Surveys on agricultural distribution and agricultural use of fertilizers in Italy Mario Adua ISTAT- National Institute of Statistics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
National Seminar on Developing a Program for the Implementation of the 2008 SNA and Supporting Statistics in Turkey Arap DİRİ 10 September 2013 Ankara.
Advertisements

An impact evaluation of Ethiopias Food Security Program John Hoddinott, IFPRI (in collaboration with Dan Gilligan, Alemayehu Seyoum and Samson Dejene)
Significance Testing.  A statistical method that uses sample data to evaluate a hypothesis about a population  1. State a hypothesis  2. Use the hypothesis.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Importance and Uses of Agricultural Statistics Section B 1.
Wisconsin Dairy Farms by Herd Size, 2007 Source: USDA/NASS, Farms, Land in Farms, and Livestock Operations Summary.
1. SECTOR OF MACRO-ECONOMIC STATISTICS, NATIONAL ACCOUNTS AND PRICES 2. SECTOR OF BUSINESS STATISTICS 3. SECTOR OF SOCIAL STATISTICS AND DEMOGRAPHY.
Management and Implementation of Statistical Surveys on Use of Mineral Fertilizers and Pesticides in the Republic of Belarus (experience and practice)
Pesticide and Fertilizer Management in the Republic of Moldova Aurora Garabagiu - National Bureau of Statistics Iulia Iordachi - Ministry of Agriculture.
MEXSAI (ICAS III) - November 2-4, 2004 Third International Conference on Agricultural Statistics 1 Social Welfare and Environmental Sustainability Towards.
Fertilizer consumption: main information sources on national level and data quality assurance Prepared by Barbara Kutin Slatnar and Enisa Lojović Hadžihasanović,
UGANDA NATIONAL PANEL SURVEY PROGRAM DECEMBER 2013 By James Muwonge, Uganda Bureau of Statistics Uganda Bureau of Statistics.
FARMS MULTIFUNCTIONALITY AND HOUSEHOLDS INCOMES IN SUSTAINABLE RURAL DEVELOPMENT Session 4: Income and Employment of the Rural Household By Marco Ballin.
Ilie Dumitrescu National Institute of Statistics Third International Conference on Agricultural Statistics MEXSAI-ICAS-III Cancun- Mexico, 2-4 November.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Integrating Agriculture into National Statistical Systems Section A 1.
Agriculture activity in the national accounts - how well it is measured? Pratap Narain B – 286 Yojana Vihar, Delhi – , India (Paper sponsored by.
Trade and Environment Dimensions in the Food and Food Processing in IRAN By:Rezvan Rahnavard and Faridoun Alani.
State Plant Protection Service 26 September 2007 ISTAMBUL 2005 Transition Facility Programme PESTICIDES USE SURVEY IN LITHUANIA Danguolė Krepštulienė,
Fulfilment of requirements of the Regulation No 1185/2009 regarding agricultural and non agricultural use of pesticides in Latvia Guna Karlsone, CSB of.
Environmental Statistics of Jordan Department of Statistics Jordan Munther Badriyah Head of Environment Statistics Division 20-22/10/-2010 Santiago - Chili.
What is the Best Indicator of Work Performed in Agriculture? IACS-4 Beijing October 2007 Pál Bóday - Éva Laczka.
Data Users Needs & Capacity Building International Programs National Agricultural Statistics Service United States Department of Agriculture November 2009.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Statistics Division Essential fertilizer data and structure for country and cross-country analysis.
Potential changes to scope of agricultural surveys and censuses in the Australian context Allan Nicholls Australian Bureau of Statistics.
FOOD AND AGRICULTURE ORGANIZATION OF THE UNITED NATIONS Statistics Division EUROSTAT - Meeting of the Working Group on "Structure of agricultural holdings.
GROUP 2 Practical C. Question 1 Cut off will depend on the country situation : 1 pig may be significant Frequency distribution – take the lower 10 – 20%
Luxembourg, 25 June Meeting of the Task Force “Agricultural land prices and rents” 25 June 2009.
Understanding Sampling
Statistics of the Environment Sub-Group Water Tuesday, 9 October Sweden: Water for services (and some comments on irrigation)
TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agricultural Statistics Department Agricultural Census Economic.
1 « Agri-environmental indicators: Nitrogen balance at NUTS IV level. A case study in Greece » NATIONAL STATISTICAL SERVICE OF GREECE.
Rome, 2015 Alikhan Smailov Chairman of the Committee on Statistics Ministry of National Economy of the Republic of Kazakhstan Development of agricultural.
Workshop LFS, April Estimating the non-response bias using exogenous data on employment Etienne Debauche Corinne Prost.
Outline 1.Government Priorities 2.Data to be collected from PHC 3.Data items to be covered in Agriculture Census 4.Data items to be covered in follow-up.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 Overview of experiences in Slovenia and Hungary Riga, July 2007 Transition Facility Statistical Cooperation Programme.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 The project “Pesticide indicators” and the use of PPP’s in the context of the new Regulation on PPPs Riga, July 2007.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Agricultural statistics part 1A Demarcation and principles Business Statistics and Registers.
1 Giuseppe Cinquegrana Researcher National Accounts directorate Istat OECD Working Party - Paris, 15 October 2008 Estimating buildings, other structures.
Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Co-operation Programme 2005 Lot 2: Pesticide Indicators Survey on Pesticide Use on Wheat Crops.
13-Jul-07 Pesticide Usage Surveys Examples of calculations: doses – area treated.
ICON-Institute Public Sector1 Important aspects of data processing and presenting format Vilnius, 5-6 September 2007 Transition Facility Statistical Cooperation.
Testing the use of administrative data to edit the 2009 Agriculture Census Dolores Lorca National Statistical Institute of Spain.
Needs on input use Guido Castellano, DG AGRI L2, Economic Analysis of EU Agriculture FSS working party meeting February 2010, Luxembourg.
Istanbul 13-14th September, 2007 Marios A.Adamides Plant Health Inspection Service Dep. Of Agriculture Min. of Agriculture Cyprus Workshop on Pesticide.
Roundtable Meeting on Programme for the 2010 Round of Censuses of Agriculture - Apia, Samoa March By Octavio da Costa Monteiro de ALMEIDA Timor.
Pesticide use survey in Lithuania 2007 PESTICIDES USE SURVEY IN LITHUANIA SURVEY CROP – WINTER WHEAT Danguolė Krepštulienė, Statistics Lithuania Darius.
1Your reference The Menu of Indicators and the Core Set from the South African Point of View Moses Mnyaka 13/08/2009.
Statistical Office of the Slovak Republic 1 Pesticide Indicators Pesticide Indicators Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Cooperation Programme.
2nd Joint Workshop on Pesticide Indicators Pesticide Usage Survey on Wheat in Hungary Zsuzsanna Szabó Hungarian Central Statistical Office September.
1 REPUBLIC OF CROATIA Central Bureau of Statistics Data collection project: PESTICIDE STATISTICS Istanbul, September Vesna Koletic, M.Sc.
ROMANIA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS ROMANIA NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STATISTICS EFFICIENCY OF FERTILIZER APPLICATION TO MAIN CROPS Aneta GÂLCĂ Gabriela.
Eurostat activities concerning regional nutrient balances.
PRIME MINISTRY REPUBLIC OF TURKEY TURKISH STATISTICAL INSTITUTE Agriculture and Environmental Statistics Department Agricultural Statistics Group 1 IMPLEMENTATION.
General features regarding Agricultural Census/ farm structure surveys in EU Presentation in a training workshop September 2011 “Preparing for Agricultural.
How to deal with quality aspects in estimating national results Annalisa Pallotti Short Term Expert Asa 3st Joint Workshop on Pesticides Indicators Valletta.
Agricultural cost of production statistics: main concepts
Agricultural census in Montenegro – methods of data collection
Pesticide data Sales data: Use data: Country use data:
Multi-Beneficiary Statistical Co-operation Programme 2005
The European Statistical Training Programme (ESTP)
Nutrient balance for nitrogen TAPAS action – Statistics Belgium in collaboration with the Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research 11 June 2009.
3.4 Fertiliser statistics transmission
PESTICIDE USAGE SURVEY IN TURKEY
FINAL REPORT PLAN PILOT PROJECT: Transition Facility Multi-Beneficiary
The main results of the Pesticides Survey
THE SAMPLING APPROACH IN SLOVENIA
Workshop on Pesticide Indicators
GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION OF PESTICIDE USAGE STATISTICS A summary
EUROSTAT FUNDED PROJECT ON IMPROVING FERTILISER DATA
Chapter 5: The analysis of nonresponse
Presentation transcript:

Surveys on agricultural distribution and agricultural use of fertilizers in Italy Mario Adua ISTAT- National Institute of Statistics

Summary Surveys: 1.Distribution of fertilizers for agricultural use 2.FSS – Survey on structural agricultural holdings 3.Use of plant protection products and fertilizers in major fruit trees cultivation 4.Use of plant protection products in specifics crops

Distribution of fertilizers for agricultural use General information Type of source: census statistical survey Survey unit: fertilizers distributor Scope or coverage: distribution of 75 types of fertilizers, crops, volumes in Kg of net nutrients per hectare cultivated Rappresentativity: exhaustive 1

Distribution of fertilizers for agricultural use Reference period: calendar year Frequency: annual Geographic coverage: NUTS 3 Non-response rate: not significant Techniques of data collection: postal survey 1

Variables surveyed Distributed quantity of 64 types of fertilizers Distributed quantity of 6 types of nutrients (N, K2O, P2O5, mesoelements, microelements, organic substances) Distributed quantity of types of nutrients per cultivated hectare Distribution of fertilizers for agricultural use

2 General information Type of source: random sampling statistical survey Sampling frame: agricultural census database Survey unit: agricultural holding FSS- structure of agricultural holdings

Scope or coverage: utilized agricultural area, livestock, UDE, use of mineral, organic and organic-mineral fertilizers in agricultural area Rappresentativity: 2,5% Reference period: FSS- structure of agricultural holdings

Frequency: on time study Geographic coverage: NUTS 2 Non-response rate:8% Techniques of data collection: face to face interview 2

Variables surveyed Area of holding treated with chemical fertilizers (ha) Area of holding treated with organic fertilizers (ha) Area of holding treated with organic- mineral fertilizers (ha) Quantity of organic fertilizers distributed by type (manure, sewage, etc) FSS- structure of agricultural holdings

Use of plant protection products and fertilizers in major fruit trees cultivation 3 General information Type of source: random sampling statistical survey Sampling frame: agricultural census database Survey unit: agricultural holding Rappresentativity: 1,25%

Use of plant protection products and fertilizers in major fruit trees cultivation 3 Scope or coverage: consumption of 64 types of fertilizers and consumption of 6 types of PPP and 3 toxicology classes by the main fruit trees cultivation Reference period: 2002 Frequency of the survey: on the time study

Use of plant protection products and fertilizers in major fruit trees cultivation 3 Geographic coverage: NUTS 2 Non response rate: 8% Techniques of data collections: face to face interview

Variables surveyed Quantity of fertilizers utilized per area, per major fruit trees cultivation Number of holdings treated with fertilizer per major fruit trees cultivation Use of plant protection products and fertilizers in major fruit trees cultivation

Use of plant protection products in specific crop 4 General information Type of source: random sampling statistical survey Sampling frame: FSS database Survey unit: agricultural holding Scope or coverage: use of plant protection products Rappresentativity: 0,25%

Use of plant protection products in specific crop 4 Reference period: crop year Frequency of the survey: annual Geographic coverage: NUTS 1 Non-response rate: 0% (non responses are replaced) Techniques of data collection: CATI- computer assisted telephone interviewing

Variables surveyed Utilized quantity of PPP, utilized per area and per crop Number of treatments on PPP per specific crop Area of holding treated with PPP Utilized quantity of types of active substances per hectare Use of plant protection products in specific crop

Suggestions We could evaluate the possibility to do a new survey of fertilizers similar to survey of PPP on specific crop. Use of plant protection products in specific crop

Conclusion Distribution of fertilizers for agricultural use The main source in Italy for each operator connected with fertilizers It can be considered a good example for other countries

Conclusion FSS We can evaluate the possibility to introduce some questions to collect information about fertilizers for each cultivation It is necessary to estimate costs and benefits

Conclusion Use of plant protection products and fertilizers in major fruit trees cultivation It has been a positive experience It is necessary to estimate costs and benefits

Conclusion Use of plant protection products in specific crop We can evaluate the possibility to introduce questions about fertilizers to obtain information on specific crop It is necessary to estimate costs and benefits

Future perspective of ISTAT It is very important to continue and to develop the surveys on the distribution and use of fertilizers We are evaluating the opportunity to introduce questions on fertilizers in other surveys (FSS, etc) It very important a financial contribution of UE We need to evaluate a contemporaneous collection of fertilizers and PPP per crop

Future perspective of ISTAT It can be useful a task-force in Eurostat We could evaluate to consider the possibility for a brand new “Regulation on fertilizers statistics”