An Approach to Compensation for Radiation-linked Diseases – an Example from the Nuclear Industry in the UK Richard Wakeford Richard Wakeford Professor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation Protection Legislation Stephen McCallum
Advertisements

Campaigning for Equality. The UCU recognises the important impact of the positive equality duties and is striving to use the legislation as widely as.
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Town Hall Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory (X-10) Oak Ridge, Tennessee February 13, 2013.
EPA Radiogenic Cancer Risk Projections for the U.S. Population Michael Boyd Radiation Protection Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2011 OAS.
This equipment was donated by Thompsons solicitors Getting Equal: Implementing the Gender Equality Duty Monday 14 th May 2007.
Medicare Advantage Plans. What are Medicare Advantage Plans? 1. Required by law to provide their members the same or greater coverage as regular Medicare.
COSTS AGREEMENTS AND DISCLOSURES BAR ASSOCIATION CPD SEMINAR 2 AUGUST 2007 By Roger Traves SC.
The Legal Implications of Practice Guidelines Cal Chaney, JD April 12, 2002.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Responsibility for Radiation Safety Day 8 – Lecture 4.
CHINA-EU FORUM workshop 38a Beijing, 9-10 July 2010 Multi-dimensional protection of labour rights 6/2/20151.
THE NEW LABOUR LEGISLATION Employment Act No. 11 of 2007 Labour Instiutions Act No. 12 of 2007 Labour Relations Act No. 14 of 2007 Work Injury Benefits.
1 Certification Chapter 14, Storey. 2 Topics  What is certification?  Various forms of certification  The process of system certification (the planning.
Chapter 4: Insurance Company Operations
Hanford Thyroid Disease Study (HTDS) Final Report Michael A. McGeehin, Ph.D., M.S.P.H. Director Division of Environmental Hazards and Health Effects National.
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Stochastic Somatic Effects Radiation induction of cancer Lecture IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation.
CHAPTER FOUR – SOURCES OF FINANCE. SOURCES OF FINANCE  Internal Sources  Refers to funds that are generated from within the firm itself – from owner’s.
International Dispute Resolution Overview Little distinction between interests disputes and right disputes, such as in U.S. and Canada – Grievance Procedures.
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Protection of the environment from ionising radiation - views of a regulator.
Maximum Permissible Dose (MPD)
Module 8: Settlement of collective labour disputes Module 8: Settlement of collective labour disputes ©2005/ILO/DIALOGUE/VE 1 The purpose of labour dispute.
Continuity Clinic Liability Insurance 101 Modified from information on
Firefighters compensation and presumptive legislation Nicola Quin, Director, Strategy and Support Division, Cancer Council Victoria.
National profiles on OSH – Methodology
NUCLEAR LIABILITY The Nuclear Installations Act 1965 Radioactivity and the Law: Cheryl Parkhouse, Solicitor Burges Salmon LLP RSC, Burlington House, London.
Environmental Risk Analysis
Social Security & Employees Benefits Administration
Clinical Trials. What is a clinical trial? Clinical trials are research studies involving people Used to find better ways to prevent, detect, and treat.
1 INTERREG IIIB “ATLANTIC AREA” Main points of community regulation 438/2001 financial management and control systems EUROPEAN COMMISSION SPAIN.
SOCIAL SECURITY COVERAGE AND BENEFITS
Effects of Low Doses Probability of Causation and implications for Public Policy Lecture at UC Berkeley March 2nd 2001 by Richard Wilson Mallinckrodt Research.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
OLA 1069 T 1008 Planning Solutions for Small to Midsized Businesses.
Compensation events and claims Presented by Prof. Khem Dallakoti.
Deconstructing Linearity Kenneth L. Mossman Professor of Health Physics Director, Office of Radiation Safety Arizona State University Tempe, AZ.
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Town Hall Meeting Amarillo, Texas March 2012.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection and the Regulatory Framework Module IV 2 Conceptual.
Risk and Human Health. Environmental Risk Analysis Comparing the risk of a situation to its benefits Allows people to evaluate and deal with consequences.
Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Town Hall Meetings Livermore, California June 29, 2010.
Radiation Health Effects
Beyond Dose Assessment Using Risk with Full Disclosure of Uncertainty in Public and Scientific Communication F. Owen Hoffman, David C. Kocher and A. Iulian.
BRITISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW Multi-Party Litigation in Comparative Perspective 27 June 2005 Current issues in English group actions.
BEIR VII: Update on the risks of “low-level” radiation Overview of the main findings by Arjun Makhijani, Ph.D. President, Institute for Energy and Environmental.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. 1 GOVERNMENT FINANCE STATISTICS ANALYTIC FRAMEWORK Part 2 This lecture describes the various.
Amanda Bath Advance Practitioner RPS
Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation Stochastic Somatic Effects Radiation risk Lecture IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation Protection and.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Copyright © 2008 Pearson Addison-Wesley. All rights reserved. Insurance Company Operations.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2007 Thomson Learning/South-WesternCallan and Thomas, Environmental Economics and Management, 4e.
International Atomic Energy Agency Regulatory Review of Safety Cases for Radioactive Waste Disposal Facilities David G Bennett 7 April 2014.
Leicester Warwick Medical School Health and Disease in Populations Cohort Studies Paul Burton.
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL PROJECTS. KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF A SEP Projects must improve, protect or reduce risks to public health or environment. Projects.
1 Course : بسم الله الرّحمن الرّحيم Chapter 7: BSS & International Regulations Omrane KADRI, Ph.D. Office 2021 Health Safety & Radiation.
New Pension System in Poland - How to Classify in Accordance with SNA 93 and ESA 95 Krzysztof Pater Undersecretary of State Ministry of Economy, Labour.
EU Basic Safety Directive 2013/59/Euratom TRAINING COURSE ON TECHNICAAL REQUIREMENTS TO FULFILL NATIONAL OBLIGATIONS FOR THE SAFE MANAGEMENT OF DSRS.
Environmental Risk Analysis Chapter 6 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
The incidence of mesothelioma in the South West Region, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight C Devrell 1, S McPhail, A Evans, A Pring and J.
The occupations of mesothelioma cases in the South West Region, Hampshire and the Isle of Wight A Evans*, A Pring, S McPhail and J Verne.
Professional Indemnity. What is Professional Indemnity insurance? Against the Insured’s legal liability to a THIRD party to: Pay compensation as a result.
Legislative Changes to the Road Accident Fund Johannesburg Country Club, Auckland Park 12 February 2009.
Occupational Health Indicators in Wyoming, 2001 – 2005 Mulloy KB 1, Stinson KS 1,Boudreau Y 2, Newman LS 1, Helmkamp J 2 1 – Mountain and Plains Education.
How it affects CA employers
Instructional Objectives:
The accidents at Fukushima Dai-Ichi Summary of Health Discussions
Office of Legal Affairs
Vesa Tanner European Commission Directorate-General Energy
Manifesto for Labour Law
BEIR VII: Update on the risks of “low-level” radiation
RADIATION SAFETY GUIDES
The UK Trade Remedies Regime: Review of Existing EU Trade Orders
Presentation transcript:

An Approach to Compensation for Radiation-linked Diseases – an Example from the Nuclear Industry in the UK Richard Wakeford Richard Wakeford Professor in Epidemiology, Institute of Population Health and Dalton Nuclear Institute, The University of Manchester, UK Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014

20 Highest Cancer Incidence Rates

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Cancer Incidence, Israel, 2012

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Dose-response Curves

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 UK Nuclear Installations Act 1965 Imposes a strict statutory duty upon the operator of a nuclear facility in the UK not to cause injury through exposure to ionising radiation. As a consequence, a claim of personal injury as a result of such exposure must establish causation, but not negligence.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 The Linear No-Threshold Model During the 1970s, a linear no-threshold (LNT) dose-response model between an excess risk of cancer and a previous exposure to ionising radiation came to be widely accepted. The LNT model implies that occupational exposure to radiation leads to some (albeit, in general, small) increased risk of future development of cancer.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Radiation Risk Models Various bodies (e.g. UNSCEAR, BEIR, US EPA, RERF) develop models of radiation- induced cancer risk based on epidemiological studies of exposed groups, the Japanese survivors of the atomic-bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki being of primary importance. These models are regularly updated.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Radiation Risk Models Radiation risk models describe the variation of excess cancer risk with the received dose of radiation. Different models apply to different cancer types, and the relevant organ/tissue- specific dose is required. Models take into account risk modifying factors, such as sex, age-at-exposure and time-since exposure.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 BEIR VII/NCI Leukaemia Mortality

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Legal Actions During the 1970s, five trade (i.e., labor) union-sponsored legal actions were brought against British Nuclear Fuels plc (BNFL) by Sellafield workers (or their dependents) alleging that cancers had been caused by occupational exposure to radiation. Eventually settled by BNFL “out of court”. Demonstrated the real possibility of a successful claim in a UK court.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Sellafield, NW England

Doses for Sellafield Workers Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014

1982 Compensation Agreement Legal claims are expensive, traumatic, time-consuming and damaging. In the early-1980s BNFL and its trade unions examined the possibility of agreeing a voluntary compensation scheme as an alternative to litigation. A compensation agreement was introduced in 1982, covering cancer deaths among BNFL radiation workers.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February Compensation Agreement The Compensation Agreement used the “Probability of Causation” (or “Assigned Share”) methodology to assess the merit of individual claims (see ILO OSH 73, 2010). The risk models used were based upon those set out in ICRP Publication 26 (1977).

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Probability of Causation The Probability of Causation methodology allows an inferential weight to be attached to the conclusion that a particular case of cancer was caused by a specific prior exposure to ionising radiation. Uses radiation risk models to calculate the excess risk resulting from a specified exposure to radiation (see ILO OSH 73, 2010).

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Probability of Causation The Excess Relative Risk (ERR) is the proportional increase in risk caused by the specific radiation exposure when compared to the relevant background risk. ERR is obtained by standard radiation risk models (e.g. UNSCEAR and BEIR). Then the Probability of Causation, PC, is PC = ERR / (ERR+1)

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Measures of Risk ERR = ( – ) / = 2 red / blue RR = / = 3 (red + blue) / blue EAR = – = red

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Probability of Causation The Probability of Causation, PC, is the proportion of cases of the particular type of cancer under consideration occurring in a hypothetical extremely large population of people, all with the same pertinent characteristics (received dose, sex, age-at-exposure, age-at-diagnosis, etc.) as the particular case under consideration, that will have been caused by the specific exposure to radiation.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Compensation Agreement A planned review of the Compensation Agreement in 1986 led to the Agreement being extended in 1987 to non-fatal cases of cancer and to UK Atomic Energy Authority (UKAEA) radiation workers. In 1991, the technical basis of the Agreement was revised in the light of the radiation risk models presented in the US NAS BEIR V Report (1990).

Compensation Scheme In the late-2000s, the technical basis of the Compensation Scheme was again revised in the light of the cancer risk models published in the UNSCEAR 2006 Report and the US NAS BEIR VII Report (2006). These risk models now form much of the basis of the risk calculations carried out in individual claims brought under the Compensation Scheme. Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014

UK Compensation Scheme Compensation Scheme for Radiation-Linked Diseases (CSRLD, now includes the great majority of radiation workers employed in the UK nuclear industry (and in the armed forces). It covers radiation workers in the nuclear power, nuclear weapons and radiochemical production industries, and in the dockyards and armed services. Claims are financially supported.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 UK Compensation Scheme Private negotiated agreement between employers and trade unions to offer an attractive alternative to litigation. Use of the Scheme by a claimant is voluntary – legal action still possible. Managed and run jointly by employers and trade unions, and administered by an independent Executive Secretariat. Applies to classified radiation workers who are members of a trade union.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 UK Compensation Scheme Currently, the cancer risk models used by the Scheme are based upon those set out in the UNSCEAR 2006 Report and the US NAS BEIR VII Report (2006). The Scheme also covers eye cataracts. Owing to the negotiated nature of the Scheme and to enhance its attractiveness, a number of generosity factors are included to address uncertainties.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Scheme Generosity Factors Examples of generosity factors –A Dose and Dose-Rate Effectiveness Factor (DDREF) of 1 –Enhancement factor applied for those diagnosed under 50 years of age –Dose records interpreted conservatively –Non-smokers favoured in respiratory cancer claims. Proportional recovery.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Proportional Recovery Whereas in the law courts an “all-or-nothing” decision is made on the basis of the “balance of probabilities” (usually taken as equivalent to a PC of 50% − a PC >50% is taken as being “more likely than not”), the Scheme pays out for a PC of between 20% and 50% – ¼, ½, ¾ of full payment (i.e. that payment that would be made for a PC >50%) at PC values of 20%, 30% and 40%, respectively.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Scheme Assessment of Cancers All cancers except chronic lymphatic leukaemia, Hodgkin’s lymphoma, skin melanoma and mesothelioma are eligible for assessment under the Scheme. Cancers are grouped according to those used in the UNSCEAR 2006 and BIER VII reports for the application of risk models to determine the PC.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Radiation Doses Organ/tissue-specific doses are obtained primarily from occupational dose records. No body shielding factors are applied for doses from external sources. Internal doses obtained from bioassay data. Some dose reconstruction (e.g. for neutron doses) may be necessary. All doses used in the Scheme are determined from agreed protocols.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Case Processing For each case an agreed set of facts is established –Independent diagnosis and classification of the disease (ICD code) –Occupational dose to affected organ/tissue –Employment history (and union membership) –Medical history –Other relevant issues (e.g. smoking history for respiratory cancer claims)

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 UK Compensation Scheme Level of payment is agreed by legal advisors representing employer and claimant. Successful claims should achieve final settlement within months of initiation. The Scheme assesses the potential impact of scientific developments through its Technical Working Party.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 Scheme Payments The Scheme has dealt with >1500 cases. >130 cases have received payments. Total payments made amount to ~£8M. Most payments have been made for PC values <50%, which are unlikely to have been successful in the law courts.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 UK Compensation Scheme The UK Compensation Scheme has successfully dealt with the legacy of relatively high occupational doses received during the early years of the nuclear industry, and offers a continuing framework of dealing with claims of radiation-induced personal injury.

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 UK Compensation Scheme The UK Compensation Scheme is very much a pragmatic initiative jointly undertaken by employers and trade unions in an attempt to avoid the adversities of litigation by offering an attractive alternative; but individuals cannot be prevented from taking legal action if they so choose, although they would have to personally finance such legal action (as they would not be supported by a trade union).

Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014 UK Compensation Scheme More details of the Compensation Scheme for Radiation-Linked Diseases can be found at its web-site:

ILO/IAEA/WHO Report ublications/books/WCMS _120131/lang-- en/index.htm Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014

ILO/IAEA/WHO Group Members Rivlin Commission, Tel Aviv, 13 February 2014

Fin