The San Simeon and Parkfield Earthquakes What the CISN did well (and could have been done better)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fast determination of earthquake source parameters from strong motion records: Mw, focal mechanism, slip distribution B. Delouis, J. Charlety, and M. Vallée.
Advertisements

Review of Catalogs and Rate Determination in UCERF2 and Plans for UCERF3 Andy Michael.
| imodules.com RE Adapter for Encompass (v2.0) Encompass and The Raiser's Edge® Integrated Data Solution CONFIDENTIAL.
CISN ShakeMap Improvements since 2012 NC/SC Products delivered to USGS (USGS website, ShakeCast, PAGER) through new Product Distribution Layer (PDL) ShakeMap.
RE Adapter for Encompass (v1.0)‏ Encompass and The Raiser's Edge® Integrated Data Solution.
Earthquake Early Warning Research and Development in California, USA Hauksson E., Boese M., Heaton T., Seismological Laboratory, California Institute of.
Iranian Broad-Band Seismic Network M. Mokhtari Director of National Center for Earthquake Prediction (IIEES) FSDN meeting Bangkok,
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey USGS Tsunami Activities 5 Year Review Craig Weaver David Oppenheimer May 16, 2007.
Brief Overview, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
Experience with some Principles for Building an Internet-Scale Reliable System Mike Afergan (Akamai and MIT) Joel Wein (Akamai and Polytechnic University,
EEC-484/584 Computer Networks Lecture 6 Wenbing Zhao
Mike Stickney Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Earthquake Studies Office Montana Regional Seismograph Network ANSS IMW RAC 21 August 2006.
California Integrated Seismic Network Strategy for Success Woody Savage David Oppenheimer ANSS-IMW Strategic Planning Meeting August 14, 2006 Salt Lake.
Group 1 Group 2 Group 1 Group 2 Immediately after the mainshock, a reconnaissance team from METU Geotechnical Engineering Division visited Van, Erciş.
SCEC: An NSF + USGS Research Center ShakeAlert CISN Testing Center (CTC) Development Philip Maechling Information Technology Architect Southern California.
MCTS GUIDE TO MICROSOFT WINDOWS 7 Chapter 14 Remote Access.
Brainstorm: How to assess an Earthquake: Stroked off B.C. coast? Rapid Earthquake Risk Assessment Source Parameters USGS World Shake Maps USGS Shake Aftershocks.
1 Chapter Overview Creating Sites and Subnets Configuring Intersite Replication Troubleshooting Active Directory Replication.
Caring. Learning. Integrity. Respect. Technology Support for Algonquin’s Mobile Learning Environment Version 2 September Edu-t ne.
Component 10 – Fundamentals of Workflow Process Analysis and Redesign Unit 10 – Process Change Implementation and Evaluation This material was developed.
Southern California Seismic Network (SCSN) and the Southern California Earthquake Data Center (SCEDC): ShakeOut Lessons Egill Hauksson, CISN Meeting, Menlo.
CS448 Computer Networking Chapter 1 Introduction to Computer Networks Instructor: Li Ma Office: NBC 126 Phone: (713)
NetworkProtocols. Objectives Identify characteristics of TCP/IP, IPX/SPX, NetBIOS, and AppleTalk Understand position of network protocols in OSI Model.
1 Fault Dynamics of the April 6, 2009 L'Aquila, Italy Earthquake Sequence Robert B. Herrmann Saint Louis University Luca Malagnini INGV, Roma.
FZU participation in the Tier0 test CERN August 3, 2006.
Meeting the ANSS Performance Standards & Future CISN Infrastructure CISN-PMG Egill Hauksson, Caltech Presented to CISN Steering and Advisory Committees.
The Parkfield Project By: Jeanine Mejares Christina Washington.
Please note: this presentation has not received Director’s approval and is subject to revision.
Earthquake Information Timeline min 10-20min 1hr 2hrs 4hrs epicenter & magnitude (USGS ENS) ShakeMap (point source) Earthquake Occurs PAGER (pending.
CISN: C alifornia I ntegrated S eismic N etwork The Program Management Group (PMG): Doug Given – USGS Pasadena Egill Hauksson - Caltech Peggy Hellweg &
Brief history, Current Activities & ARRA Improvements David Oppenheimer – USGS Menlo Park.
Overview of CISN Operations and Products David Oppenheimer USGS Menlo Park, CA.
PG&E and CISN: An Earthquake Country Partnership Stu Nishenko CISN Advisory & Steering Committees Meeting October 13, 2010 Sacramento CA.
GEOSS- Washington 2005 The International Seismological centre An Earth Observation System of Systems Avi Shapira – International seismological Centre,
Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.
Large Earthquake Rapid Finite Rupture Model Products Thorne Lay (UCSC) USGS/IRIS/NSF International Workshop on the Utilization of Seismographic Networks.
NUOL Internet Application Services Midterm presentation 22 nd March, 2004.
University of Bergen public domain software: Systems for seismic data-acquisition and processing T.Utheim 1, J.Havskov 1, Ø.Natvik 1, J.Å.Ojeda 1 and L.Ottemoeller.
CISN: Draft Plans for Funding Sources: OES/FEMA/ANSS/Others CISN-PMG Sacramento 10/19/2004.
1 Client-Server Interaction. 2 Functionality Transport layer and layers below –Basic communication –Reliability Application layer –Abstractions Files.
FitnessGram® 2015 Student Information System (SIS) Extract Import Training for Georgia School Year.
Electronic Tools for TIA Standards Development David Thompson Member of the Technical Staff GCS/EWG Meeting Sapporo, Hokkaido, JAPAN August 2000 TC
Center for Engineering Strong Motion Data (CESMD) Update March 25, 2013 CISN Advisory & Steering Committees Meeting.
1 Cythera M6.7 earthquake (January 8, 2006) in southern Aegean: uneasy retrieval of the upward rupture propagation J. Zahradnik, J. Jansky, V. Plicka,
1 30 November 2006 An Efficient Nearest Neighbor (NN) Algorithm for Peer-to-Peer (P2P) Settings Ahmed Sabbir Arif Graduate Student, York University.
Fundamentals of Workflow Analysis and Process Redesign Unit Process Change Implementation and Evaluation.
CS 3471 CS 347: Parallel and Distributed Data Management Notes13: Time and Clocks.
Business Continuity Planning for OPEN OPEN Development Conference September 18, 2008 Ravi Rajaram IT Development Manager.
Role Of Network IDS in Network Perimeter Defense.
1 Network Quarantine At Cornell University Steve Schuster Director, Information Security Office.
Basics of the Domain Name System (DNS) By : AMMY- DRISS Mohamed Amine KADDARI Zakaria MAHMOUDI Soufiane Oujda Med I University National College of Applied.
Measuring Earthquakes. Seismograph Is an instrument used to detect and record seismic waves.
A “Next-Generation” Seismic Hazards Alert/Analysis Tool for the Modern EOC Disaster Resistant California 2004 Hugo Rico Jr.Margaret Vinci Project CoordinatorMgr.
Bellringer# 27 What is the Richter Scale? What is the greatest magnitude on the Richter scale? Where would an earthquake with the greatest magnitude be.
John James Tintera, PG #325 Texas Alliance of Energy Producers Injection Well Regulatory Update April, 2016.
Earthquake Forecasting and Prediction. Parkfield, CA.
DWR/O&M Earthquake Engineering Section FY2006 Update James D. Agnew, M.S. Senior Seismologist 17 Nov 2005.
EAuthentication What is it? What is needed for FFAVORS?
ShakeAlert CISN Testing Center (CTC) Development
USGS Tsunami Activities 5 Year Review
Finite-Source Models of the December 22, 2003 Mw6
Margaret Hellweg, Richard Allen, Maren Böse,
Kinematic Modeling of the Denali Earthquake
CISN Testing Center (CTC)
Client-Server Interaction
RECENT SEISMIC MONITORING RESULTS FROM THE CENTRAL
CISN Steering and Advisory Committees
Reviewing Course Outlines for C-ID Designation
Earthquake and Tsunami Program Governor’s Office of Emergency Services
FitnessGram® 2015 Student Information System (SIS) Extract Import Training for Georgia School Year.
Presentation transcript:

The San Simeon and Parkfield Earthquakes What the CISN did well (and could have been done better)

M3 quake ≠ M6+ quake Big quakes –Have extended source regions –Are infrequent –Exercise software in unexpected ways –Shine spotlights on systems deficiencies –Overwhelm humans unaccustomed to response pressures and demand for information –Rarely happen when convenient

San Simeon Mw6.5 Earthquake Quake occurred December 22, 2003 at 11:15:56 AM (PST) –Monday –Staff gone for vacation Instrumentation was (and still is) sparse Instrumentation was (and still is) analog Quake occurred on edge of NC/SC networks

12/22/ :15:56 00:00:00Rupture initiates

12/22/ :16:2000:00:24 ? Quick Look Hypocenter

12/22/ :20:2500:04:29Final hypocenter & Md 5.6

12/22/ :20:5800:05:02ML 6.4

12/22/ :22:4000:06:44Mechanism & Mw 6.5

12/22/ :24:1300:08:171st ShakeMap - ML 6.4

12/22/ :38:2800:22:32ShakeMap update - Mw 6.5

San Simeon “Human” Time-line TimeElapsed (GMT)hr:mn:sc 19:32:0000:16:04Seismologist review and aftershock probabilities 20:00:0000:44:04OES conference call with CISN scientists 20:16:0001:00:04First HAZUS runs completed 20:30:0001:14:04Release of Internet Quick Report 21:54:0002:38:04Seismologist review of finite source

12/22/ :30:0001:14:041st Internet Quick Report

02:38:04

12/22/ :14:0002:58:04ShakeMap update

12/22/ :33:0004:17:04ShakeMap update - line source

12/23/ :34:0007:18:04ShakeMap update - Templeton data

12/24/ :28:0029:12:04ShakeMap update - Cambria data

12/23/ :34:0022:18:04Special Earthquake Report

J. Fenton

So far, so good…. Here’s what could have gone better 1.Technical issues –Competing EqintheNews pages on USGS servers in Golden, CO and Menlo Park, CA (fixed) –No ability to update aftershock probabilities (now can be done manually) –Clients inundated with automated /pager (potentially solvable) –Akamai/Reston firewall problems blocked recenteqs access (fixed) –CIT ShakeMap data exchange broken (fixed) –Dedicated com links from Parkfield broke (fixed)

2.Human Response –Inconsistent statements on mapped fault and name of quake on Day 1 –No communications with ShakeMap users about ShakeMap updates –Failure to exercise existing response procedures –SC "duty seismologist" for ShakeMap unknown in NC –~2 days to establish an internal scientific distribution list and ftp site –No 7 X 24 contact for USGS networking/security staff. Even after contact, fix took almost 2 weeks.

Limited station coverage and strong motion data in region compromised ShakeMap quality and science Distribution of ShakeMap stations = RT = Non-RT 3. Data Quality

Prototype operational –better locations –detected more earthquakes 4. Statewide pick exchange and association

Parkfield Overview Quake occurred Tuesday, September 28, 2004 at 11:15:56 AM (PST) –Key personnel in St. Louis for National Earthquake Conference Quake occurred within densely instrumented portion of NC network –SM data mostly non-RT

Parkfield time-line Earthquake Information UTC TimeElapsed time hr:mn:sc Origin Time (OT) 09/28 17:15:2400:00:00 Quick Look hypocenter 09/28 17:15:5500:00:31 Final hypocenter & M d /28 17:19:5700:04:33 First Motion mechanism 09/28 17:20:1000:04:46 Local Magnitude M L /28 17:20:3000:05:06 1st ShakeMap completed 09/28 17:21:1600:05:52 Moment Tensor Solution M w 5.909/28 17:22:2300:06:59 2nd ShakeMap completed 09/28 17:28:0800:07:44 MS relocated by duty seismologist09/28 17:46:--00:31:-- Analyst review of moment tensor 09/28 17:47:--00:32:-- ShakeMap update due to relocation09/28 17:53:--00:38:-- Finite fault line source09/20 17:54:--00:39 Probability statement released for M L 5.909/28 18:00:--00:45:-- ShakeMap update with manual finite fault09/28 18:20:--01:05:-- Update to Mw6.0 & probability revision 09/28 18:23:--01:08:-- ShakeMap update with 6 stations09/28 21:18:--04:03:-- Earthquake Report at cisn.org 09/28 21:45:--04:30:-- 1st Internet Quick Report at cisn-edc.org 09/29 01:56:--08:41:-- ShakeMap update with 1 added station09/29 05:20:--12:05:-- Four additional IQR releases09/29-10/27 ShakeMap updates with CGS/NSMP data10/08 --:--:--10 days Automatic OES/CISN exchange

Locations almost perfect

100 km distance weighting 28 SEP 2004, 17:15 SEQUENCE NO. 1, ID NO ADJUSTMENTS (KM) I ORIGIN LAT N LON W Z NWR RMS DT DLAT DLON DZ RR NF MOD PGH PGH FREE DEPTH PGH BEGIN DISTANCE WEIGHTING BEGIN RESIDUAL WEIGHTING DEPTH ADJUSTMENT DAMPED PGH RMS INCREASE - MOVE HYPO 0.60 BACK PGH RMS INCREASE - MOVE HYPO 0.60 BACK PGH RMS INCREASE - MOVE HYPO 0.60 BACK PGH RMS INCREASE - MOVE HYPO 0.60 BACK PGH RMS INCREASE - MOVE HYPO 0.60 BACK PGH RMS INCREASE - MOVE HYPO 0.60 BACK PGH DEPTH ADJUSTMENT DAMPED PGH RMS INCREASE - MOVE HYPO 0.60 BACK

24 hours

10 days later

Web traffic Request or hit count peak of 630,000/min (10,500/sec) 300,000 different IP addresses on day 1 100GB transferred on day 1 (typically 8 GB)

Did You Feel It? 7,000 questionnaires submitted for this event in the first hour 14,174 total

4:30

8:41

Parkfield Issues Technical –Mainshock and two M5 aftershocks initially mislocated (fixed) –Strong motion data exchange from CGS hung (fixed?) –Reviewed Mw update had to be forced (not fixed) –Incorrect aftershock M5 magnitudes (fixed?) Human –Duty seismologist failed to follow procedures and aftershock message was delayed –Staff overload because key individuals in St Louis Data –Most strong-motion data non-RT and recorded on film

Summary CISN delivered rapid and reliable information for San Simeon and Parkfield quakes. Technical “glitches” were addressable Human “glitches” challenging Limited instrumentation and data quality remain a significant impediment