Evidence.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
+ Arrest and Detention. + Arrests Suspects are questioned after physical evidence has been collected. Depending on the amount of evidence collected, arrests.
Advertisements

Chapter 8 Trial Procedures. The Players Judge Appointed by government Full control of courtroom Decides question of guilt (when there is no jury) and.
Introduction to Criminal Law Trials. The criminal justice system is a system of rules, roles, and procedures that determine whether or not someone has.
Participants in a Criminal Trial. Principles Canada’s criminal justice system has two fundamental principles: an accused person is innocent until proven.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 2 LAW 12 MUNDY
+ The Criminal Trial Process. + The Charter Section 11(d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that a person charged with an offence is to be.
Hearsay and Its Exceptions
Mock Trial.  GOAL IS TO MAP OUT YOUR CASE IN A STORY  TELL A STORY FROM YOUR PERSPECTIVE  DO NOT ARGUE!
EVIDENCE Trial Procedures. What is the point of Evidence? Evidence is the way in which the Crown and the defence try to reconstruct the chain of events.
PRIOR INCONSISTENT STATEMENTS FRE 801(d) Non Hearsay by definition Rule 801(d)(1) Prior Statement by Witness is not hearsay If declarant testifies and.
Introduction to the Grand Jury ACG 6935/4939. What in the world is a Grand Jury.
The Roles of Judge and Jury Court controls legal rulings in the trial Court controls legal rulings in the trial Jury decides factual issues Jury decides.
Chapter 18 The Criminal Trial. The Right to Trial by Jury Open Public Trial – trial held in public and open to spectators. Open Public Trial – trial held.
THE CRIMINAL COURT Chapter 7. Background  English Law practice dates back to William the Conqueror,  “Court” refers to an enclosed place.  Constitution.
Trial By Jury. Stages In a Trial by Jury Accused is arraigned Jury is selectedJudge addresses jury and instructs them to pick a foreperson Crown presents.
90 Trial Procedures Chapter The Adversarial System Trial procedures in Canada are based on the adversarial system: two or more opposing sides present.
 Generates competition between Crown and defence  Aim of both is to seek justice  Crown- Burden of proof is on the Crown to “prove case beyond a reasonable.
Trial Procedures II CLN4U. The Judge, The Crown, The Defence Judge: Judge: Impartial and unbiased Impartial and unbiased Applies law to case, instructs.
Criminal Trial Participant and their roles. Judge “Trier of Law” Admissibility of evidence Interprets/explains the law Instructs jury on the law/their.
CLN4U The Jury. People who are charged with a certain serious indictable offence have the option of trial before a judge and jury. In a jury trial, findings.
Investigation & Arrest – BIG PICTURE CRIME Police are notified 911 POLICE investigate ensure public safety protect & preserve crime scene collect & identify.
Trial Process Unit 2. Preliminary Hearing Only for indictable offences only! Similar to a trial, but usually much shorter. Witness and evidence will be.
Procedure Procedure at Trial. 1) Court Clerk reads the charge Indictment - if vague - quashed (struck down)
Where we’ve been... ‘Trial by jury is the most transcendent privilege which any citizen can enjoy’ Sir William Blackstone Where we’re going... ‘The trial.
Criminal Trial Process “Innocent until proven guilty”
+ Rules & Types of Evidence. + Rules of Evidence During a trial, either the Crown or the defence may object to questions asked by the opposing attorney.
The Trial Process and the Investigator as a Witness.
Law 120.  (in Criminal Trial Process Handout P. 169)
Types of Evidence From Arraignment to Verdict. Self-Incrimination The Canada Evidence Act - regulates rules of evidence (1893). Applies to federal jurisdictions.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3 RULES AND TYPES OF EVIDENCE LAW 12 MUNDY
Twelve Angry Men By: Reginald Rose. Discussion What is a jury? How is it chosen? What responsibility does an individual have to accept jury duty? How.
 These principles are intended to guarantee fairness and strike a balance between the power of the state and the civil liberties of the accused. 1. Rule.
The Criminal Court System. The Court System Depending on the crime committed decides at what court the trial will be held. Depending on the crime committed.
Evidence in Court Holy Trinity Law Audrius Stonkus.
Evidence in a Court of Law Chapter 3. Admissibility of Evidence: Relevance Relevance Competence Competence.
Pre-Trial Procedures Search and Seizure.  The law seeks to balance individual’s right to privacy and need for police to conduct a thorough investigation.
The Criminal Trial Process Section 11 (d) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms states that each person charged with an offence is to be ‘presumed innocent.
BILL OF RIGHTS VOCABULARY. VOCAB Due Process “Principle that the government must act fairly and obey the rules of law.” Search Warrant “A warrant authorizing.
Legal aspects of forensics. Civil Law private law ◦ Regulates noncriminal relationships between individuals, businesses, agency of government, and other.
Chapter 8 Trial Procedures. The Players Judge “the Bench” or “the Court” Appointed by government Full control of courtroom Decides question of guilt and.
Statements and Confessions
The Criminal Trial Process : Exploring the Variety of Evidence and Closing Court Procedures CLN4U Mr. Menla.
The Presentation of Evidence Evidence presented by both the Crown and the defence must be presented in the form of witness testimony and exhibits. All.
Motions at the Beginning of a Trial Crown and Defence may present motions to the judge Stay of Proceedings (motion to stop the trial) Only judge has authority.
CHAP. 6 COMPETENCY OF WITNESSES P. JANICKE Chap. 6: Witness Competency2 MODERN VIEW NEARLY EVERYONE IS COMPETENT NEED SUFFICIENT ABILITY TO BE HELPFUL:
Mock Trial Team Strategies and Formalities. Opening Statements 3 minutes Objective – Acquaint court with the case and outline what you are going to prove.
TRIAL PROCEDURE A criminal trial is an adversarial process – Crown against the accused Arraignment- the reading of the charge ( then accused enters plea)
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
Criminal Trial Process
The Criminal Trial Process
Unit 4 Word power.
The Criminal Court System
Chapter 6 Trial Procedures.
Chapter 6 Trial Procedures.
Criminal Trial Procedures
Questioning a Witness.
TRIAL.
Chapter 6 Trial Procedures.
Crime Scene Investigation and Evidence Collection
Chapter 8.
Pre-Trial Procedures Search and Seizure.
Start Figure 7.10 Trial by Jury, p. 183 End.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 2
Criminal Trial Process
Evidence.
THE TRIAL IN CANADIAN COURTS – Part 3
Law 12 Criminal Trial Process.
Presentation transcript:

Evidence

Evidence Direct Evidence Information (evidence) given by a person who witnessed the event in question (i.e. testimony by a bystander who saw an assault take place) eyewitness.

Eye Witnesses Advantages A witness to the crime At the crime scene Can find the accused Connections between Physical evidence and eye witness Connect with the Jury Disadvantages People may think that they saw something they didn’t Can be tainted by police misconduct Can be bullied Can be bribed Human error

What do you see?

Well, what did you see? What did the man in foreground have in his right hand? How many men were standing under the wing of the airplane? What were the “Call Numbers” on the side of the airplane? How many men were in the picture? How many women were in the picture? How many people were wearing hats?

Well, what did you see?

Circumstantial Evidence Information (evidence) that relates only indirectly to the alleged offence. Example: Evidence indicated that it was highly probable that Steven Truscott raped and murdered a 12 year old girl.

Self-Incrimination The act of implicating oneself in a crime: behaviour indicating one’s guilt Example: Admitting to have consumed alcohol before driving. However, the Charter protects you from self-incrimination.

Privileged Communication Confidential communications Examples: Conversations between spouses, clergy, patients and doctors. CANNOT be presented in Court as evidence.

Similar Fact Evidence Information (evidence) that shows that the accused has previously committed a similar offence

Hearsay Evidence Information not coming from the direct, personal experience or knowledge of the witness. Example: “Dave told me that Paul was in a gang.” In most cases it is not admissible in court, but there are some exceptions.

Opinion Evidence Evidence based on the thoughts of the witness. Usually an expert such as a coroner commenting on the cause of death.

Character Evidence Evidence of the person’s character traits can be prejudicial and is therefore restricted in its use

Photographs Identify accurate portrait of the crime scene.

Interception Devices and Video Evidence if Criminal Code procedures have been correctly followed. Private conversations can only be intercepted if Court ordered.

Confession Accused person’s acknowledgment that the charge, or some essential part of it, is true.

Polygraph Considered to be Hearsay and is inadmissible as evidence.

Illegally Obtained Evidence Evidence, which was not legally obtained. Example: Property seized from a residence where not search warrant was issued.

Forensics The application of bio-chemical and other scientific techniques to criminal investigations. Example: Human tissue, fibre analysis, DNA.

The Presentation of Evidence

Witnesses Witnesses are asked to give testimony about what they saw, what they heard, or what they know about a crime. They often show up to court voluntarily, but are sometimes summoned by the court to present themselves at trial.

Witnesses If they do not appear when summoned, they can be held in contempt of court. Witnesses take an oath to tell the truth, or give an affirmation to do so. If they lie while giving testimony, they commit perjury – a criminal offence.

The Process The process for the presentation of evidence is used by both the Crown and the Defence: The first examination is by the Crown. Usually witnesses are asked to state in their own words what they know about the facts related to the crime. Each witness tells his/her story from their point of view.

Cross-Examination The Defence may cross-examine a witness to show any inconsistencies. Then the Crown may re-examine a witness to clarify any issues raised by the Defence.

Rebuttal The Crown may rebut the evidence that is presented by the Defence by presenting evidence that contradicts what was admitted into evidence by the Defence.

Surrebuttal The Defence has an opportunity to restate its case and contradict what the Crown has just raised.