MHAC Workshop Review Impact Drill Down Reports Elizabeth C. McCullough 2 October 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Providing Insights that Contribute to Better Health Policy The Effects of Medicaid Reimbursement on Access to Care of Medicaid Enrollees: A Community Perspective.
Advertisements

Projecting Hospital Acute Bed Needs for Workshop organized by US Embassy and the Belgian Health Federal Public Service March 21, 2006 Prof. Dr.
Chi-Square Test Chi-square is a statistical test commonly used to compare observed data with data we would expect to obtain according to a specific hypothesis.
CareFirst’s White Paper on Annual Updates: The Annual Allowance Calculation A Proposed Process for Meeting the Dual Waiver Tests of the Demonstration CareFirst.
Changes to Performance-Based Payment Programs
Increasing Health Care Costs: the Price of Innovation? AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting June 7, 2004 Claudia A. Steiner, MD, MPH Bernard Friedman,
Vicky A. Mahn-DiNicola RN, MS, CPHQ Vice President, Solutions Strategy
Hypothesis Testing IV Chi Square.
WASHINGTON STATE HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY WSHA Rebasing Task Force Meeting July 15, 2013.
Section 4.2: How to Look for Differences. Cross-Tabulations College student binge drinkers experienced many personal and social problems, the researchers.
1 A Journey Together: Regional Partnerships for Health System Transformation Supporting Data March 2015.
QUANTITATIVE DATA ANALYSIS
Chapter 51 Experiments, Good and Bad. Chapter 52 Experimentation u An experiment is the process of subjecting experimental units to treatments and observing.
Clustered or Multilevel Data
STANDARDIZED INFECTION RATIO SIMPLIFIED
Unit 2 – Measures of Risk and Return The purpose of this unit is for the student to understand, be able to compute, and interpret basic statistical measures.
On Comparing Classifiers: Pitfalls to Avoid and Recommended Approach Published by Steven L. Salzberg Presented by Prakash Tilwani MACS 598 April 25 th.
Descriptive Statistics: Part One Farrokh Alemi Ph.D. Kashif Haqqi M.D.
Diagnostic Related Group Inpatient Hospital Reimbursement
Pricing Personal Account Guarantees: A Simplified Approach October 21, 2006 Andrew Biggs, SSA Clark Burdick, SSA Kent Smetters, Wharton School.
-1- Washington State Medicaid Inpatient Reimbursement System Study Phase 2 Study Methodology Redesign Update September 26, 2006.
SPARCS Race/Ethnicity Coding Concordance Analysis October 7th 2013.
Statistical Techniques I EXST7005 Conceptual Intro to ANOVA.
Potentially Preventable Readmissions: Overview of Definitions and Clinical Logic HSCRC April 6, 2010 Elizabeth McCullough, 3M Health Information Systems.
An Overview of NCQA’s Relative Resource Use Measures.
Modeling Risk Adjusted Capitation Rates in Regione Umbria Elaine Yuen, PhD; Daniel Z. Louis, MS; Paolo DiLoreto; Joseph S. Gonnella, MD American Public.
Bennie D Waller, Longwood University Statistics Bennie Waller Longwood University 201 High Street Farmville, VA
Introduction to Control Charts: XmR Chart
How Much Does Medicare Pay Hospitals for Adverse Events? Building the Business Case for Investing in Patient Safety Improvement Chunliu Zhan, MD, PhD,
Population All members of a set which have a given characteristic. Population Data Data associated with a certain population. Population Parameter A measure.
Go to index Two Sample Inference for Means Farrokh Alemi Ph.D Kashif Haqqi M.D.
Nurse Executive Case Management Workshop Home Town Health Anderson Goodwill Conference Center Macon, Georgia Prepared by: Sherry A. Milton, RHIA Milton.
 Statistical Measures allow us to compare individual values to other values in a data set. They are things like:  Per capita  Percent change  Percentile.
3M Health Information Systems APR-DRGs: A Practical Update.
HSCRC Quality Initiatives: Maryland Hospital Acquired Conditions Program July 23, 2009 Dianne Feeney, HSCRC.
CYE 15 APR-DRG Implementation The APR-DRG payment methodology will be implemented for all acute/general hospitals (provider type 02) The same payment methodology.
Overview of Hospice Payment Reform For VNAA Roundtable Robert J. Simione Managing Principal Simione Healthcare Consultants HOSPICE.
Survey Methodology Four Point Scale Very SatisfiedSatisfiedDissatisfiedVery Dissatisfied.
HSCRC Quality Initiatives: Maryland Hospital Acquired Conditions Program October 2, 2009 Dianne Feeney, HSCRC.
Copyright © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide
1 ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA) Heibatollah Baghi, and Mastee Badii.
Probability & Significance Everything you always wanted to know about p-values* *but were afraid to ask Evidence Based Chiropractic April 10, 2003.
Compliance Original Study Design Randomised Surgical care Medical care.
Vantage Care Positioning System®: Make Your Case with Medicare Spending Data November 2014 avalere.com.
Washington State Health Care Authority Hospital Payment Systems Redesign Overview February 26, 2013.
Uncertainty2 Types of Uncertainties Random Uncertainties: result from the randomness of measuring instruments. They can be dealt with by making repeated.
COST BEHAVIOR & COST-VOLUME-PROFIT ANALYSIS CHAPTER 19 TEACHER VERSION.
Independence Plan Update February 26, © 2009 Harvard Pilgrim Health Care2 Key Points  Independence Plan introduced in 2005 –Tiered copayment product.
MA Center for Health Information & Analysis Case Mix User Workgroup May 24, 2016.
If I want to identify potential delivery records, which DRG is the best for me?
CMS SAS Users Group Conference Learn more about THE POWER TO KNOW ® October 17, 2011 Medicare Payment Standardization Modeling using SAS Enterprise Miner.
CMI usage and calculations By: Deborah Balentine M.Ed, RHIA, CCS-P
Hospital Pricing Mike Del Trecco, Senior Vice President of Finance, Finance and Operations Senate Finance Committee February 9, 2017.
How to read the Product Line/Market Share Report Parameters
Exhibit 1 Financial Performance of Safety-Net Hospitals Compared with Other Acute-Care Hospitals, Medicaid Expansion States, 2015 Total: CA vs FL; CA.
Potentially Preventable readmissions policy
MARYLAND HEALTH SERVICES COST REVIEW COMMISSION
Gerald Dyer, Jr., MPH October 20, 2016
Mixed Examples of Hypothesis Testing & Confidence Intervals
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Hospital Financing
Expectation And Variance of Random Variables
P-VALUE.
Chi2 (A.K.A X2).
Provider Peer Grouping: Project Overview
MHAC Workshop Review Impact Drill Down Reports
MARYLAND HEALTH SERVICES COST REVIEW COMMISSION
A Journey Together: Regional Partnerships for Health System Transformation Supporting Data March 2015.
October 2, 2009 Dianne Feeney, HSCRC
MHAC Workshop Review Impact Drill Down Reports
Presentation transcript:

MHAC Workshop Review Impact Drill Down Reports Elizabeth C. McCullough 2 October 2009

2 Impact Report Components Expected PPC Rate by APR DRG Test of Significance Marginal Charge Impact

3 Expected Value The PPC expected value is the number of patients with a PPC that would occur if a hospital’s mix of patients by APR DRG and severity of illness subclass had experienced the same PPC rate as that in a reference or norm set of hospitals. The technique by which the expected value or expected number of PPCs is calculated is called indirect standardization. The PPC rates in the normative database are calculated for each admission APR DRG and severity of illness subclass by dividing the observed number of PPCs by the total number of patients at risk. Once a set of PPC norms are calculated, they can be applied to individual hospitals to compute its expected PPC rate. Number of Excess or Avoided PPCs equals the difference between the actual number of cases assigned a PPC minus the expected number of cases for that PPC.

4 Test of Significance A hospital’s actual and expected PPC rate can be different. This can represent a true difference or can be caused by random variation. A difference between a hospital’s actual and expected PPC rate is considered “statistically significant” if the probability that the difference can be the result of random variation is small.

5 Test of Significance (cont.) In the PPC reports, a difference between the actual and expected PPC rate is considered statistically significant at the 0.05 level. This means that the probability that the difference between the actual and expected PPC rate is the result of random variation is five percent or less (i.e., less than one chance in twenty). The calculation of statistical significance of the difference between the actual and expected PPC rate uses the Cochran-Mantel- Haenszel test (CMH).

6 Marginal Charge Impact Estimated marginal charge amount for a specific PPC PPC Impact equals the difference in the actual and expected number of PPCs times the marginal charge amount for a specific PPC Overall MHAC impact is the net sum of the PPC impact across the 50 PPCs defined in the MHAC policy for FY2010

7 Report Drill Down Overall Service Line PPC PPC by Service Line PPC by Top 25 Base Admission APR DRGs PPC by Top 25 Base Admission APR DRGs and Severity of Illness Level

8 Report Structure Drill down aggregation MHAC Total Impact Number of discharges at risk for PPC Observed (actual) number of cases assigned PPC Expected number of cases for PPC Number of observed and expected shown in rates per 1000 Percent Difference between observed and expected Significance Level –'*': Statistically significant ( p<0.05 ) higher rate of PPCs –‘***': Statistically significant ( p<0.05 ) lower rate of PPCs

9 Report – Tab 1 Overall

10 Report – Tab 1 by Service Line

11 Report – Tab 2 PPC Impact

12 Report – Tab 3 PPC by Service Line

13 Report – Tab 4 Top 25 Base APR DRGs

14 Report – Tab 5 Top APR DRGs by SOI

15 PPC v27 On-Line Access User ID - MDHosp Password - aprdrg401 PPC v27 Definition Manual Health Care Financing Review Spring 2006 Article on PPCs Methodology Overview PPC v27 Calculator