NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Faculty performance Standard 3.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Faculty of Health & Social Work Using Credit for Good Curriculum Design Presentation Revisit original objectives Impact of Credit on the Curriculum Who.
Advertisements

The Teacher Preparation World Cafe September 26, 2008 Statewide Meeting Results and Recommendations New York Higher Education Support Center Task Force.
How to Use SBP Curricular Criteria for public health bachelor’s degrees in PHP and SPH Reviews March 2015 Arlington, VA.
Center for Teaching and Learning Vision: The center will foster and sustain faculty development in the pursuit of exemplary practices in teaching and learning.
Medical Education Grand Rounds Self-Study Overview Middle States Commission on Higher Education January 13, 2010.
NASPAA University School of Public Affairs Mailing Address: 1029 Vermont Ave NW Washington DC, Faculty Total Instructional Faculty:
National Qualifications Framework in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Professor Abdullah A. Almusallam Secretary General, National Commission for Academic Accreditation.
Academic Planning and Budget Building Meeting 3. * The current model we use must change to meet current as well as new and emerging client and community.
Year 3 Team-University Dimension Comparison (Average Team Assessment of schools, compared to Average Provost Assessment of universities) Team Provost.
Coordinator of Assessment Coordinate assessment efforts on campus Maintain the NCCC General Education Assessment Plan Collect assessment results from course.
WASC Educational Effectiveness Review Report First Draft March
NWCCU Standard 2 - Educational Program and Its Effectiveness Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez October 29, 2008 SU 219 Bea Babbitt & Francisco Menendez.
NASPAA Accreditation Serving on a Site Visit Team.
NASPAA Accreditation The Logic Model: Linking All Standards from Mission through Assessment.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching communications with mission: Standard 7.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Student Learning Standard 5.1:Universal Required Competencies.
NASPAA Accreditation Matching governance with mission Standard 2.
NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as a process. InputsOutputs Outcomes Inputs  Classrooms  Syllabi  Library resources  PhD faculty  … Outputs 
NASPAA Accreditation Accreditation as an outcome.
NASPAA Accreditation Why seek accreditation?. To improve the program Contributions to advancing knowledge and practice.
NASPAA Accreditation Managing the program strategically Standard 1.
 Description  The unit has a conceptual framework that defines how our programs prepare candidates to be well-rounded educators. Every course in the.
Illinois Community College Board DUAL CREDIT: Proposed Rule Revisions & Updates.
Assessment of Higher Education Learning Outcomes (AHELO): Update Deborah Roseveare Head, Skills beyond School Division Directorate for Education OECD 31.
Shaping the Future of Management Education 2013 AACSB Business Accreditation Standards Dan LeClair EVP & Chief Operating Officer
Assessment Report Public Administration School of Education and Human Services Celia A. Watt, Ph.D., Interim Chair Edward Downey, DPA, Assessment Coordinator.
Standard 5 - Faculty Qualifications, Performance, and Development Kate Steffens St. Cloud State University.
Competency-based Instructional System Design: A Model for Program Assessment 3 rd Annual Texas A&M Assessment Conference Barbara Lyon, Ed.D., SPHR Tarleton.
October 2, 2010 Las Vegas NASPAA S ITE V ISITOR T RAINING.
Organization, Administration, and Improvement of Graduate Education Daniel Denecke, Ph.D. Program Director, Best Practices and Publications The Council.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business (AACSB International): Process and Experiences Dr. James Simpson Dr. Yeqing Bao College of Business.
Embracing Math Standards: Our Journey and Beyond 2008.
Research Findings: Good Practices in Student Retention and the First Year Experience Robert D. Reason Assistant Professor and Research Associate Foundations.
A Faculty Development Workshop for New PT/PTA Faculty Portland, OR 2015 Beginning with the End in Mind Guided Discussions Around Student Success and Career.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
1 Am I Qualified for this Job? (Minimum Qualifications for Faculty or Management at a CCC) Presented by Sandra Lindoerfer and Rich Ghidella Citrus Community.
WHO Global Standards. 5 Key Areas for Global Standards Program graduates Program graduates Program development and revision Program development and revision.
Adult Student Success Linking Learning and Work. CAEL’s Overarching Goal: Meaningful Learning, Credentials, and Work for Every Adult For more than 40.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
Faculty Ensuring competency and integrity. Faculty The university employs competent faculty qualified to accomplish the mission and goals of the institution.
Standard Two: Understanding the Assessment System and its Relationship to the Conceptual Framework and the Other Standards Robert Lawrence, Ph.D., Director.
Accreditation: What we learned about ourselves College Forum Talk August 19, 2015 Patricia A. Fleming, Ph.D. Provost/ Senior Vice President for Academic.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
Importance of Essentials of Baccalaureate Nursing Education into Professional Nursing Practice American Association of College of Nursing (AACN) Commission.
Conceptual Framework Presentation, 2006, Slide 1 The Conceptual Framework for Programs that Prepare Professionals Who Work in Schools What - Why - and.
Preparing for North Central Association / Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Accreditation Reviewing Areas of Specialization and Assessing Learning Outcomes.
Elizabeth Mellin, LPC Associate Professor PhD Program Director Binghamton University.
1. Institutional Effectiveness Resource 2. Academic Coordinator Listing 3. Preview of Faculty Credential Requirements 4. Questions and General Discussion.
Taking Learning Development outside of the university Catherine McConnell, University of Brighton.
Strategic Plan of the MACU School of English 20011—2012 Submitted by Mark S. Harris, Chair, School of English 15 Nov
Criterion 1 – Program Mission, Objectives and Outcomes Weight = 0.05 Factors Score 1 Does the program have documented measurable objectives that support.
TEQSA The Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.
Two categories: Academic, Professional Issues: Level and nature of programs consistent with mission Well defined, differ from undergraduate programs Doctoral.
CREATING A CULTURE OF EVIDENCE Student Affairs Assessment Council October 2013 Dr. Barbara Copenhaver-Bailey Assistant Vice President for Student Success.
Jerry E. Trapnell, PhD, CPA Executive Vice President and Chief Accreditation Officer AACSB International A BRIEFING ON AACSB INTERNATIONAL ACCREDITATION.
Higher Learning Commission (HLC) Re-affirmation of accreditation in
Post White Paper Professor Craig Mahoney Chief Executive Higher Education Academy.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
The College of Education Beth Kubitskey, Associate Dean EMU prepares caring, professional educators for a diverse and democratic society. Assessment for.
Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, & Students 1. Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students Standard 4: Faculty, Staff, and Students (#82) INTENT STATEMENTS 4.1.
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
Meet Me Where I Am: Developing Cross Collaborative Strategies for Retention, Persistence and Completion Aimee Stubbs, Ed.S., St. Petersburg College Misty.
Standard III Faculty.
The IAGD Mission is to improve
Employer Engagement in Accreditation
SVR: Stage of Assessment SITE VISIT REPORT: Standard 5.1
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Accreditation Leadership Committee Opening Meeting
Faculty performance for Institutional achievement
TLQAA STANDARDS & TOOLS
Presentation transcript:

NASPAA Accreditation Matching operations with mission: Faculty performance Standard 3

Managing human resources How do you find and develop faculty talents to support your mission? How do you assess their performance consistent with your mission?

Standard 3.1: Faculty qualifications  What qualifies someone to help others learn public service?  What qualifies someone to help others learn public service as your mission defines it?  How do you ensure comparability in qualifications across modalities?  “Rule of Five” minimum faculty nucleus (Std. 2)  “50% Rules”  Courses taught by FT faculty of the institution  Courses delivering competencies taught by nucleus

Academically qualified  Automatic within five years of receiving terminal degree, such as PhD or JD  Program policies define academic qualifications consistent with your institution and mission  Conference  Publications  Community Service  Engagement of Students  Assessing Performance  Red Flags

Professionally qualified  Terminal degrees in the areas in which they offer courses  Program policies define professional qualifications consistent with your institution and mission  Extent and type of experience  Teaching abilities  Assessing Performance  Red Flags

Diversity and inclusiveness No community is homogeneous. Anywhere in the world, how does a program ensure that its faculty, students and graduates serve their public, whatever dimensions of difference exist?

Standard 3.2: Faculty diversity  A program-level Diversity Plan  What dimensions of diversity matter in your area?  Essential dimensions  Additional mission-based dimension  How do you promote diversity and a climate of inclusiveness?  Red Flags

Standard 3.3: Research, scholarship, service  Given your mission, what are your expectations for faculty scholarship, community service, and student engagement?  How do you support and assess performance?  Exemplars and Impacts

Additional resources Powerpoints and more on Academic/Professional qualifications: accreditation.naspaa.org/resources ( COPRA Appendix 5 White Paper AQ-PQ.pdf) Diversity plans: accreditation.naspaa.org/resources/peer-examples If you have questions stimulated by this video, submit them to : accreditation.naspaa.org/ai-questions

Mission-driven Outcomes-oriented Evidence-based Accreditation-earning Program Management