1 Transportation Policy Area Review (TPAR) -- A suggested new approach June, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation Proposed Transportation Funding Policy Changes Fairfax County Department of Transportation March.
Advertisements

The Maryland-National Capital Park & Planning Commission September 13, 2003 A new vision for managing growth in Montgomery County The Annual Growth Policy.
Missoula Planning Summit Milestone 14 August, 2008 Missoula, Montana.
Urban Transportation Council Green Guide for Roads Task Force TAC 2009 Annual Conference and Exhibition Vancouver.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
Using Innovative Data Analysis Methods to Facilitate Communication and Transit Investment Decision Making in Montgomery County, MD U.S.DOT Transportation.
Background Why Plan For Transportation? Facts You Should Know Expectations Projects and Costs Conclusions/ Next Steps.
Community Planning Land Use Education Project Charlotte P. Burckhardt, AICP, PCP Principal Planner.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
County of Fairfax, Virginia Transportation Priorities: Project Timelines and the 2014 Bond Referendum 1 Tom Biesiadny, Karyn Moreland, Todd Minnix, Ray.
1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.
Capital Improvement Plan Workshop May 27, Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) Tool used to develop a five year timeline for scheduling necessary improvements.
Planning Board Roundtable 7/9/ Status and schedule of Subdivision Staging Policy and related studies LATR TPAR Travel/4 model development Travel.
Middle School Recommendations December Middle School Design Team (MSDT) 1. Support for the Middle School Model as Implemented in APS 2. Focus on.
Doug Brown October 23, Budget Overview A Budget Planning Process (Overland Park’s) Financial Management.
GROWTH MANAGEMENT Working With Transportation Concurrency Management Systems Florida Department of Transportation Companion to the Booklet “Working with.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Community Development & Planning Grant Pre-Application Meeting April 17,
Housing Element Update Workshop The City of Fillmore is Currently Updating its Housing Element  State law mandates the Housing Element be included.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Planning a Statistical Project Section A 1.
2022 GROWTH TARGETS I. Household Targets II. Job Targets III. Countywide Planning Policy Amendments.
Alachua County Future Traffic Circulation Corridors Map Project July 10 th, 2007.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
1 Transportation Policy Area Review (TPAR) A suggested new approach Presentation to M.C. Civic Federation November 8, 2010.
1 Overcoming Challenges in Preparation and Implementation of NAMAs Kigali, 17 th August 2015 African Regional Workshop on NAMAs.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
Board of County Commissioners School Concurrency June 10, 2008 Adoption Public Hearing.
Transit Revitalization Investment Districts Planning and Implementation of Act 238 of 2004 July 2006 Getting to TRID Lynn Colosi Clear View Strategies.
Capital Improvements Element (CIE) Annual Update Adoption Public Hearing April 5, 2011.
Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection Act December 18, 2007 Comprehensive Policy Plan Amendments Wekiva Parkway and Protection.
S.H. 121 – Dallas, Texas Case Study Presentation National Summit on Future Transportation Funding and Finance Strategies April 11, 2007 Michael Morris,
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Blueprint for Good Growth Adequate Public Facilities Implementation Capacity LOS Capital Plan Demand Unintended consequence slides adapted from presentation.
Slide Congestion Management Program Update Presentation to PPLC April 11, 2011.
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency April 24, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion: Transportation Concurrency.
Project management Topic 1 Project management principles.
Federal Funding Strategies Update Internal Working Document Update on Federal Funding California High-Speed Rail Authority In Partnership with: Kadesh.
The Kern Regional Transportation Plan A Vision and Guidebook for Kern County in 2025.
Monitoring and Evaluation. Objective Identify appropriate monitoring techniques. Identify approaches to evaluating plan implementation and effectiveness.
Chittenden County Metropolitan Planning Organization Communities working together to meet Chittenden County’s transportation needs 30 Kimball Ave., Suite.
2009 Growth Policy Growing Smarter Planning Board Status Report May 28, 2009 What’s changing? Why change? Staff Draft Recommendations Smart Growth Criteria.
Implementing Program Management Standards at Duke Energy.
RATE ANALYSIS FY FY 2019 March 6, 2014 CARSON VALLEY WATER UTILITY FUND 326 – DEPARTMENT 864.
A Strategic Agenda for Pinellas County’s Future Growth Whit Blanton, FAICP Pinellas Planning Council & Pinellas Metropolitan Planning Organization August.
Border Master Plan Laredo, Texas July 28, 2010  Laredo District  Coahuila  Nuevo León  Tamaulipas.
Transportation System Comments Santolina Level ‘A’ Master Plan.
Smyrna’s Major Thoroughfare, Bicycle, and Pedestrian Plan TOWN COUNCIL RETREAT APRIL 14, 2015.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
Neeraj Kumar Negi Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office March 11 th 2015 Performance Measurement in GEF.
Unit 1 THE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PROCESS AND THE ROLE OF THE MPO LCTCC Educational Program.
DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.
FY 2016 Budget Workshop June 11, 2015 Brian Maxwell, City Manager Dan Buckley, Deputy City Manager Mike Loftin, Finance Director 1.
Review of 2016–2021 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and 2016 Budget Assumptions Financial Administration and Audit Committee April 14,
2015 – 2020 Strategic Budget Plan Financial Administration & Audit Committee June 10, 2014.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
Greater Toronto Transportation System
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO Board October 26, 2016.
Review of 2018–2023 Strategic Budget Plan Development Process and
A Presentation to: River to Sea TPO BPAC November 9, 2016.
River to Sea TPO - CAC/TCC
Manage Project Costs Unit Guide Diploma of Project Management Qualification Code BSB51507 Unit Code BSBPMG504A.
San Mateo Countywide Transportation Plan update
Project Management Processes
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Kentucky County Treasurer’s Fundamentals Course
Rod Zivkovich Executive Director of Finance and Support Services
Capital Improvement Plans
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
Presentation transcript:

1 Transportation Policy Area Review (TPAR) -- A suggested new approach June, 2010

2 Presentation Outline 1.Guiding Principles 2.The Proposed TPAR Policy in a Nutshell 3.Proposed Process Components 4.Transit Process – 2020 Results 5.Road Process – 2020 Results 6.Example of Subdivision Process

3 1. Guiding Principles Based on Approved Master Plans. Process easily understood. Seek and Include Input from Stakeholders. Separate analysis for transit and roads. Public – private financing of solutions. Support economic development. Monitor, report and adjust key elements.

4 2. The Proposed TPAR in a Nutshell Achieving Balance Guides how to balance transportation and development activity 10 years forward Suggests standards of adequacy for –transit services –and road congestion Defines a Policy Area to be in balance if it meets both adequacy standards in the 10 year period.

5 The Proposed TPAR in a Nutshell Programming Transportation Projects If a Policy Area not in balance, then County should program the transit services / road improvements The programmed capital improvements must come from the Adopted and Approved Master Plans The proposed improvements are to be funded through a public-private partnership. Suggest a threshold of private payments before, a capital project and /or transit service program must be programmed

6 The Proposed TPAR in a Nutshell Monitoring and Reporting TPAR requires monitoring and reporting of key elements of the policy: –Development Activity –Collection of Payments –Programming / Implementation of Improvements –Annual Report –Recommendations for action to ensure the desirable balance.

7 Current Policy Areas RurE RKV FWO SSTP RurE RurW BCC AH DAM CLV CLK GTE GBG DER MVA KW GTWRurE OLY NP NB RDV POT

8 3. Proposed Process Components 1. Identify Transit Inadequacies and Solutions 2. Identify Roadway Inadequacies and Solutions 3. Cost Allocation Steps 4. Programming Public Commitments 5. Monitor and Report

9 Proposed Process for Transit Establish Geographic Policy Area Categories –Urban –Suburban –Rural Establish Service Factors –Transit Coverage –Peak Headways –Span of Service

10 Identify Transit Inadequacies and Solutions Identify Transit Inadequacies and Solutions

11

12

13

14 5A. ROAD PROCESS – 2020 RESULTS

15 * Note: Roadways include traffic operations, bikeways and walkways Proposed Process: Main Steps Identify Roadway* Inadequacies and Solutions Yes No Apply Transp. Demand Model Are there future Inadequacies? year Dev. Act. Forecasts Programmed Projects in CIP/CTP 11 Summarize Roadway Policy Area and Corridor Performance Iterate as Needed Projects not yet Programmed (State/County) Go to on slide Prepare combinations of projects for CIP/CTP for performance and to complete within 10 years

16 Standard of Roadway Performance Standard of Roadway Performance

17 3B-13: Standard of Roadway Performance

18 4B-13: Example of one Policy Area

19 Applying the Model County-wide Applying the Model County-wide

20 Setting Standards by Geographic P. Area Setting Standards by Geographic P. Area

Road Adequacy with 6-year CIP/CTP 2020 Road Adequacy with 6-year CIP/CTP

22 5. B Testing Road Solutions

23 List of Improvements for Testing

24 Adequacy of Proposed Improvements

25 Proposed Process: Main Steps C. Cost-Allocation Steps Proposed Process: Main Steps C. Cost-Allocation Steps Set public- private cost sharing Yes No 28 Is the Collection greater than the criteria of ? 25 Transit Costs from page 9 Roadway Costs from page Wait before the Project-Service is Programmed Cost per unit of development Cost estimates for capital facilities and operating expenses 27 Establish criteria for additions into the CIP/CTP 25 Go to on slide Aggregate Policy Area Fees collected as part of the subdivision process 26a 26b Set shares for Households and Employment Change since prior Executive briefing

26 Proposed Process: Main Steps D. Programming Public Commitments E. Monitor and Report Identify as a Committed Project in the CIP Schedule and Implement within 10-year Time Frame 33 ` 34 Program the Project-Service 32 From on slide Yes No Monitor & Report on Development and Implementation Commitments Go to Next Growth Policy Cycle On Schedule? Make Recommendations for Revised or New Solutions 37

27 6. Example of the Subdivision Process 1.Identify Policy Area of Development 2.Apply A.Roadway Cost B.Transit Cost 3.Subdivision Approved 4.Payment/Surety prior to Record Plat 5.Track TPAR Payments by Policy Area 6.Are road or transit improvements ready for programming? 7.Program Improvements and implement 8.Monitor and Report Progress

28 Full Report is available at

29