Software Engineering Saeed Akhtar The University of Lahore Lecture 7 Originally shared for: mashhoood.webs.com.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
System Engineering based on Chapter 6 - Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates,
Advertisements

Understanding Requirements Unit II
Analysis Concepts, Principles, and Modeling
Requirements Elicitation Techniques
7.1 A Bridge to Design & Construction
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
Chapter 7 Requirements Engineering
1 R&D SDM 1 Software Project Management Requirements Analysis 2010 Theo Schouten.
Chapter 5 Understanding Requirements
Unit-III Requirements Engineering
Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 7 Requirements Engineering copyright © 1996, 2001, 2005 R.S. Pressman & Associates, Inc.
1 R&D SDM 1 Software Project Management Requirements Analysis 2009 Theo Schouten.
Requirements Analysis Concepts & Principles
Analysis Concepts and Principles
Business Area Analysis Focus: Domain View (selected business area) Goals: –Isolate functions and procedures that allow the area to meet its goals –Define.
Analysis Concepts and Principle.
1 College of Engineering and Computer Science Computer Science Department CSC 131 Computer Software Engineering Fall 2006 Lecture # 2 Chapter 6 & 7 System.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
1 Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 7 Requirements Engineering Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter.
CMPS 435 Fall 08 These slides are designed to accompany Web Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach (The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.) by Roger Pressman.
Chapter 4 Requirements Engineering
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
Understanding Requirements. Requirements Engineering
Chapter 8 Understanding Requirements Moonzoo Kim KAIST
1 REQUIREMENT ENGINEERING Chapter 7. 2 REQUIREMENT ENGINEERING Definition Establishing what the customer requires from a software system. OR It helps.
1 COSC 4406 Software Engineering COSC 4406 Software Engineering Haibin Zhu, Ph.D. Dept. of Computer Science and mathematics, Nipissing University, 100.
Requirements Engineering CSE-305 Requirements Engineering Process Tasks Lecture-5.
Requirement Engineering Tasks Inception Elicitation Problems of scope Problems of understanding Problems of Volatility Elaboration Scenarios Negotiation.
Software Engineering Lecture No:13. Lecture # 7
Requirement Engineering. Review of Last Lecture Problems with requirement Requirement Engineering –Inception (Set of Questions) –Elicitation (Collaborative.
IS 466 ADVANCED TOPICS IN INFORMATION SYSTEMS LECTURER : NOUF ALMUJALLY 22 – 10 – 2011 College Of Computer Science and Information, Information Systems.
CS 3610: Software Engineering – Fall 2009 Dr. Hisham Haddad – CSIS Dept. Chapter 7 Requirements Engineering Elements of software requirement gathering.
Chapter 11 Analysis Concepts and Principles
Chapter 7 Requirements Engineering
Chapter 9 요구사항 모델링: 시나리오 기반 방법론 Requirements Modeling: Scenario-Based Methods 임현승 강원대학교 Revised from the slides by Roger S. Pressman and Bruce R. Maxim.
Chapter 8 요구사항 이해 Understanding Requirements
Lecture-3.
Software Engineering Saeed Akhtar The University of Lahore Lecture 6 Originally shared for: mashhoood.webs.com.
Chapter 5 Understanding Requirements
Requirement Handling
1 Chapter 11 Analysis Concepts and Principles. 2 Requirements Analysis.
1 Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 7: Requirements Engineering Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e.
1 Chapter 5 Lecture 5: Understanding Requirements Slide Set to accompany Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 7/e by Roger S. Pressman Slides.
These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.
By Germaine Cheung Hong Kong Computer Institute
1 Chapter 8 Building the Analysis Model (1) Analysis Concepts and Principles.
Requirement Engineering. Recap Elaboration Behavioral Modeling State Diagram Sequence Diagram Negotiation.
Requirements Engineering Requirements Elicitation Overview of Requirements Analysis.
Software Engineering Lecture 11: System Analysis.
1 The Requirements Problem Chapter 1. 2 Standish Group Research Research paper at:  php (1994)
Requirement Engineering
28/08/2006SE6161 Prinsip dan Konsep Analisis Analysis Concepts and Principles.
Requirement engineering & Requirement tasks/Management. 1Prepared By:Jay A.Dave.
Software Engineering Lecture 10: System Engineering.
Chapter: Requirement Engineering. Requirements Engineering  Requirement: A function, constraint or other property that the system must provide to fill.
CS 8532: Adv. Software Eng. – Spring 2009 Dr. Hisham Haddad Chapter 7 CS 8532: Advanced Software Engineering Dr. Hisham Haddad Class will start momentarily.
1 Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 7: Requirements Engineering Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e.
CS 4500: Software Development Mondays and Wednesdays 2:50-4: Snell Engineering Center.
Requirements Elicitation Techniques
Chapter 8 Understanding Requirements
Requirements Engineering
Chapter 8 Understanding Requirements
Software Requirements analysis & specifications
Chapter 7 Requirements Engineering
Chapter 5 Understanding Requirements
Chapter 7 Requirements Engineering
Requirements Engineering Tasks
Chapter 5 Understanding Requirements
Chapter 5 Understanding Requirements.
Requirements Engineering
Presentation transcript:

Software Engineering Saeed Akhtar The University of Lahore Lecture 7 Originally shared for: mashhoood.webs.com

Requirement Engineering

RE helps software engineer to better understand the problem they will work to solve Participant : Software Engineers, managers, customers and end users RE is a software engineering action that begin during the communication activity and continues into the modeling activity

RE Provides the appropriate mechanism for Understanding what the customer want Analyzing need Assessing feasibility Negotiating a reasonable solution Specifying a solution unambiguously Validating the specification Managing the requirement as they are transformed into an operational system

Requirement Engineering Task Inception Elicitation Elaboration Negotiation Specification Validation Requirement Management

Requirement Engineering Tasks Inception — Establish a basic understanding of the problem and the nature of the solution. Elicitation — Draw out the requirements from stakeholders. Elaboration — Create an analysis model that represents information, functional, and behavioral aspects of the requirements. Negotiation — Agree on a deliverable system that is realistic for developers and customers. Specification — Describe the requirements formally or informally. Validation — Review the requirement specification for errors, ambiguities, omissions, and conflicts. Requirements management — Manage changing requirements.

Inception Ask a set of questions that establish … basic understanding of the problem the people who want a solution the nature of the solution that is desired, and the effectiveness of preliminary communication and collaboration between the customer and the developer

Inception Cont’d Inception process : – Identify stakeholders “who else do you think I should talk to?” – Recognize multiple points of view – Work toward collaboration the effectiveness of preliminary communication and collaboration between the customer and the developer – Asking The first questions Who is behind the request for this work? Who will use the solution? What will be the economic benefit of a successful solution Is there another source for the solution that you need?

Elicitation It certainly simple enough, but… Why difficult – Problem of Scope The boundary of the system is ill-defined – Problem of Understanding The customer/users are not completely sure of what is needed – Problem of volatility The requirement change over time To help overcame these problem, requirement engineers,must approach the requirement gathering activity in an organized manner

Elicitation Process Guideline – meetings are conducted and attended by both software engineers and customers – rules for preparation and participation are established – an agenda is suggested – a "facilitator" (can be a customer, a developer, or an outsider) controls the meeting – a "definition mechanism" (can be work sheets, flip charts, or wall stickers or an electronic bulletin board, chat room or virtual forum) is used – the goal is to identify the problem propose elements of the solution negotiate different approaches, and specify a preliminary set of solution requirements

Quality Function Deployment Is a technique that translate the need of the customer into technical requirement for software. QFD emphasize an understanding of what is valuable to the customer and then deploys these values throughout the engineering process QFD identifies three types of requirement : – Normal Requirement – Expected requirement – Exciting requirement

Elaboration Expand requirement into analysis model Elements of the analysis model – Scenario-based elements Functional—processing narratives for software functions Use-case—descriptions of the interaction between an “actor” and the system – Class-based elements Implied by scenarios – Behavioral elements State diagram – Flow-oriented elements Data flow diagram

Negotiation Agree on a deliverable system that is realistic for developers and customers SW team & other project stakeholders negotiate the priority, availability, and cost of each requirement The Process are : – Identify the key stakeholders These are the people who will be involved in the negotiation – Determine each of the stakeholders “win conditions” Win conditions are not always obvious – Negotiate Work toward a set of requirements that lead to “win-win”

Specification Final work product produced by requirement engineer. Can be any one (or more) of the following: A written document A set of models A formal mathematical A collection of user scenarios (use-cases) A prototype

Validation examine the specification to ensure that SW requirement is not ambiguous, consistent, error free etc A review mechanism that looks for errors in content or interpretation areas where clarification may be required missing information inconsistencies (a major problem when large products or systems are engineered) conflicting or unrealistic (unachievable) requirements.

Validation Cont’d A review of the analysis model addresses the following question : Is each requirement consistent with the overall objective for the system/product? Have all requirements been specified at the proper level of abstraction? That is, do some requirements provide a level of technical detail that is inappropriate at this stage? Is the requirement really necessary or does it represent an add-on feature that may not be essential to the objective of the system? Is each requirement bounded and unambiguous? Does each requirement have attribution? That is, is a source (generally, a specific individual) noted for each requirement? Do any requirements conflict with other requirements?

Validation Cont’d Is each requirement achievable in the technical environment that will house the system or product? Is each requirement testable, once implemented? Does the requirements model properly reflect the information, function and behavior of the system to be built. Has the requirements model been “partitioned” in a way that exposes progressively more detailed information about the system. Have requirements patterns been used to simplify the requirements model. Have all patterns been properly validated? Are all patterns consistent with customer requirements?

The problems is not that there are problems. The problem is expecting otherwise and thinking that having problems is a problem Theodore Rubin

Thank You