation Teacher & Licensed Support Staff with NCEES process
Teacher Evaluation “SLO 101”
Standards and Assessment
State Board of Education Progress Update
Teacher Evaluation Process
Introduction to Core Professionalism
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
Unfilled Positions FWEA Meeting March 18, 2019.
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Working Portfolios For Non Classroom Teachers

Agenda Determine Working Portfolio rubric Understand the performance levels and scoring Brainstorm possible evidence Understand process and requirements Resources available

Who does a Working Portfolio? Bargaining Unit 5 employees classified as school or non-school level NCT (non-classroom teacher) Administrator decides whether classroom observation or working portfolio will be used Usually observation are not possible because a teacher’s primary job responsibilities do not involve the delivery of instruction. Will you be doing a Working Portfolio?

What are working portfolios? A measure of teacher practice that replace classroom observations for BU5 employees A vehicle for purposefully collecting and presenting evidence of meeting performance expectations. Consist of 5 components (Hawaii Adapted Framework for Teaching) clearly aligned to rubrics A purposeful, ongoing collection of evidence (artifacts and observations) that shows progress or achievement Compiled in physical or electronic formats Collaborative and reflective under the guidance of your administrator

What working portfolio are NOT: Collections of miscellaneous pieces of information

Components and Rubrics? Will focus on different components and use different Framework rubrics depending on your individual role Page 2 of Guidance Document Danielson book pages School counselor-pages Instructional Specialist-pages Library/Media Specialist-pages Which component and rubric will you be using?

Resources Components Rubrics Guidance Document Evidence Submission Form

Evaluated at the component level (5) Unsatisfactory 0 points Basic 2 points Proficient 3 points Distinguished 4 points Final rating is produced by averaging the scores from all five component ratings ACTIVITY-

Process Beginning Conference (20-30 minutes) NOW-January 31st Evidence Collection-NOW-End of March Progress Check Conference Optional (20-30 minutes) February-March Ending Conference (April and May) Finalize in May Share responsibility for compiling and documenting evidence

Beginning Conference Administrators should set clear expectations for the types and sources of evidence that will be considered high quality Quality of the evidence is determined by if it relates to the NCT job responsibility and clearly aligns with a specific component within the rubric QUALITY over QUANTITY Evidence of performance over the course of the year (not isolation) Collaboratively work with your administrator to avoid surprises at the end of the process

Possible Evidence Can be gathered through structured observations (24 hours notice*) of performance as opposed to collecting artifacts Verbatim scripting of teacher or student comments statements of observed teacher or student behavior Numeric information Description of the environment *offer pre-observation questions to provide context for the observation-Admin provided feedback within 2 weeks Levels of performance will not be assigned for a single observation or piece of evidence….determined as a whole of all evidence at the end of the year

PDE3 Working portfolio tab will/can house all the evidence

Progress Check Conference OPTIONAL Usually if work priorities and responsibilities change significantly after beginning conferences Teachers are responsible for scheduling with administrator Mimics the process of beginning conference Talk through the 5 components with administrator Possible to retain some evidence already collected Enter in new responses below previous responses in PDE3

Ending Conference Present the working portfolio to the administrator and participate in analyzing all evidence against the component level rubrics. Discuss areas of strength and weakness for each component Administrator assigns a final performance level rating for each component

Finalization Complete the Ending Conference Summary form in PDE3 within a few days of the ending conference Administrator reviews the summary form and provides comments as needed

PDE3 site Administrator completes Beginning conference date/time Progress check date/time (optional) NCT role (drop down box) Comments for each NCT field questions Ending conference date/time

NCT in PDE3 What are your most critical roles and responsibilities? What is the population that your work impacts directly? How do you plan to collect multiple types of sources of evidence aligned to (1st,2nd,3rd,4th,5 th ) working portfolio component? What, if anything, would you like your administrator to specifically observe or collect evidence on throughout the year?

Teacher reflection in PDE3 What strengths have the working portfolio process helped you identify? What areas for growth have the working portfolio process helped you identify? Reflecting on what you’ve learned, what are some changes in practice that would improve the work you perform?

Evidence Submission Form Used for each artifact collected (not observation) form to principal prior to the ending conference (actual artifacts do not have to be ed or uploaded in PDE3)

Questions Mahalo