Role-Play Presentation: International Private Law Debates Knowledge Auction By I.V. Getman-Pavlova & E.M. Popkova.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Language Teaching Methods
Advertisements

Four Skills for Learning a Language
NEXT How a Bill becomes a Law The Art of Debating Types of Court Civil & Criminal Cases The People’s Court
DEVELOPING ACADEMIC LANGUAGE AND TEACHING LEARNING STRATEGIES Anna Uhl Chamot Jill Robbins George Washington University.
Advantages of using speaking tasks in the language classroom. Jelena Kallonen SPEAKING TASKS AND ASSESSING SPEAKING SKILLS.
Putting it all Together Discussion with Designated Examiners Commercial.
Students, please complete the following tasks: Bakke v Regents of the University of California (1978) 1.Read the Background Summary & provide a summary.
UNIVIRTUAL FOR INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN Versione 00 del 29/07/2009.
Chapter Seven: Defense Attorneys. The RIGHT TO COUNSEL SIXTH AMENDMENT “In all criminal prosecutions the accused shall enjoy the right…..to have the assistance.
Tell your partners about your speaking activity.
Keith Nobles 1. Benefits and Dilemmas 2. Learning Objectives 3.Preparation 4. Student and Instructor Roles 5. Day of the Trial 6. Assessment 7. Quiz.
MOOT COURT.
June 2002USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service1 Critical Meeting Elements: Preparation to Minimize Conflict.
MBA Mock Trial Program. What is a Mock Trial?  Trial before a real judge (or lawyer)  Held in real courtroom (State Court)  Examination of witnesses.
Teaching Learning Strategies and Academic Language
The American Mock Trial Association Welcomes You AMTA Evaluator Orientation.
Anatomy of a Trial Composition of Team (for Competition) Prosecution/Plaintiff 3 Attorneys 3 Witnesses Defense/Defendant 3 Attorneys 3 Witnesses.
Trial. Trial: broken down  Pre-Trial hearings: Judge makes decisions on various motions  Opening statement: attorneys tell the story of the case. No.
THE TRIAL. For next time:  Read page in Pakes.
Criminal and Civil Cases
The Adversary System.  To provide a procedure for disputing parties to present and resolve their cases in as fair a manner as possible  Controlled by.
Tell the story better than the other side.. Opening Statements  This is like the introductory paragraph and thesis statement of an essay  This lays.
Who is an American Citizen and what rights do all of them deserve?
American Citizenship. Citizenship Test In your group, answer the following questions. These are samples from an actual citizenship test. Send ONE PERSON.
CIVIL CASES Prior to these lessons you should have read and précised chapter 9 of ‘The English Legal System’ by J. Martin PRECIS NOTES WILL BE CHECKED.
Roman Law Trial Athina Dimopoulou, PhD Assistant Professor (History of Law) Office: 45, Akadimias str. (3 rd floor) Mondays, 14:30-15:30
California YMCA Youth & Government Model Legislature & Court.
Introduction to Law Mr. Calella
How to Write Lesson Plan Using the Cooperative Group Instructional Model.
Do now: To the best of your knowledge, what do you think is the purpose of the direct examination.
Educational Methods The bag of tricks Direct Instruction/Lecture ä Advantages ä Teacher controlled ä Many objectives can be mastered in a short amount.
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program.
Public Forum Debate Basic Forensics. What is public forum debate? Style of debate compared to a nationally- televised debate, like Crossfire. Debaters.
Teams succeed when members have:  commitment to common objectives;  defined roles and responsibilities;  effective decision systems, communication and.
Order In The Court Business Law Mock Trial Project.
Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission.
Introduction to Debating. What Is Debating? A debate is when two teams present opposite sides of an issue before judges.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
 Prepare  Study the agenda  Study the minutes  Prepare for your contributions  Prepare to play a major role  List questions.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
Antar Abdellah. What is speaking? Producing comprehendible sounds.
1. 4:00 - 4:05 PM Welcome 4:05 – 6:15 PMShared Expertise 6:15 - 6:30 PMPrayer Break 6:30 - 7:15 PMDebate in science classes 7:15 - 7: 30 PMSurvey and.
+ Trial Basics Information you need for the trial!
Chapter 9 The Communicative Approach.
Mock Trials in the Classroom Ruth Kagan Glebe Collegiate Institute Ottawa, Ontario.
The Judicial Branch Chapter 15: Government by and for the People.
Minitrials 2013 Introductory Presentation. To access this PowerPoint in your own time: Type in into your address bar and look.
Mock Trials Court Systems and Practices.
IOWA MOCK TRIAL 101: Middle School Mock Trial Basics
Presentation for Judges
Also known as the ‘accusatorial’ system.
Academic debate (2) Lecturer: Lutsenko Olena
Presentation for Judges
A course in English for Academic Purposes Intermediate/B1+
DEBATE Dr. S K Biswas.
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program
Legal Debates ICM Sarajevo
Presentation for Judges
Mock Trial January Meeting January 12, 2016.
The European Human Rights Moot Court Competition
The Adversary System.
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program
Belleville High School Law Related Education Program
Cooperative Learning Students work together in small groups and learn through interaction with each other while the teacher coaches the process.
PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADE 8 –TEAM SPORTS
It’s a murder trial. Get ready.
SmartLaw Running a Mock Trial.
Get ready to… BATTLE!.
The High Court of Rhetoric and Refutation
Presentation transcript:

Role-Play Presentation: International Private Law Debates Knowledge Auction By I.V. Getman-Pavlova & E.M. Popkova

A moot court competition: emphasis on oral communication skills. Practice in a critically conscious dialogue to create awareness and understanding of the diverse theories of the Private International Law. Knowledge Auction

OBJECTIVES  Motivating students to study authentic materials  Practicing argumentative speaking skills  Enhancing students’ legal vocabulary in the area of Private International Law (PIL)  Improving students’ understanding of PIL concepts and their application

PREPARATORY STAGES STAGE 1 (teacher)  selecting reliable sources of material to be studied by students  preparing the glossary of terms  preparing the scenario  test compilation STAGE 2 (teacher students)  familiarizing students with the procedure  assigning roles and distributing role-based tasks  providing students with the materials to be used for preparation

DISCUSSION STAGE 3 role-play presentations by students of PIL theories with a focus on either strong or weak points of certain doctrines selection by the jury panel of the brightest presenter voting on the most successful doctrine operating in PIL

PARTICIPANT ROLES HEARING PROCEDURE Start of Hearing – introduction of participants – defense counsel speech Cross Examination Stage – counsel for the prosecution and expert witness’s speech – debates Closing Stage – panel discussion the Chairman counsel for the defense counsel for the prosecution panel members expert witnesses time-keeper

KNOWLEDGE AUCTION (an open cry type of auction) STAGE 4 RULES  teams of three or four  £20,000 for each group to spend  minimum bid value is £1000, but no minimum bid increment  the team with the most correct sentences wins  in the case of a tie, the team with the most money left wins PROCEDURE  handing out photocopies with test questions  group discussions of the correct answers to bet on  students buying the answers to the test questions one at a time  checking which answers are correct  identifying the winner

THANK YOU FOR ATTENTION