8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics 24 - 31 August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia Orbits of S2 star in.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Chapter 15: The Milky Way Galaxy
Advertisements

Astro1010-lee.com UVU Survey of Astronomy Chapter 21 Our Milky Way.
7th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics September 2012, Belgrade, Serbia Orbital precession.
Infrared Space Astrometry mission for the Galactic Bulge
The W i d e s p r e a d Influence of Supermassive Black Holes Christopher Onken Herzberg Institute of Astrophysics Christopher Onken Herzberg Institute.
Our target sample was culled from the 2MASS and DENIS near-infrared sky surveys and consists of objects spectroscopically confirmed to be L dwarfs together.
MOND Modified Newtonian Dynamics A Humble Introduction Johannes Kepler Isaac Newton Markus Nielbock.
A SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM INSPIRALING NEUTRON STARS AND BLACK HOLES Using data taken between July 2009 and October 2010, researchers from the.
1 International Conference on RadioAstron Mission November 2003, Moscow ASTROMETRIC GOALS OF THE RADIOASTRON MISSION V.E.ZHAROV 1, A.E.RODIN 2, I.A.GERASIMOV.
Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2.
The Milky Way PHYS390 Astrophysics Professor Lee Carkner Lecture 19.
The Milky Way Galaxy 19 April 2005 AST 2010: Chapter 24.
Survey of the Universe Greg Snow U Nebraska Lincoln CROP.
PRESIDENCY UNIVERSITY
The Milky Way Center, Shape Globular cluster system
Our Galaxy The Milky Way. The Milky Way Almost everything we see in the night sky belongs to the Milky Way We see most of the Milky Way as a faint band.
The Milky Way and Other Galaxies Science A-36 12/4/2007.
Observational Astronomy. Astronomy Primary Goal: Understanding the nature of the universe and its constituents Means: Equipment building, research, teaching.
Predictions of Solar Wind Speed and IMF Polarity Using Near-Real-Time Solar Magnetic Field Updates C. “Nick” Arge University of Colorado/CIRES & NOAA/SEC.
Review for Exam 3.
Kinematics of Globular Clusters in Giant Elliptical Galaxies Hong Soo Park 1, Myung Gyoon Lee 1, Ho Seong Hwang 2, Nobuo Arimoto 3, Naoyuki Tamura 4, Masato.
Black holes: do they exist?
Dark Matter begin. Definition Dark Matter is matter that we cannot see. It neither emits nor reflects any light. If we can’t see it, how do we know it.
Cosmological Tests using Redshift Space Clustering in BOSS DR11 (Y. -S. Song, C. G. Sabiu, T. Okumura, M. Oh, E. V. Linder) following Cosmological Constraints.
1 Dynamical Effects of Cosmological Constant Antigravity Μ. Αξενίδης, Λ. Περιβολαρόπουλος, Ε. Φλωράτος Ινστιτούτο Πυρηνικής Φυσικής Κέντρο Ερευνών ‘Δημόκριτος’
25.4 Galaxies and the Universe  Objectives:  Describe the different types of galaxy  Describe the solar system’s position in our galaxy  Describe the.
PREDRAG JOVANOVIĆ AND LUKA Č. POPOVIĆ ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATORY BELGRADE, SERBIA Gravitational Lensing Statistics and Cosmology.
Galaxies Stellar Neighborhoods. What are Galaxies? Galaxies are –Huge –Held together by gravity –Comprised of… Stars Objects that orbit those stars The.
Lecture Outlines Astronomy Today 7th Edition Chaisson/McMillan © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 23.
ASTR112 The Galaxy Lecture 7 Prof. John Hearnshaw 11. The galactic nucleus and central bulge 11.1 Infrared observations (cont.) 11.2 Radio observations.
Cosmic Inhomogeneities and Accelerating Expansion Ho Le Tuan Anh National University of Singapore PAQFT Nov 2008.
Correlations of Mass Distributions between Dark Matter and Visible Matter Yuriy Mishchenko and Chueng-Ryong Ji NC State University Raleigh, NC KIAS-APCTP-DMRC.
What forms the “texture” of the universe? Figure from book.
The Event Horizon Telescope: Current Observations of SgrA* Sheperd Doeleman 1, Vincent Fish 1 & the EHT Collaboration 1 MIT Haystack Observatory Abstract.
Astronomy 404/CSI 769 Extragalactic Astronomy
The Milky Way Galaxy. Sky Maps in Different Bands.
Problem. What is the distance to the star Spica (α Virginis), which has a measured parallax according to Hipparcos of π abs = ±0.86 mas? Solution.
(1) Laboratoire d’Astrophysique de Marseille [F] - (2) Université de Montréal [Ca] - (3) Observatoire de Paris [F] Asymmetries within Optical Discs of.
Galaxies: Our Galaxy: the Milky Way. . The Structure of the Milky Way Galactic Plane Galactic Center The actual structure of our Milky Way is very hard.
Milky Way: Galactic Structure and Dynamics Milky Way has spiral structure Galactic Bulge surrounds the Center Powerful radio source Sagittarius A at Center.
Dark Matter in the Milky Way - how to find it using Gaia and other surveys Paul McMillan Surveys For All, 1st February 2016.
The prospects of probing relativity in the Galactic Center with Adaptive Optics Observations Tobias Fritz, Stefan Gillessen, Hendrik Bartko, Katie Dodds-Eden,
Chapter 25 Galaxies and Dark Matter. 25.1Dark Matter in the Universe 25.2Galaxy Collisions 25.3Galaxy Formation and Evolution 25.4Black Holes in Galaxies.
Simulations for the nearby Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC 4945 Lien-Hsuan Lin 1,2, Chi Yuan 2, C.C. D. Yen 3, and S. Muller 2 1 Department of Physics, National Taiwan.
7.2 Galaxies pp
Lecture 16 Measurement of masses of SMBHs: Sphere of influence of a SMBH Gas and stellar dynamics, maser disks Stellar proper motions Mass vs velocity.
Beyond MOND: TeVeS and its Tests (Depeche MOND) Scott Noble CCRG RIT July 2, 2010.
The Orbit of S2 in the Galactic Center
© 2017 Pearson Education, Inc.
Composite profile of the Fe Kα spectral line emitted from a binary system of supermassive black holes Predrag Jovanović1, Vesna Borka Jovanović2 and Duško.
V. Bobylev and A. Bajkova Pulkovo Observatory, St. Petersburg, Russia
Figure 1. Left – a small region of a typical polarized spectrum acquired with the ESPaDOnS instrument during the MiMeS project. This figure illustrates.
The Milky Way Galaxy 1/30/03.
From: The evolution of star formation activity in galaxy groups
Different ways for graviton mass evaluations
Experimental tests of the no-hair theorems of black holes
Germán Gómez Vargas Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Figure 3. Inclination instability in the outer Solar system
Cosmological Constraints from the Double-
Journey to the Galactic Center
GPI Astrometric Calibration
Milky Way Orbits of stars in the Milky Way Rotation curves
This is NOT the Milky Way galaxy! It’s a similar one: NGC 4414.
On the
Dark matter and anomalous gas in the spiral galaxy NGC 4559
Types of galaxies.
Small Angle X-Ray Scattering Studies and Modeling of Eudistylia vancouverii Chlorocruorin and Macrobdella decora Hemoglobin  Angelika Krebs, Helmut Durchschlag,
by W. R. Binns, M. H. Israel, E. R. Christian, A. C. Cummings, G. A
(AO) Observations of the Galactic Center
Presentation transcript:

8th MATHEMATICAL PHYSICS MEETING: Summer School and Conference on Modern Mathematical Physics August 2014, Belgrade, Serbia Orbits of S2 star in Yukawa gravity: simulations vs observations D. Borka, 1 P. Jovanović, 2 V. Borka Jovanović, 1 and A. F. Zakharov 3 1 Atomic Physics Laboratory (040), Vinča Institute of Nuclear Sciences, University of Belgrade, P.O. Box 522, Belgrade, Serbia 2 Astronomical Observatory, Volgina 7, Belgrade, Serbia 3 Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Physics, B. Cheremushkinskaya 25, Moscow, Russia

Our aim is to constrain parameters of the gravitational potentials derived from modified gravity models in absence of dark matter. We simulate the orbit of S2 star around the Galactic Centre in f(R) (Yukawa-like) gravity potentials and compare it with NTT/VLT and Keck observations. The approach we are proposing can be used to constrain the different modified gravity models from stellar orbits around Galactic Centre. D. Borka, P. Jovanović, V. Borka Jovanović and, A. F. Zakharov, Constraining the range of Yukawa gravity interaction from S2 star orbits, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 11, 050, (1-15) (2013).

Outline of the talk 1.Motivation 2.Introduction (S2 star orbit) 3.Extended Theories of Gravity 4. Simulated orbits of S2 star 5. Results: comparison between the theoretical results and observations 6. Conclusions

Comparison between theoretical rotation curves and the observations 1. Motivation

1.Excellent agreement is obtained using Yukawa gravity between theoretical and observed rotation curves by Capozziello and coworkers. V. F. Cardone and S. Capozziello, Systematic biases on galaxy haloes parameters from Yukawa-like gravitational potentials, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 414, 1301 (2011). 2.For S2 star, there are some observational indications that this orbit deviates from the Keplerian case. S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, T.K. Fritz, H. Bartko, K. Dodds-Eden, O. Pfuhl, T. Ott, and R. Genzel, The orbit of the star S2 around SgrA* from VLT and Keck data, Astrophys. J. 707, L114 (2009).

Astrometric data for the star S2

L. Meyer et al. DOI: /science Science 338, 84 (2012).

NTT/VLT The New Technology Telescope/Very Large Telescope (NTT/VLT) is a telescope operated by the European Southern Observatory on Cerro Paranal in the Atacama Desert of northern Chile. The VLT consists of four individual telescopes, each with a primary mirror 8.2 m across, which are generally used separately but can be used together to achieve very high angular resolution. S. Gillessen, F. Eisenhauer, S. Trippe, T. Alexander, R. Genzel, F. Martins and T. Ott, Monitoring stellar orbits around the Massive Black Hole in the Galactic Center, Astrophys. J. 692, 1075 (2009).

Keck The Keck Observatory is a two-telescope astronomical observatory at an elevation of 4,145 meters near the summit of Mauna Kea in the U.S. state of Hawaii. Both telescopes feature 10 m primary mirrors, currently among the largest astronomical telescopes in use. The combination of an excellent site, large optics and innovative instruments has created the two most scientifically productive telescopes on Earth. A. M. Ghez, S. Salim, N. N. Weinberg, J. R. Lu, T. Do, J. K. Dunn, K. Matthews, M. R. Morris, S. Yelda, E. E. Becklin, T. Kremenek, M. Milosavljevic and J. Naiman, Measuring Distance and Properties of the Milky Way's Central Supermassive Black Hole with Stellar Orbits, Astrophys. J. 689, 1044 (2008).

S2 star ======= - S2 is a massive young star that closely orbits the supermassive black hole at the center of the Milky Way Galaxy - it is one of the brightest members of the so-called S-star cluster (Sgr A— Cluster) orbiting the central black hole - it has about 15 times Sol's mass and seven times its diameter, with orbital period about 15.8 yr 2. INTRODUCTION

Galactic center: SGR A

Extended Theories of Gravity have been proposed like alternative approaches to Newtonian gravity in order to explain galactic and extragalactic dynamics without introducing dark matter. In the case of f(R) gravity, one assumes a generic function f of the Ricci scalar R (in particular, analytic functions) and searches for a theory of gravity having suitable behavior at small and large scale lengths. Yukawa-like corrections have been obtained in the framework of f(R) gravity. The physical meaning of such corrections needs to be confirmed at different scales: for short distances, Solar system, spiral galaxies and galaxy clusters. 3. Extended Theories of Gravity

1.E. Fischbach and C.L. Talmadge, The Search for Non-Newtonian Gravity, 305p., Heidelberg-New York, Springer (1999). 2.T. P. Sotiriou and V. Faraoni, f(R) Theories Of Gravity, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 451 (2010). 3.S. Capozziello and M. De Laurentis, Extended Theories of Gravity, Phys. Rept. 509, 167 (2011). 4.S. Capozziello and V. Faraoni, Beyond Einstein Gravity: A Survey of Gravitational Theories for Cosmology and Astrophysics, in Fundamental Theories of Physics vol. 170, Springer (2011). 5.S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov, Unified cosmic history in modified gravity: From F(R) theory to Lorentz non-invariant models, Phys. Rept. 505, 59 (2011). 6.T. Clifton, P.G. Ferreira, A. Padilla and C. Skordis, Modified Gravity and Cosmology, Phys. Rept. 513, 1 (2012).

We performed two-body simulations in Yukawa gravity potential The positions of the S2 star along its true orbit are calculated at the observed epochs using two-body simulations in the Yukawa gravity potential, assuming that distance to the S2 star is d = 8.3 kpc and mass of central black hole M BH =4.3 ·10 6 M S (S. Gillessen et al., Astrophys. J. 707, L114, 2009). All the above two-body simulations in Yukawa gravity potential resulted with the true orbits (ξ, η) of S2-like stars, i.e. the simulated positions of S2-like stars. In order to compare them with observed positions, the first step is to project them to the observer's sky plane, i.e. to calculate the corresponding apparent orbits (x, y). 4. Simulated orbits of S2 star

For that purpose we used the following Keplerian orbital elements from i= deg, Ω = deg, and ω = deg (S. Gillessen et al., Astrophys. J. 707, L114, 2009).

RESULTS: Comparison between the theoretical results and observations

Figure 1. Comparisons between the orbit of S2 star in Newtonian gravity (red dashed line) and Yukawa gravity during 10 orbital periods (blue solid line) for Λ = 2.59·10 3 AU. In the left panel δ = +1/3, and in the right panel δ = -1/3.

Figure 2. The fitted orbits in Yukawa gravity for δ = +1/3 through the astrometric observations of S2 star (denoted by circles), obtained by NTT/VLT alone (left panel) and NTT/VLT+Keck (right panel). The best fits are obtained for Λ = 2.59· 10 3 AU and Λ = 3.03· 10 3 AU, respectively.

Figure 3. The comparisons between the observed (open circles with error bars) and fitted (solid lines) coordinates of S2 star (top), as well as the corresponding O-C residuals (bottom). The left panel shows the results for Δα and right panel for Δδ in the case of NTT/VLT observations and Yukawa gravity potential with δ = +1/3 and Λ = 2.59· 10 3 AU.

Figure 4. The same as in Figure 3, but for NTT/VLT+Keck combined observations and for Yukawa gravity potential with Λ = 3.03· 10 3 AU.

Figure 5. The comparisons between the observed (circles with error bars) and fitted (solid lines) radial velocities of S2 star (top), as well as the corresponding O-C residuals (bottom). The left panel shows the results in the case of NTT/VLT observations and Yukawa gravity potential with Λ = 2.59· 10 3 AU, while the right panel shows the results for NTT/VLT+Keck combined observations and for Yukawa gravity potential with Λ = 3.03· 10 3 AU. In both cases δ = +1/3.

Figure 6. The reduced χ² for δ =1/3 as a function of Λ in case of NTT/VLT alone (left) and combined NTT/VLT+Keck (right) observations.

Figure 7. The maps of reduced χ² over the Λ-δ parameter space in case of NTT/VLT observations. The left panel corresponds to δ in [0, 1], and the right panel to the extended range of δ in [0.01, 10 6 ]. The shades of gray color represent the values of the reduced χ² which are less than the corresponding value in the case of Keplerian orbit, and three contours (from inner to outer) enclose the confidence regions in which the difference between the current and minimum reduced χ² is less than , and 0.05, respectively.

Figure 8. The same as in Figure 7, but for the combined NTT/VLT+Keck observations.

CONCLUSIONS In this paper orbit of S2 star has been investigated in the framework of the Yukawa gravity. Using the observed positions of S2 star around the Galactic Centre we constrained the parameters of Yukawa gravity. Our results show that: 1.the most probable value for Yukawa gravity parameter Λ in the case of S2 star, is around AU and that the current observations do not enable us to obtain the reliable constraints on the universal constant δ; 2.the same universal constant δ which was successfully applied to clusters of galaxies and rotation curves of spiral galaxies also gives a good agreement in the case of observations of S2 star orbit; 3.the scale parameter of Yukawa gravity in the case of S2 star for δ = +1/3 is about: Λ ≈ 3000 ± 1500 AU, for vanishing δ, we recover the Keplerian orbit of S2 star;

5.for δ = +1/3 there is orbital precession in positive direction like in General Relativity, and for δ = -1/3 the precession has negative direction, as in the case of Newtonian precession due to extended mass distribution or in R n gravity ; 6.the two parameters of Yukawa gravity are highly correlated in the range (0 2 they are not correlated. 7.Borka et al. found that R n (f(R)=f 0 R n ) gravity may not represent a good candidate to solve both the rotation curves problem of spiral galaxies and the orbital precession of S2 star for the same value of the universal constant β (β =0.817 and β ≈ 0.01, respectively). According to the above results, the opposite conclusion is not eliminated in the case of Yukawa gravity with δ =1/3.

8.The constraints on parameter Λ obtained in the present paper are in agreement with the corresponding Solar System and LLR constraints presented by Adelberger et al., according to which Λ >> 1.5· m and Λ >> 4· 10 8 m, respectively. 9.The approach we are proposing can be used to constrain the different modified gravity models from stellar orbits around Galactic Centre.

REFERENCES 1.D. Borka, P. Jovanović, V. Borka Jovanović and A. F. Zakharov, Constraints on R n gravity from precession of orbits of S2-like stars, Physical Review D 85, (2012). 2.D. Borka, P. Jovanović, V. Borka Jovanović and A. F. Zakharov, Constraining the range of Yukawa gravity interaction from S2 star orbits, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics 11, 050, (1-15) (2013). 3.A. F. Zakharov, D. Borka, V. Borka Jovanović and P. Jovanović, Constraints on R n gravity from precession of orbits of S2-like stars: case of bulk distribution of mass, Advances in Space Research 54,1108–1112, (2014). 4.S. Capozziello, D. Borka, P. Jovanović and V. Borka Jovanović, Constraining Extended Gravity Models by S2 star orbits around the Galactic Centre, Physical Review D 90, (2014).