Oregon Mentoring Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Legislation passed in October 2009 established a Teacher Education And Mentoring Program.
Advertisements


Cedar Rapids Pioneer Group February 8, 2005 Dr. Susan Leddick.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
North Carolina Educator Evaluation System. Future-Ready Students For the 21st Century The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education.
Educator Effectiveness: Making Connections & Rubric Analysis Presented by the Oregon Department of Education August 2013.
PORTFOLIO.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: Increasing Student Growth and Achievement A Systems Approach: Improving Our Teacher Evaluation System Dawn.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
Developing and Supporting Highly Effective Teachers in Every Classroom Leaders of Learning Implementation Norman Public Schools Date.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Welcome – Please sign-in and sit with your Mentor Professional Growth Planning Process.
What is Effective Professional Development? Dr. Robert Mayes Science and Mathematics Teaching Center University of Wyoming.
Goals of This Session Provide background for program review development Describe document make-up.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
The Oregon System for Teacher and Administrator Professional Growth and Support System Focus on Student Learning and Growth Goals October
Data supported by professional development Baron Rodriguez Chief Information Officer Oregon Department of Education Mickey Garrison School Improvement.
Professional Growth Plan / Professional Development Guide.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
WELCOME!  The Mentoring Grant Application Webinar will begin in a few minutes!
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Resident Educator 16 “What do I need to know and do?”
EARLY LEARNING COUNCIL AND SICC COLLABORATION: Addendum to September 30, 2012 Report on EI/ECSE Unique Complexities and Recommendations to Improve Service.
March 12, Common Core Standards  K-12  Feedback by April 2, 2010, and finalized early spring.  Professional.
Urban Mathematics Education Leadership Academy Session 1 February 4-6, 2009 Dallas, TX.
Welcome to TEAMS Mid-Year Training. Workshop Goals 1.Identify and share successes with TEAMS implementation 2.Identify and problem solve concerns with.
SCHOOL BOARD A democratically elected body that represents public ownership of schools through governance while serving as a bridge between public values.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Delaware’s Performance Appraisal System for Administrators DPAS 2.5 Jacquelyn O. Wilson, Ed.D. University of Delaware Director Delaware Academy for School.
Christina Reagle, Ed.D. Mary Ellen Dello Stritto, Ph.D.
 Development of a model evaluation instrument based on professional performance standards (Danielson Framework for Teaching)  Develop multiple measures.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
Laura Spenceley, Ph.D. State University of New York at Oswego Presented at the 7 th International Conference on Excellence in School Education Improving.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Coaching: A School Team Approach. What is the common purpose of coaching? To partner with teachers and each other in order to: increase teacher effectiveness.
Literacy Strategies for AIG Readers March 6, 2015 Dana Gillis Mount Mourne IB School, Iredell-Statesville Schools A Race to the Top Initiative NC Department.
Writing a Professional Development Plan.  Step 1–Identify Indicators to be Assessed  Step 2 –Determine Average Baseline Score  Step 3 –Develop a Growth.
WELCOME!  The Physical Education Teacher Hire/ Professional Development Grant Application Webinar will begin in a few minutes!
Kentucky’s Professional Growth and Effectiveness System.
Teachers of Teachers of Mathematics (TOTOM) Bend, OR September 6, 2013 Mark Freed, ODE Mathematics Education Specialist ODE Update.
August 2013 Day 2 Grand Valley Learning Network. Activating Your Instructional Model If your school has an articulated instructional model (or definition.
Ensuring Teacher Quality Leader's Resource Guide: Algebra I EOC study1 Improving Algebra I End-of-Course Exam Scores: Evidence from the Field An examination.
Peer Assistance and Review Program Volusia County Schools “ I couldn’t have done it without you!”
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Oregon Statewide System of Support for School & District Improvement Tryna Luton & Denny Nkemontoh Odyssey – August 2010.
1 Principal Orientation. 1.The Ohio Resident Educator Program 2.Orientation Purpose 3.Collaborative Cultures 4.What is Residency? 5.Teaching and Learning.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
NC Digital Learning Competencies School Administrators and Classroom Teachers ****** Partnering for Education Impact April 19, 2016.
DO PRINCIPAL SUPERVISORS MATTER? BUILDING THE CAPACITY OF AREA SUPERINTENDENTS National Principal Supervisor Summit May 2016.
Improving Educator Practice through Instructional Mentoring
Oregon Mentoring Program
Overview New Teacher Induction Program Malden Public Schools
Iowa Teaching Standards & Criteria
Connectivity.
Best Practices.
The Impact and Value of Instructional Coaching
Consensograms Take colored dots and place on the Consensogram charts around the room. Place a dot on the map indicating where you are currently from.
CCRS Leadership Session
Collaborative Leadership
State Board of Education Progress Update
Auxiliary Rubrics Module 6 Activity Overview
Staples Motley School District
Presentation transcript:

Oregon Mentoring Program Tanya Frisendahl, Education Specialist, ODE Oregon RTI Spring Conference April 2015 Welcome Introductions

Mentoring Video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2_v- Bc2uPrk

Outcomes for Today Create a common understanding of the history and background of the Oregon Mentoring Program Articulate the impact mentoring has on improving educator practices for beginning teachers and administrators Identify the characteristics of a high quality, evidence based Mentoring Program

ODE Mentoring Program Goals INCREASE student learning and growth IMPROVE instructional practices RETAIN teachers and administrators IMPROVE leadership performance

History and Background The Beginning Teacher and Administrator Mentorship Program was: established by the 2007 Legislature through HB 2574 expanded in the 2013 legislative session with HB 3233, the Network for Quality Teaching and Learning designed to support activities related to an evidence-based mentorship program for beginning teachers and administrators

ODE Mentoring Program 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 Projects 7 6 15 Districts Served 85 72 16 44 17 62 59 Beg. Teachers (BT) 975 622 425 323 408 983 1172 BT Mentors 222 108 46 33 80 286 299 Beg. Adm. (BA) 53 28 47 97 BA Mentors 22 34 19 35 24 50 These numbers are based on the pairing forms and funded BT/BA numbers submitted by projects. These numbers are based on the pairing forms and funded BT/BA numbers submitted by projects.

Definition of Mentoring Mentoring means a professional relationship between an educator and a skilled mentor. In a confidential and trusting partnership, the mentor supports the educator to transform practice through a process of reflection and inquiry. The goals of this collaborative and continuous work are: to accelerate instructional practice, ensure equitable learning for all students, retain effective educators, and empower educational leaders. Have someone put voice to the mentoring definition (ask someone to read it) Make eye contact with someone at another table and get up and discuss this definition with them. What resonates with them How it connects with the work they do Any personal experiences with mentoring (Have you had a mentor, have you been someone’s mentor…)

Mentoring Definition Partner Share Make eye contact with someone at another table Discuss definition with them What resonates with you? How does mentoring connect with the work you do? Describe any personal experiences you have had with mentoring (e.g. have you ever had a mentor, have you been someone’s mentor…)

2014-15 ODE Mentoring Program 15 Total Projects / 59 school districts 9 Projects serve both Beginning Teachers and Beginning Administrators 6 Projects only serve Beginning Teachers Single school district projects and consortium of school districts

Mentoring Program Impact The following slides show data from surveys of beginning teachers that were mentored. They do not represent all of the beginning teachers that were mentored.

Has your mentor impacted student performance in your classroom 649 – Yes 88 - No

Has your mentor contributed to specific student learning & growth 479 – Yes 258 - No

Success as a beginning teacher attributed to the mentor program (5 years) 2008-09 – 79% of beginning teachers attributed their success as a beginning teacher to their mentor and the mentor program. (A great deal, quite a bit, some) 2009-10 - 85% of beginning teachers attributed their success as a beginning teacher to their mentor and the mentor program. (A great deal, quite a bit, some) 2011-12 - 92% of beginning teachers attributed their success as a beginning teacher to their mentor and the mentor program. (A great deal, quite a bit, some) 2012-13 - 90% of beginning teachers attributed their success as a beginning teacher to their mentor and the mentor program. (A great deal, quite a bit, some) 2013-14 - 85% of beginning teachers attributed their success as a beginning teacher to their mentor and the mentor program. (A great deal, quite a bit, some)

Mentoring Program Impact “I believe that I am a good teacher, and I can grow to be a great one. I had considered quitting after year one, but the support and encouragement I received from the mentor program is what kept me here.” Beginning Teacher 2011 “Because the beginning teachers received such excellent support, the students in his classroom have had excellent achievement rates as measured by OAKS, formative data, parent and student reports, colleague comments and my observations.” Site Administrator 2013

Mentoring Program Impact These numbers are based on survey response rates. There was a nearly 50% increase in the number of students, teachers, and administrators impacted due to an increase in funding in 2013. Should be 30 minutes into the 60 minute session at this point. During the past three years beginning teachers were asked in the survey “how many students did you teach in the current school year? The following table shows the impact of the Mentoring Program over the past three years when beginning teachers were asked that question. As this table shows, during the ‘13-14 year there was a nearly 50% increase in the number of students, teachers, and administrators impacted; however, it is important to note that there was also an increase in funding for mentoring during the 2013 legislative biennium.

Mentoring Program Standards 2014 Stakeholder Workgroup developed and proposed Mentoring Program Standards SBE adopted in August 2014 Purpose is to provide a set of program standards that: ensure consistency across the state and guide the design and implementation of highly effective, evidence-based beginning teacher and administrator mentoring programs across the state

Mentoring Program Standards Activity Individually think about: “What are the most important components of a highly effective, evidence based mentoring program?” Discuss in your table groups 2 min. - Brainstorm Individually 3 min. – Discuss at Table

Mentoring Program Standards Activity Read through the Mentoring Program Standards – Do you see the things you listed and discussed? Record questions/wonderings and activities that you are currently doing in your district/school that aligns or supports these standards Discuss at your table questions and activities that you are currently doing in your school/district that aligns or supports these standards Whole group share out 5 min. – Read through Mentoring Standards and capture notes 5 min. – Discuss at tables 5 min. – Share out whole group

Mentoring Informational Flyers and Grant Information Informational Briefs Fast Facts http://teachingresearchinstitute.org/pages/s how/ode-mentoring-program Grant Information: http://www.ode.state.or.us/search/page/?id =2218 Should be about 10 min. left in 60 min session.

Questions

for your active participation and cooperation Thank you for your active participation and cooperation 