2006 FSUTMS/CUBE Voyager Model Conversion & Support Survey Model Task Force Meeting December 2006.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Scaling up the global initiative on the implementation of the SNA and supporting statistics Meeting on Scaling up the coordination and resources for the.

Advertisements

Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework

Spark NH Council Member Survey October – November, 2012.

State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.

 Holy Family Commission Survey Results June

MEPDG Overview & National Perspective CRSI Expert Task Group Meeting July 29, 2008 Gary Crawford Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.

Office of the State Chief Information Officer Customer Satisfaction Survey Enterprise Project Management Office Gaye Mays Kathy Bromead October.

AASHTOWare  - Transportation Software Solutions Contents Participants Follow-up Purpose Introduction Results Trnsport 2004 Customer Satisfaction Survey.

NBA Survey of the Australian Blood Sector Suppliers Summary of Responses and Feedback.

Performance management guidance

PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.

By Mohamed Al-Aawah Disaster Risk Reduction Programme UNESCO Cairo Office.

Mitun PatelMXP07U. Organisational structure Top management; this includes the organisation’s general manager and its executives Department managers; this.

Getting SMARTer: The evolution of Project Management within Victoria Police Doug Witschi.

Introductions Jim Enzinna, Chief, Licensing Division Mark DiNapoli, Assistant Chief, Licensing Division Tracie Coleman, Head, Information Section Vince.

TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.

ISO 9001:2015 Revision overview - General users

Software Quality Assurance Implementation Plan June 15, 2004 Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board Chip Lagdon Director Office of Quality Assurance Programs.

Florida Model Task Force Committee Restructuring Model Task Force Meeting December 2006.

Two Strategies for Developing Solid Referral Relationships A Complete Training Series.

Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) What data will be included in the 2010 AHAR? October 1, 2009 – September 30, 2010 Seattle and King County.

Roles and Responsibilities

UBC Department of Finance Campus Community Customer Service Survey Forum Presentation March 1, 2004.

OHT 25.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 The quality assurance organizational framework Top management’s quality.

1 DOE IMPLEMENTATION WORKSHOP ASSESSING MY EMS Steven R. Woodbury

TSM&O FLORIDA’S STATEWIDE IMPLEMENTATION Elizabeth Birriel, PEElizabeth Birriel, PE Florida Department of TransportationFlorida Department of TransportationTranspo2012.

ITS Communication Plan: Focus Group & Survey Findings Raechelle Clemmons November 25, 2008.

Clay County IIIP Evaluation Project. Clay County 101 Clay County 101 Components of evaluation plan Components of evaluation plan Results of surveys Results.

August 7, Market Participant Survey Action Plan Dale Goodman Director, Market Services.

Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 

CEBP Learning Institute Fall 2009 Evaluation Report A collaborative Partnership between Indiana Department of Corrections & Indiana University November.

Modernization and Reengineering of the Census of Governments Presented at the State Data Center Annual Training Conference Lisa Blumerman Governments Division.

UBC Department of Finance Office Staff Survey Forum Presentation March 17, 2004.

Current State of FSUTMS Practice Presented to Model Task Force November 9, 2009 Terry Corkery FDOT Systems Planning Office.

US DOT Planning for Operations Initiative – An Update AASHTO SCOH Annual Meeting June 14-17, 2009 Manchester, NH Rick Backlund – FHWA Office of Operations.

Scott Butson District Technology Manager. Provide professional to all district staff Professional development has been provided on a regular basis to.

Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.

Text #ICANN51 GAC / GNSO Joint Meeting 12 October 2014.

FDOT Transit Office Modeling Initiatives The Transit Office has undertaken a number of initiatives in collaboration with the Systems Planning Office and.

1 FSUTMS-Voyager: Transit Standards within Evolving FSUTMS Summary Presentation Florida Model Task Force Tampa, Florida December 13 th, slides.

Creating a Statewide Modeling System in Virginia Presentation for the 11th TRB National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 7, 2007.

DEVELOPING PARENT INVOLVEMENT POLICIES Title I No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Section 1118.

FSUTMS Model Status and Standardization Florida Model Task Force Meeting Tampa, FL December 13, 2006 Developments and Future Directions.

Eurostat/UNSD Conference on International Outreach and Coordination in National Accounts for Sustainable Development and Growth 6-8 May, Luxembourg These.

1 Florida’s New Transit Modeling System Huiwei Shen, Yongqiang Wu & Dave Schmitt 11 th TRB Planning Applications Conference Daytona Beach, Florida May.

Tools to Support GEF National Focal Points Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points in Asia May 2008, Manila.

UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.

Commission on Teacher Credentialing Ensuring Educator Excellence 1 Program Assessment Technical Assistance Meetings December 2009.

2014–2018 State Strategic Plan Survey Results Technology Planning, Policy, and Governance.

A Strategic Plan for Pavement Engineering NCHRP 20-7(223) AASHTO Joint Technical Committee on Pavements Dan Dawood, P.E. Pennsylvania Department of Transportation.

December 16, :00 – 2:45. MPM Team Agenda 1.Review of MPM Program and Team 2.Consensus items document 3. Upcoming activities 4. Discussion.

Early Childhood Transition: Effective Approaches for Building and Sustaining State Infrastructure Indiana’s Transition Initiative for Young Children and.

WP6 – Dissemination Project Name: Enhancing Students Participation in Quality Assurance in Armenian HE- ESPAQ Ref TEMPUS BE-TEMPUS-SMGR.

Improving Technology Infrastructure and Web-based Information and Services Northeast Iowa Community College PRP031A Christine Woodson, Project Director.

Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning a Statistical Project Section B 1.

Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.

1 Caltrans State Programs Wendy Johnsen Caltrans, Division of Mass Transportation March 19, 2009.

1 Transparency Act Highlights and Timeframes for Implementation of the Act June 10 th, 2008.

Washington State Work Zone Rule  Work Zone Rule Implementation  New Work Zone Policy Cathy Nicholas, FHWA - WA Division Office Frank Newboles, WSDOT.

ISIS Project Status Report May 18, 2006 Prepared by MAXIMUS, Inc Education Systems Division for the ABT Committee.

A Framework for Assessing Needs Across Multiple States, Stakeholders, and Topic Areas Stephanie Wilkerson & Mary Styers REL Appalachia American Evaluation.

ACF Office of Community Services (OCS) Community Services Block Grant (CSBG) Survey of Grantees Satisfaction with OCS Survey of Eligible Entities Satisfaction.

CBFWA Organization and Staff Satisfaction Survey 2010 Wildlife Advisory Committee Results.

– Closed User Group – EBA CLEARING’s Quality Survey December 2015 Results.

Work Plan Work Plan Management (Document 21)

Presented to Model Task Force Meeting presented by Danny Lamb, Florida DOT District 7 November 9, 2009 Model Task Force Priorities Survey.

Evaluating performance management

Parent Involvement and No Child Left Behind (NCLB)

Use of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in FSUTMS in Support of Transportation Planning in Florida MTF DTA SUBCOMMITTE MEETING July 28, 2011.

Use of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in FSUTMS in Support of Transportation Planning in Florida FDOT Research #BDK80 Task Work Order No June.

Presentation transcript:

2006 FSUTMS/CUBE Voyager Model Conversion & Support Survey Model Task Force Meeting December 2006

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 1 Annual MTF Survey October 25-November 17, 2006 Participants 58 Participants MPO’s, FDOT, Consulting firms Introduction

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 2 Introduction Purpose: “FDOT’s Systems Planning Office administers the FSUTMS (Florida standard model) User Satisfaction and Support Survey annually as part of its quality assurance process. This survey gives the opportunity for the Model Task Force and Citilabs (software vendor of Cube/Voyager) to evaluate the quality of the products and services provided to the Florida modeling community.”

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 3 Introduction 14 Questions: Model Task Force Support FDOT Technical Support Citilabs Support Rating Scale 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey Model Task Force Support (Questions 1 to 3) Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree FDOT Technical Support 1. MTF providing clear direction and guidance to Florida modeling community 2. MTF adequately addressing modeling needs 3. MTF implementing standard procedures and state-of-the-art modeling practices statewide and issues of FSUTMS users

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 5 Model Task Force Support (Questions 1 to 3 Summary) Respondent Comments Florida MTF Headed in right direction Still many uncertainties Need faster standardization progress

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey FDOT & Users’ Group Support (Questions 4 to 6) Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree FDOT Technical Support 4. FSUTMS users’ groups help disseminate new modeling technology and policy direction 5. FSUTMS workshops meet users’ needs 6. Technical updates, manuals, newsletter, web portal, and user survey meet expectations

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 7 FDOT & Users’ Group Support (Questions 4 to 6 Summary) Respondent Comments Users’ Groups Create good knowledge-sharing atmosphere Need more outreach to non-modelers Statewide Training Workshops Difficult due to differences in local models Most web site downloads not yet available Newsletter very informative

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey Citilabs Support (Questions 7 to 9) Statement Strongly Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree Citilabs Support 7. Citilabs provides adequate technical support in a timely manner 8. I am satisfied with the solutions to specific 9. The Cube Voyager software meets my technical questions provided by Citilabs overall modeling needs 3.60

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 9 Citilabs Support (Questions 7 to 9 Summary) Respondent Comments Good quality and timeliness of responses Mixed response on Voyager Conversion of models still in transition Issues with PT program Failure to integrate ArcGIS into Cube

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 10 Suggestions for Model Task Force Adopt statewide standards Document each model’s non-standard aspects Short-term and long-term plan of activities Funding for surveys More interaction with traffic ops and PD&E More frequent MTF meetings Convey reasons for conversion delays Address problems with FTA acceptance of FSUTMS More technical presentations Fewer committees

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 11 Suggestions for Citilabs Improve Cube’s help menu and documentation Fix PT Update and improve scripting process Complete ArcGIS integration Develop script writing manual Better guidance on transit and toll modeling Enhance Cube’s analysis and reporting capabilities Coordinate better on conversion status

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 12 Suggestions for FDOT Planning More MPO-specific model training More computer-based or web-based training Detailed guidance on post-processing procedures Ensure accuracy of non-MPO county networks Better communication on research projects and future directions Faster progress on standardization Address outdated networks, zone structure, and socioeconomic data Address previous MTF meeting feedback

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 13 Action Plan Model Task Force Working with FTA on PT modeling issues Develop 5-year work program for FSUTMS Reorganize committees Citilabs Working with MTF to fix PT issues ArcGIS integration making progress Beef up technical support Committed to working with MTF

2006 FSUTMS/Cube Voyager Model Support Survey 14 Action Plan FDOT Systems Planning Office Working on FSUTMS standardization Implement 5-year work program for FSUTMS Revising training work program