1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Update on the Online Conversion Process for CC.net and GOLD: Implications for OSEP Reporting.

Advertisements

Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.

Researchers as Partners with State Part C and Preschool Special Education Agencies in Collecting Data on Child Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International.

Indicator 7 Child Outcomes MAKING SENSE OF THE DATA June

Does anyone have concerns about the child’s functioning with regard to the outcome area? D OES THE CHILD EVER FUNCTION IN WAYS THAT WOULD BE CONSIDERED.

Data Analysis for Assuring the Quality of your COSF Data 1.

Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia 1 Virginia’s System for Determination of Child Progress (VSDCP)

Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.

Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.

Update on Child Outcomes for Early Childhood Special Education Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center The National Association.

2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data.

Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Lynne Kahn Christina Kasprzak Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes.

Orientation for New Staff Lynne Kahn Kathy Hebbeler The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center Early Childhood Outcomes Center September 2011.

Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.

State Activities in Measuring Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn, Donna Spiker, Melissa Raspa, & Kathleen Hebbeler ECO Center Presented at: International Society.

1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.

Highs and Lows on the Road to High Quality Data American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA November, 2011 Kathy Hebbeler and Lynne Kahn ECO at SRI International.

CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.

The Results are In! Child Outcomes for OSEP EI and ECSE Programs Donna Spiker Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International October 13, 2011 (CCSSO-SCASS.

Update on Part C Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center June 2011 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International.

The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International August, 2011.

Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.

Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Outcomes (Indicators C-3 and B-7) Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010 San.

Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009.

Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.

The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,

Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.

Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.

Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.

1 Using a Statewide Evaluation Tool for Child Outcomes & Program Improvement Terry Harrison, Part C Coordinator Susan Evans, Autism Project Specialist.

Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.

UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.

Child Outcomes: Understanding the Requirements in order to Set Targets Presentation to the Virginia Interagency Coordination Council Infant &

Module 5 Understanding the Age-Expected Child Development, Developmental Trajectories and Progress Every day, we are honored to take action that inspires.

Looking for Patterns in Child Outcome Data – Examples from NYS New York State Department of Health Bureau of Early Intervention.

Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,

1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.

What can we learn from 5+ years of ISTAR-KR? Michael Conn-Powers Early Childhood Center IIDC/Indiana University.

2012 OSEP Leadership Conference Leading Together to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education:

Measuring Child Outcomes Christina Kasprzak Robin Rooney (ECO) Early Childhood Outcomes (NECTAC) National Early Childhood TA Center Delaware COSF Training,

Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement Kansas Division for Early Childhood Annual Conference Feb. 23rd 2012.

Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.

Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.

Early Childhood Outcomes Center Orientation for New Outcomes Conference Participants Kathy Hebbeler Lynne Kahn The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center.

Critical Markers of High Quality Child Outcomes Data ECO Advisory Board March, 2012.

Summary Statements. The problem... Progress data included –5 progress categories –For each of 3 outcomes –Total of 15 numbers reported each year Too many.

Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.

Considerations Related to Setting Targets for Child Outcomes.

Parent and National TA Perspectives on EC Outcomes Connie Hawkins, Region 2 PTAC Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn ECO at FPG and NECTAC.

Update on the Online Conversion Process for AEPSi: Implications for OSEP Reporting.

Early Childhood Outcomes Workgroup Christina Kasprzak and Lynne Kahn ECO and NECTAC July 2009.

Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.

Child Outcomes Measurement Tools & Process A story of 3 conversions.

Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories Approaches for Converting Assessment Data to the OSEP Outcome Categories NECTAC.

Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI International AUCD Meeting Washington, DC

Review of Summary Statements for Target Setting on Indicators C3 and B7 Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 9,

Supporting Continuous Quality Improvement in Family Child Care: A Peer Learning Group Session 5: Improving Outcomes for Children in Family Child Care:

Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)

Update on the Online Conversion Process for AEPSi:

Update on the Online Conversion Process for CC.net and GOLD:

Webinar for the Massachusetts ICC Retreat October 3, 2012

Why Collect Outcome Data?

ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO

ECO Suggestions on Indicators C3 and B7 Kathy Hebbeler, ECO

Review of Summary Statements for Target Setting on Indicators C3 and B7 Lynne Kahn and Christina Kasprzak ECO/NECTAC June 9,

Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes

Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009

Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference August 2008

Presentation transcript:

1 Quality Assurance: The COS Ratings and the OSEP Reporting Categories Presented by The Early Childhood Outcomes Center Revised January 2013

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 2 FunctioningFunctioning

3 Entry

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 4 EntryExit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 5 EntryExit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 6 Key Point The OSEP categories describe types of progress children can make between entry and exit Two COS ratings (entry and exit) are needed to calculate what OSEP category describes a child progress

7 How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e e. % of children who maintain functioning at a level comparable to same-aged peers Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND Rated 6 or 7 at exit Early Childhood Outcomes Center

8 EntryExit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 9 EntryExit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 10 EntryExit

11 How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e d. % of children who improve functioning to reach a level comparable to same-aged peers Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated 6 or 7 at exit Early Childhood Outcomes Center

12 EntryExit

13 How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e c. % of children who improved functioning to a level nearer to same aged peers, but did not reach it Rated higher at exit than entry; AND Rated 5 or below at exit Early Childhood Outcomes Center

14 EntryExit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 15 EntryExit

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e b. % of children who improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to same aged peers Rated 5 or lower at entry; AND Rated the same or lower at exit; AND “Yes” on the progress question (b) 16 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e b. % of children who improved functioning, but not sufficient to move nearer to same aged peers OR Rated 6 or 7 at entry; AND Rated 5 or lower at exit; AND “Yes” on the progress question 17 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

18 EntryExit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 19 EntryExit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 20 EntryExit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 21 EntryExit

How changes in ratings on the COS correspond to reporting categories a - e a. % of children who did not improve functioning Rated lower at exit than entry; OR Rated 1 at both entry and exit; AND Scored “No” on the progress question (b) 22 Early Childhood Outcomes Center

23 EntryExit

Early Childhood Outcomes Center 24 EntryExit

25 Federal Reporting Categories: Activity COS Ratings to Progress Categories Early Childhood Outcomes Center

ECO Calculator

27 ECO Calculator (Tutor) Early Childhood Outcomes Center

The Early Childhood Outcomes Center 28 For more information….