Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Desired Results Developmental Profile - school readiness© A Project of the California department of education, child development division.
A HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE SCHOOL READINESS:. WHERE DID WE START? 1999 : KSDE began working with Kansas Action for Children to define School Readiness 2000:
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Missouri Schoolwide Positive Behavior Support (MO SW-PBS) Implementation Mary Richter MO SW-PBS State Coordinator.
Driving Questions: Strategies for Uses of ARRA Funds Ongoing Professional Development.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)
The Head Start Child Development and Early Learning Framework A Focus on School Readiness for Infant and Toddler Children August 19, 2014 RGV Pre-Service.
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
Alternate Assessment on Alternate Achievement Standards Aligned to Common Core State Standards 1.
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Milwaukee Math Partnership Year 1 External Evaluation Lizanne DeStefano, Director Dean Grosshandler, Project Coordinator University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center 1 Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney March 2008 The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center National Early Childhood Technical.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
School Improvement Improving what’s happening in the classroom for students with disabilities: instruction & its impact on student learning Systems that.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Proficiency Delivery Plan Strategies Curriculum, Assessment & Alignment Continuous Instructional Improvement System ( CIITS) New Accountability Model KY.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
1 Early Childhood and Accountability OSEP’s Project Director’s Meeting August 2006.
SPP Indicators B-7 and B-8: Overview and Results to Date for the Florida Prekindergarten Program for Children with Disabilities PreK Coordinators Meeting.
2010 ECO Conference How Will I Know? How Will You Know? Implementation Fidelity Surveys: 2 States’ Experiences.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
Minnesota’s School Readiness Study 1 Developmental Assessment at Kindergarten Entrance.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Presented at State Kindergarten Entry Assessment (KEA) Conference San Antonio, Texas February, 2012 Comprehensive Assessment in Early Childhood: How Assessments.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Section 1. Introduction Orientation to Virginia’s QRIS.
Linking the DRDP to Instruction: Using the DRDP (2015) Reports
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
OKLAHOMA EARLY READING FIRST What We Are Learning Priscilla Griffith University of Oklahoma Go Sooners!
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Minnesota's Approach to Comprehensive Assessment Megan E. Cox, Ph.D. Principal Leadership Academy January 11, 2016 Minnesota’s Approach to Comprehensive.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
1 Alignment of Inclusive Pre-School Learning Environments and Quality Rating Improvement System 391 Grant Funding May 7, 2012.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
The Early Education & Support Division presents…
Child Outcomes State of the State
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
FPG Child Development Institute
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
February 21-22, 2018.
Child Outcomes Summary (COS) Process Training Module
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008
Presentation transcript:

Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education Office of Early Learning and School Readiness Child Outcomes State of the State

Ohio: Demographics 6 th Largest State for children with disabilities (ages 3-21) 12/09 child count: 23, School Districts 88 Counties – Education Service Centers – County Boards of DD 16 State Support Teams-regionalized TA/PD

Ohio Assessment Policies State statute requires programs to document child progress using research- based indicators prescribed by the Department and report results annually.

Accountability & Continuous Improvement Ohio Early Learning Program Guidelines: Systematically assess conditions, practices, policies and program performance Conduct annual self-assessment with identified stakeholders and community partners to evaluate accomplishment of program goals – Data reported to ODE – Child progress data – Program licensure report – Family input and feedback – Complaint records – Fiscal reports – Transition services

Early Childhood Outcomes Summary Form Initial year of the COSF: 2007 – Trained local teams of teachers and administrators Locals report scores to state – Fall & spring of every year State does conversion of COSF scores to progress categories Implementing alternate form spring 2011 – Source summary OR – Evidence statements

Early Childhood Outcomes Summary Form Multiple Sources Required Two Sources are consistent statewide for funded programs – Get It! Got It! Go! & – Ages/Stages Questionnaire: Social- Emotional (completed with parent)

Measurement System Knowledge & Skills Preschool special education supervisors Annual series of communication – Fall Data/Reporting Requirements – February Supervisor Discussions – Spring Institutes Two Institutes – Stage 1: Data Quality and Accuracy – Stage 2: Data Analysis and Public Reporting For families: outcomes brochure/cards

Measurement System Knowledge & Skills Data collection protocols Data checks in the state data system – Funding impact

Data Collection: Efficient, Effective, Accurate

Measurement System Knowledge & Skills New Web pageWeb Webinar series (in development with ECO Center) Teacher reference sheet Approved PD through regional state support teams Alternate COSF form- 2 options

Teacher Reference: PROCESS Implementation

ECO Implementation Survey Purpose: Identify challenging practices for local districts and personnel – Survey May 2010 Lessons Learned: – Multiple sources of information – Duplication of source summaries – Comparable to same-aged peers – Use of Decision Tree – Fidelity of Process – Data Issues

2010 ECO ConferenceHow Will I Know? Use of the Decision Tree

ECO Implementation Survey Lessons Learned – Core team input Preschool special education teacher General education teacher Parent Related services personnel – Involving parent

2010 ECO ConferenceHow Will I Know? Reasons for Completion without all Members Contributing

2010 ECO ConferenceHow Will I Know? Involving Parents

Whole child Whole class Whole system How is this in evidence?

Accountability Framework Early Childhood Program Capacity MeasuresCurriculum-Embedded Performance Measures Child and Family Outcome Measures Aligned with P-12 Content Standards Literacy: GGG and KRA_L Early Childhood Outcomes Summary Parent Survey Health & Developmental Screenings Tools for Alignment to the Early Learning Content Standards IEP Outcomes ELLCO: Early Language & Literacy Classroom Observation ELLRT: Early Language & Literacy Reflection Tool Self-Assessment Tools

State Infrastructure Regionally Based/Local Needs Professional Development – Preschool Literacy Core Curriculum (CORE) – SIRI: Pre K/K State Institutes for Reading Instruction – Teacher Leaders – Ohio Early Learning Content Standards Integrated Curriculum The IEP and the Early Childhood Curriculum Teacher Leaders Assessment Training Observation and Mentoring ELLCO Observations and TA English Language Learners Regional Leadership Meetings

PD Connection IVDL/Higher Education Faculty – At no cost unless college credit desired Institute of Education Science Grant- APPLE: Ohio – Evaluate statewide professional development in Ohio 80 Teacher Leaders each year Group A will participate in the Preschool Literacy Core Group B will participate in Preschool Literacy Core with Teacher Leader support Group C will participate in two of the Ohio Early Learning Content Standards modules (Math, Science, Social Studies)

Ohio Resource Center for Mathematics, Science ad Reading Resources for early childhood – Early Childhood Bookshelf – Standards-aligned and Peer Reviewed Lessons – Early Childhood Building Blocks- Best Practice Articles

What do we know? Children served in Public Preschool and PSE classrooms experienced statistically significant growth from fall to spring Public Preschool participants had significantly higher KRA-L scores than all other K students. PSE participants who are nondisabled in K have higher KRA-L scores than all other K students who are nondisabled.

Early Language and Literacy Classroom Observation (ELLCO) Study Results Instrument Classrooms rated on 14 individual ELLCO elements 5 point evidence scale (5 = exemplary or strong evidence) 2 subscales: – General Classroom Environment – Language, Literacy and Curriculum Methodology Stratified random sample of PSE classrooms 2009: 115 observations in PSE 2010: 299 observations conducted

ELLCO Study Questions What is the quality of literacy practices in ODE-funded early education programs? How do the scores of programs and classrooms compare with recognized standards of effective literacy practice (defined as a 4 or 5 on the ELLCO rating scales)? To what extent are teachers (best practices) and programs (capacity) making progress toward reaching or exceeding recognized standards of literacy practice that promote literacy success? Based on the ELLCO results, what are statewide or local professional development needs?

ELLCO Mean Ratings for PSE Classrooms, Spring 2010, N=299

N=115 *N=116 STANDARD EFFECTIVE PRACTICE ELLCO Mean Ratings for PSE Classrooms, Spring 2009

ELLCO Results 2010 Highest-rated ELLCO elements: – Classroom Management Strategies (Mean=4.29) – Classroom Climate (Mean=4.24) – Organization of the Classroom (Mean=3.99) Lowest-rated ELLCO elements: – Presence and Use of Technology (Mean=3.18) – Recognizing Diversity in the Classroom (Mean=2.84)

Summary of ELLCO Results % PSE classrooms demonstrated effective literacy practices Higher levels of teacher educational attainment were associated with higher ELLCO ratings for all three scores Average early childhood education teaching experience was approximately 12 years Teachers with 13 or more years of teaching experience scored significantly higher on the Language, Literacy, and Curriculum Subtotal & Classroom Observation Total than teachers with 6-12 years of teaching experience Higher ELLCO ratings are associated with classrooms that have a smaller percentage of students with disabilities 28