Advisors:Rurng-Sheng Guo Wen-Chen Chang Graduate: Su-Yin Wang 2009/06/19, NKNU.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring the Neutron and 3 He Spin Structure at Low Q 2 Vincent Sulkosky College of William and Mary, Williamsburg VA Experimental Overview The.
Advertisements

Hadron physics with GeV photons at SPring-8/LEPS II
Patricia Aguar Bartolomé Institut für Kernphysik, Universität Mainz PSTP 2013 Workshop, Charlottesville 11th September 2013.
HD group LEPS RCNP C. Morisaki. ① Development of NMR measurement system for the polarized HD target ② Development of single crystal HD target.
Experimental Status of Deuteron F L Structure Function and Extractions of the Deuteron and Non-Singlet Moments Ibrahim H. Albayrak Hampton University.
 *(1520) CrossSection Zhiwen Zhao Physics 745. Λ BARYONS (S = − 1, I = 0) Λ 0 = u d s Λ(1520) D 03 I( J P ) = 0( 3/2 − ) Mass m = ± 1.0 MeV [a]
Study of two pion channel from photoproduction on the deuteron Lewis Graham Proposal Phys 745 Class May 6, 2009.
SPIN 2004 Oct. 14, 2004 W. Kim, S.S. Stepanyan, S. Woo, M. Rasulbaev, S. Jin (Kyungpook National University) S. Korea Polarization Measurements of the.
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo-production --On behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2γ collaboration Wei Luo Lanzhou University.
PAIR SPECTROMETER DEVELOPMENT IN HALL D PAWEL AMBROZEWICZ NC A&T OUTLINE : PS Goals PS Goals PrimEx Experience PrimEx Experience Design Details Design.
Coherent  -meson Photo-production from Deuterons Near Threshold Wen-Chen Chang Wen-Chen Chang for LEPS collaboration Institute of Physics, Academia Sinica,
Proton polarization measurements in π° photo- production --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III and GEp-2 γ collaboration 2010 Annual Fall Meeting.
T.C. Jude D.I. Glazier, D.P. Watts The University of Edinburgh Strangeness Photoproduction At Threshold Energies.
Apex Target Marco Oriunno, April 23, Design and fabrication by: Marco Oriunno, Dieter Walz, Jim McDonald, Clive Field, Douglas Higginbotham, and.
Considerations for the Optimal Polarization of 3 He Targets Brielin C. Brown University of Virginia October 10, 2008 SPIN 2008.
HD target.
3 He Polarization Tests at UIUC Danielle Chandler David Howell UIUC.
Vincent Sulkosky Massachusetts Institute of Technology Spokespeople: J.-P. Chen, A. Deur, F. Garibaldi Hall A Collaboration Meeting December 10 th, 2012.
Rosen07 Two-Photon Exchange Status Update James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne National Lab For the Rosen07 Collaboration.
Motivation. Why study ground state hyperon electroproduction? CLAS detector and analysis. Analysis results. Current status and future work. M. Gabrielyan.
HD target. HD target overview Characteristics of polarized HD target Polarization Method HD target is polarized by the static method using “brute force”
Polarized Proton Solid Target for RI beam experiments M. Hatano University of Tokyo H. Sakai University of Tokyo T. Uesaka CNS, University of Tokyo S.
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
Low–field NMR (or MRI) Images of Laser polarized Noble Gas.
Measurement of F 2 and R=σ L /σ T in Nuclei at Low Q 2 Phase I Ya Li Hampton University January 18, 2008.
Trilinear Gauge Couplings at TESLA Photon Collider Ivanka Božović - Jelisavčić & Klaus Mönig DESY/Zeuthen.
G-2 accelerator and cryo needs Mary Convery Muon Campus Review 1/23/13.
Optimization of Field Error Tolerances for Triplet Quadrupoles of the HL-LHC Lattice V3.01 Option 4444 Yuri Nosochkov Y. Cai, M-H. Wang (SLAC) S. Fartoukh,
Advisors:Rurng-Sheng Guo Wen-Chen Chang Graduate: Su-Yin Wang 2009/06/19, NKNU.
1 G9a -FROST. 2 Experiments FROST New generation of CLAS photoproduction experiments with FROzen Spin Polarized Target (FROST) E02-112: γp→KY (K + Λ,
Measuring the charged pion polarizability in the  →    −  reaction David Lawrence, JLab Rory Miskimen, UMass, Amherst Elton Smith, JLab.
MC Check of Analysis Framework and Decay Asymmetry of  W.C. Chang 11/12/2005 LEPS Collaboration Meeting in Taiwan.
Λ and Σ photoproduction on the neutron Pawel Nadel-Turonski The George Washington University for the CLAS Collaboration.
A Measurement of Two-Photon Exchange in Unpolarized Elastic Electron-Proton Scattering John Arrington and James Johnson Northwestern University & Argonne.
CONSTRUCTION AND TEST OF A TRANSVERSE SUPERCONDUCTING HOLDING MAGNET 15th CB Meeting Mainz March 8th, 2010 Henry G. Ortega Spina.
1 NMR Samples Types of NMR tubes Sample preparation.
Oct 6, 2008Amaresh Datta (UMass) 1 Double-Longitudinal Spin Asymmetry in Non-identified Charged Hadron Production at pp Collision at √s = 62.4 GeV at Amaresh.
Measurement of photons via conversion pairs with PHENIX at RHIC - Torsten Dahms - Stony Brook University HotQuarks 2006 – May 18, 2006.
Status of Beam Asymmetry Measurements for Meson Photoproduction ASU Meson Physics Group Hadron Spectroscopy WG Meeting – June 2009 Status of Beam Asymmetry.
**PhD Dec (CLAS Analysis Note). OZI evading/respecting process 49.2 ± 0.6 % 34 ± 0.5 % Experimentally this decay mode is (15.3 ± 0.4) % mode is.
HLAB meeting paper 2011/1/18 T.Gogami CLAS ( CEBAF Large Acceptance Spectrometer ) Clam shell is open.
M. Ueda, T. Yamasaki, and S. Maegawa Kyoto University Magnetic resonance of Fe8 at low temperatures in the transverse field.
Photoproduction of the  (1385) resonance at LEPS K. Hicks & D. Keller, Ohio U. LEPS Collaboration Meeting May 1, 2008.
00 Cooler CSB Direct or Extra Photons in d+d  0 Andrew Bacher for the CSB Cooler Collaboration ECT Trento, June 2005.
Search for the  + in photoproduction experiments at CLAS APS spring meeting (Dallas) April 22, 2006 Ken Hicks (Ohio University) for the CLAS Collaboration.
DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He DNP for polarizing liquid 3 He Hideaki Uematsu Department of Physics Yamagata University.
J-PARC でのハイパー核ガンマ線分光実験用 散乱粒子磁気スペクトロメータ検出器の準備 状況 東北大理, 岐阜大教 A, KEK B 白鳥昂太郎, 田村裕和, 鵜養美冬 A, 石元茂 B, 大谷友和, 小池武志, 佐藤美沙子, 千賀信幸, 細見健二, 馬越, 三輪浩司, 山本剛史, 他 Hyperball-J.
Jan. 18, 2008 Hall C Meeting L. Yuan/Hampton U.. Outline HKS experimental goals HKS experimental setup Issues on spectrometer system calibration Calibration.
K* photoproduction from g11 K. Hicks Ohio University HSG meeting, 12 June 2009.
 0 life time analysis updates, preliminary results from Primex experiment 08/13/2007 I.Larin, Hall-B meeting.
Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,
U-spin and the Radiative decay of Strange Baryons K. Hicks and D.Keller EM Transition Form Factor Workshop October 13, 2008.
Hall C Summer Workshop August 6, 2009 W. Luo Lanzhou University, China Analysis of GEp-III&2γ Inelastic Data --on behalf of the Jefferson Lab Hall C GEp-III.
Inclusive cross section and single transverse-spin asymmetry of very forward neutron production at PHENIX Spin2012 in Dubna September 17 th, 2012 Yuji.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Development of polarized HD target for LEPS experiments RCNP Osaka University Japan Hideki Kohri.
Study of repulsive nature of optical potential for high energy 12 C+ 12 C elastic scattering (Effect of the tensor and three-body interactions) Gaolong.
NMR Using a Halbach Array Michael Dillman, on behalf of the Nuclear and Particle Physics Group. Advisor K. Slifer, E. Long Motivation : Nuclear Magnetic.
Overview of recent photon beam runs at CLAS CLAS12 European Workshop, Feb , Genoa, Italy Ken Livingston, University of Glasgow Tagged photons.
Derek F. Jackson Kimball. Collaboration Dmitry Budker, Arne Wickenbrock, John Blanchard, Samer Afach, Nathan Leefer, Lykourgas Bougas, Dionysis Antypas.
Hadron Physics at LEPS2 and next-term LEPS LEPS2 overview  solenoid spectrometer  ’-bound hidden ss-bar in with.
Photoproduction of      and     on the proton for comparing ūu and d̄d productions at LEPS/SPring-8 May/16/2016 RCNP, Osaka University, Japan.
Hall A Collaboration Meeting Slide 0 Measurements of Target Single-Spin Asymmetries in QE 3 He ↑ (e, e’) Update of QE A y (E05-015) experiment.
Polarized solid Targets for AFTER
Elastic Scattering in Electromagnetism
Analysis Report Haiyun Lu.
Observation of Diffractively Produced W- and Z-Bosons
Precision Measurement of η Radiative Decay Width via Primakoff Effect
INFN-Sezione di Pavia, Italy
Progress on J-PARC hadron physics in 2016
Presentation transcript:

Advisors:Rurng-Sheng Guo Wen-Chen Chang Graduate: Su-Yin Wang 2009/06/19, NKNU

 Introduction  PHYDES01 Production  NMR Measurement  Signal Distortion (Appendix)  Analysis  Result and Conclusion  Discussion and Future 2

Motivation

Diffractive production within the vector-meson-dominance model through Pomeron exchange One-pion-exchange OZI uud ss ss-knockout uud-knockout A.I.Titov et al. Phys. Rev. C58 (1998)

Cross Section at E  = 2.0 GeV Vector-meson- dominance model One pion exchange ss knockout uud knockout A.I.Titov et al. Phys. Rev. C58 (1998) 2429 Pomeron exchange is more ten times than anothers Only the Pomeron exchange is clear. The experimental data are from H. J. Besch, G. Hartmann, R. Kose, F. Krautschneider, W. Paul, and U. Trinks, Nucl. Phys. B70, 257 ~1974!. 5

LEPS data :LD2 LAB angle  CM angle  6

Cross Section at E  = 2.0 GeV Vector-meson- dominance model One pion exchange ss knockout uud knockout A.I.Titov et al. Phys. Rev. C58 (1998) 2429 Pomeron exchange is more ten times than anothers Only the Pomeron exchange is clear. The experimental data are from H. J. Besch, G. Hartmann, R. Kose, F. Krautschneider, W. Paul, and U. Trinks, Nucl. Phys. B70, 257 ~1974!. 7

Cancel the systematic error P A   p p 8

pp AA (  :+1 p:+1/2)(  :+1 p:-1/2) S=+1 S=+2 S=- 1/2 S=+1 S=-1 S=0 S=+1/2 S=+1 S=0 S=+1 S=-1/2 S=+1 S=0 S=+1 S=+1/2  p p 9

Beam-Target double spin asymmetry at E  = 2.0 GeV Strangeness content is assumed to be 0%(Solid), 0.25%(Dashed), 1%(Dot-dashed). (  0,  1 ) is the relative phase between the strange and non-strange amplitudes. A.I.Titov et al. Phys. Rev. C58 (1998)

 Example: t-channel exchange of Λ(1520) photoproduction  Exchange particle is clear to see, if … ▪ Fix the spin and orientation of initial state particles. ▪ The spin and orientation of final state are measured. 11

HD Overview

Polarized this Symmetry requirement hetero-HD (boson “D” and fermion “H”) no Symmetry requirement polarization is low 18.6 days 6.3 days 13

14

Photon beam polarizationCircular polarization Photon beam energyE= GeV Photon beam intensity10 6 γ's/sec SpectrometerStandard LEPS magnetic spectrometer Tagger, SC, AC, SVTX, DC1, DC2, DC3, and TOF wall 15

16

17

 Advantage and disadvantage  HD molecule does not contain heavy nuclei such as Carbon and Nitrogen.  Good for experiments observing reactions with small cross section  The HD target needs thin aluminum wires (at most 20% in weight) to insure the cooling.  Target Size  25 mm in diameter; 50 mm in thickness 18

19

TC1SCTC2IBC Magnetic field0.15T2T0.15T1T Temperature4.2K1.2K4.2K300mK Time30 mins3 hours30 mins100 days Could we keep polarization at… Could we succeed in polarization? 20

Polarized HYdrogen-DEuteride target for Strangeness (PHYDES)

H2H2 HD D2D2 Extraction HD D2D2 Extraction HD [H] = 1.26% In PHYDES01 [D] = 2.07% [HD] =97.66% 22

Since TC1 not work now

ProcessSolidify HD P H REF measuring Aging time IBC condition SC condition TC condition P D REF measuring Magnetic field0T1.08T 0.15T7.26T temperature14~22K4.2K14mK0.3K1.2K4.2K Time [HD]=97.66%; 0.68 HD was solidified for PHYDES01. After 53 days aging, the relaxation time in three conditions are measured. 24

26

27

Cancellation circuit for keeping away signals which enter in Lock-in Amp at direct without entering in the coil. 16MHz 15MHz 14MHz 28

29

 Polarization signal area  Measure reference signal in thermal equilibrium A 30

polarization at thermal equilibrium state polarization decay function combine two function 31

Appendix

 The smallest width of the NMR shape can be estimated from the uncertainty principle.  Precision of frequency.  The non-uniformity of the local magnetic field in a superconductor  The non-uniformity of the local magnetic field from the induced current of aluminums wires and cool finger. 33

B real ΔBΔB B center ΔB B center Magnetic field uniformity profile Measurement value Fitting by 4 th -order polynomial 34

35

 The PHYDES01 use 0.68 mole HD only. The smallest cell size is 34 mm. The biggest size is 80 mm (the length of aluminums)  This result shows the most likely cell position around -14 cm and cell length around 46 mm. 36

 Preparation of Analysis  Unification of the Signal Amplification  Magnetic Field Adjustment  Data Position Shift  Unification of Bin Size  Phase Adjustment  Extracting the Signal Area (Relaxation Time)  Histogram Method  Model Method  Extracting the Signal Area (Polarization)  Histogram Method  Model with Deviation Method  Error Estimation  Relaxation Time Estimation  Polarization Estimation 38

The original data with the sensitivity = (1mVrms/-47dBm) The signal is ten times of original one. We also change the signalshape to positive. 39

B -1 B0B0 B1B1 B3B3 B2B2 B -3 B -2 ~ B 50 B -50 ~ reset 40

After Peak Shift 41

 If bad phase …  If good phase … Quadrature In Phase Quadrature 42

 After remove background, for each pulse, start analysis 43

44

45

 Fitting example 46

D:IBC,18hours,θ=0.4H:IBC,332hours,θ=0.75  H model increase decrease increase decrease  D model 47

 Fitting example 48

Zoom in each signal Average of 73 signals 49

Same as discussed in extracting the signal area of relaxation time 50

Bad fitting by signal deviation 51

52

Gauss deviation= E-04 D model at 300mK, 1.08T D model with Gauss deviation Fit the sigma of deviation in small region Use the sigma to fit the background 53

polarization at thermal equilibrium state polarization decay function combine two function 55

left right combine Original New error 56

57

Consistent Inconsistent 59

 Histogram method  Model method H, TC, increase, 47 hours

 Histogram method  Model method D, TC, decrease,46hours

 When extract the signal area of polarization, peak up the model method.  When extract the signal area of relaxation time, peak up the histogram method. 62 [M]

 The production polarized of HD target succeeded,  If the initial polarization is assumed to be 100%, the H polarization becomes 98% and D polarization becomes 97%  The relaxation times in the SC and TC condition are found to be long enough compared with the staying time needed for the transportation of the HD target.  The relaxation time in the IBC condition is found to be long enough to produce a new polarized HD target for replacement in continuous experiments. 63

 Study of Aging Time  Lower Polarization  NMR Measurement  Improvement of D Polarization  From Success of Polarized HD Target to Using the Polarized HD Target in LEPS Experiment 65

67

 For sweeping magnetic field, one need to break superconductor-state of magnet, and turn the magnet to drive-state. It waste a lot of liquid helium.  If the polarization of D and H are both measured, the magnetic field sweep from 1T to 7T will generate a lot of heat and waste a lot of liquid helium.  The significant change of magnetic field, make the polarization of HD unstable. Cannot be avoided Can be avoided easy by separating the cancellation circuits of H and D, 68

D. Babusci et al., LEGS expt. L18/L19 (1994). The time line from LEGS group

 The Difficulties of FAFP and SFT  The concentration of o-H 2 can not be handled easy now.  The concentration of p-D 2 can not be handled easy now. (p-D 2 should be ~0)  The amounts of heat depend on the amounts of HD and RF power.  The relation between concentration of o-H 2 and the relaxation time of H is not well known enough. 70

 There are still many subjects that we have to work on:  Installation of HD target system in the LEPS experiment hutch.  The transit of HD target from RCNP to SPring-8/LEPS.  Acceptable trigger rate for data taking. 71

Thank you for your kind attention.

73

74

TC1SCTC2IBC Magnetic field0.15T2T0.15T1T Temperature4.2K1.2K4.2K300mK Time30 mins3 hours30 mins100 days H Relaxation time~147 hours~277 hours~147 hours~2546 hours Remained Polarization of Init P H 99.66%98.58%98.24%38.27% Init P H = 41.4 % D Relaxation time~48 hours~303 hours~48 hours~1740 hours Remained Polarization of Init P D 98.96%97.98%96.96%24.41% Init P D = 12.2 %12.07%11.83% 2.95%

Hysteresis from cold finger and aluminum wire 76

HD Polarization41.4%12.2% Temperature estimate by the polarization (Assume B=17T) ~40mK~29mK  Bad linearity of the NMR signal height.  Bad Thermal conductivity of Al wires or Kel-F NMR coil supporter 77

 NMR system – to correctly measure the polarization.  NMR system – to increase Signal/Noise ratio.  Al wires or NMR coil supporter -to decrease the HD temperature.  Distillator - to improve the purity of HD 78

 Practice of transferring the target by using a solid H2 target  A polarized HD target after the aging of 2~3 months will be ready for the experiment.  install the HD target system in the LEPS experiment hutch. (  Support frames for the IBC and TC2 will be constructed.  IBC and TC2 will be transferred from RCNP to SPring-8/LEPS.  Circularly polarized ultra-violet laser beam will be prepared.  Check the polarization of the HD target can be kept when the photon beams of ~1 M γ‘s hit the target.  Check trigger rate for data taking is acceptable. 79

Appendix

 Histogram area  Histogram model D, IBC, decrease,69hours 81

Model method Histogram method H Polarization & IBC data C. Morisaki, Master thesis of Osaka university (2009). 82

83

θ=0 θ=0.8 θ=0 84

85

86

87

0212 increase Big rangeSmall range 88

89

90

Cooling power DRS Thermal sensor HD target 91

 Magnetic field=17T  Temperature=17mK Cooling power DRS Thermal sensor HD target 92

 the Log P Time Empty cell HD 93

94

95

96