Atmospheric Validation Working Group Members (23): Heather Graven, Manvendra Dubey, Arlyn Andrews, David Baker, Kevin Bowman, Martha Butler, Jim Collatz,

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Quantification of the sensitivity of NASA CMS-Flux inversions to uncertainty in atmospheric transport Thomas Lauvaux, NASA JPL Martha Butler, Kenneth Davis,

Advertisements

GHG Verification & the Carbon Cycle 28 September 2010 JH Butler, NOAA CAS Management Group Meeting Page 1 Global Monitoring, Carbon Cycle Science, and.

GHG Verification & the Carbon Cycle Hyperspectral Workshop JH Butler, NOAA 31 March 2011 Page 1 Greenhouse gases – What we do well and what we need to.

Summary discussion Top-down approach Consider Carbon Monitoring Systems, tailored to address stakeholder needs. CMS frameworks can be designed to provide.

National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.

Detection and Quantification of Urban Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Ground- based results from the INFLUX Experiment Map of road emissions from Hestia with.

CMS – 2012 Reduction in Bottom-Up Land Surface CO 2 Flux Uncertainty in NASA’s Carbon Monitoring System Flux Project through Systematic Multi-Model Evaluation.

Atmospheric Carbon and Transport – America A new NASA Earth Venture Suborbital mission dedicated to improving the accuracy, precision and resolution of.

NACP Breakout Session: North American Terrestrial Carbon Monitoring and Decision Support Capabilities (combined from CMS and CarboNA proposals) Organized.

Improving and extending CMS land surface carbon flux products including estimates of uncertainties in fluxes and biomass. Jim Collatz, Randy Kawa, Lesley.

GEOS-CARB: A Framework for Monitoring Carbon Concentrations and Fluxes Steven Pawson 1, Lesley Ott 1, David Baker 2, George J. Collatz 1, Janusz Eluszkiewicz.

Use of satellite and suborbital observations to constrain North American methane emissions in the Carbon Monitoring System Daniel Jacob (PI), Steven.

External Communications Working Group Kevin Bowman, Peter Griffith, Kevin Gurney, Elizabeth Nelson, Ariane Verdy Interns: Maya Hutchins, Adam Norris 2013:

Algorithm Assessment/Intercomparison WG WG Coordinator: Sangram Ganguly - BAERI/NASA ARC (represented by Cristina Milesi) Group Members: David Baker, Molly.

O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY 1 Carbon Cycle Modeling Terrestrial Ecosystem Models W.M. Post, ORNL Atmospheric Measurements.

What Can We Learn from Intensive Atmospheric Sampling Field Programs? John Lin 1, Christoph Gerbig 2, Steve Wofsy 1, Bruce Daube 1, Dan Matross 1, Mahadevan.

MAPPING NACP PROGRESS ONTO LONG-TERM CARBON CYCLE SCIENCE GOALS Anna M. Michalak.

Coordinated US Initiative on Emissions Research Introduction and Goals Claire Granier and Greg Frost NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Chemical Sciences.

Mapping Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Los Angeles Basin by Remote Sensing Using a Fourier Transform Spectrometer on Mt. Wilson Kam Weng (Clare) Wong.

1 ESA Noordwijk 20 Jan 2004 Frank Raes, Peter Bergamaschi, Hugh Eva, Alan Belward Institute for Environment and Sustainability Joint Research Centre European.

M. De Mazière NDACC SC 2011, Nov. 11, 2011 NORS Demonstration Network Of ground-based Remote Sensing observations in support of the GMES Atmospheric Service.

Greenhouse gas fluxes derived from regional measurement networks and atmospheric inversions: Results from the MCI and INFLUX experiments Kenneth Davis.

Sharon M. Gourdji, K.L. Mueller, V. Yadav, A.E. Andrews, M. Trudeau, D.N. Huntzinger, A.Schuh, A.R. Jacobson, M. Butler, A.M. Michalak North American Carbon.

Diagnosis, attribution, prediction and decision support: Progress, problems and two paths forwards Kenneth Davis Department of Meteorology The Pennsylvania.

The role of the Chequamegon Ecosystem-Atmosphere Study in the U.S. Carbon Cycle Science Plan Ken Davis The Pennsylvania State University The 13 th ChEAS.

Airborne Observations of Atmospheric O 2 and CO 2 on Regional to Global Scales Britton Stephens (NCAR, Boulder, USA and NIWA, Wellington, New Zealand)

FLUXNET and Remote Sensing Open Workshop Mathias Goeckede, Natascha Kljun, Laura Chasmer Topic 3: Fluxes, Hyperspectral Remote Sensing and Upscaling.

Discussion Topics – Delaware River Basin Pilot Project Synergistic opportunities between FIA/FHM/GC/USGS –Scaling – top down/bottom up – multi-tier approach.

IntroductionUnderstanding the IOOS ProjectThe SAIC Team OverviewSummaryPast PerformanceThe SAIC Team Approach 1 Agenda  Introduction  The SAIC Team.

15-18 October 2002 Greenville, North Carolina Global Terrestrial Observing System GTOS Jeff Tschirley Programme director.

Regional Inverse Modeling in North and South America for the NASA Carbon Monitoring System Arlyn Andrews (NOAA/ESRL), John Miller (NOAA/ESRL, CIRES), Thomas.

Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.

Participant NameOrganization Collatz, George (Jim) (WG Lead)NASA GSFC Brown, MollyNASA GSFC Denning, ScottColorado State University Escobar, VanessaSigma.

Methane and Nitrous Oxide in North America: Using an LPDM to Constrain Emissions Eric Kort Non-CO2 Workshop October 23, 2008.

Data Assimilation Working Group Dylan Jones (U. Toronto) Kevin Bowman (JPL) Daven Henze (CU Boulder) 1 IGC7 4 May 2015.

1 CHARGE The goal of the breakout groups is to –define and prioritize research questions to help guide the US Global Change Research Program, –determine.

Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.

The Role of Virtual Tall Towers in the Carbon Dioxide Observation Network Martha Butler The Pennsylvania State University ChEAS Meeting June 5-6, 2006.

Quantification of anthropogenic emissions from an urban region: First results of time-integrated flask samples from the Indianapolis Flux Project (INFLUX)

Breakout Session IV: Applying Remote Sensing Observations to Impacts Assessment Background (1) The IPCC WG 2 Report (2008) “Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation.

Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: The NASA HQ Perspective November 13, 2014.

Measurements of atmospheric O 2 in relation to the ocean carbon cycle Ralph Keeling Scripps Institution of Oceanography.

International workshop on Asian Greenhouse Gases Budgets Physical Research Laboratory, Ahmedabad, India September 2011 Pep Canadell*, Prabir Patra.

Site-Level Model-Data Comparison A Proposed NACP Interim Synthesis Project Ken Davis, Peter Thornton, Kevin Schaefer, Dan Riciutto Coordinators.

International Collaboration on Data Assimilation in Terrestrial Carbon Cycle Science CARBON FUSION

Data Management Working Group Kathy Hibbard, Peter Griffith, Lucia Woo, Diane Wickland, Michael Keller, Riley Duren, Marc Fisher, Molly Brown, Kevin Bowman,

How do ocean ecosystems work? Use remote sensing to address fundamental questions Lack of field data on BGC processes, impeding calibration and validation.

ENEON first workshop Observing Europe: Networking the Earth Observation Networks in Europe September, Paris Total Carbon Column Observing Network.

MCI Break-Out Coordination Time Lines Deliverables Topic Groups –Subregional intensive group –Top-down group –Bottom-up group.

Fossil fuel CO 2 and CH 4 emissions (mass, isotopic, spatial and temporal descriptions) Session organizers: Robert Andres, Marc Fischer, Kevin Gurney Brief.

Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:

CarboEurope: The Big Research Lines Annette Freibauer Ivan Janssens.

A Modeling and Synthesis Thematic Data Center for the North American Carbon Program Robert B. Cook 1, Yaxing Wei 1, W. Mac Post 1, Peter E. Thornton 1,

External Communications Working Group Molly E Brown, NASA GSFC with WG team.

Ken Jucks and Diane Wickland Carbon Monitoring System: Welcome from NASA HQ November 12, 2014.

NASA CMS UNCERTAINTY WORKING GROUP Active members ( ): Chris Badurek, David Baker, Nicolas Bousserez, Jim Collatz, Riley Duren, Sangram Ganguly,

Success and Failure of Implementing Data-driven Upscaling Using Flux Networks and Remote Sensing Jingfeng Xiao Complex Systems Research Center, University.

NASA Carbon Monitoring System (NASA-CMS) NASA Carbon Monitoring System Science Team Overview George Hurtt NASA-CMS Science Team Leader Department of Geographical.

Measurement, Reporting, and Verification Working Group Birdsey, Richard (WG Lead)USDA Forest Service Delgado Arias, SabrinaSigma Space Domke, GrantUSDA.

Methane emission trends in the United States and new bottom-up inventories for flux inversions Daniel J. Jacob with Bram Maasakkers, Jianxiong Sheng, Melissa.

Wildfire activity as been increasing over the past decades Cites such as Salt Lake City are surrounded by regions at a high risk for increased wildfire.

July 24, GHG Measurement Program ARB’s greenhouse gas measurement program is designed to support California’s GHG reduction efforts Identify Specific.

Anna M. Michalak Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Department of Atmospheric, Oceanic and Space Sciences University of Michigan Reconciling.

FIVE CHALLENGES IN ATMOSPHERIC COMPOSITION RESEARCH 1.Exploit satellite and other “top-down” atmospheric composition data to quantify emissions and export.

NASA CMS Algorithm Assessment/Intercomparison Working Group Summary Presentation November 6 th, 2013 Coordinator: Scott Powell Members: David Baker, Molly.

Climate CoLab Land Use Webinar: International Activities Jayant Sathaye Advisor 25 June 2014.

Data Assimilation and Carbon Cycle Working Groups

Snow Watch Team Terms of Reference

An Integrated View of North American Biosphere Carbon Flux Inter-annual Variability: from satellite CO2 to phenology Junjie Liu1, Kevin Bowman1, Dave.

Carbon Model-Data Fusion

Presentation transcript:

Atmospheric Validation Working Group Members (23): Heather Graven, Manvendra Dubey, Arlyn Andrews, David Baker, Kevin Bowman, Martha Butler, Jim Collatz, Ken Davis, Riley Duren, Marc Fischer, George Hurtt, Lucy Hutyra, Daniel Jacob, Christine Kang, Ralph Keeling, Thomas Lauvaux, Junjie Liu, Chip Miller, Thomas Nehrkorn, Tom Oda, Nick Parazoo, Crystal Schaaf, Steve Wofsy

Focus: Integration of atmospheric measurements and modeling to study carbon exchanges using “top-down” approaches Progress: Gaining awareness of current methods, activities and challenges, many common to several different projects Discussing various types of atmospheric data and their uses and limitations Providing more detail about the available CMS products to facilitate their integration in current projects Making other available resources known to the community, e.g. library of footprints from WRF-STILT Considering role of atmospheric studies to meet MRV needs and potential synergy with MRV working group and CMS Applications Team Atmospheric Validation Working Group

Monthly telecons on CMS and related atmospheric projects Started June 2014, participating on each call Jim Collatz – CMS land carbon flux products Thomas Nehrkorn and Lucy Hutyra - Regional CO 2 inversion for the Boston-DC corridor Gretchen Keppel-Aleks – Use of TCCON data to evaluate land carbon fluxes Riley Duren – Understanding user needs for MRV Arlyn Andrews – CarbonTracker-Lagrange

Survey questions from Atmospheric WG What atmospheric data are being used in your project? What atmospheric models are being used in your project? How could the integration of atmospheric data or models be enabled or improved in your project, e.g. what atmospheric data or model products would you like to be made available?

18/52 projects are using atmospheric data # of projects

17/52 projects are using atmospheric models Atmospheric models and reanalyses # of projects GCMs # of projects Tracer models # of projects

24/52 projects had suggestions for integration with atmospheric models or data Comparison of complementary top-down studies, potentially at different scales Comparison of top-down and bottom-up studies, e.g. forest change, coastal fluxes Integration of top-down and bottom-up studies for sectoral attribution Improved data availability, e.g. drilling data, meteorological data, early access to provisional data, more GHG observations and/or alternate types (aircraft) Integration of atmospheric data into corrections for remote sensing products

Atmospheric WG breakout topics Future activities Survey results Other topics of interest: Responding to stakeholders’ needs Integrating in situ and column data Role of atmospheric studies in quantifying land sink of CO 2 Role of atmospheric studies in evaluating CH 4 inventories and land models Defining background composition for regional inversions Evaluation and regime selection for atmospheric models