Gendered divisions of labour and the intergenerational transmission of inequality Jonathan Gershuny Centre for Time Use Research Department of Sociology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Welfare State Matters: A Typological Multilevel Analysis of Wealthy Countries Hae-Joo Chung, RPh, MSc Department of Health Policy and Management, The Johns.
Advertisements

James Heintz, PERI, University of Massachusetts Expert Consultation on Womens Economic Empowerment SOAS, University of London, Jan , 2012.
Can some women have it all? Social group differences in the parenthood effect re-examined Pia Schober University of Cambridge.
Following lives from birth and through the adult years GeNet Gender Equality Symposium Erzsébet Bukodi Institute of Education, University.
Division of Domestic Labour and Women s Human Capital ESRC Gender Equality Network Project 4: Gender, Time Allocation and the Wage Gap Jonathan Gershuny.
Understanding womens employment in Europe: the importance of class and gender. Tracey Warren.
The parenthood effect: what explains the increase in gender inequality when British couples become parents? Pia Schober London School of Economics.
Income inequality within couples and redistribution through the tax-benefit system: the case of the UK Holly Sutherland Institute for Social and Economic.
Pia Schober London School of Economics
Quantitative Methods and Gender Inequalities Jacqueline Scott University of Cambridge.
Breadwinners, carers and gender inequality: implications for pension policy in the UK Debora Price Centre for Research on Ageing and Gender University.
Employment transitions over the business cycle Mark Taylor (ISER)
Lone Parents and Social Policy: Developments in the EU and Beyond Nov 2010.
The Role of Statistics in relation to the WLB Policy and it’s Implementation 12 Nov Seung-Ah Hong(KWDI) International Seminar on Gender Statistics.
Grandparenting and health in Europe: a longitudinal analysis Di Gessa G, Glaser K and Tinker A Institute of Gerontology, Department of Social Science,
Gender-Based Typologies
Women‘s employment in the context of culture and work-family arrangements in a comparative perspective Birgit Pfau-Effinger, University of Hamburg.
GENDER ISSUES ACADEMIC YEAR Gender and the welfare state.
HADAS MANDEL TEL-AVIV UNIVERSITY Which Social Policies Sustain Gender Equality in the Labour Market? PRESENTED AT THE CONFERENCE “GENDER EQUALITY IN THE.
Comparative Methods in Research on Gender Wendy Sigle-Rushton ESRC Methods Festival 2 July 2008 St. Catherine’s College, Oxford.
Young People’s emotional well-being: The impact of parental employment patterns Dr Linda Cusworth Social Policy Research Unit, University of York International.
1 Reconciling work and family lives Production and reproduction –working mothers and caring fathers : policy implications ISPA Annual Conference Friday.
Does everyone agree what childcare means? Helen Penn Cass School of Education University of East London, UK.
Women's new roles II Birgitta Jansson Parents – Collective and private welfare – Society supports families – Family “haven in a heartless world”
Varieties of public policy POLI 352A. What does government do? Extracts resources Expends resources Regulates Directly owns means of production.
The Social Benefits of Early Childhood Education and Care Analytical Review prepared on behalf of NESSE by Helen Penn Cass School of Education, University.
FENICs Female Employment and Family Formation in National Institutional Contexts Women’s Entry into Motherhood in France, Sweden, East and West Germany,
Centre for Tax Policy and Administration Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Trends in Top Incomes & Inequality, and their implications.
Intergenerational contributions to childcare across Europe Alison Smith University of Edinburgh.
Olivier Thévenon INED Brussels - EFSI 7 november 2014 The role of childcare services on family and work outcomes.
Family policies Source: Tito Boeri and Jan van Ours (2008), The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton University Press.
Cross-national comparative research with longitudinal data: Understanding youth poverty Maria Iacovou (ISER) with Arnstein Aassve, Maria Davia, Letizia.
Fathers’ work-family conflict: analysis of European Social Survey data Svetlana Speight & Sara Connolly Margaret O’Brien, Eloise Poole, Matthew Aldrich.
Centre for Market and Public Organisation Understanding the effect of public policy on fertility Mike Brewer (Institute for Fiscal Studies) Anita Ratcliffe.
Introduction to the Multinational Time Use Study Jonathan Gershuny Centre for Time Use Research Department of Sociology University of Oxford.
EMPLOYMENT MATTERS A lunchtime seminar series about employment relations and the world of work
Statistics to Support Policies on Work and Life Balance Kyunghee Kim Employment Statistics Division Statistics Korea.
C entre for T ime U se R esearch Overview of the Multinational Time Use Study Kimberly Fisher Centre for Time Use Research International.
International overview of fathers and leave based on 2012 review Peter Moss Institute of Education University of London 1.
Federal Department of Home Affairs FDHA Federal Statistical Office FSO Balancing family and work in everyday life: a European comparison Dr. Katja Branger.
Welfare Regimes and Poverty Dynamics: The Duration and Recurrence of Poverty Spells in Europe Didier Fouarge & Richard Layte Presented by Anna Manzoni.
Intergenerational Contributions to Childcare: Potential Policy Responses Alison Smith University of Edinburgh.
Globalization and Changes in Life Courses in Modern Societies Hans-Peter Blossfeld Universität Bamberg.
Comparative gender inequality Week 20 Comparative Sociology.
HAOMING LIU JINLI ZENG KENAN ERTUNC GENETIC ABILITY AND INTERGENERATIONAL EARNINGS MOBILITY 1.
Centre for Market and Public Organisation Understanding the effect of public policy on fertility Mike Brewer (Institute for Fiscal Studies) Anita Ratcliffe.
Family Policy The West European Cases. Outline Fertility crisis and tendency toward equality Fertility crisis and tendency toward equality Swedish model.
Gender regimes, employment and family. What is gender equality? Ulla Björnberg Department of Sociology Gothenburg University Sweden
Nordic Family Policy and Demographic Consequences Presentation at 11 th LPR Network seminar, Tallinn th of September 2014 Ann-Zofie Duvander.
Time, Money and Inequality in International Perspective Lars Osberg -Dalhousie University -I.S.E.R. U of Essex.
Comparing welfare systems Week 18 Comparative Sociology.
Fighting child poverty across the OECD: is work the answer? Presentation: Joint OECD/Korea Regional Centre on Health and Social policy July 2006, Seoul.
Half way to gender equality in work? -- Evidence from time use data Jonathan Gershuny & Man Yee Kan Centre for Time Use Research Department of Sociology.
Reconciling work and family life: Korean policy challenges in an international perspective Presentation: Chung-Ang University 19 February 2008, Seoul Willem.
Maternal Movements into Part time Employment: What is the Penalty? Jenny Willson, Department of Economics, University of Sheffield.
PEP Annual Conference Policy and Research Forum
Head, Asian Social and Health Outreach, OECD
Family Policy across the OECD
Seminar presentation:
Public policy and European society University of Castellanza
Spain’s Mediterranean welfare and the family
Family Policy across the OECD
Public policy and European society University of Castellanza
Family Policy : an International Perspective
Understanding the division and negotiation of unpaid labour in couples
Comparative gender inequality
Family policies Source: Tito Boeri and Jan van Ours (2008), The Economics of Imperfect Labor Markets, Princeton University Press.
Does everyone agree what childcare means
Centre for Time Use Research (CTUR)
Domestic work: some evidence from research
Presentation transcript:

Gendered divisions of labour and the intergenerational transmission of inequality Jonathan Gershuny Centre for Time Use Research Department of Sociology University of Oxford For GENET Conference, December 2009

This Talk Proposition: –National systems of regulation of access to work have effects on life chances which differ markedly by gender and class-of origin. Based on two unpublished papers: –Man-Yee Kan, Oriel Sullivan, JG; Gender Convergence in Domestic Work (2009) –JG; Dynamics of Social Position (2008) Kan, Sullivan and Gershuny are in the Sociology Department and Centre for Time Use Research, University of Oxford.

Definitions Portable or Embodied (vs Fixed) capitals: human (Becker, Mincer) or (1) economic, (2) social, (3) cultural (Bourdieu) Embodied capitals formed: 1.In household of origin… 2.…then through the formal educational system… 3.…and recursively through practices of daily life. time-use gives empirical estimates of practices Embodied capital dynamics life chances Good/bad outcomes result from current capitals Capitals indicate advantages and outcomes Hence, new approach to intergenerational social mobility.

The day and the lifecourse Theoretical intuition: Daily choices among paid work, unpaid work, leisure/consumption capitals form at differential rates differentiate individual life-chances consequences for transmission of position to children

Two steps (two data sources) STEP 1 (Multinational Time Use Study) –Typologies of national systems of work regulation and gender ideologies… –…are strongly associated with different historical changes in work patterns STEP 2 (British Household Panel Study) –Lifecourse changes in gender work-sharing… –…polarise class mobility and life-chances

The Multinational Time Use December 2009

Welfare Regimes and Gender Ideologies liberal market regimes: –UK, the USA, Canada and Australia –modified breadwinner gender ideology, women both paid work & caring roles social democratic nordic regimes: –Denmark, Norway, Finland, Sweden –dual earner family model, high employment rate of both women and men conservative/corporatist regimes: –Netherlands, France, Germany, Austria –weak familist gender ideology, men primary breadwinners, women carers southern regime: (later addition to typology) –Spain, Italy and Israel –traditional familist gender ideology, stronger emphasis on womens family role

Step 1. Public regulation matters Note: –corporatist, liberal and nordic groups all start out rather similar in the 1960s –Gender equality in total work (isowork) Implications: 1.Public policy has a real effect on gendered balance between paid and unpaid work 2.Gender differentials in rates of accumulation of economic capital affected by regime choices.

Human capital: the Essex Score Data from British Household Panel Study –5000 UK households, 1991present Variables in the model: Age, age squared, Education dummies MOW scores (mean occupational wage, 2 digit categories, standardised to 0-100) Work, family care months over past 4 years Dummies for top MOW decile and deciles 7 to 9 Product of MOW dummies and age, age squared Sex only in selection equation Kan and Gershuny ISER WP

BHPS longitudinal evidence

Contrasting leavers and stayers Consider all women in employment at time of BHPS interview before first birth: –leaverswomen not in employment the year after first birth. –stayerswomen in employment at all of six subsequent annual interviews. –Note third intermediate category: non-leavers with various other post-birth strategies. (details of regression modelling available on request)

Alternative household work strategies

Step 2. Gender balance matters UK as example of liberal regime lacking strong childcare & paternity leave regulations: For women with parents in top quintile: –Income (humcap) penalties falling from the 1930s to 1950s birth cohorts, to around 20%. For women with parents in bottom quintile: –penalties rising from 1920s to 1950s birth cohorts, from 40% to 70% 7 yrs after birth.

L/S penalties interact with parents class situation and regimes Conclude: gendered polarisation in intergen. transmission of life chances… … results from choices made under constraints of national system of regulation …and this effect is intensified by concurrent rise in marital dissolution: He leaves with the human capital Shes left with the baby… …and another child grows up in poverty.