05-0026 NDIA, Slide 1. 05-0026 NDIA, Slide 2 Outline Current M151/M423 Performance & Deficiencies APKWS Warhead & Fuze Development Program –Technology.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Systems Engineering From a Life Cycle Perspective John Groenenboom Director Engineering – Mesa Boeing Rotorcraft Dec 12, 2007.
Advertisements

Safer Clinical Systems About Safer Clinical Systems June 2011.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Integrating an EMS Framework into the Pollution Prevention Program at Tinker AFB 30th Environmental & Energy Symposium & Exhibition April 8, 2004 San Diego,
A History of the M72 LAW and Current Improvement Programs
Environment case Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009 Hellen Foster, Jarlath Molloy NATS, Imperial College London.
50 th Annual Fuze Conference 10 May 2006 Presented by: Mr. Rene C. Kiebler Deputy Project Manager for Combat Ammunition Systems ,
Small Diameter Bomb (SDB) Program Public Overview Briefing Current As of: 24 August 2001 Air Armament Center Lethal Strike JPO Eglin Air Force Base,
Lightweight Machine Gun and Ammunition: The “Clean Slate” Approach
OICW System Enhancements STO III.WP Specific Goal: Design, Build and Demonstrate Prototype Micro-Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) based Safe &
OJJDP Performance Measurement Training 1 Incorporating Performance Measurement in the Formula Grant RFP and Application Format Presenter: Pat Cervera,
United States Air Force
The 2006 Naval S&T Partnership Conference is presented by NDIA with technical support from ONR Naval EM Railgun Innovative Naval Prototype 3 August 2006.
Anthony Cannone Mechanical Engineer
AIM Background & Current Capabilities Brief to FRB Jake Aplanalp AIM/CPM Program Manager NAWCTSD Orlando November,
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Commercial Crew Initiative Overview and Status to the COMSTAC Philip McAlister NASA Exploration Systems Mission.
Page 1 of 5 Thermal power management TWG direction and plans ARIES Project Meeting 13 December 2007 M. S. Tillack, A. R. Raffray.
Pittsburgh, PA Software Engineering Institute Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh, PA Sponsored by the U.S. Department of Defense.
EMIS Chapter 6. EMIS Chapter 6 EMIS Chapter 6 Fig 6.2 shows where the SEMP fits into the earliest program stages. Fig 6.5 has an.
M I S S I O N The Army SBIR program is designed to provide small, high-tech businesses the opportunity to propose innovative research and development solutions.
The Software Product Life Cycle. Views of the Software Product Life Cycle  Management  Software engineering  Engineering design  Architectural design.
BD / Pre SalesPMO Analysis / Requirements DesignDevelopmentTest / UATDeployMaintain PHASES ERP (AX) Implementation Lifecycle Sales/BD AX Solution.
UNCLASSIFIED March 10, 2011 Rapid Acquisition OSD CAPE Cost Assessment and Program Evaluation.
AMRDEC Technology As It Pertains To the Global War on Terror 39th Annual Gun & Ammunition / Missiles & Rockets Conference & Exhibition Jason Gilliam US.
May 11, Ordnance and Tactical Systems Advanced Crew Served Weapon (ACSW) Matt Solverson - General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems Dave Steimke.
Safety, Reliability & Performance of the Ahead (ABM) Programmable Fuze System NDIA 39th Annual Gun & Ammunition Baltimore, MD Apr , 2004 Presented.
Guns and Ammunition Conference Low Cost Solutions for Modern Munitions
Results of NASA/DARPA Automatic Probe and Drogue Refueling Flight Test Keith Schweikhard NASA Dryden Flight Research Center
USCG 57mm / Mk 3 Gun Mount Test, Evaluation & Certification Program
1 Commercial Crew Program The Next Step in U.S. Space Transportation Brent W. Jett October 11, 2012 Commercial Crew Program - Same Crew…New Ride.
DEVELOPMENTAL TEST & EVALUATION DT&E – From Concept to Combat Integrated Test Process Darlene Mosser-Kerner Developmental Test & Evaluation OUSD(AT&L)/Systems.
Initiate Technology Development Finalize AoA Plan, AS, ICD, TDS, Develop CDD, and TEMP Initiate Milestone B Program Review Planning Process Initiate Acquisition.
1 CCOS Update November 3, 2006 PC Meeting Project Status –Completed Projects Results –On-Going Projects Status Plan for CCOS Final Phase –Guiding Principles.
May 11, Ordnance and Tactical Systems Advanced Crew Served Weapons (ACSW) 2004 Small Arms Symposium & Exhibition National Defense Industrial Association.
1 Pharmacy Re-Engineering (PRE) Project Overview April 24, 2007 Birmingham, AL Mike Mims Program Manager for Pharmacy Systems.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Update Steve Dierker Associate Laboratory Director for Light Sources NSLS-II Project Director Conventional Facilities.
AMC Committed To Excellence ALACV PROGRAM ALACV Airburst Demonstration Fuze For 40mm Cannon Caliber Ammunition Fred Herr US Army ARDEC Mark Tomes Alliant.
Presented To: Precision Strike Association Annual Programs Review Presented To: Precision Strike Association Annual Programs Review Presented By: LTC Bill.
KINETIC INITIATED CORE MUNITIONS (KICM™) 0.50 Caliber
Lecture 2.1b: DoD Acquisition Process (SEF Ch 2)
Insensitive Munitions S&T Roadmap Robert Maline
Planned ACQ101ACQ201 LOG101LOG201LOG304 On-line HybridClassroom Level I Level IILevel III LOG235 Acquisition Logistics Education Scheme.
Bridging the Gaps: Public Health and Radiation Emergency Preparedness Planning Guidance and Infrastructure Effects March 23, 2011.
S40mm APFSDS-T & HEAB-T Development 39th Gun and Ammunition Conference
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force As of: 02 Mar 051 Partnering with Industry on System Safety & MIL-STD-882D.
Technology Commercialization Technology Commercialization, 2011 Sanjay Dhole, Technology Programs Coordinator Maricopa SBDC.
Reproduction interdite © ALMA EUROPEAN CONSORTIUM Reproduction forbidden Design, Manufacture, Transport and Integration in Chile of ALMA Antennas Page.
May 11, Ordnance and Tactical Systems Advanced Crew Served Weapon (ACSW) Matt Solverson - General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems Dave Steimke.
October 15, 2007 Smart Card. Smart Travel. TransLink ® Card Procurement Study Update Presentation to the TransLink Operating Group.
ProjectImpactResourcesDeadlineResourcesDeadline Forecast Plan Time Resources Risk 001xx 002xx 003xx 004xx 005xx 006xx 007xx TotalXX Example 1: Portfolio.
Parks & Recreation Service Delivery Model Review Progress Report #1 City of Pitt Meadows Council January 19,
Section 4: Technical Approach Nancy gets up and introduces the overall technical approach –ISD process across the top –Technical approach process/ procedures.
18 March 2004 / Rev. 01 Cyber Blue – Team 234 Perry Meridian High School Indianapolis, IN Design Review Process Documentation This document is intended.
Baseline The baseline at July Previously there was a lack of consistency for: Pathways into specialist clinics; Policies, procedures and guidelines.
VA Internal Use Only 1 Product Architecture Recommendation Briefing Template.
Supportability Design Considerations
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
Kuali Coeus & PI Portal (START myResearch) Overview & PI Portal Demo
PF-0009a.
Status of the Planning Working Group’s (PWG) Efforts
Acquisition Sustainment Tool Kit (ASTK
Phase 3 Tollgate Review Discussion Template
Request for Proposal (RFP)
TORFQ ACTIONS TO BE RELEASED
Agenda Overview Tactical Employment ATK 25mm Barrett HEDP System
Iowa College Aid Processing System (ICAPS)
PDO Safety Leadership for Front Line Supervisors 2017
Proposed Strategic Planning Process for FY 2013/14 thru FY 2015/16
SCOTT NO meeting Measurement
CTOC TTM Team Annual Plan
Presentation transcript:

NDIA, Slide 1

NDIA, Slide 2 Outline Current M151/M423 Performance & Deficiencies APKWS Warhead & Fuze Development Program –Technology Objectives –Key Performance Parameters –Target Set –Exit Criteria Risk Reduction Activities Summary Current M151/M423 Performance & Deficiencies APKWS Warhead & Fuze Development Program –Technology Objectives –Key Performance Parameters –Target Set –Exit Criteria Risk Reduction Activities Summary

NDIA, Slide 3 M151 Warhead / M423 Fuze Characteristics Insensitive Munitions (IM) Performance –Bullet Impact: Deflagration –Fragment Impact: Detonation –Slow Cook Off: Detonation –Fast Cook Off: Detonation Naturally Fragmenting Case –Produces ~7500 fragments –Majority of Fragments are 0-1 grain –Limited Fragment Distribution Pattern Limited Target Set M423 Fuze –Single Safety (non MIL-STD-1316 Compliant) –Single Mode (Point Detonating) Insensitive Munitions (IM) Performance –Bullet Impact: Deflagration –Fragment Impact: Detonation –Slow Cook Off: Detonation –Fast Cook Off: Detonation Naturally Fragmenting Case –Produces ~7500 fragments –Majority of Fragments are 0-1 grain –Limited Fragment Distribution Pattern Limited Target Set M423 Fuze –Single Safety (non MIL-STD-1316 Compliant) –Single Mode (Point Detonating)

NDIA, Slide 4 APKWS Block II Program Overview System Input Contract Awards (2) Design Maturation & Demo Integrate Warhead & Fuze Perform IM Screening Perform Preliminary Environmental Tests Perform Dynamic Demonstration Proof of Concept Testing of Warhead Concept(s) Testing of Fuze Concept(s) Critical Design Review Requirements & Design Define and Prioritize Targets Contractors Demonstrate an Understanding of Requirements Preliminary Design Review FY05 : Phase III FY04 : Phase II FY04 : Phase I Government Screening Tests to Focus Research Fuze Input Fuze Input FY04 Exit Criteria Exit Criteria Warhead Input Follows Successful LCPK ATD Model for Transitioning Technology Multiple Contracts Must Meet Exit Criteria at End of Each Phase Follows Successful LCPK ATD Model for Transitioning Technology Multiple Contracts Must Meet Exit Criteria at End of Each Phase

NDIA, Slide 5 Proposed APKWS Block II Objectives Main Focus: Insensitive Munition Compliance  Improved MIL-STD-1316 Compliant Fuze  Improved Warhead and Fuze Performance Program Ends in FY05 with TRL 6 Prototype Designs and Supporting Test Data Low Risk Transition to APKWS Block II SDD Main Focus: Insensitive Munition Compliance  Improved MIL-STD-1316 Compliant Fuze  Improved Warhead and Fuze Performance Program Ends in FY05 with TRL 6 Prototype Designs and Supporting Test Data Low Risk Transition to APKWS Block II SDD Integrate Technologies to Replace the Current M151 and M423

NDIA, Slide 6 Expanded Target Set Truck MANPADS MOUT / N on -H ardened F ield S tructures IFV

NDIA, Slide 7 APKWS Key Performance Parameters Geometry Insensitive Munitions Lethality Cost –Initial Warhead ICD to Be Maintained as M151 –Weight and CG Limits Are TBD by AMRDEC  Wind Tunnel Tests to Determine Growth Options –Initial Warhead ICD to Be Maintained as M151 –Weight and CG Limits Are TBD by AMRDEC  Wind Tunnel Tests to Determine Growth Options –MIL-STD-2105B  Bullet Impact  Fragment Impact  FCO (Fast Cook-Off)  SCO (Slow Cook Off) –MIL-STD-2105B  Bullet Impact  Fragment Impact  FCO (Fast Cook-Off)  SCO (Slow Cook Off) –MANPADS –BMP-2 IFV –Trucks –MOUT  E&T Bunker  Brick over Block –MANPADS –BMP-2 IFV –Trucks –MOUT  E&T Bunker  Brick over Block –MIL-STD-1316 Compliant –Multi-mode –MIL-STD-1316 Compliant –Multi-mode –Warhead and Fuze DTUPC Less Than $1,500 –Lower Is Better –Warhead and Fuze DTUPC Less Than $1,500 –Lower Is Better Fuze

NDIA, Slide 8 Contractor Teams Warhead and Fuze Development Warhead Development Fuze Development

NDIA, Slide 9 Exit Criteria 1.Insensitive Munitions (IM) Compliance 2.MIL-STD-1316 Fuze Safety Compliance 3.Lethality Considerations 4.Length, Weight, and CG Requirements 5.Compatible with Current Rocket & Launcher Interface Must Support Guided and Unguided Configurations Assumes a Front Mounted Warhead on Guided Round 6.AUPC under $ Low Technical Risk 1.Insensitive Munitions (IM) Compliance 2.MIL-STD-1316 Fuze Safety Compliance 3.Lethality Considerations 4.Length, Weight, and CG Requirements 5.Compatible with Current Rocket & Launcher Interface Must Support Guided and Unguided Configurations Assumes a Front Mounted Warhead on Guided Round 6.AUPC under $ Low Technical Risk

NDIA, Slide 10 APKWS Block II Inch-stones Contract Award, Mar 2004 AFSRB Preliminary Review, Jun 2004 PDR/Completion of Phase I, Jun 2004 In-Process Review (IPR) #1, Oct 2005 IM Board Review, Sept 2004 AFSRB Status Review, Dec 2004 CDR/Completion of Phase II, Feb & Apr 2005 Contract Award, Mar 2004 AFSRB Preliminary Review, Jun 2004 PDR/Completion of Phase I, Jun 2004 In-Process Review (IPR) #1, Oct 2005 IM Board Review, Sept 2004 AFSRB Status Review, Dec 2004 CDR/Completion of Phase II, Feb & Apr 2005

NDIA, Slide 11 APKWS Block II Warhead Test Efforts Insensitive Munitions Bullet Impact Fragment Impact Fast Cook Off Slow Cook Off Performance Tests Arena Water Capture Penetration Tests Earth & Timber Bunker Brick Over Block Insensitive Munitions Bullet Impact Fragment Impact Fast Cook Off Slow Cook Off Performance Tests Arena Water Capture Penetration Tests Earth & Timber Bunker Brick Over Block

NDIA, Slide 12 APKWS Block II Fuze Test Efforts Explosive Train Reliability/Component Output Out-of-Line Safety Progressive Arm Subverted Safety (Jolt, Jumble 1.5 m drop) Performance –1 st & 2 nd Safety Features –Target Detection Limited Environmental Target Detection Sensor and Warhead Integration Explosive Train Reliability/Component Output Out-of-Line Safety Progressive Arm Subverted Safety (Jolt, Jumble 1.5 m drop) Performance –1 st & 2 nd Safety Features –Target Detection Limited Environmental Target Detection Sensor and Warhead Integration

NDIA, Slide 13 APKWS Warhead / Fuze Program Summary Design for IM Enhanced Fragmentation Enhanced Blast Dual Safe, Multi-mode Fuze Design for IM Enhanced Fragmentation Enhanced Blast Dual Safe, Multi-mode Fuze APKWS Block II Warhead and Fuze Program Will Provide the Capability to Defeat the Current and Evolving Threat Next Step: