Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Differential Response and Data American Humane 2007 Conference on Differential Response in Child Welfare Patricia Schene, Ph.D.
Advertisements

Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 6, 2010 Division of Service Support,
Illinois Department of Children and Family Services, Pathways to Strengthening and Supporting Families Program April 5, 2010 Division of Service Support,
Is Change Really Needed in Florida’s Child Welfare System?
Interim Director Bobby Cagle Georgia Division of Family and Children Services.
The Information Domains and Information Collection.
Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:
Getting Started With Intake & CPS Process. Developmental Competencies SW Understands the roles and tasks of the intake process SW Understands.
Successful Solutions Professional Development LLC A Basic Approach to Child Safety Chapter 4 Mandated Reporting Law.
Assessing for Key Child Welfare Issues Version 1.0 | 2014.
Dimensional Assessment for Co-Occurring Disorders 8 th Annual Prevention and Recovery Conference Todd Crawford, LPC, LADC Director, Residential Services.
An overview of Florida’s Practice Model Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
Child Protection Transformation Overview October 18, 2012.
Orientation Core 100_OR_PPT_July 2013 PPT 1. Module 1: Introduction to the Child Welfare Pre-Service Training OBJECTIVES : Identify Child Welfare Pre-Service.
This is what it’s all about…
Nurturing Change: National Guidance & Support Getting it right for every child in Practice Assessment & Planning Jane Aldgate – Wendy Rose Getting it right.
1 Module 1. 2 Module 1 Learning Objectives Participants are able to: Discuss the purpose of a safety plan in response to impending danger. Justify the.
Child Safety FrameworkChild Safety Framework Central to our core mission.
Overview of the Safety Assessment and Management Process Bryle Zickler, Human Services Program Specialist – OCYF Jana Hitchcock, Curriculum & Instructional.
Florida Department of Children and Families Copyright 2013 Florida Department of Children & Families.
1 Safety, Risk And Protective Capacity. 2 Competencies Assessing safety, risk and protective capacity Gathers and evaluates relevant information about.
Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity.
CPS INVESTIGATIVE ASSESSMENT. Competencies Ability to integrate your investigation and family assessment into one document Ability to document solution.
Safety Framework Supervisors as Coaches Department of Children and Families.
WEBINAR, AUGUST 9, 2011 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES Quality Service Review Ratings on the Quick.
Structured Decision Making Child Welfare and the Law Spring 2006.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Updates.
1 Effects of Abuse and Neglect on Child Development Dynamics of Abuse and Neglect: Signs of Maltreatment.
Other Parent Home Assessment 1.Complete a modified home study of the other parent’s household to include: Verification of legal parental relationship Household.
Child Safety: A Guide for Judges and Attorneys Agencies and Courts Meeting August 5, 2009 Jennifer Renne National Child Welfare Resource Center on Legal.
ADOLESCENTS IN CRISIS: WHEN TO ADMIT FOR SELF-HARM OR AGGRESSIVE BEHAVIOR Kristin Calvert.
Introduction to Key Concepts
Critical Thinking in Safety Decision-Making: Evaluating Information Sufficiency Reconciling and Validating Information Applying the Safety Threshold Criteria.
Assessing Child Vulnerabilities 1. Introductions Name Agency and Position What you’d like to learn today 2.
1300: In-Home Safety Assessment: A Closer Look At The Fourteen Safety Threats Booster Shot.
Safety Planning. Safety Plan KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5:
Assessing Child Safety The Seventeen Safety Threats Central to the Core Mission.
ASSESSING CHILD SAFETYASSESSING CHILD SAFETY Central to our core mission.
Child Safety Framework: Analyzing and Planning for Child Safety.
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
Case Management.  Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Ongoing Family.
Thursday, January 07, 2016 Charting the Course towards Permanency for Children in Pennsylvania Module 5: Risk Assessment.
Making Small but Significant Changes. Learning Objectives Upon completion of this module participants will be able to: Understand how protective factors.
 Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Family Functioning Assessment.
© CDHS College Relations Group Buffalo State College/SUNY at Buffalo Research Foundation Guiding Framework for Interventions Recommendation 1.
204: Assessing Safety in Out-of-Home Care Overview.
SunCoast Region Transformation Implementation Team November 2, 2012.
SSPE, SPE, and Supervisor.  Context for the Training  Training Related to Implementation of Safety Decision Making Methodology  Fidelity of the Ongoing.
7/6/09Office of Training and Professional Development1 Unit 3D: Safety Assessment Safety Permanency Well-being.
Clinical Supervision in CPS and FVS Safety Risk Critical Thinking.
Introduction to the Domains
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Documenting a Sufficient Family Functioning Assessment
Case Consultation.
Family Preservation Services
Florida’s Safety Methodology
Making Small but Significant Changes
Module 9 Safety Planning
Assessment and Analyzing Family Functioning
DECISION- MAKING HOW TO USE THE PPT TEMPLATE:
Module Safety and Risk.
DECISION- MAKING HOW TO USE THE PPT TEMPLATE:
Assessment of Impending Danger and Caregiver Protective Capacities
Module 7 Why We Must Understand the Family, The Child and the Parent / Caregiver
CPS Investigative assessment
Present Danger Assessment and Planning
The Family Functioning Assessment: Investigation and Safety Planning
Further Information Gathering for Impending Danger Assessment
Keeping Kids Safe When their Parents are struggling with Substance Use: From Preventing Removal to Reunification.
Georgia Division of Family and Children Services
Presentation transcript:

Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity

Safe ? Yes No KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Discipline or Behavior Management

Present or impending danger threats Child vulnerability Caregiver protective capacity = Safe or Unsafe +/-

Information Standards

D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Discipline or Behavior Management KNOW THE FAMILY

Present or impending danger threats Child vulnerability Caregiver protective capacity = Safe or Unsafe +/-

Children are considered safe when there are no present or impending danger threats, or the caregivers’ protective capacities control existing threats.

Children are Unsafe when vulnerable to present or impending danger threats, and caregivers have insufficient protective capacity to control existing threats.

 Immediate  Significant  Clearly Observable  Severe harm  Present tense—right now  Requires immediate response

 Premeditated maltreatment  Injuries to the face and head  Life threatening living arrangements  Bizarre cruelty toward a child  Child needing immediate medical care  Caregiver unable to provide basic care  Caregiver out of control or under the influence of substances posing an immediate danger threat to the child

First Contact for all Investigations… focus is on Present Danger First Contact for all Investigations… focus is on Present Danger 24 hour or Immediate response? 24 hour or Immediate response? IMMEDIATE RESPONSE!

 CPI has responsibility…  Case Manager has responsibility…  Responsibility is to take action—protective action

 Impending Danger... not happening at this moment… …but a “state of danger”  Child is in a position of continual or pervasive danger

 Impending danger… not as obvious  Impending danger… more prevalent

 Imminent—could or likely will occur in the near term  Require a controlling intervention

KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Discipline or Behavior Management reveals

Present or impending danger threats Child vulnerability Caregiver protective capacity = Safe or Unsafe +/- Child Vulnerability

Children are vulnerable because they depend on others for protection and care

 Information Domains give us the information we need to determine child vulnerability… ◦ Age ◦ Physical ability ◦ Cognitive ability ◦ Developmental status ◦ Emotional security ◦ Family loyalty KNOW THE FAMILY D1: Extent of Maltreatment D2: Surrounding Circumstances D3: Child Functioning D4: Adult Functioning D5: General Parenting Practices D6: Discipline or Behavior Management

 Additional considerations of child vulnerability: ◦ prior impact of maltreatment ◦ child’s isolation from the community ◦ child’s ability to anticipate or judge danger ◦ child’s ability to articulate problems or danger ◦ situations in which a child’s own behavior provokes a dangerous reaction from a caregiver

Our concerns about safety should involve all children in the household

Present or impending danger threats Child vulnerability Caregiver protective capacity = Safe or Unsafe +/- Caregiver Protective Capacities

Protective Capacity… how a parent thinks, feels, acts… Protective Capacity… how a parent thinks, feels, acts… that makes him or her protective!

Examples: understanding of protective role understanding and recognizing threats recognition of a child’s needs reality oriented accurate perception of a child ability to accurately process and interpret various stimuli intellectually able Specific knowledge, understanding and perceptions that contribute to protective vigilance

Examples: physical capacity and energy impulse control ability to set aside own needs adaptive, assertive and responsive takes action history of being protective Specific action, activity, performance that results in protective vigilance

Examples: emotional bond with the child positive attachment with the child love, sensitivity and empathy for the child resiliency stability effectively meets own emotional needs emotional control Specific feelings, attitudes and identification with the child and motivation that results in protective vigilance

Are caregivers protective?Who do we assess? Parents in the Household Adult Caregivers in the Household

36 Present or impending danger threats Child vulnerability Caregiver protective capacity = Safe or Unsafe +/-

Step 1 Gather sufficient information Step 2 Weigh the information against our criteria for present & impending danger to determine if one or more exists Step 3 Determine child vulnerability to these identified threats, again using the sufficient information gathered Step 4 Determine if protective capacity exists to manage the specific identified threats Step 5 Reach a decision about whether the child is safe or unsafe

a.A child being in a state of danger due to parent/caregiver behaviors, attitudes, motives, emotions and/or situations posing a specific threat of severe harm to a child. b.An immediate, significant, and clearly observable family condition that is actively occurring or in process of occurring at the point of contact with a family and will likely result in serious harm to a child, therefore requiring a prompt CPS “system” response. c.The point at which a negative family condition gets worse. d.It is the same as present danger.

a.A CHILD BEING IN A STATE OF PERVASIVE DANGER DUE TO A PARENT’S BEHAVIORS, ATTITUDES, MOTIVES, EMOTIONS OR OUT OF CONTROL FAMILY CONDITIONS. b.An immediate, significant, and clearly observable family condition that is actively occurring or in process of occurring at the point of contact with a family and will likely result in serious harm to a child, therefore requiring a prompt CPS “system” response. c.The point at which a negative family condition is identified. d.It is the same as present danger. Answer (a) best describes impending danger. Answer (b) is incorrect because it is the definition for present danger. Impending danger is not clearly observable and actively occurring upon first contact with the family, that is why sufficient information collection helps us recognize the more subtle, disguised out of control family conditions that produce impending danger threats. Answer (c) is incorrect because negative family conditions and circumstances related to impending danger are representative of clearly identifiable danger threats, not simply the risk of maltreatment. Answer (d) is incorrect because present and impending danger are separate and distinct types of danger threats.

a.Family resources b.General parenting practices including discipline and knowledge of child development c.Parenting strengths d.How a parent determines if their children are developing appropriately e.Personal and parenting behaviors, cognitive, and emotional characteristics that specifically and directly associate with protecting one’s child(ren)

a.Family resources b.General parenting practices including discipline and knowledge of child development c.Parenting strengths d.How a parent determines if their children are developing appropriately e.PERSONAL AND PARENTING BEHAVIORS, COGNITIVE, AND EMOTIONAL CHARACTERISTICS THAT SPECIFICALLY AND DIRECTLY ASSOCIATE WITH PROTECTING ONE’S CHILD(REN) The correct answer is (e). Answers (a), (c) and (d) while potentially useful information to have, are not specific enough, that is, are not directly associated with the caregiver’s ability to protect their child in the form of cognitive, behavioral or emotional assets to qualify as protective capacities. Answer (b) is incorrect because it is a combination of the general parenting practice and disciplinary practice and behavior management information domains.

a.True b.False

a.TRUE b.False Answer (a) is correct. While the threat is not immediate and actively occurring in your very presence the impending danger threat is generated from a pervasive state of out of control family conditions and is highly likely to occur in the imminent or very near future.

a.True b.False

a.True b.FALSE Once a danger threat has been identified in the home, the vulnerability of all children is assessed, not just the alleged child victim making answer (b) the correct response.

a.True b.False

a.True b.FALSE The correct answer is (b) false. It is just the opposite, by definition present danger is the more obvious “in your face” danger threat while the more subtle, but pervasive impending danger is much more prevalent in the family’s that typically you will come into contact in your line of work.

Module Two: Present and Impending Danger, Child Vulnerability and Protective Capacity Congratulations!

1. Log into FSFN. 2. Click Create > Worker Training > Individual Training Plan. 3. Click Search within the Assigned Training in Progress group box. 4. Enter E-Learning 2: Present Danger (or simply enter “E“ followed by *) and then click search. 5. Click Select next to the course when it appears. 6. Click Continue at the bottom of the page. 7. When the selected course title is displayed on your Individual Worker screen, indicate that the status is “Completed” and record the completion date. 8. Click Save. To receive credit for this course, you will need to: This should then be displayed in your “Individual Training History”.