Crop Insurance and Processing Vegetables: Farmer Practices and Net Returns Paul D. Mitchell Ag and Applied Economics, UW-Madison

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Changes to Crop Insurance Joe Outlaw Professor and Extension Economist Co-Director, AFPC Texas A&M University November 10, 2014 A major portion of this.
Advertisements

2014 FARM BILL: COMMODITY PROGRAMS Jody Campiche Assistant Professor & Extension Economist Oklahoma State University.
Crop Insurance and Corn: Helpful Hints to Make More Money and GRP in Juneau, Adams, and Marquette Counties Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics.
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products Lesson Overview In this lesson, we will learn about: – Wyoming acres of annually-planted crops, and.
New Disaster Assistance Programs in the 2008 Farm Bill: Focus on SURE Rod M. Rejesus Assistant Professor and Extension Specialist Dept. of Ag. and Resource.
Wesley N. Musser Farm Management Specialist Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Maryland.
DISCLAIMER The purpose of the following material is to promote the awareness of risk management concepts and to highlight USDA’s risk management products,
Crop Insurance Update for Baltimore County Wesley N. Musser Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Maryland.
MARYLAND VEGETABLE CROP INSURANCE UPDATE Wesley N. Musser Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Maryland.
Choosing Crop Insurance for 2004 William Edwards Iowa State University.
Choosing Crop Insurance for 2012 William Edwards, ISU Extension Economist.
Lunch and Learn February 10, 2004 Crop Insurance Update George Patrick.
Cash Rental Rates and Land Values Where from Here? Craig Chase, Field Specialist Farm & Ag Business Management.
AN OVERVIEW OF FEDERAL CROP INSURANCE IN WISCONSIN PAUL D. MITCHELL AGRICULTURAL AND APPLIED ECONOMICS UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-EXTENSION.
Economic Impacts of Specialty Crops in Wisconsin Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Central Wisconsin Processing Crops March 9, 2011.
Federal Crop Insurance Programs: Historic Performance, Contemporary Issues prepared by: Gary Schnitkey, Bruce Sherrick, Bob Hauser, Paul Ellinger Agricultural.
Corn Seeding Densities and Transgenic Traits: Economics and Farmer Behavior Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Wisconsin Crop Management.
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products Lesson Overview In this lesson, we will learn about: – Wyoming acres of annually-planted crops, and.
The New Economics of Crop Production in Wisconsin: Crop Consultants’ Perspective Paul D. Mitchell Assistant Professor Agricultural and Applied Economics.
Insuring Forage Crops for SURE Eligibility and for Winter Cover Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison (608)
University Extension/Department of Economics COMBO: Crop Insurance for 2011 Crop Advantage Series Jan Farm Management Extension Staff.
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products Lesson Overview In this lesson, we will learn about: – Wyoming acres of annually-planted crops and.
C ROP I NSURANCE U PDATES FOR 2013 Paul D. Mitchell Associate Professor of Agricultural & Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison January 18,
2012 Crop Insurance Update Overview Feb. 21, 2012 George Patrick Purdue University For specific information, contact a crop insurance agent.
Integrating ACRE, SURE, and Crop Insurance: Producer Strategies for 2010 Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Group Risk Plan.  Departure from traditional approaches Insure county yields  Requires less paperwork  Cost may be less than basic APH.
Economic Analysis of Supplemental Deductible Coverage as Recommended in the USDA’s 2007 Farm Bill Paul D. Mitchell University of Wisconsin-Madison Thomas.
By: Cody Darius Shay Alix Carmen Revenue Protection.
The “New” Economics of Crop Production in 2008 Paul D. Mitchell Assistant Professor Agricultural and Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison.
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products Lesson Overview In this lesson, we will learn about: – Wyoming acres of annually-planted crops, and.
Risk Management Programs in the 2008 Farm Bill William Edwards, Extension Economist.
Choosing Crop Insurance for 2010 William Edwards, ISU Extension Economist.
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products Lesson Overview In this lesson, we will learn about: – Wyoming acres of annually-planted crops, and.
January 2010 Steven D. Johnson Farm & Ag Business Management Specialist (515)
University Extension/Department of Economics Crop Insurance for Organic Producers: The Latest Update 10 th Annual Iowa Organic Conference Ames, Iowa Nov.
Crop Insurance Update November 2, 2007 Team Grain Friday WiscLine Teleconference Paul D. Mitchell Ag and Applied Econ, UW-Madison ,
Value of AGR-Lite for WI Vegetable Growers UW Extension & WPVGA Grower Conference February 7, 2007 Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural.
1 Getting a Grip on GRIP Gary Schnitkey Agricultural Economist University of Illinois.
G RAIN M ARKETS AND C OST OF P RODUCTION Paul D. Mitchell Associate Professor of Agricultural & Applied Economics University of Wisconsin-Madison
Stacks of Bills vs. Stacks of Genes: The Economics of Planting Transgenic Seeds February 23, 2007 Paul D. Mitchell UW-Madison Ag & Applied Economics Office:
Department of Economics SURE Farm Program North Central Iowa Crop & Land Stewardship Clinic Iowa Falls, Iowa December 30, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain.
ACRE and SURE and an Update on the New Crop Insurance Rules Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January.
Department of Economics Where are we with today’s economics and crop insurance? Chad Hart Fall Agronomy In-Service.
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Crop Insurance 2013 National Agricultural Credit Conference San Diego, California Apr. 17, 2013 Chad Hart.
Effects of Crop Insurance and Government Payments on Annual Financial Risk Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
Areawide Suppression of European Corn Borer with Bt Corn Reaps Benefits for Non- Bt Growers Paul D. Mitchell Ag & Applied Economics, UW-Madison Central.
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products Lesson Overview In this lesson, we will learn about: – Wyoming acres of annually-planted crops, and.
Understanding Farm Programs Crop Insurance, ACRE and SURE: Changes and Hints for 2009 Paul D. Mitchell Agricultural and Applied Economics University of.
Econ 339X, Spring 2010 ECON 339X: Agricultural Marketing Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
This institution is an equal opportunity provider. Crop Insurance for 2016 Corn & Soybeans Using 2016 Projected Prices.
RISK MANAGEMENT CROP INSURANCE Submitted by Darrell Boatright Modified by Georgia Agriculture Education Curriculum Office June 2007.
Federal Crop Insurance and Disaster Programs
Grain Markets and Cost of Production
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products
Crop Insurance Decisions and the new Farm Bill
Update on Risk Management and Processing Crops
The Supplemental Coverage Option (SCO)
Production Risk Management: Running With The Bulls
Crop Insurance for Onion Producers
RMA Crop Production and Revenue Insurance Products
Location Biochemistry 1125
Center for Agricultural and Rural Development
Drought, Politics and Risk Management Strategies
COMBO: Crop Insurance for 2011
Improved Farm Financial Safety Net based on Revenue Insurance
Associate Professor/Crop Markets Specialist
Crop Insurance Options for 2011
Crop Insurance (Guest Lecture)
Crop Insurance in 2011 AgriGold Seeds Meeting Ames, Iowa July 22, 2011
Federal Crop Insurance and Disaster Programs
Presentation transcript:

Crop Insurance and Processing Vegetables: Farmer Practices and Net Returns Paul D. Mitchell Ag and Applied Economics, UW-Madison Central WI Processing Crops Meeting Hancock, WIMarch 14, 2007, Extension Web Page:

Goal Today Use easily available USDA-RMA data for processing crops to examine Use easily available USDA-RMA data for processing crops to examine Farmer Practices with crop insurance Farmer Practices with crop insurance Performance in terms of Net Returns Performance in terms of Net Returns Make basic recommendations regarding using crop insurance for processing corps Make basic recommendations regarding using crop insurance for processing corps

Crop Insurance in WI USDA’s Risk Management Agency (RMA) manages federal crop insurance program USDA’s Risk Management Agency (RMA) manages federal crop insurance program RMA “endorses” policies: makes subsidies available for companies and farmers RMA “endorses” policies: makes subsidies available for companies and farmers Without RMA endorsement/subsidy, few crop insurance policies would be available Without RMA endorsement/subsidy, few crop insurance policies would be available Every company sells the same federal crop insurance policies for the same price Every company sells the same federal crop insurance policies for the same price What crops are insurable in WI? What crops are insurable in WI?

CropPolicyCropPolicy ApplesGYC Green Peas GYC BarleyAPHPotatoesGYC CabbageGYC Snap Beans GYC CranberriesAPH Sweet Corn APH, GRP, GRIP Corn APH, CRC, GRP, GRIP Hybrid Seed Corn GRP, GRIP, Dollar Plan Nursery Dollar Plan OatsAPH Dry Beans APHMintAPH Forage Production APH, GRP Soybeans APH, CRC, GRP, GRIP Forage Seeding Dollar Plan Tobacco Guaranteed Production Sorghum APH, CRC Wheat APH CRC

How GYC Crop Insurance Works GYC (Grower Yield Coverage) = basically same as APH, but for vegetable crops GYC (Grower Yield Coverage) = basically same as APH, but for vegetable crops Choose % of your average yield (based on your yield history) as your guarantee Choose % of your average yield (based on your yield history) as your guarantee If your harvested yield falls below your guarantee, trigger a payment If your harvested yield falls below your guarantee, trigger a payment Many Rules: varieties, planting dates, unit structure, double cropping, etc. Many Rules: varieties, planting dates, unit structure, double cropping, etc. Not covered today Not covered today

GYC/APH Prices this year Corn APH: $3.50/bu Corn APH: $3.50/bu Soybeans APH: $7.00/bu Soybeans APH: $7.00/bu Sweet Corn APH: $60.00/ton Sweet Corn APH: $60.00/ton Potatoes GYC: $5.95/cwt Potatoes GYC: $5.95/cwt Snap Beans GYC: $85.00 Snap Beans GYC: $85.00 Green Peas GYC: Contract Price Green Peas GYC: Contract Price What’s the Participation Rate? What’s the Participation Rate?

Participation Rate For processing crops, general upward trend in insured acres For processing crops, general upward trend in insured acres Now around 60%, comparable to field corn Now around 60%, comparable to field corn Exception: sweet corn much flatter, lags general trend: 40-50% participation Exception: sweet corn much flatter, lags general trend: 40-50% participation Main Point: Lots of farmers are buying insurance for their processing crops, and more and more are doing so Main Point: Lots of farmers are buying insurance for their processing crops, and more and more are doing so How are they using it? (their practices=?) How are they using it? (their practices=?) How does it affect their Net Returns? How does it affect their Net Returns?

RMA Data “Summary of Business” on line summary of each insurance program/policy by crop and state for each year “Summary of Business” on line summary of each insurance program/policy by crop and state for each year Policies sold, acres, units, liabilities, total premium, subsidy, indemnities, loss ratio Policies sold, acres, units, liabilities, total premium, subsidy, indemnities, loss ratio Use these data for (7 years) to describe insurance practices and experience Use these data for (7 years) to describe insurance practices and experience

Cat vs. Buy Up Coverage RMA sells Catastrophic (Cat) coverage for $100/crop/county (Basically Free!) RMA sells Catastrophic (Cat) coverage for $100/crop/county (Basically Free!) Yield guarantee is 50% of your average, price is 55% of max price election Yield guarantee is 50% of your average, price is 55% of max price election Buy Up: higher % of average yield (50%- 75%, even up to 85%) and higher price election (up to 100% of max) Buy Up: higher % of average yield (50%- 75%, even up to 85%) and higher price election (up to 100% of max) Buy Up more popular, more expensive Buy Up more popular, more expensive Cat very cheap, less popular Cat very cheap, less popular

Average Buy Up over Crop Acres Acres % Acres % Policies Green Peas 16,35085%89% Potatoes20,95857%55% Snap Beans 23,30262%71% Sweet Corn 19,79657%74%

Buy Up Coverage in 2006 Crop Acres Acres % Acres % Policies Green Peas 16,45388%96% Potatoes29,18469%66% Snap Beans 31,51571%80% Sweet Corn 25,43571%81%

Summary Buy Up vs. Cat Most farmers use Buy Up coverage Most farmers use Buy Up coverage Use of Buy Up coverage is increasing Use of Buy Up coverage is increasing % Acres vs % Policies shows more smaller farmers use Buy Up, but not by much % Acres vs % Policies shows more smaller farmers use Buy Up, but not by much Exception: Potatoes is reverse Exception: Potatoes is reverse Green Peas almost all Buy up Green Peas almost all Buy up 96% policies in % policies in 2006 Potatoes lowest use of Buy Up Potatoes lowest use of Buy Up 66% policies in % policies in 2006

Unit Structure Must define the insured unit of land Must define the insured unit of land Yield guarantee is at the unit level Yield guarantee is at the unit level Yield from the whole unit must fall below your guarantee to trigger an indemnity Yield from the whole unit must fall below your guarantee to trigger an indemnity Basic Unit: all acres of crop in one unit Basic Unit: all acres of crop in one unit Optional Unit: break basic unit into smaller fields, following RMA rules Optional Unit: break basic unit into smaller fields, following RMA rules Use as many Optional Units as possible Use as many Optional Units as possible

Unit Structure Summary Most farmers using Optional Units Most farmers using Optional Units Unit Structure fairly constant last 7 years, slight upward trend Unit Structure fairly constant last 7 years, slight upward trend Exception: Potatoes went from 2 to 5 units per policy Exception: Potatoes went from 2 to 5 units per policy Crop Average # Units/Policy Green Peas 1.40 Potatoes3.97 Snap Beans 2.03 Sweet Corn 1.76

Summary of Farmer Practices Most farmers use crop insurance for their processing vegetables and more are doing so Most farmers use crop insurance for their processing vegetables and more are doing so Most use Buy Up coverage or are switching from Cat to Buy Up coverage Most use Buy Up coverage or are switching from Cat to Buy Up coverage Many farmers use Optional Units, especially for potatoes (snap beans to some extent) Many farmers use Optional Units, especially for potatoes (snap beans to some extent) Most farmers keeping constant unit structure (not switching), except for potatoes Most farmers keeping constant unit structure (not switching), except for potatoes Practices for potatoes are in transition Practices for potatoes are in transition

Double Cropping RMA has a standing policy not to insure second crop in a double crop rotation RMA has a standing policy not to insure second crop in a double crop rotation Corn planted following an early hay cutting is not insurable Corn planted following an early hay cutting is not insurable Soybeans following early peas or snap beans are not insurable Soybeans following early peas or snap beans are not insurable Does this double crop restriction limit buying crop insurance for processing crops? Does this double crop restriction limit buying crop insurance for processing crops? You tell me! You tell me!

What about Net Returns? How does crop insurance affect expected net returns? How does crop insurance affect expected net returns? Examine expected net returns effects using Loss Ratios derived from RMA data Examine expected net returns effects using Loss Ratios derived from RMA data Loss Ratio = Indemnities/Premium Loss Ratio = Indemnities/Premium The issue is what premium to use: total premium or farmer portion? The issue is what premium to use: total premium or farmer portion? RMA cares about program loss ratio, farmers care about farmer loss ratio RMA cares about program loss ratio, farmers care about farmer loss ratio

Loss Ratio Simple way to see how the insurance affects farmer net returns Simple way to see how the insurance affects farmer net returns Do farmers on average make or lose money with the crops insurance? Do farmers on average make or lose money with the crops insurance? Jumps around between years: high in bad years, low in good years Jumps around between years: high in bad years, low in good years Note: RMA subsidizes premiums and program loss ratio includes that subsidy as part of the total premium collected Note: RMA subsidizes premiums and program loss ratio includes that subsidy as part of the total premium collected

Program Loss Ratio Loss Ratio = Indemnities/Total Premium Loss Ratio = Indemnities/Total Premium Loss Ratio > 1 means paid more indemnities than premiums received (program on average losing money) Loss Ratio > 1 means paid more indemnities than premiums received (program on average losing money) Loss Ratio < 1 means received more premiums than indemnities paid (program on average making money) Loss Ratio < 1 means received more premiums than indemnities paid (program on average making money) RMA goal to get a long term program loss ratio that is around 1.0 RMA goal to get a long term program loss ratio that is around 1.0

Average Program Loss Ratios Crop Average Loss Ratio Green Peas 0.48 Potatoes0.47 Snap Beans 0.49 Sweet Corn 0.40 Corn0.87 Soybeans1.49 Wheat0.57

Program Loss Ratio Summary Over the last 7 years Over the last 7 years Grain crops had higher loss ratios than processing vegetables (closer to 1.0) Grain crops had higher loss ratios than processing vegetables (closer to 1.0) Processing Vegetables Processing Vegetables On average, about twice as much total premium collected as indemnities paid On average, about twice as much total premium collected as indemnities paid Upward trend (it’s getting better) Upward trend (it’s getting better) RMA has room for improvement to get 1.0 RMA has room for improvement to get 1.0

Buy Up Program Loss Ratios Higher on average than total program loss ratio (better for farmers) Higher on average than total program loss ratio (better for farmers) RMA has internal premiums for Cat too low RMA has internal premiums for Cat too low RMA has better (relatively lower) premiums for higher coverage levels RMA has better (relatively lower) premiums for higher coverage levels Flat trend for Green Peas, Snap Beans, and Sweet Corn ( ) Flat trend for Green Peas, Snap Beans, and Sweet Corn ( ) What’s going on with Potatoes? What’s going on with Potatoes? String of better and better years? String of better and better years? Farmers with better land buying insurance? Farmers with better land buying insurance? Premiums increasing? Premiums increasing?

Farmer Loss Ratio Farmers do not pay all the premium Farmers do not pay all the premium Farmer Loss Ratio = Farmer Loss Ratio = Indemnities/Farmer Premiums Loss Ratio > 1 means farmers paid more indemnities than premiums received (farmers on average making money) Loss Ratio > 1 means farmers paid more indemnities than premiums received (farmers on average making money) Loss Ratio < 1 means farmers received more premiums than indemnities paid (farmers on average losing money) Loss Ratio < 1 means farmers received more premiums than indemnities paid (farmers on average losing money) Buy Up only, no farmer premium for Cat Buy Up only, no farmer premium for Cat

Average Farmer Loss Ratio (Buy Up) Crop Average Loss Ratio Green Peas 1.70 Potatoes2.72 Snap Beans 1.81 Sweet Corn 1.53

Summary Farmer Loss Ratio On average across WI over the last 7 years, farmers made money with crop insurance for processing vegetables with buy up coverage On average across WI over the last 7 years, farmers made money with crop insurance for processing vegetables with buy up coverage For every $1 paid in premium, they received $1.53 to $1.81 in indemnities For every $1 paid in premium, they received $1.53 to $1.81 in indemnities Explains increased participation rates Explains increased participation rates What’s going on with Potatoes? What’s going on with Potatoes? String of better and better years? String of better and better years? Farmers with better land buying insurance? Farmers with better land buying insurance? Premiums increasing? Premiums increasing?

Note: It’s a 7-Year State Average, Not a Guarantee This loss ratio analysis is the average for all policies in Wisconsin by crop This loss ratio analysis is the average for all policies in Wisconsin by crop Some years it will be higher, some years lower, this the 7-year average Some years it will be higher, some years lower, this the 7-year average Some counties have low loss ratios and some counties have high loss ratios Some counties have low loss ratios and some counties have high loss ratios Data by county exist, but it’s a big file Data by county exist, but it’s a big file Some farmers have low loss ratios, some have high ones—each farmer is different Some farmers have low loss ratios, some have high ones—each farmer is different

Probability of Receiving Indemnities Can use the RMA data to find out how many policies and how many units received indemnities Can use the RMA data to find out how many policies and how many units received indemnities Rough empirical estimate of the probability of receiving an indemnity Rough empirical estimate of the probability of receiving an indemnity Can examine by Buy Up vs. Cat coverage Can examine by Buy Up vs. Cat coverage Again, it will be a state wide estimate Again, it will be a state wide estimate

Probability Pay Indemnity % Policies Pay Crop Buy Up Cat Green Peas 27%3% Potatoes37%5% Snap Beans 33%11% Sweet Corn 18%3%

Summary of Probabilities No real trend for crops No real trend for crops Potato buy up has a downward trend Potato buy up has a downward trend Cat policies rarely pay: 3-5% (< 1 in 20) Cat policies rarely pay: 3-5% (< 1 in 20) Snap Beans = 11% (over 1 in 10) Snap Beans = 11% (over 1 in 10) Buy Up policies pay 27%-37% Buy Up policies pay 27%-37% Roughly range between 1 in 4 to 1 in 3 Sweet Corn = 18% (less then 1 in 5) Sweet Corn = 18% (less then 1 in 5)

Summary of Net Returns Effects Program loss ratios too low in WI for processing crops (premiums too high) Program loss ratios too low in WI for processing crops (premiums too high) Only 7 years, will be awhile before RMA acts Only 7 years, will be awhile before RMA acts Farmer loss ratios over 1.0, so farmers on average making money with the insurance Farmer loss ratios over 1.0, so farmers on average making money with the insurance For every $1 paid in premium, they received $1.53 to $1.81 in indemnities For every $1 paid in premium, they received $1.53 to $1.81 in indemnities Potatoes are in transition or strange history Potatoes are in transition or strange history In any given year, 20% to 35% of Buy Up policies pay, 5-10% Cat policies pay In any given year, 20% to 35% of Buy Up policies pay, 5-10% Cat policies pay

Conclusions: GYC (APH) Crop Insurance for Vegetables Crop insurance, especially Buy Up coverage, likely valuable for many/most WI processing vegetable farmers Crop insurance, especially Buy Up coverage, likely valuable for many/most WI processing vegetable farmers Consider at least Cat: $100/crop/county Consider at least Cat: $100/crop/county Use as many Optional units as possible Use as many Optional units as possible Insurance has risk management benefits, not just increase average net returns, also reduces returns variability with yield floor Insurance has risk management benefits, not just increase average net returns, also reduces returns variability with yield floor March 15 th final day to purchase crop insurance March 15 th final day to purchase crop insurance

Sweet Corn and GRP and GRIP Can buy Corn GRP and GRIP for sweet corn acres in WI Can buy Corn GRP and GRIP for sweet corn acres in WI No comparable option for other crops No comparable option for other crops No Soybean GRP/GRIP for green peas or snap beans No Soybean GRP/GRIP for green peas or snap beans New county by county analysis of corn GRP for WI: few hard copies, plus web New county by county analysis of corn GRP for WI: few hard copies, plus webwww.aae.wisc.edu/mitchell/extension.htm

Is GRP a Good Deal? Color maps of expected net returns as bu/ac (multiply by RMA price) Color maps of expected net returns as bu/ac (multiply by RMA price) Green is positive average net return Green is positive average net return Red negative average net return Red negative average net return Actual bu/ac numbers on my web page Actual bu/ac numbers on my web page Again, no risk management benefit included in the analysis Again, no risk management benefit included in the analysis Remember: March 15 th final day to purchase crop insurance Remember: March 15 th final day to purchase crop insurance

Expected Returns (bu/ac) to GRP Harvested Acres Option Corn

Expected Returns (bu/ac) to GRP Planted Acres Option Corn

Expected Returns (bu/ac) to GRP for Soybeans

Questions? Paul D. Mitchell UW-Madison Ag & Applied Economics Office: (608) Cell: (608) Extension Web Page: