NSF Update AAAC 8 February 2007. Update Topics FY2007 Budget Situation FY2007 Budget Situation FY2008 Request FY2008 Request Senior Review Status and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OFFICE OF SCIENCE 1 Large Synoptic Survey Telescope News since the February update Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee Telecon May 2012 Fred Borcherding/Nigel.
Advertisements

Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Facilities and Cyberinfrastructure April 2, 2014 Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure Wayne Van.
NSF Regional Grants Conference St. Louis, MO
National Science Foundation & Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences Celeste M. Rohlfing Head, Office of Multidisciplinary Activities
Tony F. Chan Assistant Director April 2007 State of MPS.
University of Ottawa Wednesday, October 25, 2012 Dave Bowen – Team Leader NSERC NSERC Update.
Conversation with ACCORD on GSMT 21 January 2005 Michael S. Turner, Assistant Director Directorate for Mathematical & Physics Sciences National Science.
AAS Congressional Visits Day Tom Statler & Maria Womack March 12, 2013.
EPP Program at NSF M. Goldberg, J. Kotcher, M. Pripstein, J. Stone, R. Ruchti.
Introduction to: NSF Directorate for Mathematical and Physical Sciences (MPS) Jack Lightbody, Deputy Assistant Director, MPS June 6, 2008.
NSF Program Update Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee 13 February 2006.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Providing Access for US Astronomers to the Next Generation of Large Ground Based OIR Telescopes 1.Scientific Potential 2.Current Design Efforts 3.Complementarity.
Division of Astronomical Sciences Program Update AAAC 11 February 2008.
BY THE NUMBERS WASHINGTON IN FY th : National ranking in NSF funds $140 Million: NSF funds awarded 38: NSF-funded institutions 459: NSF grants.
Enabling a GSMT for the US Community: AURA’s Proposal to the NSF Stephen E. Strom 04 June, 2004 Tucson, AZ National Optical Astronomy Observatory Tucson.
1 1 AST Committee of Visitors February 2011 National Solar Observatory Overview Craig Foltz Program Officer NSO.
The FY 2009 Budget Thomas N. Cooley, NSF Council of Colleges of Arts and Sciences March 13, 2008.
AAAC Meeting February, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort at a.
Astroparticle Physics – US NSF Perspective Tony Chan, Assistant Director for Mathematical and Physical Sciences & Joe Dehmer Director, Division of Physics.
NSF Program Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee February 15, 2005.
NSF Program Update Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee 11 May 2006.
AST Portfolio Review Tom Statler, NSF/AST AAAC Telecon, 11 May 2012.
NSF Program Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee May 16, 2005.
A Roadmap forNationalOIRFacilities AAAC May 2005 OIR Long Range Planning Committee Document for submission to NSF AST and CAA May 2005.
AAAC Jim Ulvestad February 10, Outline Brief Facility and Science News Budget Outlook & Astro2010 Status Meta-issues 2 02/10/2012.
NSF Division of Astronomical Sciences AAAC October 15-16, 2009 Craig Foltz.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY Advisory Committee for Cyberinfrastructure 10/31/06 Craig.
Biological Sciences in the Federal R&D Portfolio Kei Koizumi April 17, 2008 for the NSF BIO Advisory Committee AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program
LSC – Hanford 16 th - 19 th August 2004 The View from NSF Changes in NSF leadership Funding Interagency Working Group response to Q2C Outreach - New $5M.
NSF Town Meeting AASCalgary 6 June Update Topics NSF personnel news and AST realignment NSF personnel news and AST realignment FY2006 Current Plan.
NSF Program Update Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee 12 October 2006.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
Morris Aizenman Senior Scientist Directorate for Mathematical & Physical Sciences National Science Foundation Physics and Engineering Sciences Committee.
National Science Foundation Division of Astronomical Sciences Facility/Large Project Oversight and Role of Managing Organization Committee of Visitors.
Introduction & NSF Overview NSF Tribal College Workshop November 14, 2008.
“From the Ground Up: Balancing the NSF Astronomy Program” Senior Review Major Recommendations November 2006 Implications for GSMT.
Report from NSF/MPS Tony Chan Assistant Director Directorate for Math & Physical Sciences Fermi Lab Users Meeting June 7, 2007.
NSF Division of Astronomical Sciences Senior Review Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 11 October 2005.
AST Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 10 May 2007.
TCUP Leadership Forum January 3, 2014 Sylvia M. James, Ed.D. Division Director, Human Resource Development (HRD)
America’s 21st Century Transportation Fuel Ethanol From Biomass.
CHOICE NEIGHBORHOODS FY2014 PLANNING GRANTEE WEBCAST U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development | February 24, 2015.
NSF Program Update Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Oct 11, 2005.
“From the Ground Up: Balancing the NSF Astronomy Program” Senior Review Major Recommendations November 2006.
1 Investing in America’s Future The National Science Foundation Strategic Plan for FY OPP Advisory Committee 10/26/06.
AAAC Jim Ulvestad December 1, Divestment issues  “Divestment,” in the parlance of the Portfolio Review, implies removal of a telescope from the.
UPDATE on NSF & MPS Presentation to MPSAC 22 April 2004 Michael S Turner Assistant Director for MPS.
1 Cyber-Enabled Discovery and Innovation Michael Foster May 11, 2007.
An Overview of the Federal Budget for 2009 Kei Koizumi March 13, 2008 for the CCAS Washington Seminar AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program
Division of Astronomical Sciences Update (Life After the Senior Review) Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 11 October 2007.
1 LSST Town Hall 227 th meeting of the AAS 1/7/2016 Pat Eliason, LSSTC Executive Office Pat Osmer, LSSTC Senior Advisor.
Senior Review of NSF Facilities NOAO Users Committee October 4, 2005.
Division of Astronomical Sciences Senior Review Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee 10 May 2007.
Giant Magellan Telescope Project Status and Relationship with the NSF Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee February 8, 2007 Patrick McCarthy -
Mid-Scale Projects Vernon Pankonin Team Leader. Mid-Scale Projects Programmatic Characteristics Not a formal funding program. Collection of proposals.
Office of Science January 28, 2008J.Blazey / SiD Workshop / SLAC1 The View from DOE Moving ForwardMoving Forward HEPAPHEPAP FY08 “in review”FY08 “in review”
NSF Priority Areas Status Report Dr. Joann Roskoski April 7, 2005.
Jim Ulvestad Division Director, AST May 6, 2011 Division of Astronomical Sciences.
GSMT SWG Meeting November, New GSMT Role NSF has asked that AURA/NOAO act as NSF’s "Program Manager" for the GSMT Technology development effort.
NSF Update October 2009 Jo Ann Smith, Ph.D. Research Development Office of Research & Commercialization.
LSST CORPORATION Patricia Eliason LSSTC Executive Officer Belgrade, Serbia 2016.
Large Synoptic Survey Telescope
National Science Foundation Opportunities
Washington THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (NSF) is the only federal agency whose mission includes support for all fields of fundamental science and engineering.
AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program
Astronomy and Astrophysics Advisory Committee Oct 11, 2005
Unidata Policy Committee Meeting
Unidata Policy Committee
Office of Research & Commercialization
Presentation transcript:

NSF Update AAAC 8 February 2007

Update Topics FY2007 Budget Situation FY2007 Budget Situation FY2008 Request FY2008 Request Senior Review Status and Town Meetings Senior Review Status and Town Meetings

Looking towards AAAC Annual Report Senior Review report accepted Senior Review report accepted AST implementation underway AST implementation underway GSMT Program restructured GSMT Program restructured Interagency implications of Senior Review recommendations Interagency implications of Senior Review recommendations Plans beginning for next Decade Survey Plans beginning for next Decade Survey

FY2007 Request for AST $215.11M (FY % or $15.5M) NSF request shaped by American Competitiveness Initiative Facilities base operations budgets held level pending outcome of senior review Increases for: - GSMT ($5M, up $3M) - TSIP ($4M, up $2M) - AODP ($1.5M, restored) - Physics of the Universe activities enhanced - Elementary Particle Physics - dark energy, dark matter studies (with Physics Division) - Research grants programs up overall - Gemini future instrumentation FY2007 Budget Request

MPS by Division

Current FY2007 Budget Situation Continuing Resolution through 15 Feb Continuing Resolution through 15 Feb  Activities funded at FY2006 levels  No new starts Post Feb 15 – Continuing Resolution for Remainder of Year at 2007 Request? Post Feb 15 – Continuing Resolution for Remainder of Year at 2007 Request?  Rules?  New starts?

FY 2008 Request

Call for Reinvestment in STEM Increase US talent poolIncrease US talent pool Strengthen basic researchStrengthen basic research Develop, recruit & retain best/brightestDevelop, recruit & retain best/brightest Ensure innovation in AmericaEnsure innovation in America

ACI EmphasesEmphases Tie fundamental discoveries to marketable technologies.Tie fundamental discoveries to marketable technologies. Facilities and instrumentationFacilities and instrumentation World class science and engineering workforceWorld class science and engineering workforce Focus on Phys Sci & EngineeringFocus on Phys Sci & Engineering Doubles NSF, DOE-OS, NIST over 10 years Doubles NSF, DOE-OS, NIST over 10 years Biggest federal response since Sputnik Biggest federal response since Sputnik

FY 2008 MPS Focus Areas Physical sciences at the nanoscalePhysical sciences at the nanoscale Science beyond “Moore’s Law”Science beyond “Moore’s Law” Physics of the universePhysics of the universe Complex systemsComplex systems Fundamental mathematical and statistical scienceFundamental mathematical and statistical science SustainabilitySustainability Cyber-enabled Discovery and InnovationCyber-enabled Discovery and Innovation

MPS by Division

MPS Facilities in Operation 1 The NOAO total includes funding for instrumentation programs that build public-private partnerships. In FY 2008, the Telescope System Instrumentation Program is funded at $5 million. The Adaptive Optics Development Program is funded at $1.5 million, level with FY 2007 request, but moves into the disciplinary instrumentation program and so no longer appears in the NOAO budget in FY The base NOAO/NSO program funding increases by $3.63 million over the FY 2007 request.

Facilities in Development and Under Construction Design and Development: DUSEL: will begin formally in FY 2008, total $6.0M, building on previous Discovery Research.DUSEL: will begin formally in FY 2008, total $6.0M, building on previous Discovery Research. Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope: level $5.0M.Giant Segmented Mirror Telescope: level $5.0M. LSST development as planned at $1.3MLSST development as planned at $1.3M Facilities under Construction: ALMA: reflects new baseline, early operations increases to $8.2 million. IceCube: operations initiated at $1.5M level Advanced LIGO: construction begins FY 2008.

MREFC Request

Status of Other Interagency Efforts VERITAS VERITAS  NHPA consultation termination in process  Work on Kitt Peak resumes ~ March? ATST ATST  PDR in Nov - Ready for Construction  EIS and NHPA process continues NVO NVO  No new starts in FY2007 – FY2008 issue

Polar Programs

Senior Review Status AST has begun implementation plan AST has begun implementation plan  Consult facilities managers  Consult agency partners, CAA, AAAC,… AST will take implementation plan to community AST will take implementation plan to community  Town meeting series started in Seattle at AAS  Other meetings  Ann Arbor – 26 January  Washington, DC - 16 February  Santa Cruz - 8 March  Princeton - 16 March  Atlanta - 23 March  Tucson – 5 April Welcome constructive comments to address: Welcome constructive comments to address:

Developing an NSF Response and Implementation Plan AST is working closely with facilities to understand implications of recommendations as we consider possible implementation NSF is active in encouraging and engaging in discussion with other possible partners in facility operations, including international partners and other funding agencies. AST is working with the community and NOAO to determine where re-investment in existing OIR facilities should occur and in the development of an integrated and coordinated “System”

Developing an NSF Response and Implementation Plan AST is undertaking detailed cost reviews of each observatory necessary to understand where cost reductions can be made   Understand operational costs, appropriate staffing levels   Consider other operational and business models   Hope to complete within next 6 to 8 months Explore costs and legal issues associated with recommendations e.g. environmental, deconstruction, divestiture, termination costs – engaging outside studies over the next year Many changes will take several years to implement – Budget implications in FY2009

Cost Reviews We have a 50 year tradition of operations that we must examine, both for now and for future facilities We have a 50 year tradition of operations that we must examine, both for now and for future facilities Can current level of service be delivered for less? Can current level of service be delivered for less?  Some opinions based on university-scale ops  Hidden subsidies, etc.  We all must understand the costs thoroughly NSF, facilities, and community must look at different service models NSF, facilities, and community must look at different service models  Changes similar to those at NAIC may be necessary at all AST facilities  NSF will support efforts towards implementation of recommendations by managing organizations.

Senior Review Recommendations Implications at this meeting GSMT program restructuring GSMT program restructuring Arecibo Arecibo VLBA VLBA Gong ++ Gong ++

Community Input is Essential AST Web site for the Senior Review: ( The Senior Review Report: ( input Decade Survey planning input