Revision of Problem Drug Use indicator Danica Klempová and Julián Vicente 42nd Reitox HFP meeting, 27 May 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT DATA INDICATORS IN THE UNODC DATA COLLECTION SYSTEM.
Advertisements

Post Research Benefits Mandika Wijeyaratne MS, MD, FRCS Dept. of Surgery, Colombo.
REPORT Full report Executive summary Methodology STATISTICAL ANNEX Seizures Drug use Prices Illicit laboratories.
The PV Policy Group Project FIRST THEMATIC WORKING GROUP MEETING Friday 07 October 2005 in Catania, Italy Presentation Markus Kurdziel & Corinna Klessmann.
Overview of the 2011 Work Programme Paul Griffiths Scientific committee meeting, Lisbon, November 2010.
ISIC and CPC Maintenance and Revision Policies Expert Group Meeting May 18-20, 2011.
BUILDING PARTNERSHIPS FOR ENERGY SECURITY
Quality Improvement/ Quality Assurance Amelia Broussard, PhD, RN, MPH Christopher Gibbs, JD, MPH.
Monitoring drug related overdose and mortality in Europe Dr. Eva Keller.
Overview of the 2010 work programme Paul Griffiths, Roland Simon, Rosemary de Sousa Scientific Committee meeting, Lisbon, November 2009.
Strenghtening collaboration with Serbia - IPA4 Project expected outcomes Frédéric Denecker, Programme Management Officer Reitox and International Cooperation.
Splinter Meeting of Project Leaders in International Education Efforts on Environmental Science Vienna, April 6 th.
ARQ part II data management Training pack 1: Content and conceptual issues.
Estimation of the Prevalence of Problem Drug Use in Lithuania Dr Gordon Hay Centre for Drug Misuse Research University of Glasgow, United Kingdom.
Treatment system-based data collection: an integrated approach to monitoring Expert meeting: Implementation of the treatment strategy EMCDDA Lisbon,
Sharing Session- 17 th Annual International Conference on the Reduction of Drug-Related Harm NIGERIA CANADAPAKISTANBRAZIL.
Annual report 2010: the state of the drugs problem in Europe.
Annual report 2009: the state of the drugs problem in Europe International Conference: New trends in drug use: facts and solutions, Parliament of the Republic.
“Problem, intensive drug use and polydrug use” Introduction Danica Klempova, Scientific Committee meeting, Lisbon, 17 November.
SWWT Topical Groups. TOR Open to all SWWT members Maintain regular discussion Responsible for –initiating thematic projects –Discussing progress/advances.
Second expert group meeting on Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Cohesion Policy
Improving international comparability of health expectancy indicators Task Force on Health Expectancies, European Commission, Luxembourg, 2 June 2008.
Benoît ESNAULT Commission de Régulation de l’Energie 17th Madrid Forum Madrid, 15 January year network development plan ERGEG recommendations.
ELDD Reflection – past, present and future 29th Meeting of the Scientific Committee, 18 Nov 2008.
Information on NECD and Gothenburg Protocol revisions Eduard Dame DG Environment European Commission Energy & Environment.
Linda Montanari, Buenos Aires, October 2003 CICAD/OAS, Demand Reduction Experts Group Meeting The Information System on Treatment Demand in EU EMCDDA.
EMCDDA Work Programme Key Issue 1: Key Indicators 30th Meeting of Scientific Committee J Vicente (together with D Olszewski, D Klempova, L Montanari,
1 Joint Research Centre (JRC) Annual Meeting of the EGTC Platform The EGTC-ready to use - Beyond cohesion policy Ulla Engelmann Interinstitutional and.
Gerhard Bühringer, Monika Sassen Institut für Klinische Psychologie und Psychotherapie Institut für Therapieforschung, München EMCDDA work and scientific.
Overview of EMCDDA’s 2009 Scientific Work Programme Paul Griffiths, Roland Simon - REITOX Meeting, Lisbon, November 2007.
Stretching the limits – Keeping the principles High Level Forum on Official Statistics NY, 27 February 2012 Heli Jeskanen-Sundström Director General.
NCP training session 30 October 2002 Integrated information system on RTD in Europe Gwenda Jeffreys-Jones, DG RTD European Commission.
Linking Data with Action Part 1: Seven Steps of Using Information for Decision Making.
Regular and intensive use of cannabis and related problems: Some results from literature and from the 2002 REITOX reports (CT P1) Roland Simon.
BEST PRACTICE PORTAL BEST PRACTICE PORTAL project presentation to the Scientific Committee Ferri et al Lisbon, 16th July 2010.
19 – 20 October 2009 Crime data availability Money-laundering Cynthia Tavares Task Force meeting Luxembourg, 19 – 20 October 2009.
EMCDDA 2009 Conference Update Maria Moreira, November 2008.
Draft fiche on delegated act on the European code of conduct on partnership (ECCP) Structured Dialogue Brussels, 19 September
Mexico’s Experience Monitoring Millennium Development Goals New York, 17 th December, 2013 Enrique Ordaz INEGI 1 Open Working Group.
Launch of the INCB Annual Reports March 2016.
Eurostat I) Context & objectives of KIP INCA project Project owner is the Environment Knowledge Community (EKC) EKC is an EU inter-services group involving.
Overview of the cannabis use in Europe Paul Griffiths, Reitox academy, Berlin, 29th March 2007.
Industrial & ACC participation in NMP Stage IPs DG RTD/G-1/IA NCP Meeting - Ad Hoc group’s results Slide 1 Results of the AD HOC Group.
Strategy The overall goal of the 2016 – 2018 strategy is to ensure that the association focuses on activities that give added value to the.
Maria João Valente Rosa
Discussion: Timely estimates of economic indicators – Session C3 –
Improving performance measurement in Primary Health Care
Key findings on comparability of language testing in Europe ECML Colloquium 7th December 2016 Dr Nick Saville.
WP 4 – EPIDEMIOLOGY GEMMA Gatta
Monitoring drug-related crime in Europe: state of play
Methodological studies in the field of Agro-Environmental Indicators
The future of disability statistics within the ESS Agenda point 3.6
Planning a Learning Unit
INSPIRE Development of Implementing Rules
CBP Biennial Strategy Review System ~Meetings Detail~ DRAFT August 29, /6/2018 DRAFT.
Item 10 – Conclusions of the meeting
Updates on IPC Acute Malnutrition GNC Meeting, Amman, Oct 2018
Developing European standards for victimisation surveys
Benchmark Revisions Overview of the Current Situation
Marleen De Smedt Geoffrey Thomas Cynthia Tavares
Martyn Pennington Head of Unit, EuropeAid
RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE CONTRACTING PARTIES TO THE BARCELONA CONVENTION
Water Scarcity & Droughts Policy in the EU Gap Analysis
Communication and publications
Main recommendations & conclusions (1)
5.b3 Monitoring & Reporting 2019
Revision of Decision 2010/477/EU
Skopje, 21 November 2017, General Population Survey results– launch
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe
Meeting Of The European Directors of Social Statistics
Presentation transcript:

Revision of Problem Drug Use indicator Danica Klempová and Julián Vicente 42nd Reitox HFP meeting, 27 May 2010

Overview 1. Rationale 2. Steps already taken 3. Steps planned 4. Possible impact of FPs workload

Rationale PDU as defined until now more suitable for estimating the size of populations of heavy, chronic heroin users Changing drug situation in Europe (i.e. emergence of new populations like heavy/dependent cocaine users or cannabis users in need of treatment) requires rethinking Both conceptual and methodological problem (classical PDU data sources might not be the best to access these newly emerged populations) Demands from FPs, policy makers; EU Drug Action Plan

Steps already taken 2 lines of work: 1) maintain and improve current work, 2) update the concept of the area and develop methods beyond PDU Presentations and discussions at expert meetings 2009 PDU annual expert meeting – issues summarised, some solutions proposed, ppt used as a basis for a “Delphi method” among PDU national experts – unfortunately low response rate (Planned special session with some Scientific Committee members in April 2010 – cancelled) A bulk of work ongoing in parallel with GPS experts – monitoring heavy/dependent/problem cannabis use, now stage of validation studies in several countries, European analysis

Steps planned Review the conceptual basis of the current definition (e.g. operationalisation of definition elements – “regular” and “long- term”, in line with international classifications, flexibility in changing conditions, harm thresholds, etc.) Work with a smaller “working group” – national experts + other scientists Present the results to the broader group for discussion before taking any decisions Multidisciplinary, longer-term process, stimulating research Work on monitoring problem cannabis use Develop Recommendations (definitions, methods, minimum prevalence, etc.) based on the work done 2011: validation study by indirect methods

Possible impact of FPs workload in the next 5 years National experts and scientists can be asked to participate in the working group, give comments or discuss certain topic at the PDU annual expert meeting In interested countries, some feasibility studies or pilot research may be conducted In 2011 or 2012, Recommendations might be given to all countries with cannabis past year use prevalence greater than small to include short cannabis scales