Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 Part One: The Questions These statistics are the collapsed results with the not applicable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eyes and Ears Citizens and the Police Working Together For a Safer Community.
Advertisements

University of Illinois Police Department Welcome WelcomeTo Summer Registration 2006.
SECURITY AND PARKING SERVICES A PRO-ACTIVE APPROACH TO CAMPUS SECURITY AND PARKING ISSUES.
Riding a Bike for Transport 2011 Survey Findings.
Protecting society and helping keep people safe RESTRICTEDSlide 1RESTRICTED Thefts.
No place for hate --- Exploring the experiences of hate crimes and incidents in further and higher education: race and ethnicity --- Rob Holland Research.
Welcome to Crime Prevention Training.
Violence on Campus Prevention & Response. Active threat defined An active threat can be defined as: A person whose immediate activity can cause death.
Crime Prevention Crime Prevention is: the anticipation, recognition and appraisal of a crime risk and the initiation of some action to remove or reduce.
Health and wellness is essential to our students’ academic and personal success. The university remains committed to strengthening the supportive aspects.
External & Strategic Development Services (ESDS) NSS and Gender Comparison of : Male and female students Sector and UEL Year 2006 to 2009 Strategic Planning,
Survey Results September Survey Information There is an error margin of ±3.6 on this survey. South Ogden City sent out 5,300 surveys and received.
Whitworth Campus Climate Survey Spring Thanks to: Tim Caldwell, for the use of his survey. Tim Caldwell, for the use of his survey. Jenni Holzinger,
Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.
Fire Marshall Tool Box Training Jo Smith – Safety, Health and Environment Manager Claire Doran Paula Evans Room A132 Ext: 3334/3432 Mobile:
Introduction. CU Police Crime Prevention Unit Ray Price Beverley VanCleef We provide programming for the Cornell Community.
Building Monitor Evacuation Training October 2010.
Town of Fairview Community Survey  RESEARCH AND TRAINING SPECIALISTS, INC  Concord, North Carolina  April 2011.
SHELTER IN PLACE DRILL TRAINING Preparation for April 2008 Drill.
Captain Brent Denny Public Safety  Police Department ◦ Patrol ◦ Detectives ◦ 24 sworn police officers ◦ 7 Administrative Staff ◦ Community Service.
Chris Harris & Alison Cares Department of Criminal Justice & Criminology.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
Examining the Experiences of LGB Students Using the ACHA-NCHA Todd M. Smith December 1, 2006.
Emergency Eye/Face Wash Training Training Provided by University of Wisconsin-Stout Safety and Risk Management Services.
Fremantle Visitor Information Centre Report 2011.
NEW EMPLOYEE ORIENTATION Starting on the Right Foot!
Fall 2012 Office on Diversity and Inclusion Leah Cox with Sally Scott, Director of Disability Resources Tracy Citeroni, Sociology Farhang Rouhani, Geography.
REALTOR WATCH Presented By Pasco County Sheriff’s Office Crime Prevention Unit Bob White, Sheriff.
George Street ETRO Visitor Research Quarter 1 Findings September to November 2014 Key Findings Presentation December 2014.
Welcome to College of Engineering February 2015 Health and Safety Briefing.
Personal Safety Advice Compiled by DC Jeremy House States of Jersey Police Last Updated 03/02/2011 Not Protectively Marked.
McMaster Rounds. A Crime Prevention Initiative designed to work with the community to improve safety on campus Basis of rounds is similar to “medical.
San Luis Obispo Community College District SENSE 2012 Findings for Cuesta College.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
FAST CUSTOMER SATISFACTION SURVEY COMPARISON
THIS IS With Hosts... Your On a Date Get Your Party On Virtual Awareness Campus Know How Hall Happenings.
University of Kentucky. Design and Administration The survey was the product of collaboration between the President’s Commission on Diversity and Institutional.
Officer Lisa Van Horn Officer Bev Van Cleef.  The Cornell Police Crime Prevention Unit’s mission is to deter crime or the perception of crime and to.
Hampshire County Council: Customer Insight Project, Community Safety Steve Postlethwaite and Sam Hepenstal.
Prepared for: Vancouver Police Department Resident and Business Survey Prepared by: NRG Research Group April 4, 2007.
STALKING. Basics of Stalking  Harassing, threatening, or menacing behavior  Is the behavior repeated conduct?  If suspect feels fear – take it seriously.
Counseling & Psychological Services Basics: Recognizing and Responding to Students in Distress.
Safety in the City and University Environment Reserve Officer Brian Arnold University of San Francisco Department of Public Safety.
Attitudes Towards Women in the Workforce.  Females have more positive attitudes towards women working than do men.
“Employee Survey 2007” Analysis of results and comparison with 2005 survey results May 2007.
EXCERPTS for the Safety Audit Committee Preliminary Summary Report Campus Safety Awareness: Engaging Students to Create the Safest Campus Community Possible.
Social Media: The New Note Home Does Age Effect Responsiveness and acceptance to Social Media? By: David Yarbrough EDTC 5130.
Employee Survey 2005 Results from employee survey run during Feb/March 2005.
Post-Presentation Active Shooter Exercise A simple set of short exercises to have participants practice what they have learned.
College Student Survey (CSS) 2006 CSS INSTITUTIONAL PROFILE Margie Bennett, Director Institutional Research and Compliance March 2007.
2015 Survey Information Technology Services February 8, 2016 Climate and Diversity.
Michigan State University Extension Michigan State University 4-H Field Staff Perceptions of Area of Expertise Teams Elizabeth Scott Doctoral Candidate.
Heterosexist Attitudes in Schools  Elizabeth A Baczkiewicz  Luther H Christensen  Elenore C Schoenfeld  June 30, 2004  University of Minnesota Duluth.
Course of Study 6. Security Management  Security and its Importance  Security of the Guest and their Property  Security Needs for the Staff and the.
Overview of Crisis Protocols Introduction Ways We’re Trying to Make Campus Safer Transition to New Plan.
Gender & Street Work 2 studies of Swedish Street Work Malin Andersson, Malin Lundström & Jeny Rengman.
Headline results from residents' survey Areas of personal concern for residents Which of these issues are you most concerned about at the moment?
To Safe Space! Facilitated By: Daniel M. Maxwell Director Campus Center.
Lexington High School Youth Risk Behavior Survey 2015 Results.
IB Diploma Examinations May 2015 Final advice and explanation of conditions.
PROMOTING THE HEALTH OF MEN WHO HAVE SEX WITH MEN WORLDWIDE A training curriculum for providers.
CRIME AND SAFETY SURVEY TOPLINE RESULTS MAY 2013.
Physical Security at Data Center: A survey. Objective of the Survey  1. To identify the current physical security in data centre.  2.To analyse the.
Welcome to Crime Prevention Training.
Does Environmental Design Matter?
Building Monitor Evacuation Training
Final findings of climate survey
Final findings of climate survey
Fire Safety City Campus
The Store Starts Here: Increasing Awareness of Events and Customer Perceptions in Parking Lots.
Presentation transcript:

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 Part One: The Questions These statistics are the collapsed results with the not applicable answers removed. The categories were reduced from the original six (strongly disagree, disagree, neutral, agree, strongly agree and not applicable) to three categories, disagree, neutral, and agree. This was done to increase the numbers in each category in order to make the results more meaningful as well as to avoid the not applicable answers.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 Legend Solid black bars indicate female responses White bars indicate male responses The first two bars indicate Disagree, the second two indicate Neutral and the last two bars indicate Agree responses.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 1. I feel safe on campus.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 2. I feel safe in my residence (on campus).

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 3. I feel safe walking around campus by myself in the daytime.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 4. I feel safe walking around campus by myself after dark.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 5. I think I am at a high risk for becoming a victim of crime on campus.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 6. I sometimes miss classes and extracurricular activities when they are held on campus at night because of safety concerns

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 7. My academic performance has suffered because of personal safety concerns.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 8. My social life has suffered because of personal safety concerns.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 9. I feel safe using the phys-ed facilities at night.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and I feel safe inside campus bars.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and The buildings on campus are clearly marked with their names on the outside.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and The campus maps are useful.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and Building directories are available and accessible.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and Stairwells, fire routes and building exits are clearly marked.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and Stairwell doors that automatically lock behind you are well marked.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and The lighting on campus is adequate and effective in the day.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and The lighting on campus is adequate and effective at night.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and The signs on campus are well lit

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and the bike racks are located in well lit areas.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and The physical aspects of the campus (placement of trees, bushes, lights, wheelchair ramps), contribute to a general feeling of uneasiness at night.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and I feel safe when using the bike rack areas.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and I feel safe using the bathrooms on campus.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and While walking past a large lineup for a campus bar, I feel intimidated.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and I think Queen's is committed to creating and maintaining a safe campus.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and I am encouraged to report personal safety concerns that I have.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and I know what to do to report a personal security concern.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and I think help would be readily available if I had a personal safety concern.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and I think Queen's follows up on personal safety concerns promptly.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and The presence of security patrols on campus increases my sense of safety.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and I think Queen's effectively communicates personal safety concerns (e.g. by posting warnings) to the Queen's community.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 Please note that the number of responses in the category of transgendered was 2, therefore, a meaningful comparison between all the categories (female, male and transgendered) could not be made.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 For the part of the survey that asked where you felt particularly safe or unsafe, there were many common responses. In order from most common to the least common response are the answers.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 Why do you feel particularly safe in a building at night?  Lots of people around.  Well lit.  Familiar building  Many staff around.  Can be behind locked doors.  Lots of services open late (pubs, Walkhome etc...).  Very busy.  Always open.  Central location.  Available phones. Things going on.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 Why do you feel particularly unsafe in a building at night?  Not well lit.  No people around.  Too many corners/stairwells etc...  Suspicious people have access.  Confusing buildings.  Building isolated.  People can see where you are in the building.  Underground.  Dark corridors.  Very physically open building.  Building not locked when it could be.  Have no staff on at night.  No phones around, close to you.  Unmonitored hallways.

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 The buildings that were felt to be the most safe determined by the number of identical responses are;  John Deutsch University Centre  Stauffer Library  The Phys-ed centre Mackintosh Corry

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 The buildings that were felt to be the least safe again, according to the number of identical responses are;  Mackintosh Corry  Jeffery Hall John Deutsch University Centre

Bar Designation: Disagree-1 and 2/ Neutral - 3 and 4/ Agree - 5 and 6 Further Information Our survey responses also included 28 persons who self-identified as target groups under the Human Rights Act (visible minorities, gay, persons with disabilities etc.). We compared their responses to both the male and female non-self-identified responses. The main discrepancies were in terms of perceptions of safety. Self identified respondents felt less safe than men, but more safe than women on campus at night and when walking past lineups to campus bars. Self identified people also felt, along with women, that they were more at risk to become a victim of crime than men. Gay persons felt the most unsafe around the Phys ed centre, campus bars and bike racks, compared to men, women or visible minorities/persons with disabilities. Visible minorities/persons with disabilities also felt most unsafe in bathrooms, followed by women, gay persons and men. Because of the relatively small sample size of self-identified individuals, we are reluctant to read too much into the responses, but it appears that as a group, these individuals who self identified generally feel less safe on campus than men, but slightly more safe than women. Once adjusted by gender, the indication is that members of these groups feel more vulnerable than those who did not self-identify