Scenario Optimization, part 2. Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Contents CVAR portfolio optimization Demo of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Omega Guidelines and insights Luis A. Seco Sigma Analysis & Management University of Toronto RiskLab.
Advertisements

MS&E 211 Quadratic Programming Ashish Goel. A simple quadratic program Minimize (x 1 ) 2 Subject to: -x 1 + x 2 ≥ 3 -x 1 – x 2 ≥ -2.
Financial Risk Management of Insurance Enterprises Interest Rate Caps/Floors.
SA-1 Probabilistic Robotics Planning and Control: Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes.
MMA708 - Analytical Finance II EXOTIC CAP PRICING 18 December 2013
VAR METHODS. VAR  Portfolio theory: risk should be measure at the level of the portfolio  not single asset  Financial risk management before 1990 was.
Scenario Optimization. Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Contents Introduction Mean absolute deviation models.
Operations Management Linear Programming Module B - Part 2
Mathematics in Finance Numerical solution of free boundary problems: pricing of American options Wil Schilders (June 2, 2005)
B-1 Operations Management Linear Programming Module B - New Formulations.
1 Dynamic portfolio optimization with stochastic programming TIØ4317, H2009.
Alexei A. Gaivoronski IIASA, Workshop on Coping with Uncertainty, Stochastic optimization and modeling of network risk and uncertainty:
Slide 4b.1 Stiff Structures, Compliant Mechanisms, and MEMS: A short course offered at IISc, Bangalore, India. Aug.-Sep., G. K. Ananthasuresh Lecture.
Optimization in Financial Engineering Yuriy Zinchenko Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Calgary December 02, 2009.
Multi-objective Approach to Portfolio Optimization 童培俊 张帆.
POMDPs: Partially Observable Markov Decision Processes Advanced AI
Reinsurance Presentation Example 2003 CAS Research Working Party: Executive Level Decision Making using DFA Raju Bohra, FCAS, ARe.
OPTIMAL PRESENT RESOURCE EXTRACTION UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF FUTURE RISK Professor Dr Peter Lohmander SLU, Sweden,
Finite Mathematics & Its Applications, 10/e by Goldstein/Schneider/SiegelCopyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. 1 of 68 Chapter 9 The Theory of Games.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2001 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Option Valuation Chapter 21.
B-1 Operations Management Linear Programming Module B - Harder Formulations.
Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management
Value at Risk.
Roman Keeney AGEC  In many situations, economic equations are not linear  We are usually relying on the fact that a linear equation.
June 2001 Universita’ degli Studi di Bergamo Corso di dottorato di ricerca 1 Asset/Liability Management Models in Insurance.
© 2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part. Chapter.
Hedging and Value-at-Risk (VaR) Single asset VaR Delta-VaR for portfolios Delta-Gamma VaR simulated VaR Finance 70520, Spring 2002 Risk Management & Financial.
Advanced Risk Management I Lecture 6 Non-linear portfolios.
Financial Risk Management of Insurance Enterprises Valuing Interest Rate Options.
Alternative Measures of Risk. The Optimal Risk Measure Desirable Properties for Risk Measure A risk measure maps the whole distribution of one dollar.
Dividing and Simplifying Just as the root of a product can be expressed as the product of two roots, the root of a quotient can be expressed as the quotient.
Some Background Assumptions Markowitz Portfolio Theory
1 Options Option Basics Option strategies Put-call parity Binomial option pricing Black-Scholes Model.
Planning Production of a Set of Semiconductor Components with Uncertain Wafer and Component Yield Frank W. Ciarallo Assistant Professor Biomedical, Industrial.
Economics 2010 Lecture 12 Perfect Competition. Competition  Perfect Competition  Firms Choices in Perfect Competition  The Firm’s Short-Run Decision.
1 Value at Risk Chapter The Question Being Asked in VaR “What loss level is such that we are X % confident it will not be exceeded in N business.
INVESTMENTS | BODIE, KANE, MARCUS Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 18 Option Valuation.
EXPLORATION AND PRODUCTION (E&P) How to Choose and Manage Exploration and Production Projects Supat Kietnithiamorn Kumpol Trivisvavet May 9, 2001 Term.
Team 9 Jin woo Choi Philip Liu Nallely Tagle
Portfolio Management Unit – 1 Session No.4 Topic: Investment Objectives Unit – 1 Session No.4 Topic: Investment Objectives.
Fundamentals of Futures and Options Markets, 5 th Edition, Copyright © John C. Hull Value at Risk Chapter 18.
Adviser: Frank, Yeong-Sung Lin Presenter: Yi-Cin Lin.
Value at Risk Chapter 16. The Question Being Asked in VaR “What loss level is such that we are X % confident it will not be exceeded in N business days?”
Warm Up Find the GCF of these sets 1) 10, 122) 14, 213) 24, 40 Answers: 1) 2 2) 7 3) 8.
Example 2.4 An Option Model for Hedging Investment Risk.
1 Multi-Objective Portfolio Optimization Jeremy Eckhause AMSC 698S Professor S. Gabriel 6 December 2004.
Hua ChenSeptember 26, 2009Discussion on “Hedging Longevity Risk by Asset Management” 1 Discussion on “Hedging Longevity Risk by Asset Management – an ALM.
Option Valuation.
Author: Tadeusz Sawik Decision Support Systems Volume 55, Issue 1, April 2013, Pages 156–164 Adviser: Frank, Yeong-Sung Lin Presenter: Yi-Cin Lin.
Choosing an Investment Portfolio
1 BA 555 Practical Business Analysis Linear Programming (LP) Sensitivity Analysis Simulation Agenda.
1 1 Ch20&21 – MBA 566 Options Option Basics Option strategies Put-call parity Binomial option pricing Black-Scholes Model.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 21 Option Valuation.
Dynamic asset and liability management. Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Asset and Liability Management (ALM)
Stochastic Optimization
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. Polynomials 4.
Alexei A.Gaivoronski January 2006 TIØ4137 Financial Optimization 1 Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Department.
8.2 M ULTIPLYING AND D IVIDING R ATIONAL E XPRESSIONS Simplify rational expressions. Multiply and divide rational expressions. Objectives rational expression.
Alexei A.Gaivoronski IKT Økonomi1 Provision of mobile data services: portfolio analysis Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Parametric Quadratic Optimization Oleksandr Romanko Joint work with Alireza Ghaffari Hadigheh and Tamás Terlaky McMaster University January 19, 2004.
Simplify Radical Expressions Using Properties of Radicals.
2.5 The Fundamental Theorem of Game Theory For any 2-person zero-sum game there exists a pair (x*,y*) in S  T such that min {x*V. j : j=1,...,n} =
Properties and Computation of CoVaR efficient portfolio Shin, Dong Wook SOLAB Industrial and System Engineering Department, KAIST
Market-Risk Measurement
Tools for Decision Analysis: Analysis of Risky Decisions
Simplify Radical Expressions Using Properties of Radicals
Unit #2 Radicals.
Risk Mgt and the use of derivatives
Portfolio models for fixed income securities
Ratios involving complex fractions
Presentation transcript:

Scenario Optimization, part 2

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Contents CVAR portfolio optimization Demo of VAR and CVAR optimization Put-call efficient frontiers

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Value at Risk in portfolio optimization Loss function Probability that loss does not exceed some threshold Probability of losses strictly greater than some threshold

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Value at Risk in portfolio optimization Relation between different quantities

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Value at Risk in portfolio optimization Conditional Value at Risk

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski CVAR portfolio models Loss function CVAR for  being 100%  VAR: Or for discrete scenarios Assuming denominator equal 1-  We need to simplify this keeping in mind our objective of using CVAR in portfolio risk management models

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski CVAR portfolio models General CVAR portfolio model Two possible advantages of this model  It takes into account the losses incurred if abnormal scenarios materialize  CVAR is convex function of portfolio as opposed to VAR and for this reason it is easier to compute  In order to take advantage of this it is necessary to look more carefully into CVAR formulation

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski VaR and CVaR: comparison CVaR may give very misleading ideas about VaR VaR/CVaR fraction of portfolio 2

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski LP formulation of CVAR portfolio model Introduce auxilliary variables Or in case of discrete scenarios Averaging these with respect to scenarios

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski LP formulation of CVAR portfolio model Which gives Dividing this by 1-  and rearranging we get And recalling expression for CVAR we get finally

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski LP formulation of CVAR portfolio model LP CVAR portfolio model This is linear model if losses are linear

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Portfolio optimization with CVAR constraints

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Put-call efficient frontiers Portfolio performance is measured against random target g: liabilities, benchmark, index, competition, etc Reward: portfolio exceeds target, risk: portfolio is below target Integrated view of financial management process Upside potential: payoff of a call option on the future portfolio value relative to target Downside potential: short position in a European put option on the future portfolio value relative to the target Portfolio call value: expected upside, put value: expected downside Put/call efficient portfolios and put/call efficient frontiers

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Put-call efficient frontiers Tracing put/call efficient frontier Start with LP without constraints Portfolio value Target portfolio value

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Put-call efficient frontiers Constraint which connects portfolio value with upside and downside Put/Call efficient portfolio

Financial Optimization and Risk Management Professor Alexei A. Gaivoronski Dual problem Helps to obtain insight into the nature of solution Solution does not depend on  !! This means that efficient frontier is the straight line