GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM GMS CEP-BCI Phase II Results Monitoring Framework GMS Environment Operations Center.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 GEOSS Monitoring & Evaluation. 2 1st GEOSS M&E WG meeting outcomes Agreed on 1.the final draft of Terms of Reference for the M&E WG 2.The plan for delivery.
Advertisements

LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
YMCA Proposal Writing Successful Strategies for Financial Development.
Labour Market Indicators Library NetWork KILM-STAT EASMAT- EMAC-EMAO-ETM Costa Rica.
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Component 4: Strengthened Institutions and Financing Activity Progress and Component Strategy.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Component 2: Biodiversity Landscape Conservation and Livelihoods Development Activity Progress and Component.
Online Statistics for Australian, New Zealand & Asian Academic Libraries Cathie Jilovsky.
GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Component 3: Climate resilience and low carbon strategies developed Activity Progress and Component Strategy.
Comprehensive M&E Systems
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Principal Professional Development Summer 2006 Getting Ready for SIP: Identifying “Root Causes” Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability,
YMCA Proposal Writing Successful Strategies for Financial Development.
HOW TO WRITE A GOOD TERMS OF REFERENCE FOR FOR EVALUATION Programme Management Interest Group 19 October 2010 Pinky Mashigo.
GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Component 1: Environmental Planning Systems, Methods and Safeguards Improved Activity Progress and Component.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Miyo Wahkohtowin Community Education Authority Maskwacis Student Success Program Presented by Ahmad Jawad March 8, 2011.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Improving Results Reporting Operations Managers Workshop Kiev, October 2008 Bratislava Regional Center Management Practice.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
PEACE III - Theme 1.1 Aid for Peace – Phases I & II 21 September 2011 Celeste McCallion.
IMPLEMENTATION OF THE BWP & PERFORMANCE MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT.
GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM GMS CEP-BCI Phase II NSU arrangements and implementation procedures GMS Environment Operations Center.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Unit 10. Monitoring and evaluation
Project Monitoring and Evaluation in the GMS 7-18 May 2012, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen Project Monitoring and Evaluation for Road Construction in Lao.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
Module 9 Mainstreaming in country monitoring systems Country-led environmental and climate change mainstreaming (specialist course) Training materials.
Development of Core Public Health Indicators for Decision Making. The PAHO’s Experience Carlos Castillo-Salgado, Special Advisor, Forum for Public Health.
SUB-MODULE 5. MEANS OF VERIFICATION RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Impact Measurement why what how Atlanta. Today Imperatives Questions Why Now? Significant Challenges Breakthroughs in the field CARE’s Long-Term.
Elements of an Effective Regional Strategy for Development of Statistics - SADC Ackim Jere SADC Secretariat Gaborone, Botswana PARIS 21 Forum on Reinforcing.
Leadership in Development: Driving Change in the GMS Phnom Penh Plan for Development Management.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
 Four Main Sections:  (a) Plan (Unit Level) Monitoring Program  (b) Broader Scale Monitoring Strategies  (c) Timing & Process  (d) Biennial Evaluation.
Logic Model, Monitoring, Tracking and Evaluation Evaluation (Section T4-2)
Comprehensive M&E Systems: Identifying Resources to Support M&E Plans for National TB Programs Lisa V. Adams, MD E&E Regional Workshop Kiev, Ukraine May.
Local HWTS Monitoring Eva Manzano, CAWST Technical Advisor Laos Vientiane, Lao PDR November 11, 2014.
GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM GMS CEP-BCI FINANCIAL STATUS AS OF 30 TH SEPTEMBER 2012.
NFM: Modular Template Measurement Framework: Modules, Interventions and Indicators LFA M&E Training February
1 HSRC EPWP SEMINAR 07 JUNE 2016 Presentation by Lulu Mdletshe EPWP Co-ordinator: Department of Transport.
From Data to Action: Using a System of Indicators and Supports to Promote Postsecondary Success Maureen Carew Senior Community Engagement Associate.
Presented at Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA, November 2011 Lessons Learned about How to Support Outcomes Measurement.
GFDRR Work Plan April 27, 2016 Luis Tineo
Social Protection Global Technical Team Retreat,
Country Level Programs
Department of Cooperative Governance
SCOA for Municipalities:
Nepal Administrative Staff College Dipendra Purush Dhakal
Evaluation : goals and principles
SCOA for Municipalities:
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم.
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation System M E S
منهج الإطار المنطقي وإطار الرصد والتقييم وإطار النتائج
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
Introduction on the outline and objectives of the workshop
Monitoring and Evaluation
Project Management Training
Partner Implications from Seminar: New Approaches to Capacity Development Break-out Group: Role of Assessment frameworks.
Results Based Management for Monitoring & Evaluation
LOA Assessment 31 October – 04 November 2016
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
Presentation transcript:

GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM GMS CEP-BCI Phase II Results Monitoring Framework GMS Environment Operations Center

GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Monitoring during Phase 1 Multiple different sets of monitoring – Program DMF – DPSIR monitoring framework developed to track BCI and other program elements (impact level) – Financial monitoring – Activity monitoring under LoAs Challenges and opportunities – Lack of consistent follow up and application of MF – Fragmentation of information collection and reporting Opportunities for Phase 2 – Transition from monitoring inputs and outputs / activity delivery to tracking results at a program level

GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Phase 2 Results Monitoring Framework Level 1: GMS development trends IMPACT LEVEL Tracked through: GMS Statistics Level 1: GMS development trends IMPACT LEVEL Tracked through: GMS Statistics Level 3: CEP-BCI operational efficiency INPUT LEVEL tracked through: Annual financial, administration reports and program evaluations Level 3: CEP-BCI operational efficiency INPUT LEVEL tracked through: Annual financial, administration reports and program evaluations Level 2: Effectiveness of CEP-BCI interventions OUTCOME AND OUTPUT LEVEL Tracked through: DMF annual updates, progress reporting Level 2: Effectiveness of CEP-BCI interventions OUTCOME AND OUTPUT LEVEL Tracked through: DMF annual updates, progress reporting How effective have CEP-BCI activities been in contributing to development outcomes? How efficient are CEP- BCI operations and staff? What progress has been made on development in the GMS?

GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Level 1: GMS Development Trends Tracks IMPACT level trends – Changes in these trends are a result of cumulative efforts of all partners over time. Adapted DPSIR framework from Phase 1; Applicable at four levels: Regional, National, Landscape / Provincial and Site level Examples of themes tracked: changing demographic situation, dependence on primary resources, climate change, land use change Tracked through: GMS-EOC interactive web tools (GMS Statistics, Interactive Atlas)

GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Level 2: Effectiveness of CEP-BCI interventions Tracks OUTPUTS and OUTCOMES which can be linked directly to CEP-BCI Components and subcomponents: Targets for 2016 outlined in program DMF; Annual milestones and indicators proposed in component strategies (2013 to 2015) Activity level indicators and targets developed during activity scoping Reported through EOC and NSU progress reporting to WGE, individual activity progress reporting

GREATER MEKONG SUBREGION CORE ENVIRONMENT PROGRAM Level 3: Efficiency of EOC operations Tracks inputs and operational (financial and staff) efficiency of EOC Some examples: – Program performance (Timeliness of reporting, % of annual milestones met, effectiveness and relevance rating during program evaluation) – Financial mobilization (% overheads / EOC cost, annual disbursement and liquidation ratios) – EOC / NSU staff resources (gender, GMS nationals, NSU participation) Reported through EOC and NSU progress reports to WGE