Project Co-Sponsors: KU Center for Research on Learning CAST NASDSE www.centerononlinelearning.org Online Learning for Students with Disabilities: What.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An Overview of Indianas Special Education Rules Professor Daniel J. Abbott ED 242 Fall 2009.
Advertisements

DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Enforcing and Maintaining the IEP
An Overview of How to Effectively Use IEPs in the Creation of Accommodation Plans Molly Rosinski Disability Program Analyst Reasonable Accommodation Support.
Understanding the IEP Process
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
LEARNING MORE ABOUT SPECIAL EDUCATION Weng Ventura designs.
Parent Academy Topic: Special Education Basics 1.
Special Education Annual Report for to the Board of Education Jamesville-DeWitt Central School District November 2, 2009.
English Learners (EL) who are Students with Disabilities (SWD) 2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference August 5, 2010 Supreet Anand Supervisor Title III Student.
Improving Outcomes for Students with Disabilities Office of Exceptional Children Cathy Boshamer, Director John Payne, Team Lead November 7, 2013.
Mary-Ann Toh Binfon M.Ed. Special Education Learning Disabilities Consultant.
Virtual Schools are Virtually Here: Now What? A National Perspective Matthew Wicks Chief Operating Officer International Association for.
Continuity, Consistency, Collaboration, Coherence.
Project Co-Sponsors: KU Center for Research on Learning CAST NASDSE Paula Burdette, NASDSE Skip Stahl, CAST Online Learning.
Presented by Paul Nijensohn & Sarah Sebert Illinois State Board of Education 2008 Nonpublic Special Education Conference on Best Practices.
Project Co-Sponsors: KU Center for Research on Learning CAST NASDSE Skip Stahl, CAST DIGITAL NATIVES ONLINE.
 Describes the special education program and services that are provided within a school district and those special education programs and services which.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
Laura Matson, Ph.D. Director, Special Services Puget Sound Educational Service District Navigating the School Culture September 25, 2014.
Dr. Wilder.  gave students with disabilities the right to be educated in public schools – zero reject  Continuum of services must be available.
Welcome Survey Facilitators! Apps and Tech Solutions for STEM and Students with Disabilities By Dr. James Basham, University of Kansas.
MIDWAY COLLEGE LBD PROGRAM Overview of Program June 2008.
1 The Paraprofessional In The Classroom: The Paraprofessional In The Classroom: A Partner in the Achievement of All Students.
Disability and Ability By: Evelyn King, Jill Stephens, & Carrie Werner.
Assessing and Teaching Students with Mild/Moderate Disabilities Chapter 1 IEP Legal Requirements Writing PLOPs.
Molly Rosinski Boston and Dallas Regional Disability Coordinator An Overview of How to Effectively Use IEPs in the Creation of Accommodation Plans.
1 Newark Public Schools Office of Special Education’s Professional Development Center Dr. Clifford Janey, Superintendent Dr. Don Marinaro, Assistant Superintendent.
WALKING THROUGH CHILD STUDY. What is the Child Study Committee? A committee that enables school personnel, and non school personnel, as appropriate, to.
SPECIAL EDUCATION 101 What Do YOU Need to Know?
Special Education in the United States Susie Fahey and Mario Martinez.
Teaching Students with Special Needs in General Education Classrooms, 8e Lewis/Doorlag ISBN: © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Special Education Teacher  This job is to Teach elementary school subjects to educationally and physically handicapped students.  Includes teachers who.
District 97 Special Education Status and Plan Michael J. Padavic, LCSW Director.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
Labeling  Allows students with disabilities to receive services  Labels may be stigmatizing or result in discrimination  View children by their abilities.
Welcome Survey Facilitators! Computer-Adapted Instruction and Assessment By Tabitha Pacheco and Heather Goodwin-Nelson & Ins and Outs of iPads for Students.
Welcome to the “Special Education Tour”.  Specifically designed instruction  At no cost to parents  To meet the unique needs of a child with disabilities.
Special Education is not a place, it’s a service. Board Presentation November 28, 2011.
The Brave New World of Special Education The purpose of special education and our roles in facilitating optimal learning outcomes for ALL students.
Essential Terms and Concepts  Special education has its own unique vocabulary and terms.  Being familiar with the concepts increases your understanding.
Legal Aspects of Special Education Eligibility and Placement IEP and 504.
 What is special education?  How does a student qualify for services?
Grandparents Raising Grandchildren April 25, 2013 Dr. Sabrina Salmon Special Education Coordinator Oklahoma State Department of Education.
INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT INTODUCTION TO ASSESSMENT Chapter One.
SPECIAL EDUCATION 101 What Do You Need to Know? Presented by: MaryLou Heron & Kristen Strong Training and Consultation Staff.
Pathfinder Parent Center South Valley Special Education Unit John Porter, Director
Michigan Department of Education, Office of Special Education August 12, 2014 The New System of Evaluation, Determination of Eligibility, and Individualized.
Shelton Special Education November 7, 2012 Molly Baasch.
Special Education The Role of the School Counselor.
Special Education & IDEA 2004 A Presentation Made to the Liberty University School of Law By Randall Dunn. October 22, 2007.
Disability Awareness & Instructional Strategies Special Education Paraprofessional Workbook Module 4.
Learner Variability and Access to Learning Richard Jackson Emmaus Series Spring Retreat May 5, 2016.
Expert Topic Presentation By Chris Coombe March 9, 2009.
Time for Change: Examining Utah Data Relating to Student Performance
Utah TEAMs: Together we can Envision and Achieve More
Developing a Compliant and Instructionally relevant IEP
Understanding the IEP Process
My Child has a IEP… Now What???
Shelton Special Education
Special Education Workshop #2 By Lori Centeno, IEP Teacher
Disability Services Procedures
Students with Disabilities
Beaufort County Schools Programs for Student with Disabilities
Leadership Academy Special Education.
EXPLORING THE LEARNING SAFETY NET
Mrs. Lisa Joyner Virginia Baptist College lisateaches.com
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
WA-AIM 1% Participation Cap
Exceptional Children’s Program
Presentation transcript:

Project Co-Sponsors: KU Center for Research on Learning CAST NASDSE Online Learning for Students with Disabilities: What we know, and what we need to know Diana Greer; Sean Smith, University of Kansas Paula Burdette, NASDSE Rachel Currie-Rubin; Skip Stahl, CAST

Today’s Presentation Center Overview Status Update What we know What we don’t know

Our Charge To research how online learning can be made more accessible, engaging, and effective for K-12 learners with disabilities: Identify – trends & issues – positive & negative consequences – promising approaches Test – feasibility, usability & effectiveness

Demographics David Glick, 2011

The Reality

The Types

The Challenges 1.Providing student support for engagement 2.Coordination with students’ local school district/getting students’ records 3.Deficiency in curriculum 4.Lack of or inability to provide adult support/involvement 5.Lack of qualified staff and staff time 6.Difficulty in identifying students 2012 iNACOL

Challenges Related to Special Education Inconsistent policies across states and districts Accessibility and Universal Design gaps Teacher preparedness varies Monitoring and accountability difficult due to lack of data Rationale for placements not clear

Special Education Challenges cont. Social and Emotional Supports may or may not be available Lack of guidance to assist teams in determining appropriateness of online education Digital divide: schools, homes that have digital access and those who do not

Question #1: Sean What aspects of the design of learning management/content management systems and their content increase or decrease the involvement of students with disabilities?

What We Know

Does your state have data on which students with disabilities are receiving their instruction through an online environment? – Online program 24% Yes 76% No – Supplemental online course 11% Yes 89% No – Blended program 7% Yes 93% No – Related Services 9% Yes 91% No State Director of Special Education Survey

State Directors Survey (N=46)  Autism 43%  Deaf-Blindness 15%  Deafness 30%  Emotional Disturbance 46%  Hearing Impairment 33%  Intellectual Disabilities 39%  Multiple Disabilities 29%  Orthopedic Impairment 35%  Other Health Impairment 43%  Specific Learning Disability 48%  Speech or Language Impairment 39%  Traumatic Brain Injury 30%  Visual Impairment Including Blindness 28%  Developmental Delay 20% Students from what disability areas participate in any online environment?

Question #2: Rachel How does the context of online learning affect student engagement, persistence and achievement?

What about Engagement and Learning? Teacher “quality”: What knowledge, skills, and beliefs do highly skilled and experienced online educators and novice online educators have? Peer-to-peer relationships and the impact on student learning Case studies to understand peer to peer relationships, relationships with “learning coaches” and teachers

District Administrator Survey District offers online instruction (N=78) Yes (76%) – 56% have offered online instruction for 1-5 years – 41% have offered online instruction for 6-15 years Offer online instruction for SWDs (N=78) Yes (78%) – 56% have offered online instruction for SWDs for 1-5 years – 43% have offered online instruction for SWDs for 6-15 years

District Administrator Survey (N=103) Challenges teachers face in teaching SWDs online – 61% Knowing how to accommodate for students' disabilities – 48% Knowing how to use instructional strategies in online settings – 41% Knowing how to use specific technologies – 25% Limitations in technology infrastructure within the district – 20% Other

District Administrator Survey 36% reported that their teachers are well prepared to teach SWDs online – 39% reported their teachers are not well prepared – 25% reported they don’t know or did not answer 57% reported being prepared to make decisions affecting the online instruction of SWDs

Question #3: Diana What we are learning about teachers who teach students with disabilities in an online environment?

Teacher Survey 110 Participants – 89% taught for 6+ years – 31% taught online for 6+ years – 47% are certified to teach SWDs

Teacher Survey: Teacher Satisfaction Satisfied with teaching online (in general) – Satisfied: 72% Neutral: 11%Dissatisfied: 2% Satisfied with teaching SWD online – Satisfied: 60% Neutral: 16%Dissatisfied: 8% Adequate support to teach SWD online – Yes: 55% No: 11% Sometimes: 19% 76% plan to continue teaching SWD for at least 2 years

Where they teach? % 95% 47% 86% 2% 71% 85% 96% 33% 49% 7% 27% Teach: – Online Schools:  HS - 80%; MS – 47%; ES- 2% – Individual Courses:  HS – 85%; MS – 33%; ES – 7% Students with Disabilities : – SLD, ED, Autism, OHI, Intellectual Disabilities, Multiple Disabilities Where they teach? District Administrator Survey Online Schools Individual Courses

% 72% 46% 51% 25% 26% 24% 16% 21% 26% The following percentage of teachers reported that their students receive these:  67% Content Instruction  46% Skill-based instruction  25% Assistive Technology Support  24% Social-Emotional/Behavioral Instruction  21% Speech Language Service Teacher Survey: Supports provided to SWD District Administrator Survey Content Instruction Skill-based Instruction Assistive Technology Support Speech Language Service Social- Emotional/ Behavioral Instruction Teacher Survey: Supports provided to SWD

Teacher Survey: Instructional % 39% 45% 46% 44% 26% 40% 30% 34% 36% 19% 26% Teachers chose top 3 instructional methods to support SWDs:  47% Video  45% Activities or labs  44% Text  40% Discussion  34% Audio  19% Games Teacher Survey: Instructional Methods District Administrator Survey: Instructional Methods Video Activities or labs TextDiscussion AudioGames

Teacher Survey: Challenges faced 40% Knowing how to accommodate for SWDs 30% Knowing how to use instructional strategies online 37% Limitations to the district technology infrastructure 23% Knowing how to use specific technologies

Teacher Survey: Challenges faced % 61% 30% 48% 37% 41% 23% 25% 20% The following percentages of teachers reported that their students receive these supports:  40% Knowing how to accommodate for SWDs  30% Knowing how to use instructional strategies online  44% Limitations to the district technology infrastructure  23% Knowing how to use specific technologies Teacher Survey: Challenges faced District Administrator Survey: Challenges Knowing how to accommodate for SWDs Knowing how to use instructional strategies online Limitations to the district technology infrastructure Other Knowing how to use specific technologies

Question #4: Paula What steps can the education system take to increase the success of students with disabilities in online learning?

What to do? Partner with others to learn what works, for what types of learners, under what circumstances. Based on the best knowledge now, develop guidance for providers to use. Collect and use data to improve knowledge, implementation, and future guidance.

National Education Policy Center Recommendations: – Approval and Oversight of Providers (fully online and supplemental courses): “provide accommodations and services as required by [IDEA] …” – Promulgation of Rules (quality standards): “provisions for students with special needs…”

iNACOL Principles of Model Legislation 1.Shift to competency-based education 2.Increase access for each student and permit entire continuum - from blended to fully online 3.Design outcomes-based accountability and funding incentives 4.Increase access to excellent teachers 5.Provide room for innovation

COLSD Policy Review Themes – Placement and enrollment – Allowable providers – Funding – Administrative duties – Accommodations – Assessment – Graduation/exit – Accessibility

North Washington States we are working with: Carolina Florida Kansas Virginia Michigan Ohio

Visit us at: centerononlinelearning.com Contact us at: Follow us on Twitter For More on the Center