Social Classification: The Making of the NS-SEC David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright 2006 – Biz/ed The Labour Market.
Advertisements

Market Analysis.
1 The SEP Gradient, Race, or the SEP Gradient and Race: Understanding Disparities in Child Health and Functioning Lisa Dubay, PhD, ScM The Urban Institute.
Understanding womens employment in Europe: the importance of class and gender. Tracey Warren.
Occupational coding: principles, practice and problems A workshop within the ESRC Research Methods Programme Peter Elias Institute for Employment Research.
The use of LFS data in the production of annual mortality rates Alaa Al-Hamad Centre for Health Analysis and Life Events.
ESRC Methods Festival Resources to Analyse Occupations and Social Class: The NS-SEC David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of.
Employment quality in the OECD Better Life Initiative Anne Saint-Martin Meeting of the Group of Experts on Measuring Quality of Employment September.
The Effects of Informal Care on Paid-work Participation in Great Britain Ursula Henz Presentation at the BSPS 2004 conference, University of Leicester,
Operationalising ESeC in Finnish statistical sources, Finnish EU SILK and Census 2000 ESeC workshop, 30 of June 2006 Bled, Slovenia.
Life expectancy by NS-SEC Structure, technical and conceptual issues and results BSPS 8 Sept 2011 Brian Johnson ONS Health & Life Events Division Newport.
United Nations Statistics Division Principles and concepts of classifications.
Does Your School Really Know What You Do?: Classification and Compensation of Campus NMC Staff David Herrington, Princeton University Andrew Bonamici,
Class and Poverty: Cross-sectional and Dynamic Analysis of Income Poverty and Life-style Deprivation Dorothy Watson, Christopher T. Whelan and Bertrand.
EPUNet Conference Barcelona, 8-9 May 2006 EPUNet Conference Barcelona, 8-9 May 2006.
PART FOUR – COMMERCIAL LEGISLATION in the UAE
Socioeconomic inequalities in mortality: Men aged (4) Chris White Principal Research Officer Office for National Statistics LS Clearance 20105D.
Overview of the International classification of occupations (ISCO) A case for Uganda Ssennono vincent.
United Nations Statistics Division Overview. Overview  Of the many classifications in the Family, five reference classifications will be discussed at.
Compensation management
Basis for Compensation fixation
Some comments on ESEC outline of the talk Theoretical aspects, objectives : what we agree on, what we suggest Measurement issues Coding ISCO Additional.
ISCO88, ISCO08 and ESeC Regional Meeting, 9 December 2005 Presentation of Hungary.
USE OF LITHUANIAN CLASSIFICATION OF OCCUPATIONS ISCO 88, ISCO 2008 and the Development of the ESeC Regional Meeting, Oslo, 7 June 2005 Violeta Skamarociene.
Work Package 11 Using ESEC based on ECHP to examine class differences in Persistent Poverty, Deprivation and Economic Vulnerability.
Validating ESeC using Round 1 of the European Social Survey ESeC Validation Conference, Lisbon, January 2006 Eric Harrison & David Rose ISER, University.
Class Schemas and Employment Relations Comparisons between the ESeC and the EGP class schemas using European data By Erik Bihagen, Magnus Nermo, & Robert.
Measuring Social Class
1 COURSE OBJECTIVE l DEVELOP AN UNDERSTANDING OF »CONCEPTS »PRINCIPLES »PROCEDURES »PROCESSES »PROGRAMS AS THEY RELATE TO THE DESIGN AND ADMINISTRATION.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. 1 GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS COVERAGE OF THE GFS SYSTEM Part 1 This lecture defines the concept.
Developing a European Socio-economic Classification: Why, What and How David Rose & Eric Harrison Institute for Social and Economic.
Market Analysis. Market Position Market Niche – small part of an existing market Market Leader – maintain dominant position in the market? Market Follower.
CLASS FOUR-EMPLOYEE BENEFITS. EMPLOYMENT RETIREMENT INCOME SECURITY ACT OF 1974 (ERISA) Employee benefit plans established for providing medical, surgical,
A European Socio-economic Classification: How we got here and where we are going David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex.
Using EseC to look across and within classes Workshop on Application of ESeC Lake Bled, June 2006 Eric Harrison & David Rose ISER, University of.
The Application of ESEC to Harmonized European Data: Introducing the Statistical Compendium Rhys Davies and Peter Elias.
Gerrit Bauer, Jean-Marie Jungblut, Walter Müller, Reinhard Pollak, Felix Weiss, Heike Wirth MZES, University of Mannheim, ZUMA ESeC Workshop on Application.
Why is it important to measure and understand organisational change? Skill Change, Control at Work and Employee Well-Being Duncan Gallie.
Operationalising and Validating ESEC Information Requirements and Potential Data Sources.
European Socio-Economic Classification Validation Conference Portuguese Statistical Office Lisbon, January 2006.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Statistical Division Economic Characteristics in the Census Questionnaire Angela Me, Chief Social and Demographic.
A European Socio-economic Classification: How we got here and where we are going More David Rose & Eric Harrison Institute.
The European Socio-economic Classification: A Summary and Explanation ESeC Validation Conference, Lisbon, January 2006 David Rose & Eric Harrison ISER.
A European Socio-economic Classification: How we got here and where we are going More David Rose & Eric Harrison Institute.
European Socio-economic Classification: Finalising the Matrix David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex.
Validation studies : project using French data Assessing the consistency of ESeC with theoretical framework “à la Goldthorpe” Pointing out using ISCO as.
Validation of ESeC: The Effect of Coding Procedures and Occupational Aggregation Level Cornelia Hausen, Jean-Marie Jungblut, Walter Müller, Reinhard Pollak,
The Draft E-SEC as a measure of employment relations Eric Harrison.
Developing a European Socio-economic Classification: Why, What and How David Rose & Eric Harrison Institute for Social and Economic.
Structure of the Hungarian population in employment by ESeC Based on LFS and Census 2001 Elizabeth Lindner Hungarian Central Statistical Office.
Application of ESeC in Estonian Social Surveys based on EU-SILC and LFS data Merle Paats Leading Statistician from the Social Statistics Department, Estonia.
European Socio-economic Classification: Operational Rules David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex.
Class stratification and life chances
Session 5: International Standard Classification of Status in Employment, 1993 (ICSE-93) David Hunter International Labour Office Department of Statistics.
Validation studies : projects using French data Assessing the consistency of ESEC with theoretical framework à la Goldthorpe Assessing the explanatory.
National experience of using ISCO 88 & Why do we update NCO 96 Prepared by: Galya Stateva National Statistical Institute Bulgaria.
Copyright 2006 – Biz/ed Market Analysis.
International Conference ADDRESSING QUALITY OF WORK IN EUROPE Sofia, Bulgaria October 2012 “Satisfaction with working conditions and work organisation.
Changing employment relations & reforms of social security systems.
CPE 3100 Industrial management Wage Payment Systems.
European Socio-Economic Classification: A Validation Exercise Figen Deviren Office for National Statistics.
Social Class and Wages in post-Soviet Russia Alexey Bessudnov DPhil candidate St.Antony's College CEELBAS seminar 30 May 2008 Please note that this is.
Usefulness and limitations of ESeC prototype in the French context
Compiled by Elizabeth Lindner, Miklós Lakatos – HCSO
What they are How markets are segmented
Concepts of industry, occupation and status in employment - Overview
Workshop on the data collection of occupational data
Sylvain Jouhette WORKSHOP ON THE DATA COLLECTION OF OCCUPATIONAL DATA Luxembourg, 28 November 2008 ESeC: European Socio-economic.
Item 2.5 – European Socio-economic classification (ESeC)
European Socioeconomic Groups (ESeG) Agenda point 8
Presentation transcript:

Social Classification: The Making of the NS-SEC David Rose Institute for Social and Economic Research University of Essex

Overview (1)Conceptual basis of NS-SEC (2)Criterion validation of NS-SEC (3)Constructing the NS-SEC using SOC2000

The NS-SEC 1Higher managerial and professional occupations (1.1 Large employers and higher managerial) (1.2 Higher professional) 2Lower managerial and professional occupations 3Intermediate occupations 4Small employers and own account workers 5Lower supervisory and technical occupations 6Semi-routine occupations 7Routine occupations 8Never worked and long- term unemployed

Categories of the Operational Version of the NS-SEC

Collapsing the NS-SEC (1) Operational categoriesEight (Nine) ClassFive ClassThree Class L1 Employers in large establishments L2 Higher managerial occupations 1.1 Large employers and higher managerial occupations 1.2 Higher professional occupations 1 Managerial and professional occupations 1 Managerial and professional occupations L3 Higher professional occupations L4 Lower professional and higher technical occupations L5 Lower managerial occupations L6 Higher supervisory occupations 2 Lower managerial and professional occupations L7 Intermediate occupations 3 Intermediate occupations L8 Employers in small establishments L9 Own account workers 4 Small employers and own account workers 2 Intermediate occupations Analytic variables 3 Small employers and own account workers

Collapsing the NS-SEC (2) Operational categoriesEight (Nine) ClassFive ClassThree Class L10 Lower supervisory occupations L11 Lower technical occupations 5 Lower supervisory and technical occupations 3 Routine and manual occupations L12 Semi-routine occupations 6 Semi routine occupations L13 Routine occupations 7 Routine occupations L14 Never worked and long-term unemployed 8 Never worked and long-term unemployed Never worked and long-term unemployed Analytic variables 4 Lower supervisory and technical occupations Never worked and long-term unemployed 5 Semi-routine and routine occupations

Conceptual basis for the NS-SEC (Goldthorpe) Employment relations and conditions are central to delineating the structure of socio- economic positions in modern societies

The Derivation of the NS-SEC Basic SEC Positions EMPLOYERSSELF-EMPLOYED WORKERS EMPLOYEESEXCLUDED

Typical elements of the Labour Contract Short-term exchange of money for effort Payment by the time or piece No occupational pension or health scheme Contract easily terminated Low level of job security

Typical elements of the Service Relationship Long-term exchange of service for compensation Greater job security and employability Salary Incremental or similar payment systems Occupational pension and health schemes Greater control over the job and thus trust between employer and employee

The Derivation of the NS-SEC Basic SEC Positions EMPLOYERSSELF-EMPLOYEDWORKERSEMPLOYEESEXCLUDED Labour Form of employment regulation ServiceIntermediate Supervisors, lower technical semi-routine, routine Intermediate Professionals managers LargeSmall Never worked Long-term Unemployed Self-employed (1.1) (1.2,2,4) (4) (1.1,1.2,2) (3) (5,6,7) (8)(8)

Validation studies (a)CRITERION VALIDATION Do measures of employment relations discriminate between the categories of the NS-SEC? (b)CONSTRUCT VALIDATION How well does the NS-SEC explain variance in theoretically relevant dependent variables?

Criterion validation 1form of remuneration 2career opportunities 3autonomy with regard to time MEASURES OF EMPLOYMENT RELATIONS Three conceptually separable respects in which employment relations are differentiated according to whether a service relationship or labour contract prevails

Summary (1) NS-SEC is first a conceptual construction (hence NS-SEC is a schema) To operationalise the schema we need an algorithm to a detailed set of occupation- by-employment status units

Summary (2) (a)how closely the basic occupational and employment status classifications available map onto the categories of the NS-SEC (i.e. adequacy of the derivation matrix) (b)how much information is available relevant to the construction of the algorithm linking these classifications to the schema (i.e. issues of criterion validity) How well the NS-SEC schema is operationalised depends upon two things:

Constructing the Derivation Matrix (1) Information required on: 1.occupation: coded to SOC2000 OUG; 2.employment status; 3.number of persons in the establishment (0, 1-24, 25+).

The NS-SEC Derivation Matrix

Constructing the Derivation Matrix (2) 1.The derived employment status variable (say, empstat) is created by combining data on whether an individual is an employer, manager, self- employed or an employee; size of establishment; and supervisory status. 2.The full set of categories and associated values of empstat is thus: Employer with 25 or more employees; Employer with less than 25 employees; Self-employed with no employees (own account worker); Manager in an establishment with 25 or more employees; Manager in an establishment with less than 25 employees; Supervisor; Employee

Constructing the Derivation Matrix (3) 1.Managers may only be allocated to occupations in SOC Major Group 1 (Managers and Senior Officials). This negates the need to ask for self- reported managerial status. 2.Respondent only needs to be asked whether s/he has formal supervisory duties or is an employee. This information should either not be collected or be ignored for managers.

Constructing the Derivation Matrix (4) The derivation routine for the employment status variable varies with SOC major group. If the OUG is in major group 1 then data are needed on 1.whether self-employed or employee and 2.size of establishment. The size of establishment data can be collapsed prior to or during the derivation. If the OUG code is in major groups 2-9 then data are needed on 1.self-employed or employee 2.size of establishment and 3.supervisory status

Derivation of empstat for managers (SOC Major Group 1)

Derivation of empstat for SOC Major Groups 2-9

Allocation to NS-SEC Derivation Matrix Note: in row 2, column 5, this OUG has been allocated to 5 for lower managerial occupations, despite an establishment size of 25+. We noted earlier that the size variable could be over-ridden for some managerial occupations. Similarly, the supervisor and employee codes are overridden for managers in rows 1 and 2. A manager is a manager is a manager…

Constructing the Derivation Matrix (5) 1.The rows of the NS-SEC derivation matrix are the OUGs of SOC2000 and the columns are the employment status derived variable. 2.The structure of the matrix reflects the distinction made in SOC2000 between managers and other employees. Managers are coded to major group 1 only. 3.Accordingly in the matrix the managerial cells are only valid for SOC codes 1111 to As a corollary, for these managerial OUGs the cells for other employees (including supervisors) are invalid. 5.For SOC major groups 2 to 9, it is the managerial cells that are invalid, as managers in these occupations should be coded to major group 1.

Example illustration of parts of the NS-SEC derivation matrix

Constructing the Derivation Matrix (6) In practice, ONS does not leave empty cells in the matrix. Instead, they use editing rules to force codes into empty cells. Thus:

Reduced & Simplified versions of NS-SEC Reduced NS-SEC- if no information on establishment size Simplified NS-SEC-if data only on occupation

NS-SEC Household Class EITHER Highest Income Householder ORDominant position in labour market

Advantages of the NS-SEC Conceptually clear and rigorous Simple to create Flexible in use Easier to maintain Better explanatory tool