1 Northwest Energy Efficiency Taskforce Workgroup # 1 Measuring What Matters Looking ahead, what data must we have to succeed?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
Advertisements

D EEMED M EASURE R EVIEW P ROJECT Final Report December 7, 2010 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael Baker.
Draft Action Plan Update – Agenda Item No. 5D Central Valley Flood Protection Board.
1 Conservation: An Alternative Energy Source for Local Communities Ted Coates, Power Manager September 20, 2008.
1 Workgroup #4: Marketing and Public Awareness Initial Recommendations.
Public Interest Energy Research –Natural Gas Program Status Presentation to Air Emissions Advisory Committee May 12, 2005 Philip Misemer California Energy.
NATIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING FORTHE DEVELOPMENT OF A NATIONAL IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR THE GLOBALLY HARMONISED SYSTEM OF CLASSIFICATION AND LABELLING.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Energy Efficiency at BPA Northwest Clean & Affordable Energy Conference Josh Warner May 31, 2013.
Workshop for Proposed EPIC Triennial Plans Investor Owned Utility Programs July 31, 2014.
1 Measuring What Matters – Looking ahead, what data must we have to succeed? NEET Workgroup #1 Report Co-Chairs: Massoud Jourabch and Mary Smith Executive.
Promoting Energy Efficiency In Buildings in Developing countries.
GTM for Product Leaders Project Overview A project that guides product leaders and their teams in developing a successful go-to-market strategy.
ITU Activities on Bridging the Standardization Gap (BSG) ITU Regional Standardization Forum for Africa (Kampala, Uganda, June 2014) Vijay Mauree,
Less is More: SEE Action and the Power of Efficiency Hon. Phyllis Reha Commissioner, Minnesota PUC Co-Chair, SEE Action Customer Information and Behavior.
Knowledge to Shape Your Future Electric / Gas / Water Information collection, analysis and application EE Potential Summary Study Overview CALMAC Meeting.
Measuring What Matters November 7 th Agenda Review and update of tasks and timeline Review and update of tasks and timeline Role of RTF Role of.
MeTA Jordan Executive Summary Baseline data is an important source for policy makers to diagnose the pharmaceutical and health sector situation in order.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
California Needs Assessment of Workforce Issues for Energy Efficiency, Demand-Side Management, Renewable Energy and the Green Economy Conducted by the.
Indonesia ICT Consultative Forum (IICF) Coordinating Ministry for Economic Affairs | US-ASEAN Business Council KEMENKO PEREKONOMIAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA.
Water Supply Planning Initiative State Water Commission November 22, 2004.
NEET Workgroup #3 - Residential Subgroup Snohomish County PUD November 2008.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Slide 1 Accelerating Energy Efficiency To Reduce the PNW Power System's Carbon Footprint Tom Eckman Manager, Conservation.
Workgroup #3 High Impact Energy Efficiency Initiatives John Savage Stan Price.
April_2010 Partnering initiatives at country level Proposed partnering process to build a national stop tuberculosis (TB) partnership.
Experience you can trust. Phase 1: Cataloguing Available End-Use and Efficiency Load Data September 15, 2009 End-Use Load Data Update Project.
Stationary and Area Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13, 2012 Washington, D.C. Hall of the States 1.
Energy Efficiency – Building an Energy Resource Kathleen Hogan Deputy Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency US DOE.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council Action Plan Summary.
DRAFT Preliminary: BPA Summary of 6 th Plan Supply Curves May 15, 2009 Lauren Gage
Ukraine In-Depth Energy Efficiency Review VI International Specialized Trade Fair “ENERGY EFFICIENCY RENEWABLE ENERGY – 2013”, Kiev, 8 November 2013 Steivan.
The Energy Policy Act of 2005 and Its Revisions to PURPA November 11, 2005 Grace D. Soderberg Assistant General Counsel National Association of Regulatory.
Presentation to Energy Optimization Collaborative October 2015 ENERGY A Proposal to Expand the Calibration Research Agenda: Part Two.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 1 Distribution System Efficiency Potential & Conservation Voltage Reduction Power Committee April 2009.
Evaluation of Wood Smoke Quantification and Attribution RTF PAC October 17, 2014.
WG 1: Measuring what matters December 5 th meeting.
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Preferred Resources Pilot August 17, 2015
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
September 18, 2014 Jim West :: Co-Chair, RTF Policy Advisory Committee RTF Policy Advisory Committee Background.
Enabling Results: Monitoring and Evaluation in the U.S. ENERGY STAR Program September 28, 2012Ashley M. King Environment Officer.
An Overview of the Smart Metering Programme in GB.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Behavior Based Energy Efficiency (BBEE) October 2011.
2014 Enhanced RCP Jennifer Light & Lakin Garth Regional Technical Forum December 8, 2015.
Sixth Power Plan A Public Utility Point of View Bill Gaines, Director, Tacoma Public Utilities Craig Smith, Assistant General Manager, Snohomish PUD Northwest.
Process for Review of 6 th Plan Supply Curves June 19, 2009 Lauren Gage
Barriers to Implementing Energy Efficiency at Small and Rural Utilities Jennifer Anziano and Ryan Firestone August 19, 2015.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
3/12/ Regional Conservation Resource Supply Assessment Who Wants It & Why How We Propose to Do It And Whose to Blame If We Fail.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
1 DRAFT DO NOT CITE OR QUOTE For NPC Resource Study Discussion Only NPC Demand Task Force – Residential and Commercial Findings & Recommendations January.
ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.
Strategic Planning for State Energy Workforce Consortia Day 2.
Update from the United States Standards and Conformity Assessment Work in the Sub Committee on Standards and Conformance.
Getting to Net Zero Taskforce March 4. Agenda Getting to Net Zero Task Force Meeting. March 4th, :00PM-9:00 PM Smith Campus Center 700 pm Welcome.
LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER ENERGY EFFICIENCY POTENTIAL STUDY Demand Analysis Working Group (DAWG) September 25, 2014.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Energy Efficiency Policy Options and Program Best Practices MD PSC Planning Conference on State’s Future Electricity.
LEVERAGING US EXPERIENCE: INDIA’s ENERGY PRODUCTIVITY ROAD MAP
August ICA Agenda Time Topic 8:00 – 8:15
Market Operations Engagement Group EVSE Working Group – Principles
European Commission “Intelligent Energy for Europe”
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
Tracking Progress for Building Efficiency Accelerator
New Homes/ Manufactured Homes Work Group
Global Climate Change Alliance: Intra-ACP Programme
Building Efficiency Accelerator
Sixth Power Plan Setting Conservation Targets and Implementation Strategies Jill Steiner, Snohomish Public Utility District Northwest Power and Conservation.
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System
International Energy Council
Synergies between NDCs & SDGs; Integration into National Planning
Energy Storage Roadmap & Flexibility Roadmap Information Session
Presentation transcript:

1 Northwest Energy Efficiency Taskforce Workgroup # 1 Measuring What Matters Looking ahead, what data must we have to succeed?

2 Proposed Agenda INTRODUCTIONS Review of goals for NEET Review of objectives, timeline, and deliverable for our working group: Measuring What Matters Review of tasks mapped out for the Working group PHASE 1 TODAY: CURRENT STATE SURVEY –1. WHAT’S ALREADY COLLECTED –WHAT STILL NEEDED DETERMINE SURVEY INSTRUMENT METHOD OF SURVEY –2. DETERMINE SUBGROUP ORGANIZATION UTILITY/STATE/REGIONAL + OTHER? IOU/PUBLIC/STATE + OTHER GAS UTILITIES OR ORGANIZATIONS OTHER: FED? INDUSTRY PARTNERS? CONSULTANTS? CALIF? –3. Determine SUBGROUP CHAIRS? ASSIGN/SIGN UP DELIVERABLE/PRODUCT DESCRIPTION DUE DATES MILESTONES PREPARE TO PRESENT

3 Proposed Agenda 1.INTRODUCTIONS 2.Review of goals for NEET 3.Review of objectives, timeline, and deliverable for our working group: Measuring What Matters 4.Discussions: 5.Data needs 6.Data availability 7.Identifying important gaps 8.Leveraging national, regional, other data sources to fill the gaps 9.Identification of sub-groups 10.Schedule for next steps

4 Who’s here Circulate list Roundtable introductions

5 Background on NEET and Workgroups Regional collaboration can provide for the acquisition of greater amounts of energy efficiency at an affordable cost. A Taskforce Executive Committee was formed consisting of 25+ senior-level representatives from utilities, state government, customers, industry and energy efficiency specialists to review and develop specific energy efficiency recommendations for the Northwest. Several technical work groups were formed to address key areas of focus for the region. Work groups will be open to all interested parties and co-chaired by key regional experts. Staff time and commitment to these work groups will be essential to the success of this effort.

6 NEET Objective Advance the region’s energy efficiency acquisition through greater regional collaboration, commitment, customer involvement Advance the region’s energy efficiency acquisition through greater regional collaboration, commitment, customer involvement Timetable –By August 15 – Establish Current status –By September 26 - Identify strategies for acceleration of Energy Efficiency –By December 17 make recommend actions

7 Working groups 1.Measuring what matters 2.Emerging solutions and technologies 3.High impact energy efficiency initiatives 4.The role of Marketing and Public awareness 5.Building energy efficiency workforce of the future 6.Rethinking governance and EE policies

8 Workgroup #1 Tasks Task 1: Survey the Council, Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, the Energy Trust of Oregon, BPA, individual utilities and states to determine to what extent existing data is current, sufficient, and useful in the following areas: Task 5: Provide background on the different types of state programs which, in conjunction with utility-funded efforts, promote energy efficiency. –Survey state energy efficiency incentives and results –Survey state energy efficiency mandates and results –Survey state and local building codes regarding energy efficiency –Survey extent of building code enforcement –Survey state energy efficiency product standards Tasks 1 and 5 would need survey Task 2: Explore whether a regional approach to acquiring needed data is appropriate and, if so, recommend a solution. Task 3: Evaluate the current role of the Regional Technical Forum (RTF) and determine if it is adequately supported. Task 4: Recommend schedule and topics for regional research and data collection/analysis in the Northwest. Identify priority data needs. Evaluate budget needs in conjunction with other energy efficiency needs, opportunities and priorities. Task 6: Identify opportunities for regional synergies in the development of coordinated state approaches to energy efficiency incentives, building codes, code enforcement and product standards.

9 Workgroup #1 Questions: Data What type of data (customer characteristics, energy consumption, end-use/load shape and energy efficiency cost data, etc.) is essential for: –Forecasting future loads (ENRGY AND PEAK) –Estimating energy efficiency potential –Providing the underpinnings for effective energy efficiency programs? How is data currently collected and how current is existing data? Is some data more important than others? How often does it need to be updated to be of use? What is the ideal scale to collect necessary data – utility territory, state, regional? Is there adequate data available for all parts of the region?

10 Workgroup #1 Questions: State Initiatives, etc How do state initiatives, whether incentives, mandates or regulations, operate in tandem with utility-funded energy efficiency programs to enhance overall energy efficiency achievement? How do state initiatives, whether incentives, mandates or regulations, operate in tandem with utility-funded energy efficiency programs to enhance overall energy efficiency achievement? How do the four Northwest states currently collect data? Are there opportunities for more collaboration and in what ways? Is a regional approach for collecting data appropriate and, if so, what would be an optimal solution (s)? Are the current data collection initiatives (such as the Regional Technical Forum) effective and is the information readily accessible to stakeholders? Are their opportunities for greater efficiency, ease of use, transparency, etc.? Are data collection efforts adequately staffed and funded?

11 What data is needed for; Demand forecasting –Energy and capacity Conservation –Planning –Implementation –Evaluation Demand Response

12 Issues to be addressed by subgroupgs How do we identify important gaps? How should we leverage national, regional and other data sources to fill the gaps? All the other prior questions…

13 Subgroups Tasks 1-6 –Future data needs –Refine survey instrument to reflect that subgroup: –Survey current state of data –Identify the gaps –Leveraging ReportingTimetable

14 Workgroup #1 Tasks For today Task 1: Survey the Council, Northwest Energy Efficiency Alliance, the Energy Trust of Oregon, BPA, individual utilities and states to determine to what extent existing data is current, sufficient, and useful in the following areas: Task 5: Provide background on the different types of state programs which, in conjunction with utility-funded efforts, promote energy efficiency. –Survey state energy efficiency incentives and results –Survey state energy efficiency mandates and results –Survey state and local building codes regarding energy efficiency –Survey extent of building code enforcement –Survey state energy efficiency product standards

15 Suggested subgroups Utilities IOU +Publics State and local government Regional and National organizations Private companies

16 Measuring what Matters PHASE 1 SURVEY Task 1: Survey existing data for currency, sufficiency and usefulness Definition of energy efficiency includes both gas and electric. Definition of energy efficiency includes both gas and electric. Types of Data that we need to assess availability, adequacy and frequency. 1.Customer characteristics data 2.Energy consumption data 3.End use/load shape data, including hourly load data 4.Market characteristic and market baseline data 5.Energy efficiency technology or behavior change savings and cost data

17 Survey of Council, NEEA, Energy Trust, BPA, IOU, Publics, States Review of draft survey questions Survey Format to use Telephone On-line Identifying survey lead Identifying the correct person/s to the survey to. Compiling the data Preparing the findings

18 Comments about the survey?

19 Data Needs issues need to be addressed –ACCESSIBILITY Electronic library for all data, including evaluation work –END-USE CONSUMERS End use/load shape data, including hourly load data Customer characteristics data –Residential, Commercial, Industrial, Ag –New construction, existing buildings –NEEA – frequency low, sample size relatively small –Behavioral segmentation Market Segmentation –Targeted market sectors – how using energy and decision-making, market actors; focus on commercial sector. Energy consumption data –Tie customer characteristics to consumption data for EUIs, billing data –Tracking consumption over time – panel of customers over time –PRODUCTS / SERVICES / PRACTICES Market sales information –Market sales and tracking on ongoing basis – private sector data on SKUs – trend data Regional measure database –Updated incremental cost data –Market shares for equipment –Baseline efficiencies for equipment – distribution of equipment sales –Savings for equipment and behavior changes –Best information/ status on emerging technologies Product and Services market characteristics and practices –Targeted supply chain for individual products – how does it work? –Baseline, etc –EVALUATIONS Sharing of information Regional initiatives where coordination of activities and results would be efficient (e.g. Energy Star Homes)

20 Additional issues Avoided Cost (lack of consistency) Costs ( incremental EE measures, non- energy benefits ) Sectoral detail (transportation) Fuel market shares (gas, oil, wood..) Changing baselines Forecast needs Free-ridership (group 6?) Model validation data needs (simulation data)