KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: EDUC Report.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Dual Purpose Use of Data by the MSU ADVANCE Project Outline Overview of the ADAPP Project Framework of the Project Use of a Work Environment Survey to.
Advertisements

Making the Case for Christian Higher Education: New Challenges, New Opportunities Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University CCCU CEO Conference.
COACHE: The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education An initiative to improve faculty recruitment, retention, and work/life quality Based.
ADVANCE Implementation Mentors (AIM) Network Women of Color Survey and Interview Results Funding for this presentation was made possible through the National.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education 2010 Survey of Pre-tenure Faculty.
Key Communities and Objectives Outcomes- Based Assessment Telling the Story Results Closing the Loop.
Campus Climate for UNC Charlotte Faculty Findings from the 1998, 2001, & 2004 UCLA HERI Faculty Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment Office of.
Diversity Assessment and Planning with members of the October 14, 2005.
1 Faculty Leadership Development Programs at Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., Director, AdvanceVT.
1 Faculty Climate Survey Highlights Institutional Research & Faculty Development and Diversity March 2008.
Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) University of Minnesota.
INQUIREINSPIREINNOVATEIMPLEMENT Leadership, Community and Values University of Washington LEADERSHIP, COMMUNITY and VALUES Preliminary Findings: Surveys.
Phase II: Survey Findings January 2015 APSAC and CSSAC Presentation Purdue Quality of Work Environment Initiative 1.
Benchmarks from the Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey University Faculty Meeting October.
Data Compiled from the Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE)
WOMEN FACULTY AND THE SOCIAL–CULTURAL NEXUS IN HIGHER EDUCATION Karla A. Henderson, North Carolina State University To examine the social- cultural nexus.
ADVANCE Catalyst Program Baseline Measurement for Women in CST  Applicant tracking trends  Hiring trends  Retention and promotion study  Campus Climate.
Sex comparisons among science faculty at Hunter College Hunter College Gender Equity Project & Provost’s Office 2007 Science Faculty Survey Department.
University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.
Tulane University 1 Tulane University Employee Satisfaction Survey Results October 2012.
COACHE Presentation LUCINDA FINLEY Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs.
Teacher Engagement Survey 2014
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Vice Provosts Meeting November 5, 2012 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey: Associate Professors Associate Professors Community Meeting October 30, 2013 Nancy Whelchel, Associate.
Getting the Most from COACHE Study of Early Career Faculty January 30, 2007 Cathy A. Trower, Ph.D.
Retention Survey Report Submitted March 22, 2004; corrections March 29, 2004 Presented to the Provost on May 28, 2004 Recruitment and Retention Subcommittee,
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Deans’ Council Meeting November 8, 2012 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
WSU SAMPLE  All full-time tenured and tenure-track faculty  All campuses  Response rate: 57.6 % (N=603)  At least 50 % response rate in all colleges.
HERI FACULTY SURVEY Surveys mailed through campus mail to all Full-Time faculty during the Spring 2005 semester A follow-up second mailing for non- respondents.
Return to Table of Contents Grand Valley State University HERI Faculty Survey 2014 Results Full-Time Undergraduate Teaching Faculty Grand Valley State.
Task Force on Women Faculty Report for the Advisory Committee on Faculty Well-Being August 28, 2008.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ARHU Report.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: A Quick Look at A Few Things that Matter to Faculty Presentation for NC State University Board of Trustees Academic Affairs.
Faculty Survey Highlights University Council Presentation Lynn McCloskey Edward S. Macias April 7, 2008.
Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
1 NC State University 2008 Staff Well-Being Survey Highlights from Overall Results A Presentation to the Staff Senate Nancy Whelchel, Ph.D University Planning.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Some Select Findings for Vice Provosts to Pique Curiosity in What the Data Can Tell Us Presentation for Vice Provosts.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: BSOS Report.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ENGR Report.
University of Maryland ADVANCE Investing in Cultures of Inclusive Excellence.
COACHE: Tenure- Track Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Conducted by the Harvard Graduate School of Education: The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher.
Faculty Well-Being North Carolina State University March 10, 2009 Committee on Faculty Well-Being.
Faculty Well-Being Survey: Reappointment, Promotion & Tenure & Post-Tenure Review Presentation for NC State Faculty Senate February 27, 2007 Nancy.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey: Non-Tenure Track Faculty Non-Tenure Track Faculty Community Meeting October 14, 2013 Nancy Whelchel,
Gender & IT Education Gender and IT Education Conference, Indiana University, 2007 Gender & IT Education The Importance of Mentors Faculty and Student.
Powered by Results of Survey On Work-Life Balance Administered by Caregiver Support Working Group of The New School Social Justice Committee
2008 COACHE Survey of Pre-Tenure Faculty Faculty Senate January 25, 2011 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: BMGT Report.
District Climate Survey—Parents & Community Results and Analysis June /10/20101.
CCHE 680 Denise Zambos. The student’s college choice… After high school, the student must decide if they will go to college and what college they will.
School of Biological Sciences Staff Survey 2013 Department of Zoology Results Briefing, 21 May 2013.
Higher Education Research Institute at UCLA Higher Education Research Institute University of California at Los Angeles HERI Faculty Survey 57.
Kapil Bawa, Ph.D., Professor of Marketing, Zicklin School of Business Micheline Blum, Director, Baruch College Survey Research, Distinguished Lecturer,
© All rights reserved Your Voice, Your CC: The Colorado College Employee Climate/Engagement Survey Advancement.
What Women have said helps them to succeed An evaluation of the women’s programs.
COACHE Spring 2015 Faculty Satisfaction Survey Overview of Results Presentation to NC State Faculty Senate January 26, 2016 Katharine Stewart, VP for Faculty.
Faculty Diversity & Work Life Survey Review
AAMC Faculty Forward Engagement Survey Results
LUCINDA FINLEY Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs
Faculty Climate Survey Highlights
ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: ENGR Report
The 2015 COACHE Survey YORK COLLEGE Faculty Satisfaction
COACHE Survey Results Monday, February 5, 2018
Director of Community Engagement, Office of the Provost
McPherson College, Fall 2017
Woodland Public Schools Parent Survey Results
College of Business Scorecard
College of Education Scorecard
Presentation transcript:

KerryAnn O’Meara Associate Professor, Higher Education Co-PI UM ADVANCE Corbin M. Campbell Research Assistant ADVANCE Research and Evaluation: EDUC Report The Work Environment for Tenured/Tenure Track Faculty at the University of Maryland

What are the work environment experiences of UM T/TT faculty? Organizational Commitment Satisfaction with Department and UM Climate for Diversity Work-Life Climate & Policies Career Advancement Opportunities Management of Responsibilities Recognition Leadership Opportunities Information, Communication, & Decision-Making Faculty Learning Professional Networks & Collegiality Perceived Productivity How do they differ by Gender, Race, and Rank? 2

Research Method Survey Development Based on conceptual framework and review of the literature Sent to experts for review of construct and content validity Small pilot for review of response process validity Survey Administration Spring, 2011, the link to the online UM Work Environment Survey (UMWES) was sent via to all full-time faculty. The UMWES will be repeated again in spring, 2013 and spring, Survey Analysis for this report Descriptive analyses T-tests & Chi-Squared (p<.05) for differences by gender and rank Only patterns of differences are reported here 3

EDUC Tenured/ TT Response Rates There were 41 Tenured/TT EDUC Respondents to the survey (approximately 43% of Tenured/TT EDUC faculty in fall of 2010). Of the EDUC tenured/ tenure track respondents: 59% female and 41% male 15% were faculty of color, 85% were White Faculty and 0% were International faculty 34% Assistant Professors, 15% Associate Professors, and 51% Full Professors 4

Limitations Possible response biases Measures self-reported perceptions and experiences Mainly descriptive analyses Most questions aimed at unit level b/c of connection between unit and retention Capture a snapshot of people and time—spring 2011 experiences, fall 2010 faculty Could not run college level analyses by race or rank due to low N 5

Positives: EDUC Satisfaction More satisfied with unit’s (77% versus 61%)* and university’s (74% versus 59%)* national reputations. Autonomy: 90% felt in charge of the direction of their research 74% satisfied with the autonomy in their role Diversity: 77% were satisfied with diversity on campus 92% believe diversity is important for UMD* 82% believe units work hard to create diverse representation 6

EDUC Challenges Respondents prize autonomy, but are not satisfied with opportunities for collegiality, collaboration,* and connection. Respondents prize diversity, but a quarter have experienced discrimination and more are concerned about fair treatment for women* and faculty of color. Respondents agree that tenure process is clear and fair, but half had concerns for their own advancement. A majority feel they can voice their opinions and their voices make a difference, but few agree that their units are transparent in terms of decision-making and information-sharing." 7

Organizational Commitment 42% of EDUC participants stated they were likely to leave the university in the next two years (vs. 31% for all UMD respondents). 92% of EDUC participants had seen at least one faculty in their unit leave in last 3 yrs; 39% of EDUC respondents had had an outside offer while at UM (compared to 41% for all UMD). Most frequent reason for wanting to leave UMD is because of lack of collegiality (38%), for a higher salary (31%), or for a more prestigious institution or department (25%) or retirement (25%). These numbers differ in important ways from UMD as a whole. 8

EDUC Top Reasons for Intending to Leave % indicates the percent of faculty who intend to leave (n=16) who selected that item as one of up to three reasons for leaving 9 EDUC AllUMD AllUMD WomenUMD FOC Lack of Collegiality (38%)Higher Salary (57%) Higher Salary (61%) Higher Salary (31%) Departmental/Institutional Prestige (41%) Departmental/Institution al Prestige (38%) Departmental/Institutional Prestige (48%) Dept./Institutional Prestige (25%) Retirement (25%) Lack of Collegiality (24%)Lack of Collegiality (26%) Lack of Collegiality (19%), Spousal Career Opportunities (19%), To be closer to family (19%) Work-life balance (22%)Work-life balance (23%)

Survey Item EDUC % Satisfied/ Very Satisfied The amount of autonomy I have in my role as a faculty member here 74 The diversity on campus 77 My overall experience working in my unit49 My unit’s national reputation* 77 My overall experience working at UM51 The University’s national reputation * 74 The quality of the graduate students * 79 The support of colleagues here 64 The University’s location 61 Satisfaction: Resources & Conditions at UMD 10

Survey Item % EDUC Satisfied/ Very Satisfied The sense of fit between my values and those of my unit 51 The quality of the undergraduate students 41 Clerical/administrative support 38 The amount of time I spend on research versus teaching and service 39 Assistance with research administration in your unit 39 The transparency of decision-making within my unit 32 Amount of access to TAs, RAs * 21 Professional assistance for improving teaching 34 Expectations for committee service 24 My salary and benefits23 Assistance with finding grants24 Satisfaction: Resources & Conditions at UMD 11

Diversity and Fair Treatment The majority of EDUC respondents perceive that : diversity is important for UMD (92% for EDUC vs. 80% for UMD)* units work hard to create diverse representation (82% for EDUC and 79% for UMD), A minority of EDUC respondents perceive that female faculty* and faculty of color receive fair treatment (46% and 49%, respectively, for EDUC v. 60% and 57% for UMD). 26% of EDUC faculty agree that they have experienced discrimination (v. 23% for UMD). 12

Work-Life Climate 45% of EDUC respondents were satisfied with their unit’s culture for work-life balance (v. 42% for UMD) 18% agreed that the university does what it can to make family life and the tenure track compatible (v. 25% for UMD). 31% agreed that there are role- models for work-life balance (v. 30% for UMD). Similar to UMD respondents, EDUC rated many of UMD’s policies and programs for work- life balance as valuable, but few took advantage of these programs and many had not heard of the programs. “…The environment that you need to work 100 hours per week is deflating and demoralizing for those who want children.” 13

Work-Life Climate “In my unit it is generally expected that people need to make work their top priority” (EDUC 44% versus UMD 55%). “Campus childcare is the program I would focus on...The program does not start until the child turns 2 - what is the faculty member supposed to do before then?” 14

Promotion and Tenure 56% of EDUC respondents reported clear requirements and 54% fair processes for tenure (v. 68% for UMD for both). 45% of EDUC respondents perceived clear requirements for promotion to Full Professor (v. 52% for UMD). 60% of EDUC respondents believe the process for advancing to Full Professor is fair (vs. 59% for UMD) Yet, 50% of EDUC respondents had concerns about their own advancement. 15

Evaluation of Teaching, Research, & Creative Work Less than half of EDUC respondents agreed that their unit supports: effective teaching (47%) interdisciplinary scholarship (30%) engaged scholarship (46%) cutting edge research (33%) “The counting mentality where people… are reduced to a simple metric…without any consideration of impact, creativity, relevancy, complexity [is highly problematic]” “We are way behind the times in…what constitutes research in my unit. Senior colleagues seem stuck to old ways that are not reflective of [current] ways of doing research... This…does not stimulate creativity and taking risks.” 16

Information, Communication, Decision-Making A majority of EDUC participants felt open to share their opinions (64%) and felt that their voice does make a difference in their department (56%). Yet, only a third or fewer participants agreed that their unit was transparent in terms of: information sharing (28%) resource allocation (33%) salary increases (18%) 17

Professional Growth Learning 68% of EDUC respondents reported learning a great deal regarding their research in the past year. 49% reported that their unit provides an environment that stimulates their academic learning. 44% reported that the institution provides an environment that stimulates their academic learning. Networks 72% of EDUC respondents said core discussion network mainly off campus 39% satisfied with collegiality in unit 38% have been effectively mentored by someone in their unit 29% agree individuals at the institution have connected me with important people in my field 39% have relationships with other UMD faculty that have supported career advancement* 34% satisfied with the opportunity to collaborate * 18

Summary Very few patterns of differences comparing EDUC and UMD overall While four items showed significant differences by gender (see report), no patterns of differences emerged. This is unusual compared to other colleges and UMD overall. 10/

Summary The biggest challenges for EDUC seem to be internal (both shared with UMD and distinct within it). Lack of collegiality is key in intent to leave Low satisfaction and experiences with collegiality, having been effectively mentored, others making connections in the field, providing opportunities to collaborate Transparency: information sharing, resource allocation, salary Experiences of discrimination Culture for work-life balance Concerns for own advancement 10/

UMD v. COACHE Findings UMDCOACHE Al RanksTTAssocFull Likely to leave (next 2 years-UMD; next 5 years-COACHE) 31%14%19%27% Satisfaction with institution60%66%58%63% Satisfaction with department61%74%66%65% Satisfaction with compensation30%52%29%44% Satisfaction with work-life balance42%39%50%65% Agreement that the institution does what it can to make family obligations and faculty life compatible 25%38%25%29% Clear requirements for tenure or promotion68%/52%53%63%86% All data for comparisons from Public Research Universities TT = 11,550 faculty; Assoc and Full = 1675 faculty 10/

Findings & Advance Interventions Key Findings Retention and Advancement Work-Life climate Feedback on performance and concerns about career advancement Newer forms of scholarship/finding grants Transparency Collegiality and Networks Key Activities Advance Professors mentoring Work-Family Awareness, Parental Leave Early Career/Associate Learning Communities Seed grants for interdisciplinary research Dashboards Seminars 22 10/

“The New Normal” What kinds of efforts do we have underway already addressing some of these issues? What kind of efforts might take place inside the College of Education to build a stronger “new normal” in terms of faculty work-life environment? 10/