Design Thinking Hawaii: Assessment. GradingFeedback.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The IB Learner Profile The aim of all IB programs is to develop internationally minded people who help to create a better and more peaceful world. Common.
Advertisements

Design, prototyping and construction
Analyzing Student Work
Understanding by Design - Stage 1 -
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Creating an Evaluation Plan Freya Bradford, Senior Consultant NorthSky Nonprofit Network May 23, 2013.
Engineering Design Rubric Dimensions 1, 2 and 7.
Marzano Art and Science Teaching Framework Learning Map
Observing Behavior A nonexperimental approach. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE APPROACHES Quantitative Focuses on specific behaviors that can be easily quantified.
Systems Engineering Management
Presented by TS Hamilton. Five Core Competencies We link our courses to CalSTRS core competencies.
#17 - Involve Users in the Development Model of Multinational Corporations - Is it worth it? Experience Report IRCSE '08: IDT Workshop Friday 31 October.
SOFTWARE ENGINEERING BIT-8 APRIL, 16,2008 Introduction to UML.
Design thinking evidence. design thinking assessment points When should assessment happen During the end of the project demonstration During the transitions.
Indiana’s Early Learning Development Framework
What should a Housy graduate be able to do? December 4, 2014 J. Martinez.
Staff Performance Evaluation Process
Primary Research. Purpose  To understand the qualitative and quantitative methods commonly used in primary research.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
OBSERVATIONAL METHODS © 2012 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
=_A-ZVCjfWf8 Nets for students 2007.
Inquiry and Investigation. What was the TOPIC? PROBLEM? CIVIC INQUIRY?
Welcome to Educ 338x No Teacher Left Behind Adam Rich Jennifer Shelley.
Interaction Design CMU. Today’s objectives Continue Design approaches (UCD, ACD)  User-Centered Design  Activity-Centered Design.
Let’s Talk Assessment Rhonda Haus University of Regina 2013.
Chapter 8 Language & Thinking
The Strategic Teacher and
Twilight Training October 1, 2013 OUSD CCSS Transition Teams.
A Quick Quiz What is your DI IQ? Discuss with peers… What do you know about differentiation? What concerns or fears do you have regarding differentiation?
storytelling PoV: authentic, character-driven drama that captures all your learnings in 3 minutes STORY design.
1 st Quarter Self- Reflection English I. The Grade Profile The purpose of a grade profile is to give students the opportunity to take responsibility for.
Design Challenge Explanation Design thinking is a methodology that teaches children the confidence to creatively solve problems in their lives. This is.
Prototyping 101 (from idea to solution). Thomas A. Edison “I have not failed, I've just found 10,000 ways that won’t work”
Bellringer Oct 1: pd 2 Write on a piece of lined paper your name and date. Answer the following questions with complete sentences. Do not write the questions.
“A POV is a compelling statement of user, need, and insight that focuses and inspires your design process.” Provide focus/Frame the problem Inspire your.
Recruit, Train, and Educate Airmen to Deliver Airpower for America How Focus Groups Can Help Your Unit 1.
Early PhaseImplementation PhaseInnovation Phase Reflection and Revision Teacher makes time and space for student to reflect on what they have learned and.
Understand the purpose and benefits of guiding instructional design through the review of student work. Practice a protocol for.
DEFINE optional plan 5 – 10 minute talk (examples, mini-activity?)
Source : The Problem Learning and innovation skills increasingly are being recognized as the skills that separate students who are.
Facilitate Group Learning
. Copyright © Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.
Cut out each icon. Glue one icon to one page in your binder/spiral.
BECOMING CRITICAL THINKERS: Four strategies to use in the classroom.
Prototyping life cycle Important steps 1. Does prototyping suit the system 2. Abbreviated representation of requirements 3. Abbreviated design specification.
0 ©2015 U.S. Education Delivery Institute While there is no prescribed format for a good delivery plan, it should answer 10 questions What a good delivery.
Guided Reading How can we make this really effective for our students?
Subject-specific content: A Generic scoring guide for information-based topics 4 The student has a complete and detailed understanding of the information.
Design thinking skills. scoring: description Exceeds Expectation Meets Expectation Approaches Expectation Missing.
Personal Project: THE RUBRIC Learning Intention We are learning to identify the important components of the Personal Project, and understand.
storytelling PoV: authentic, character-driven drama that captures all your learnings in 4 minutes STORY design.
Design thinking basic rubric (summative edition).
Presented by The Solutions Group Decision Making Tools.
Investigate Plan Design Create Evaluate (Test it to objective evaluation at each stage of the design cycle) state – describe - explain the problem some.
March, 2016 SLO End of Course Command Levels. OUTCOMES Teachers will… be prepared to determine end of course command levels for each student. be prepared.
PGES Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Self-Awareness LET I. Natural Tendencies Everyone has preferences. How these are developed in each of us is a complex combination of things. Whether you.
The Pennsylvania state university college of nursing Nursing 200w
Reflection and Revision
D.think.
Exploratory Research: Qualitative Research
Sign up front for how we need them set up and what we need them to have (pens, a bit of space? a partner maybe)
New Goal Clarity Coach Training October 27, 2017
RES 728 Competitive Success/snaptutorial.com
RES 728 Education for Service/snaptutorial.com
DOCS–Modules Link: Overview
Module 6 Questioning Part 2
CONSUMER MARKETS AND CONSUMER BUYING BEHAVIOR
Requirements Engineering Introduction
Humanities Impact Project #4 Day 1
Presentation transcript:

Design Thinking Hawaii: Assessment

GradingFeedback

Type OutcomeProcess

4

Descriptions of user empathy supported by many examples of emotions, physical necessities and behaviors, including a variety of surprising insights and deep needs. Human centeredness (user empathy) is expressed through descriptions of human emotion, physical necessities, surprising insights and/or needs on the part of users. Limited examples of user empathy with few surprising insights or needs included. Little to no description of user empathy. empathy ✔ Team 1 Team 2 Team 3 Student Design Thinking Growth Goal: To develop inspiration for design decisions based on in depth human centered needs. Purpose: To procure deep seated values, beliefs and needs from people that uncover human centered problems Team 4 Team 5 Team 6

In addition to ✔ prototypes are tested in a thorough manner that shows thoughtful analysis how feedback was used in each iteration. Through prototyping, getting feedback and iterating, student created a solution that addressed user needs. There is a clear record of how iterations to the prototype incorporated feedback from users to better address user needs. Prototyping provides partial solution for needs. Little or no iteration or evidence of responding to feedback. Little or no prototyping accomplished. No indication of responding to feedback. prototype/test ✔ Team 1 Team 2 Team 3 Student Design Thinking Growth Goal: To generate solutions based on responses to iterative prototypes instead of just making a representation. Students should focus on human centered feedback and show a bias towards action while developing ideas. Purpose: To quickly create manifestations of an idea in order to test ideas and to iterate failures Team 4 Team 5 Team 6

7

Many needs uncovered include emotional, physical, obvious/non- obvious Some needs uncovered Very few needs uncovered. Many are mainly solutions. Documented proof that needs come from external sources Needs are mixture of made up and coming from external sources Needs are made up or disconnected from any sources Student/team: place student initials or team name next to the category that best describes their process work Follow empathy procedures like a script. Have trouble deviating from that script Constantly seek novel, complex patterns in empathy data Can occasionally identify unexpected topics and pursue them Are able to identify interesting topics as they arise and pursue them in depth Students start to look beyond surface level empathy data Only look to capture the most basic empathy data NoviceIntermediateExpert Place student initials or team name along the spectrum Empathy Outcomes: Needs Empathy Evidence: Where do the needs come from? Empathy Behaviors Biases towards uncovering beliefs, values, and behaviors Has trouble identifying beliefs, values, and behaviors Able to identify a few beliefs, values, and behaviors

Proof that iteration comes entirely from testing prototypes Iteration comes partially from testing prototypes Little evidence of iteration coming from response to testing Student/team: place student initials or team name next to the category that best describes their process work Prototypes made only to model an idea Students create various prototype and iterate on ideas Prototypes created with the intention to learn more about an idea Disputes settled and questions answered primarily by building and testing prototypes Students make a few prototypes with some iteration on ideas Students create one or two prototypes without iterating on the idea NoviceIntermediateExpert Place student initials or team name along the spectrum Prototype/Test Outcomes: Frequency Prototype/Test Evidence: Where does the iteration come from? Prototype/Test Behaviors Spend little to know time testing prototypes Spend time developing testing conditions for prototypes Create extensive testing scenarios as a way to maximize learning from prototypes

Prototyping Dexterity: Creates variety prototypes throughout the entire process as a way to continually develop understanding for problems NoviceIntermediateExpert Place student initials or team name along the spectrum Creative Confidence Link to Human Needs: At all times can justify design decisions based on evidence from human feedback Reframing Problems: Can state a strong point of view but never becomes too attached to any given problem definition or solutions. Prototyping Dexterity: Only constructs basic prototypes in order to represent idea Link to Human Needs: Few of the design decisions are based on evidence from human feedback Reframing Problems: Can define a problem but often cannot let go or change perspective Prototyping Dexterity: Creates some prototypes to test and understand solutions Link to Human Needs: Some design decisions are based on evidence from human feedback Reframing Problems: Can state a point of view and occasionally redefine the problem Place student initials or team name along the spectrum

Assessment GradingFeedback

Type OutcomeProcess

Creating Assessments What things would we like to assess? What might these things look like? How might we capture these things?