Question and Answer 1) A weighted Monte-Carlo ray trace of particles exiting the target/magnet assembly for all primary beam energies showing: a) Where.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Beam-plug and shielding studies related to HCAL and M2 Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt November 25,
Advertisements

Beam-plug under M2 and HCAL shielding studies Robert Paluch, Burkhard Schmidt October 9,
P HI T S Exercise ( II ) : How to stop , ,  -rays and neutrons? Multi-Purpose Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System title1 Feb revised.
The best collimator configuration (material, number of collimators, collimator shape) is determined by minimizing the ratio R, where N ae is the number.
Method of beam extraction from a synchrotron by the instrumentality of multilayer Cu-Fe shield Bondarenko Alexey.
Hall D Photon Beam Simulation and Rates Part 1: photon beam line Part 2: tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut Hall D Beam Line and Tagger Review.
Upcoming Review of the Hall D Photon Beam and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut, for the GlueX collaboration GlueX Collaboration Meeting.
Status of the Tagger Hall Background Simulation Simulation A. Somov, Jefferson Lab Hall-D Collaboration Meeting, University of Regina September
Alessandro Fois Detection of  particles in B meson decay.
HER and LER radiative bhabhas The next two figures show the trajectories of the off-energy beam particle from radiative bhabhas. The first figure shows.
Pair backgrounds for different crossing angles Machine-Detector Interface at the ILC SLAC 6th January 2005 Karsten Büßer.
Transfer reactions Resonant Elastic scattering Inelastic scattering: GR.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
1 Probability and randomness Photon is 3-D spread out little chunk of EM wave. Gazillions of electrons in metal: Which one will be kicked out? What if.
E-  identification 1. Reminder from previous presentations, questions, remarks 2. Čerenkov option 3. Study of several optical configurations 4. Conclusions.
GLAST LAT Project Test Beam Meeting, June 6, 2006 S. Funk 1/6 PS Positron Simulations Stefan Funk June 6, 2006.
Update on the Gas Ring Imaging Cherenkov (GRINCH) Detector for A 1 n using BigBite Todd Averett Department of Physics The College of William and Mary Williamsburg,
HPS Test Run Setup Takashi Maruyama SLAC Heavy Photon Search Collaboration Meeting Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility, May 26-27,
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle HH-Zeuthen-LC-Meeting Zeuthen September.
Status of the Beamline Simulation A.Somov Jefferson Lab Collaboration Meeting, May 11, 2010.
1/18 The Distribution of Synchrotron Radiation Power in the IR C. H. Yu IR Overview SR Distribution in the IR The Protection of SR Power.
Hypernuclear Physics in Hall A E Status John J. LeRose December 16, 2009.
Karsten Büßer Beam Induced Backgrounds at TESLA for Different Mask Geometries with and w/o a 2*10 mrad Crossing Angle LCWS 2004 Paris April 19 th 2004.
Electronics play a critical role in modern accelerator physics experiments. Events will be recorded at a rate of 200,000/second. Modular electronics such.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle
1 Report on analysis of PoGO Beam Test at Spring-8 Tsunefumi Mizuno July 15, 2003 July 21, 2003 revised August 1, 2003 updated.
Detector Monte-Carlo ● Goal: Develop software tools to: – Model detector performance – Study background issues – Calculate event rates – Determine feasibility.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Nov Beam Catcher in KOPIO (H. Mikata Kaon mini worksyop1 Beam Catcher in the KOPIO experiment Hideki Morii (Kyoto Univ.) for the KOPIO.
Masterclass Introduction to hands-on Exercise Aim of the exercise  Identify electrons, muons, neutrinos in the ATLAS detector  Types of Events.
Geant4 Tracking Test (D. Lunesu)1 Daniela Lunesu, Stefano Magni Dario Menasce INFN Milano GEANT4 TRACING TESTs.
Activation around dump shielding, and design of beam line mask Mathieu Baudin, RP Genevieve Steele, EN-STI Helmut Vincke, RP.
1 GEM R&D Activity in USTC Yi Zhou University of Science & Technology of China.
Photon Source and Tagger Richard Jones, University of Connecticut GlueX Detector ReviewOctober 20-22, 2004, Newport News presented by GlueX Tagged Beam.
Magnetized hadronic calorimeter and muon veto for the K +   +  experiment L. DiLella, May 25, 2004 Purpose:  Provide pion – muon separation (muon veto)
Inclusive Measurements of inelastic electron/positron scattering on unpolarized H and D targets at Lara De Nardo for the HERMES COLLABORATION.
N 0 primary photons generated N d primary photons detected Determination of the photon mass attenuation coefficients Check on ParentID( ) Energy value.
The PrimEx-I Beam line. A. GasparianPrimEx-II Beam Line, August 5, MC Results for the PrimEx-I configuration Beam Background on HyCal: Energy Distribution.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
The Q Weak Experiment Event tracking, luminosity monitors, and backgrounds John Leacock Virginia Tech on behalf of the Q Weak collaboration Hall C Users.
Simulations on “Energy plus Transmutation” setup, 1.5 GeV Mitja Majerle, V Wagner, A Krása, F Křížek This document can be downloaded.
Results From the Radphi LGD Dan Krop 12/11/03. The Radphi Experiment Radphi Experiment Took Data in Jlab Hall B From May to July Hours Of Beam.
Radiation study of the TPC electronics Georgios Tsiledakis, GSI.
Progress Report on GEANT Study of Containerized Detectors R. Ray 7/11/03 What’s New Since Last Time?  More detailed container description in GEANT o Slightly.
Detecting shielded nuclear contraband using muon tomography Judson Locke, William Bittner, Leonard Grasso, Dr. Kondo Gnanvo; Adviser: Dr. Marcus Hohlmann.
A. SarratILC TPC meeting, DESY, 15/02/06 Simulation Of a TPC For T2K Near Detector Using Geant 4 Antony Sarrat CEA Saclay, Dapnia.
The PrimEx-I Beam line. A. GasparianPrimEx-II Beam Line, August 5, MC Results for the PrimEx-I configuration Beam Background on HyCal: Energy Distribution.
W Prototype Simulations Linear Collider Physics & Detector Meeting December 15, 2009 Christian Grefe CERN, Bonn University.
Present status of production target and Room design Takashi Hashimoto, IBS/RISP 2015, February.
CHANNELING 2014 COMPTE-RENDU R.CHEHAB R.Chehab/Channeling20141.
N_TOF EAR-1 Simulations The “γ-flash” A. Tsinganis (CERN/NTUA), C. Guerrero (CERN), V. Vlachoudis (CERN) n_TOF Annual Collaboration Meeting Lisbon, December.
Positronium intensity measurement preparation SNU Bongho Kim.
Dark Current in ILC Main Linac N.Solyak, A.Sukhanov, I.Tropin ALCW2015, Apr.23, 2015, KEK LCWS'15, Tsukuba, 04/2015Nikolay Solyak1.
Further SR Studies for the Electron Polarimeter M. Sullivan for the JLEIC Collaboration Meeting Oct. 5-7, 2016.
J. Helsby, P. Ford, R. Hoch, K. Gnanvo, R. Pena, M. Hohlmann, D. Mitra
JLEIC MDI Update Michael Sullivan Apr 4, 2017.
M. Sullivan Apr 27, 2017 MDI meeting
A 3D design model of the apparatus for the Laser Wakefield Acceleration of electrons at ELI-NP S. Balascuta1 , R. Dinca1 1) “Horia Hulubei” National.
Update of the SR studies for the FCCee Interaction Region
CLAS12 Beamline Configurations
Electron probe microanalysis EPMA
Geant3 Simulation of Shielding for “sheet of flame” Background
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Polarized WACS Experiment (E ) Using Compact Photon Source (CPS)
Member States HST2000.
Bubble Chamber Planning Meeting
… continue with realistic particle
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
GEANT Simulations and Track Reconstruction
Summary of the FCCee IR Workshop Jan 2017 at CERN
Presentation transcript:

Question and Answer 1) A weighted Monte-Carlo ray trace of particles exiting the target/magnet assembly for all primary beam energies showing: a) Where the scattered "good" events go. b) Where the un-scattered primary beam goes. c) Where the "photon" beam produced goes - and what it hits. d) Where the inelastic "sheet of flame" (the fan of in-elastics sweep out of the target/magnet) goes and what structures it hits. 2) The proximity of significant magnetic material (support structures, other magnets, shielding, etc) and some argument or calculation that these won't effect the trajectories of charged particles discussed in (1) above. 3) A design for thin target exit window safety shielding (plastic or Al cover) that has cut outs only for the places where the "good" events exit. Or a credible argument that this cannot be done geometrically without compromising the measurement. 4) A clear written statement in the conduct of operation that they will never leave the target/magnet energized with no experiment personnel on duty in either the counting house or Hall A - 24/7 coverage when it is energized. With no ambiguous wording or wiggle room on this one.

1) A weighted Monte-Carlo ray trace of particles exiting the target/magnet assembly for all primary beam energies showing: a) Where the scattered "good" events go. The detector b) Where the un-scattered primary beam goes. Local dump or the Hall A dump x y z Px Py Pz Beam TargetField T/7deg T/7deg T/7deg T/7deg T/7deg x y z Px Py Pz Ptot TargetField T/90deg T/90deg T/90deg T/90deg T/90deg

c) Where the "photon" beam produced goes - and what it hits. The photon beam could come from the sycrodron radiation in the chicane, or from the bremstrahlung radiation when beam hiting materials(windows, coils or the target itself). In the following several pages we will present simulation of them. Det 1Det 2

Sycrotron Radiation from Chicane Radiation Power: Beam FZB1 Critical Radiation Power (GeV) (Tesla) (Watt) E E E-05 Placed one detector behine each FZ magnet. Shooting 100k electrons in GEANT4 simulation, detected very few photons at detector2. Most of them are block by the stainlesssteel vacuum box. Those photons detected by detector 2 will hit the target chamber. Since their energies are as low as 50 keV, they can not go through the window at all. Det 1Det 2

Chicane Sycrotron Rates Conclusion: 1.The Rate is small enough comparing to the beam electron 2.Photon energy is at KeV level 3.Total radiation power is very small

Bremstrahlung simulation Lot of photons are created inside the target chamber and even more are created when beam is hiting the local dump! But they are backward photons. In this bremstrahlung simulation, we only consider those photons from either the scattering chamber (windows and coils) or from the target itself. We simulated 2 situation, one is for beam goes to Hall A dump the other is for beam goes to local dump. See details in the next several pages.

Bremstrahlung, Beam Goes to Hall A Dump 5T target field,E=2.257

Photon 635 mm downstream 5T target field,E=2.257, Beam goes to Hall A dump Most of these photons will be blocked by the local dump or its stand. Part of them will go from the top and bottom then hit the septum iron block.

Photon Rates behind the local dump Most of these photons will be blocked by the septum iron block or the copper coils. The septum iron block covers +/-700 mm in X, +/-422 mm in Y. 5T target field,E=2.257, Beam goes to Hall A dump

Bremstrahlung, Beam Goes to Local Dump 5T target field, E=2.257, Beam goes to local dump

Photon 635 mm downstream 5T target field, E=2.257, Beam goes to local dump Most of these photons will be blocked by the local dump or its stand. Part of them will go from the top and bottom then hit the septum iron block.

Photon Rates behind the local dump 5T target field, E=2.257, Beam goes to local dump Most of these photons will be blocked by the septum iron block or the copper coils. The septum iron block covers +/-700 mm in X, +/-422 mm in Y.

d) Where the inelastic "sheet of flame" (the fan of in-elastics sweep out of the target/magnet) goes and what structures it hits. Tried very hard to find the‘sheet of flame’, but not succeed. Here is the detail: Place a flat layer detector at 600 mm downstream, which is 2000mm X 2000mm. Keeping the target field at 5 tesla, shoot electrons with flat distribution in energy(0- 3.5GeV),theta(0-Pi) and phi(0-2Pi) under the following 2 situations: 1) No coils and scattering chamber geometries. 2) With coils and scatering chamber geometries. See more figures on the next page.

With(Left) and Without(Right) Coils and Scattering Chamber Geometry Symmetrical distribution in phi in the left plot. Events lost due to the coil and scattering chamber in the right plot, but still symmetrical in phi.

Where the scattered electrons and their children go? Place cylindrical detector with R=550mm surrounding the target chamber.

2) The proximity of significant magnetic material (support structures, other magnets, shielding, etc) and some argument or calculation that these won't effect the trajectories of charged particles discussed in (1) above.

3) A design for thin target exit window safety shielding (plastic or Al cover) that has cut outs only for the places where the "good" events exit. Or a credible argument that this cannot be done geometrically without compromising the measurement. Already on position.

4) A clear written statement in the conduct of operation that they will never leave the target/magnet energized with no experiment personnel on duty in either the counting house or Hall A - 24/7 coverage when it is energized. With no ambiguous wording or wiggle room on this one.